O - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

O

Description:

O&M Cost Modelling, Technical Losses and Associated Uncertainties Axel Albers Dipl.-Phys. Deutsche WindGuard Consulting GmbH Oldenburger Stra e 65, D26316 Varel – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Jrg73
Category:
Tags: standard

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: O


1
OM Cost Modelling, Technical Losses and
Associated Uncertainties
  • Axel Albers
  • Dipl.-Phys.
  • Deutsche WindGuard Consulting GmbH
  • Oldenburger Straße 65, D26316 Varel
  • a.albers_at_windguard.d
  • testing- and calibration laboratory with
  • quality management system according EN ISO/IEC
    170252005

DAP-PL-3565.99 for power curve
measurements, wind measurements, wind resource
assessments
for power curve measurements
2
Contents
  • Modelling of OM cost development in time
  • Comparison of modelled OM cost with real wind
    farm data
  • Development of WT availability in time
  • Combination of uncertainties of wind resource,
    expected technical losses and OM cost

3
OM Cost Issues
  • Questions
  • 1. How large are maintenance and repair cost?
  • 2. How do maintenance and repair cost develop
    with the age of WTs?
  • Problems
  • A) analysis of future OM-cost on component by
    component basis often impossible
  • B) accurate public data on OM cost is rare
  • C) only limited number of wind farms in high age
    (15-20a)
  • D) rapid development of technology and size of
    WT in last decade
  • Several studies show rise in QM-cost with WT age
    (BWE, WMEP, University of Durham and TU Delft)

4
Operational Costs by WT Age According to WMEP 2006
repair
maintenance
insurance
property
other
Warranty Period
operating year
Source WMEP 2006
5
Rise of Repair and Maintenance Cost BWE 2002 Study
  • In second decade cost twice as high as in first
    decade (BWE study 1999)
  • 12 /MWh/a average cost over 20 years
    (corresponds to BWE 2002 numbers if 2000 full
    load hours are assumed), well in line with cost
    of most full service contracts
  • Often assumed by wind farm developers or
    financiers
  • - no rise with age
  • - step functions after 10a or steps every 5th
    year

6
Improved Approach for Rise in Repair and
Maintenance Cost
  • There is no reason to assume a step function.
  • Integrated cost increase in 2nd decade compared
    to 1st decade overtaken from BWE 2002 study
    (double cost in 2nd decade)

7
Physical Model for Rise in Repair and Maintenance
Cost
  • Damage increase per time is inversely
    proportional to remaining lifetime L-t
  • - L total lifetime
  • - t age
  • Damage increase is proportional to increase of
    cost C

8
Fit of Model for Rise of Repair and Maintenance
Cost to Observations
  • In single years large outliers are observed, but
    the cumulated cost is fitted well by model.
  • Always the same cost rise has been assumed (twice
    as much cost in 2nd decade than in 1st decade).

9
Extrapolation of Repair and Maintenance Cost
  • standard approach 0.012/kWh/a averaged over
    20a assumed (value from BWE-study 2002)
  • Estimated standard uncertainty of standard
    approach 50 of modelled cost

10
Observations in Old Wind Farms In Respect to
Availability
  • Experience based on
  • - hundreds of WTs in age 12-20a in
    Eastern-Frisia (backyard of WindGuard)
  • - due diligence in the frame of sales of wind
    farms
  • - technical management of wind farms
  • Availability normally high, but within year 5 to
    15 single events with long standstills likely
  • One event with 3 months standstill leads to 2.5
    additional non-availability over 10 years
  • Consequence 97 availability hardly possible in
    2nd decade in case of only a single extraordinary
    event

11
Model for Increase of Availability Losses in Time
  • The initialisation is treated case dependent
  • - adjustment according to warranties or
  • - adjustment according to availability of past
    operating period or
  • - adjustment according to experience with wind
    turbine type

12
Example for Increase of Availability Losses in
Time
  • Model adjusted to observed non-availability
    losses in past (after initial project stage with
    teething problems)

13
Combination of Uncertainties of Wind Resource
(Revenue) and OM-Cost
  • Problem 1 The lower the wind resource, the lower
    the wear (repair cost)
  • Solution
  • i) calculate P50-value of OM-cost and standard
    uncertainty of OM- cost on the basis of Px-value
    of the production estimate
  • ii) combine standard uncertainty of wind
    resource (revenue) and new standard uncertainty
    of OM-cost as independent uncertainties
  • iii) consider normal distribution of difference
    of revenue and OM- cost with the combined
    standard uncertainty and calculate Px-value of
    this distribution

14
Combination of Uncertainties of Non-Availability
Losses (Revenue) and OM-Cost
  • Problem 2 increase of OM-cost with age highly
    correlated with increase of non-availability
    losses
  • Solution
  • combine standard uncertainty of OM-cost and
    standard uncertainty of revenue due to
    non-availability losses linearly

15
Result of Combination of Uncertainties
moderate wind resource, high tariff
high wind resource, low tariff
  • final result risk assessment of net earnings

16
Conclusions
  • Individual modelling of expected OM cost and
    availability over project lifetime is recommended
  • Long-term OM cost often underestimated in
    planning phase
  • - often about 85 EBITDA-margin expected over
    20a
  • - latest study of BWE from 2009 76
    EBITDA-margin (average of 66 wind farms)
  • Cost modelling often results in positive earnings
    even after 20 years
  • Problem type certificate valid only 20 years
  • - building permit of WT may lose validity
  • - extension of type certificate to longer period
    in most cases not possible
  • i) high cost
  • ii) WT design often not conform with latest
    revision of IEC 61400-1
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com