Title: Educators engaged in meaning-making about their work:
1Educators engaged in meaning-making about their
work
Using deep dialogue and a sustainable system of
governance to improve performance.
Paula Joyce, PhD candidateTransformative
Education Research GroupScience Mathematics
Education Centre (SMEC)Curtin University of
Technologywww.expandingcircles.com.au
2Research Questions
- What happens when teachers are given the
opportunity to make decisions about their work? - Are schools (as claimed by Habermas) the best
places to learn about democracy)? - How are decisions made in schools, who makes them
and who is held accountable? - Is transformative change in schools possible?
- What is considered valuable and measureable in
schools?
3Background Significance
- Schools
- Sites of fragmented problem/solution cycle
- Untapped tacit knowledge about teaching
learning - Fractured pedagogical approaches
- Decision making processes and governance do not
lead to action - Autocratic, endowed leadership
- Classroom push precludes deep learning
- Poor network of stakeholders
- Limited information flow in downward direction
- Assumed culture and values
- External metrics measure teacher performance by
measuring students
4Purpose
- To introduce the Expanding Circles of Governance
(ECoG) structure into a school to enable whole
school reculturing restructuring. - Emergent
- Ecological
- Coparticipant
- Harnesses tacit knowledge
Governance the heart of decision making
5Methodology
- Multiple paradigms
-
- Theoretical Referents
Explanation
Criticalism
Positivism
Systems theory
Integralism
Complexity theory
Triangulation
Objectivity
Spiral dynamics
Validity Reliability
Experimental
Auto/ethnographic
Network theory
Chaos theory
Interpretivism
Post-modernism
Post-positivism
Theories of democracy and deliberation
6Educational Research Paradigms
Western History Anthropology Interpretive turn Reflective turn Critical Studies Critical turn The Arts Literary turn Narrative turn Integral Philosophy Ecological turn Spiritual turn
Paradigms Interpretivism Criticalism Postmodernism Integralism
Focus Meaning (subjective) Emancipation (social justice) Pluralism (difference) Holism (balance)
Method Ethnographic Autobiographical 4th Generation Evaluation participant observation case study Critical Action Research Policy critique Writing as inquiry Performance Ethnography Visualising Imagining Critical auto/ethnography Philosophical inquiry
Quality Standards Legitimation trustworthiness authenticity Praxis critical reflection agency advocacy re-envisioning Representation multiple perspectives polyvocality verisimilitude pedagogical thoughtfulness Combination of standards of inquiry from various paradigms
Peter C Taylor, Curtin University, 2009
7Multiple Research Paradigms
Integralism
Criticalism
Interpretivism
8Organisational Change
- Organisational framework
- January, 2008
- Organisational framework
- July, 2009
- Restructuring/reculturing emergent and
ongoingecological systemempowering
leadershiptrust and opennessvalue/belief
explicitchallenges the status quo and long held
beliefsimproves the flow of information
throughout the schoolincreasesd self-efficacy
and individual self-worthdecisions are make as a
result of deep-thinkingeffective meetingsclear
agendaoriented to actionspace for every voice
to be heardrecognises complexityclarifies
responsibilityprovides opportunities for
emerging leadershipdialogic evaluative
9Praxis oriented change-knowledge linked to action
Epistemology
Phronesis
Knowledge claims
Techne
10Outcomes
- clearly defined organisational structures
- improved information flow (up and down) to all
corners of the organisation - emergent leadership opportunities - leading not
managing - clearly defined roles
- effective meetings - purposeful discussion
- realisation of professional learning communities
- clear agreement to plans and projects
- engages the wisdom within an organisation
- gives people the big picture of the organisation
- process demands action stops ineffective
whining
www.expandingcircles.com.au