The Excavation Site of Khirbet Qeiyafa - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Excavation Site of Khirbet Qeiyafa

Description:

Obecn p edstaven nov ho produktu, kter spl uje po adavky z kazn k – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:224
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Rost95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Excavation Site of Khirbet Qeiyafa


1
The Excavation Siteof Khirbet Qeiyafa
  • Introduction to the general context of the
    excavation and attempts to identify the site

Rostislav Kurka
2
Khirbet Qeiyafa
  • What it really is
  • Where it really is
  • What is its importance

3
What is Khirbet Qeiyafa?
  • an archaeological site that has only recently
    been excavated (start 2008)
  • a 2.3 ha large fortified city dated approximately
    to the 10th century BCE
  • it plays an important role in the current debate
    about the beginnings of the kingdom of Judah

source http//qeiyafa.huji.ac.il
4
Khirbet Qeiyafa in the Spotlight
  • originally noted and briefly surveyed at the end
    of the 19th century (1869 Victor Guérin, 1883
    - C.R. Conder H.H. Kitchener)
  • during the 20th century completely forgotten
  • in 1992 briefly noted by Yehuda Dagan
  • in 2001, by Z. Greenhut
  • in 2005, noticed by Saar Ganor of the Israel
    Antiquities Authority, who noticed a massive Iron
    Age structure at the site (2-3 m high wall)
  • in 2007, examination led by Saar Ganor and prof.
    Yosef Garfinkel, excavation started 2008

5
Leading the Excavation
  • Saar Ganor
  • prof. Yosef Garfinkel

6
Yosef Garfinkel
  • 1956
  • PhD archaeology 1992,
  • then 2004 professor at
  • the Hebrew University
  • in Jerusalem
  • excavated many sites from the neolithic and
    chalcolithic periods, like Tel Tsaf, Sha'ar
    HaGolan, Gesher and neolithic Ashkelon
  • since 2007 has been leading the Khirbet Qeiyafa
    excavations
  • engages in the dispute about the beginnings of
    ancient Judah/Israel

7
Why Khirbet Qeiyafa became important?
  • main reasons for choosing particularly this site
    for the excavation, as stated by GanorGarfinkel
  • Khirbet Qeiyafa is not a tel (a site where many
    strata have accumulated one above other)
    Qeiyafa ''is essentially a single-stratum, Iron
    Age site. In most of the site, remains are found
    immediately below the topsoil.''
    (Ganor-Garfinkel, 2009)
  • the site is fairly intact (i.e. has not been used
    for digging and gathering building materials
    etc.)
  • geopolitical importance situated in the Elah
    Valley, on the presumed border between Judah and
    Philistia, overlooking main road to Jerusalem and
    Hebron from the Coastal Plain

8
Source Google Earth
9
Source Google Earth
10
Geographical Location
  • Khirbet Qeiyafa is located in the Shephelah
    region (the hill country between the mountains of
    Judah and the coastal plain)
  • approximately 27 km west of Jerusalem, near the
    city of Bet-Shemesh
  • because of this, the researchers see it as an
    important border site from 10th century BCE, time
    of the conflict between the Philistines and Judah
    (mentioned in the Bible - Saul, David)
  • Tel-es-Safi, identified as biblical Gath, is only
    12 km west from KQ if KQ indeed was a Judean
    border city, it might have had great importance
    in this respect

11
Between Azekah and Sochoh
two other important archaeological sites in vicinity Tel Zakariyeh, associated with the Biblical Azekah, lies 2 km to the west, Khirbet Shuwaika, associated with Biblical Sochoh, lies 2.5 km to the southeast
12
Source Google Earth
13
Between Azekah and Sochoh
14
Location in Elah Valley
  • Khirbet Qeiyafa is situated on the northern side
    of the Elah Valley, overlooking it
  • Elah Valley ''Terebinth Valley'', the place of
    the battle described in 1 Sam 17

15
Excavation process
  • in 2007, initial two-week examination of the site
    took place
  • in 2008, the first season a six-week excavation
    was undertaken
  • 600 square meters of the city were uncovered,
    including a 4-chamber gate, a casemate-system
    city wall and 2 buildings in the western part of
    the city
  • also an ostracon was found which made Qeiyafa
    famous
  • first week in November later that year, a second
    gate was uncovered in the eastern part of the
    city. GarfinkelGanor believe it to be the main
    gate, facing Jerusalem

source http//qeiyafa.huji.ac.il
source http//qeiyafa.huji.ac.il
16
source http//qeiyafa.huji.ac.il
(after 2010 season)
Total length of the city walls about 700 m
17
(No Transcript)
18
Possibilities for site identification
  • Originally (pre-2008), Garfinkel and Ganor
    entertained the idea of identifying the city as
    Biblical Azekah (Tel Zakariyeh would have been
    something else).
  • Counterargument according to Biblical account,
    Azekah remained settled and important until
    post-exilic period (Jr 347, Neh 1130), whereas
    KQ did not last
  • Jeremiah 347 ''When the king of Babylon's army
    fought against Jerusalem, and against all the
    cities of Judah that were left, against Lachish,
    and against Azekah for these defenced cities
    remained of the cities of Judah.''
  • Nehemiah 1130 ''...Zanoah, Adullam, and in
    their villages, at Lachish, and the fields
    thereof, at Azekah, and in the villages thereof.
    And they dwelt from Beersheba unto the valley of
    Hinnom.''

19
Possibilities for site identification
  • After discovering the second gate, GG proposed
    KQ is Biblical Sha'arayim (''Two gates'').
  • Cf. 1 Sam 1752 ''And the men of Israel and of
    Judah arose, and shouted, and pursued the
    Philistines, until thou come to the valley, and
    to the gates of Ekron. And the wounded of the
    Philistines fell down by the way to Shaaraim,
    even unto Gath, and unto Ekron.''
  • Counterargument the ending -ayim might be
    ''pseudo-dual'' and does not have to mean
    literally two gates
  • N. Na'aman had also proposed that Sha'arayim must
    lay on the way to Gath, which KQ probably
    wouldn't
  • since Sha'arayim is mentioned as a direction, it
    would require it to be well-established in the
    general knowledge and tradition, however, KQ by
    all evidence did not last more than few decades

20
Possibilities for site identification
  • Ephes Dammim ''between Azekah and Sochoh''
  • 1 Samuel 171 ''Now the Philistines gathered
    together their armies to battle, and were
    gathered together at Sochoh, which belongeth to
    Judah, and pitched between Sochoh and Azekah, in
    Ephesdammim.''

21
Source Google Earth
22
Possibilities for site identification
  • Ephes Dammim ''between Azekah and Sochoh''
  • Counterargument Ephes Dammim was an area name,
    Philistines were camping there, Goliath asked
    Israelites to ''come down''
  • Adithaim or Gov random sites from the Biblical
    lists

23
Questions left to answer
  • Excavation of Khirbet Qeiyafa has already
    provided valuable discoveries and could still
    contribute to the quest for the history of
    ancient Israel/Judah
  • Khirbet Qeiyafa was by all evidence a border city
    between Judah and Philistia
  • Was it really a Judean city?
  • What city should be Khirbet Qeiyafa identified
    with, if any?
  • How can its research contribute to Biblical
    archeology? What could it mean?

24
Thank you for your attention!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com