Title: The Excavation Site of Khirbet Qeiyafa
1The Excavation Siteof Khirbet Qeiyafa
- Introduction to the general context of the
excavation and attempts to identify the site
Rostislav Kurka
2Khirbet Qeiyafa
- What it really is
- Where it really is
- What is its importance
3What is Khirbet Qeiyafa?
- an archaeological site that has only recently
been excavated (start 2008) - a 2.3 ha large fortified city dated approximately
to the 10th century BCE - it plays an important role in the current debate
about the beginnings of the kingdom of Judah
source http//qeiyafa.huji.ac.il
4Khirbet Qeiyafa in the Spotlight
- originally noted and briefly surveyed at the end
of the 19th century (1869 Victor Guérin, 1883
- C.R. Conder H.H. Kitchener) - during the 20th century completely forgotten
- in 1992 briefly noted by Yehuda Dagan
- in 2001, by Z. Greenhut
- in 2005, noticed by Saar Ganor of the Israel
Antiquities Authority, who noticed a massive Iron
Age structure at the site (2-3 m high wall) - in 2007, examination led by Saar Ganor and prof.
Yosef Garfinkel, excavation started 2008
5Leading the Excavation
- Saar Ganor
- prof. Yosef Garfinkel
6Yosef Garfinkel
- 1956
- PhD archaeology 1992,
- then 2004 professor at
- the Hebrew University
- in Jerusalem
- excavated many sites from the neolithic and
chalcolithic periods, like Tel Tsaf, Sha'ar
HaGolan, Gesher and neolithic Ashkelon - since 2007 has been leading the Khirbet Qeiyafa
excavations - engages in the dispute about the beginnings of
ancient Judah/Israel
7Why Khirbet Qeiyafa became important?
- main reasons for choosing particularly this site
for the excavation, as stated by GanorGarfinkel - Khirbet Qeiyafa is not a tel (a site where many
strata have accumulated one above other)
Qeiyafa ''is essentially a single-stratum, Iron
Age site. In most of the site, remains are found
immediately below the topsoil.''
(Ganor-Garfinkel, 2009) - the site is fairly intact (i.e. has not been used
for digging and gathering building materials
etc.) - geopolitical importance situated in the Elah
Valley, on the presumed border between Judah and
Philistia, overlooking main road to Jerusalem and
Hebron from the Coastal Plain
8Source Google Earth
9Source Google Earth
10Geographical Location
- Khirbet Qeiyafa is located in the Shephelah
region (the hill country between the mountains of
Judah and the coastal plain) - approximately 27 km west of Jerusalem, near the
city of Bet-Shemesh - because of this, the researchers see it as an
important border site from 10th century BCE, time
of the conflict between the Philistines and Judah
(mentioned in the Bible - Saul, David) - Tel-es-Safi, identified as biblical Gath, is only
12 km west from KQ if KQ indeed was a Judean
border city, it might have had great importance
in this respect
11Between Azekah and Sochoh
two other important archaeological sites in vicinity Tel Zakariyeh, associated with the Biblical Azekah, lies 2 km to the west, Khirbet Shuwaika, associated with Biblical Sochoh, lies 2.5 km to the southeast
12Source Google Earth
13Between Azekah and Sochoh
14Location in Elah Valley
- Khirbet Qeiyafa is situated on the northern side
of the Elah Valley, overlooking it - Elah Valley ''Terebinth Valley'', the place of
the battle described in 1 Sam 17
15Excavation process
- in 2007, initial two-week examination of the site
took place - in 2008, the first season a six-week excavation
was undertaken - 600 square meters of the city were uncovered,
including a 4-chamber gate, a casemate-system
city wall and 2 buildings in the western part of
the city - also an ostracon was found which made Qeiyafa
famous - first week in November later that year, a second
gate was uncovered in the eastern part of the
city. GarfinkelGanor believe it to be the main
gate, facing Jerusalem
source http//qeiyafa.huji.ac.il
source http//qeiyafa.huji.ac.il
16source http//qeiyafa.huji.ac.il
(after 2010 season)
Total length of the city walls about 700 m
17(No Transcript)
18Possibilities for site identification
- Originally (pre-2008), Garfinkel and Ganor
entertained the idea of identifying the city as
Biblical Azekah (Tel Zakariyeh would have been
something else). - Counterargument according to Biblical account,
Azekah remained settled and important until
post-exilic period (Jr 347, Neh 1130), whereas
KQ did not last - Jeremiah 347 ''When the king of Babylon's army
fought against Jerusalem, and against all the
cities of Judah that were left, against Lachish,
and against Azekah for these defenced cities
remained of the cities of Judah.'' - Nehemiah 1130 ''...Zanoah, Adullam, and in
their villages, at Lachish, and the fields
thereof, at Azekah, and in the villages thereof.
And they dwelt from Beersheba unto the valley of
Hinnom.''
19Possibilities for site identification
- After discovering the second gate, GG proposed
KQ is Biblical Sha'arayim (''Two gates''). - Cf. 1 Sam 1752 ''And the men of Israel and of
Judah arose, and shouted, and pursued the
Philistines, until thou come to the valley, and
to the gates of Ekron. And the wounded of the
Philistines fell down by the way to Shaaraim,
even unto Gath, and unto Ekron.'' - Counterargument the ending -ayim might be
''pseudo-dual'' and does not have to mean
literally two gates - N. Na'aman had also proposed that Sha'arayim must
lay on the way to Gath, which KQ probably
wouldn't - since Sha'arayim is mentioned as a direction, it
would require it to be well-established in the
general knowledge and tradition, however, KQ by
all evidence did not last more than few decades
20Possibilities for site identification
- Ephes Dammim ''between Azekah and Sochoh''
- 1 Samuel 171 ''Now the Philistines gathered
together their armies to battle, and were
gathered together at Sochoh, which belongeth to
Judah, and pitched between Sochoh and Azekah, in
Ephesdammim.''
21Source Google Earth
22Possibilities for site identification
- Ephes Dammim ''between Azekah and Sochoh''
- Counterargument Ephes Dammim was an area name,
Philistines were camping there, Goliath asked
Israelites to ''come down'' - Adithaim or Gov random sites from the Biblical
lists
23Questions left to answer
- Excavation of Khirbet Qeiyafa has already
provided valuable discoveries and could still
contribute to the quest for the history of
ancient Israel/Judah - Khirbet Qeiyafa was by all evidence a border city
between Judah and Philistia - Was it really a Judean city?
- What city should be Khirbet Qeiyafa identified
with, if any? - How can its research contribute to Biblical
archeology? What could it mean?
24Thank you for your attention!