Environmental Quality Service Council IDEM Report August 18, 2006 PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 32
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Environmental Quality Service Council IDEM Report August 18, 2006


1
Environmental Quality Service CouncilIDEM
ReportAugust 18, 2006
  • Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner
  • IN Department of Environmental Management

2
Thank You for Helping IDEM During the 2006
Legislative Session
  • HB1110Removal of Mercury Convenience Switches
    from End of Life Motor Vehicles.
  • SB 234Improving the rulemaking process and
    authorizing the Environmental Stewardship
    Program.
  • HB1117Simplifying the solid waste statutes and
    eliminating the groundwater task force.
  • SB 146Removing the Property Transfer Disclosure
    Form from Statute.

3
IDEMs Environmental Goal
  • Increase the personal Income of all Hoosiers
    from the current 0.88/1.00 of the national
    average to at least 1.00/1.00 of the national
    average while maintaining and improving Indianas
    Environmental Quality.

4
How is Personal Income Linked to Environmental
Improvement?
  • Maslows Pyramid reminds us that people meet
    their basic needs for food, shelter and security
    before addressing other needs
  • In most of Indiana, personal autos for
    transportation are a basic need
  • People with lower incomes can often only afford
    older more polluting automobiles which contribute
    more than their share to our transportation
    related air quality issues

5
Income and the Environment
  • People with more income typically purchase newer
    cars that pollute less
  • Similarly, newer industrial processes have less
    waste (more product per unit of input)
  • Waste typically becomes pollution
  • Financially successful industries typically are
    able to purchase these newer processes that
    pollute less

6
Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index Yale
Center for Environmental Law Policy Yale
University Center for International Earth
Science Information Network (CIESIN) Columbia
University http//www.yale.edu/epi/
7
(No Transcript)
8
How Will IDEM Help Increase Personal Income?
  • Clear, consistent and speedy decisions
  • Clear regulations
  • Assistance first, enforcement second
  • Timely resolution of enforcement actions
  • Every regulated entity will have current valid
    permits without unnecessary requirements

9
How Does IDEM Protect the Environment?
  • Measure the air, water and land to determine the
    existing state of the environment.
  • Compare the measured values to levels that
    protect human health and the environment.
  • Ambient Air Quality Standards
  • Water Quality Standards
  • Use modeling to determine how much of a substance
    can be added to the environment.

10
How Does IDEM Protect the Environment?
  • Develop regulations and Issue permits to restrict
    discharges to the environment to safe levels.
  • Inspect and monitor permitted facilities to
    ensure compliance with the permits.
  • Enforce against people who exceed their permit
    levels or violate regulations
  • Educate people on their environmental
    responsibilities.

11
Performance Metrics
Quality of Hoosiers' Environment Result Target Target Comments
of Hoosiers that live in counties that meet air quality standards 77 100 80 5 counties _at_ 1,419,455 of 6,271,973 failed
of CSO Communities with approved programs to prevent the release of untreated sewage 27 100 20 75 by 2007 is goal
Permitting Efficiency Total calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute Permitting Efficiency Total calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute Permitting Efficiency Total calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute Permitting Efficiency Total calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute Permitting Efficiency Total calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute
Land 122,463 37,430 86,864 238 permits 750 permits 125 permits
Air 445,827 207,731 385,000 238 permits 750 permits 125 permits
Water 188,724 44,550 200,000 238 permits 750 permits 125 permits
Places emphasis on back logged permits Places emphasis on back logged permits Places emphasis on back logged permits Places emphasis on back logged permits
Compliance Total percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards Compliance Total percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards Compliance Total percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards Compliance Total percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards Compliance Total percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards
Inspections 95.33 97 75
Self reporting 98.05 99 95
Continuous monitoring (COM) 99.38 99.90 98.95
Tracks observations and not just inspections Tracks observations and not just inspections Tracks observations and not just inspections Tracks observations and not just inspections
Organizational Transformation Budgetary agency dollars spent on key outside contracts for core agency functions. Organizational Transformation Budgetary agency dollars spent on key outside contracts for core agency functions. Organizational Transformation Budgetary agency dollars spent on key outside contracts for core agency functions. Organizational Transformation Budgetary agency dollars spent on key outside contracts for core agency functions. Organizational Transformation Budgetary agency dollars spent on key outside contracts for core agency functions.
Dollars spent on outside services per year 5,079,367 0 3,447,017 Will require increase in head count to accomplish
12
Counties above AQ Standards
  • January 10, 2005
  • Allen
  • Boone
  • Clark
  • Dubois
  • Elkhart
  • Hamilton
  • Hancock
  • Madison
  • Marion
  • Shelby
  • St. Joseph
  • October 1, 2005
  • Clark
  • Dubois
  • Hamilton
  • Marion

13
Counties above AQ Standards
  • January 1, 2006
  • Clark
  • Dubois
  • Hamilton
  • Marion
  • Vanderburgh
  • October 1, 2006 (Projected)
  • Clark
  • Dubois
  • Marion
  • Vanderburgh

14
Ozone Attainment Status
15
Major Voluntary Air Emission Control Announcements
  • Alcoa will add Scrubbers for SO2 Emission Control
    to all units at its Warrick Power Plant near
    Newburgh.
  • Indiana Kentucky Electric Corporation will add
    Scrubbers for SO2 Emission Control to all six of
    its units in Madison.

16
The following 32 CSO communities have either an
approved LTCP or sewer separation
  • Akron
  • Albion
  • Aurora
  • Avilla
  • Berne
  • Bluffton
  • Brazil
  • Bremen
  • Brownsburg
  • Butler
  • Chesterfield
  • Columbia City
  • Columbus
  • Decatur
  • Greenfield
  • Kendallville
  • Knox
  • LaGrange
  • LaPorte
  • Markle
  • Michigan City
  • Milford
  • New Haven
  • Ossian
  • Remington
  • Seymour
  • Sullivan
  • Veedersburg
  • Warren
  • Warsaw
  • Waterloo
  • Winamac

17
Permitting
  • IDEM is still meeting the statutory deadlines for
    permit issuance, as reported in past years
  • IDEM now tracks the total calendar days a permit
    is in house and is applying a deadline to permits
    that traditionally do not have a statutory
    deadline as a new interpretation to the intent
    of statutes

18
Total Permit Calendar Days
19
Air Permits for New Facilities
  • New Toyota Production at Lafayette Suzuki
    Facility
  • Louis Dreyfus Soy Biodiesel PlantLargest in the
    US
  • Ten new Ethanol Production Facilities

20
(No Transcript)
21
Office of Enforcement2002-2006
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Referrals 887 607 467 547 324
Violation Letters 17 33 47 203 125
Notice of Violations 561 457 318 202 281
Agreed Orders 311 349 314 258 237
Commissioner's Orders 15 15 6 41 28
Dismissals 125 121 44 48 29
August 1, 2006
22
The 120 Cases over Two Years Old
  • March 2005, notified regulated community that
    IDEM wanted old cases resolved by June
  • 90 cases resolved (approximately)
  • 20 settlements pending
  • 10 commissioner orders issued
  • Purpose clear the process and get on fresh
    footing with the regulated community

23
Poor Data Systems Caused Confusion
  • 120 cases over 2 years old (119)
  • 40 Resolved by 6/10
  • 19 Additional resolved by 10/12
  • Industry asking why they were not included when
    they had old cases on the books
  • 120 cases reported some of which were old
  • Issued 8 old and 2 newer Commissioners Orders by
    6/10/05
  • 40 of these were older than 2 years

24
Status of the 119 Old Cases
  • 110 have been moved through the process
  • 63 Agreed Orders
  • 24 Commissioners Orders
  • 12 Dismissals
  • 1 Referred to EPA
  • 5 Referred to the Attorney General
  • 3 Deferred due to Criminal Prosecution
  • 3 Violation Letters Issued

25
Status of the 119 Old Cases
  • The Remaining 9 old cases involve 4 facilities
  • 1 Air Case with Citizens Gas Coke Utility
  • 5 Air Cases with U.S. Steel
  • 2 Air Cases with Grain Processing Corp
  • 1 Water Case with the City of Warsaw
  • Each of these Cases is in Active Negotiation and
    each of these parties is taking actions to
    improve the protection of the environment during
    the negotiations.

26
Possible Issues for 2007 Legislation
27
Possible 2007 Legislative Issues
  • Budget
  • Federal Funds continuing to decrease
  • State General Funds fluctuate
  • Except for Title V, Dedicated fund charges not
    well related to program costssome programs like
    CAFOs, Methamphetamine clean-up and Mercury
    Switch management completely unfunded.
  • Environmental Crimes Legislation from Senator
    Kenleys Task Force

28
Environmental Crimes Task Force
  • Environmental Crimes Task Force (SEA 195) has
    been meeting since October, 2006.
  • Chaired by Senator Kenley
  • Developing more specific environmental criminal
    statutes.
  • Plan to bring draft legislation to the EQSC this
    year.

29
Possible 2007 Legislative Issues
  • Streamlined Rulemaking when adopting Federal
    Requirements (including deadlines) without
    change.
  • Ask EQSC to study Environmental Rulemaking
    Process.
  • Request Legislative authority to bank unused
    Supplemental Environmental Project Value and
    perhaps recover with a tax credit.
  • Consider Prohibiting the Commissioner from
    renewing a permit for a facility that was not
    constructed or has not operated for the past 5
    years.

30
Possible 2007 Legislative Issues
  • Streamline the OEA (Office of Environmental
    Adjudication) Process, especially for permit
    appeals. Issues include
  • Standing
  • Timeliness of decisions
  • The Standard of Review (i.e. Arbitrary and
    Capricious)
  • Potential for the Collection of damages
  • Current Roles of Environmental Districts
  • Regional Water and Sewer Districts
  • Solid Waste Management Districts

31
Major Regulatory Initiatives
  • Rulemaking to establish presumptive 8-1-6 VOC
    BACT controls to streamline permitting
  • Acid Scrubbers for foundry core making amines
  • Compliance with certain NESHAPs
  • Rulemaking to require the removal of mercury
    convenience switches from automobiles prior to
    crushing or shredding
  • Rulemaking to allow Performance Track (Indiana
    Environmental Stewardship Program)Will be
    accepting applications in September.

32
Major Regulatory Initiatives
  • Regulations to facilitate the proper management
    of e-scrap.
  • Outdoor Wood Fueled Boilers.
  • Utility NOx, SO2 and Mercury emission rules
  • CAIR, which regulates NOx and SO2, has been
    preliminarily adopted by the Air Pollution
    Control Boardgeneral consensus.
  • CAMR, regulating mercury, has not been second
    noticed because there has been no resolution of
    issues between Utilities which favor the federal
    program and the Hoosier Environmental Council
    which favors a 90 reduction.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com