NSP 1 Challenges, Success and Lessons Learned - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

NSP 1 Challenges, Success and Lessons Learned

Description:

NSP 1 Challenges, Success and Lessons Learned Kate Blood NSP Program Manager WI Department of Commerce Why did we decide to work in housing?? Given the housing bubble ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:198
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Departme211
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NSP 1 Challenges, Success and Lessons Learned


1
NSP 1 Challenges, Success and Lessons Learned
  • Kate Blood
  • NSP Program Manager
  • WI Department of Commerce

2
Why did we decide to work in housing??
  • Given the housing bubble, mortgage crisis,
    escalating foreclosures why do we love working
    in this field??

3
Why affordable housing
  • Maybe because permanent housing and the concept
    of home is one of the most stabilizing factors
    in an individuals life

4
Happiness Research
  • Global research on happiness has shown that the
    two most critical determinants of happiness
    were
  • Stable housing
  • Adequate food
  • Between housing and food housing was 1
  • And thats why what we do is so critical

5
NSP in Wisconsin
  • Overview
  • Approximately 38,800,000 in NSP 1 funds received
    by Wisconsin Department of Commerce
  • These funds were allocated across eight regions
    incorporating all areas of highest need in the
    state

6
NSP distribution of funds
  • WHEDA 5,807,600
  • Statewide Regional Allocations 27,093,611
  • Incentive Allocations 2,000,000
  • Administration 3,877,912
  • ______________
  • TOTAL 38,779,123

7
NSP per activity (changes from 1/09 to 10/09)
  • Activity A Financing Mechanisms -
    5,807,600
  • Activity B Acquisition/rehab/
  • resale (up gt5m) 15,743,611
  • rental (down 3m) 7,000,000
  • Activity C Landbanking (down 1.25m)
    750,000
  • Activity D Demolition (down 600K)
    1,400,000
  • Activity E Redevelopment (down 800K) 4,200,000
  • Administration 3,877,912

8
NSP timeline in theory
  • The Grantees per their contracts agreed to
    complete the housing activities according to the
    following schedule
  • On or Before Activity
  • 06/30/09 Finalize agreements with partnering
    organizations
  • Establish record keeping system
  • 09/30/09 Execute grant agreement set-up housing
    activities (obligate funds)
  • 12/31/09 Set-up Housing activities and begin
    to expend funds
  • 03/31/10 Set-up Housing Activities and expend
    funds
  • 06/30/10 Set-up Housing Activities and expend
    funds
  • 08/15/10 All funds must be obligated by grantees
    by this date
  • 09/30/10 Continue housing assistance activities

9
NSP TimelineReality Check
  • Running behind schedule
  • Last of the 31 grantees were not in contract
    until 10/9/09
  • Documents required to be able to obligate NSP
    funds by grantees are not in for 12 of the 31
    grantees (Tier 1 Environmental Review, MOUs with
    partnering agencies, identification of HUD
    approved homebuyer counseling provider)

10
Progress to Date
  • Despite these delays, as of 10/30/09
  • Funds have been obligated for 77 housing
    activities (all activity categories except for
    landbanking)
  • On average, 51 of the committed housing
    activities for the 2nd quarter ending 12/31/09
    have had funds obligated

11
Progress contd
  • As of end of 2nd quarter -9/30/09
  • Over 2.5m has been obligated (includes admin
    dollars)
  • Of the funds for housing activities 72 has been
    for lt50 CMI households

12
Challenges
  • The real estate market is changing daily
  • More buyers are entering the market
  • Increased competition for foreclosed homes from
    speculators, developers with no NSP restrictions
    (ex. 1 discount)
  • Competition can often close with no contingencies
    (ex. appraisal, HQS inspection) and quicker than
    NSP grantees can

13
Challenges Contd
  • Changing Demographics
  • Grantees are experiencing difficulty in finding
    foreclosures in the census tracts that theyd
    identified almost 11 months ago as their highest
    risk/impact neighborhoods due to
  • Shifting demographics of foreclosures (to higher
    tier)

14
Challenges contd
  • Demographics of foreclosures has begun to change

15
Challenges contd
  • Overall temporary decrease in number of
    foreclosures (due to rules requiring banks to
    consider more people for loan modifications) ,
    and increase overall in home sales prices

16
Challenges contd
  • 1 discount from appraisal
  • this 1 discount puts NSP grantees at a
    disadvantage in the increasingly competitive
    demand for these foreclosed homes.
  • Appraisals in the last 6-9 months are reflecting
    the depreciated value of homes, making REO
    holders increasingly resistant to further
    discount the sales price for NSP bidders

17
Challenges contd
  • Difficulty working with some lenders, REO holders
  • REOs reluctance to work with Federal funds
  • REOs unwillingness to allow contingencies, ex.
    Appraisal requirement, HQS inspection
  • Ex. Weve had reports that a HUD contracted
    entity for foreclosures wont allow an appraisal
    prior to 1st (final) offer their sales price is
    based on their appraisal, but may be more than 60
    days old, wont provide date of appraisal to
    prospective buyers
  • Extended time to close due to backlog on REOs
    side

18
Challenges contd
  • Lean budget for administration and activity
    related soft costs
  • NSP is capped at 10 by the HERA guidelines

19
Challenges contd
  • Heightened regulatory and monitoring requirements
    per Federal emphasis on transparency
  • Some ambiguity in the guidelines for the NSP
    program given its hybrid combination of CDBG,
    HOME and NSP-specific guidelines

20
Challenges contd
  • Tight timeline for obligation of funds
  • August 15, 2010 all NSP funds must be obligated
    to avoid recapture
  • Quarterly housing activity benchmarks for
    grantees must be met to avoid withholding of
    further funding

21
Challenges contd
  • Examples of obstacles encountered by grantees in
    getting NSP obligated
  • Time delays in getting required documents to
    obligate funds approved by Non-profit boards,
    City Counsel, Mayors, etc.
  • Stretching their NSP dollars to meet their
    contracted housing activities with rising sales
    prices

22
Summary
  • NSP is a one time opportunity to not only stem
    deterioration of neighborhoods by foreclosures,
    but to bring about catalytic change that can lead
    to revitalization
  • Along with the opportunity that this program
    provides, comes certain somewhat arduous
    requirements, documentation responsibilities and
    potential of OIG auditing.

23
Summary contd
  • Suggestions
  • Balance the competing demands
  • Seize the Day!
  • when you find a good foreclosure opportunity, act
    boldly AND
  • Proceed with Caution!
  • Documenting your adherence to the program
    requirements
  • 1 discount,
  • URA notice to sellers,
  • HUD approved home-buyer counseling provider, etc.
  • Keep documentation of your policies (ex.
    Affordability guidelines) and apply them
    consistently in all cases
  • Call your HUD rep and State NSP grant
    administrator if you have a question and document
    the question/answer

24
Summary contd
  • And finally
  • when youve just lost a bid for a perfect
    foreclosed home, or youre frustrated at the
    regulatory requirements
  • Remember
  • You didnt choose the affordable housing because
    it was the easy path

25
Remember
  • that you are one of a cadre of committed housing
    advocates, and
  • that you are helping to provide and secure the 1
    ingredient of happiness
  • stable housing
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com