Gender-disaggregated data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Gender-disaggregated data

Description:

Gender disaggregated data. Not only about what men and women do, or their characteristics. Need data to understand differentiated impacts, vulnerabilities, opportunities* – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:169
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: apma2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gender-disaggregated data


1
Gender-disaggregated data
  • Karabi Baruah Ph.D
  • Gender, HIV Development Specialist
  • For Training Course on Gender Equitable
    development Projects
  • APMASS WAP, AIT
  • 27th June 2012 Danang, Vietnam

2
Session Outline
  • Basic concepts and issues related to the
    collection, analysis and use of
    gender-disaggregated data
  • Common understanding of terms useful in gender
    disaggregated data
  • Approaches to collecting and analysing gender
    disaggregated data

3
GDD and Analysis
  • Gender-disaggregated data the collection of
    information, from a sample group that includes
    both male and female participants, on the
    different experiences, needs, interests, and
    access to opportunities and resources of men and
    women so as to establish an accurate picture of
    the local context.
  • Gender analysis the examination of relationships
    between men and women and the factors that create
    and influence differential opportunities and
    constraints for men and women at the local,
    regional and global level.

Source Hovorka, IDRC, 1998.
4
Gender-disaggregated data (GDD)
  • Collection of data disaggregated by sex
    (strictly, this is sex-disaggregated data)
  • However GDD is more than simply collecting data
    FROM women and men
  • GDD requires a gender-sensitive data collection
    process to reveal hidden or untold information

4
5
Why the Need for Gender Disaggregated Data?
  • Capture real need, contribution, benefits
  • GDD needs to be accompanied by disaggregated data
    on other variables (age, race, etc) to reflect
    gender dynamics
  • To improve project effectiveness and
    sustainability (project is then more responsive).
  • Better information lead to better performance
    (fish harvest, income, etc)
  • The benefits are to both women and men

6
Gender disaggregated data
  • Not only about what men and women do, or their
    characteristics
  • Need data to understand differentiated impacts,
    vulnerabilities, opportunities
  • Especially important for monitoring and evaluation

7
GDD at different phases
  • GDD in baseline (so we can measure changes from a
    gender perspective)
  • Difference in labor, income, control and access
    to resource, perceptions
  • GDD in process (both within project and on target
    population)
  • Difference in participation
  • GDD on outcome and impact
  • Focus on long-term effects of the project,
    measuring against baseline data

8
Common understanding of terms useful in gender
disaggregated data
9
  • ? Data
  • Sex disaggregated data, and
  • Gender disaggregated data
  • Statistics
  • ? Indicator Gender sensitive Indicators
  • Qualitative quantitative

10
Sex Gender-disaggregated data (GDD)
  • Data Unprocessed information that can be
    quantified
  • Sex-disaggregated data Collection of data
    disaggregated by sex (strictly by physical
    attributes )
  • Gender Disaggregated Data are Analytical
    indicators derived from sex-disaggregated data on
    socioeconomic attributes

10
11
STATISTICS
  • Processed data from a sample
  • Numerical information answering the question,
    how much, how many that are usually presented
    in aggregate form as numbers or proportions in
    tables and graphs (Hedman, Perucci and Sundstrom
    1996
  • Quantitative descriptions of some aspect(s) of
    the study population (Fowler 1992)
  • Characteristics of the study sample (Blalock
    1979) )

12
Gender- sensitive indicators
  • An indicator is a pointer. It can be a
    measurement, a number, a fact, an opinion or a
    perception that points at a specific condition or
    situation, and measures changes in that condition
    or situation over time. (CIDA)
  • Gender-sensitive indicators have the special
    function of pointing out gender-related changes
    in society over time. (ibid)
  • Gender-sensitive indicators should be developed
    alongside other indicators measuring progress or
    achievements
  • Who develops indicators? Need for a participatory
    approach

12
13
Examples of indicators
  • Quantitative indicators
  • Qualitative indicators
  • Level of income generated from agricultural
    activities for both male- and female-controlled
    crops.
  • Levels of womens and mens inputs, by
    socio-economic grouping, in terms of labor,
    tools, etc.
  • Number (or ) of women and men in key
    decision-making positions, by socio-economic
    grouping.
  • Average household expenditure of female/male
    headed households on education/health.
  • Respondent attitude towards new project
    component, disaggregated by sex.
  • Level of satisfaction by women and men with
    degree of participation in project
    implementation.
  • Perception of change in gender equality within
    the community since the project started.
  • Feedback in relation to the usefulness of
    training sessions and gender training material.

14
Approaches to collecting and analysing gender
disaggregated data
15
Qualitative Quantitative Methods of GDD
  • Structural questionnaire surveys for quantitative
    GDD
  • Qualitative data collection in-depth
    interviews, Survey structured interviews,
    Focus group discussion Narratives, case-studies,
    life stories etc

16
Examples of format for quantitative questions
  • Question 1 (yes/no, several options, multiple
    choice)
  • Option a
  • Option b
  • Option c
  • Question 2 (no specific number how many
    things/years/children/etc? income?
  • _________
  • Question 3 (Rating questions)
  • Do you agree?
  • Strongly disagree Strongly agree
  • ? ? ? ? ?

17
Quantitative indicators may fail to capture gender
  • Examples
  • an increased income may hide an increase in
    dependence towards a spouse an equal sex-ratio
    may hide that an activity is not tailored to
    womens needs

18
Qualitative indicators
  • Qualitative indicators can be defined as
    people's judgments and perceptions about a
    subject, such as the confidence those people have
    in sewing machines as instruments of financial
    independence. (CIDA)
  • Hence qualitative indicators are crucial to
    participatory methods, since they dont measures
    things or numbers but peoples views.

19
How gender-sensitive are the survey questions?
  • Issues to include
  • Issues to avoid
  • Question that dont generate gender-disaggregated
    data (household income, or respondent income)
  • Questions that only cover waged labor or
    cash-crop (since these will be male dominated) to
    measure livelihoods.
  • Assume the respondent knows better than other
    family members (access to training, resources,
    decision-making). A husband and a wife may give a
    different view on their level of decision-making,
    or on domestic violence)
  • Questions designed to cover differentiated task
  • Who collects water (or fuelwood, fodder,
    foodstuff) in your household? How far do you
    respondent or this person have to travel to
    collect water?
  • Or different crop cycles
  • Plowing, planting/transplanting, weeding,
    picking, grinding, etc., which may better
    represent both men and womens economic activity
  • Questions that ask about intra-household dynamics
  • Question on time-use (to pick up what specific
    questions dont)
  • Informal work when asking about labor activity

20
Examples of bad and good data collection methods
in term of gender
  • Bad
  • Good
  • In a household survey, use HH as respondents
    (most HH are men, responses will reflect their
    views)
  • In-depth interviews with women are conducted by
    men interviewers (contextual possible in some,
    not in others)
  • Selection of respondents based on village
    leaders, or available list (leaders tend to be
    men, so are their networks list often use
    designated HH)
  • Depending on context, mixed Focus-group
    discussion where men talk and women remain silent
    (or men sit in the middle, women on the outside)
  • Respondents are alternated between W and M, or
    both W and M (father/mother), (husband/wife) are
    chosen
  • In-depth interviews with women are conducted by
    women interviewers (opposite may also be true in
    some context, men should interview men)
  • Random selection with equal number of women and
    men, or separate selection methods in some
    contexts (may take into account division of
    labor where are M and W)
  • Male and female only FGD. However, whenever
    possible mixed FGD can be very useful to show
    contrasting or common views

21
Qualitative analysis
  • Qualitative analysis is used to understand
    social processes, why and how a particular
    situation that indicators measure came into
    being, and how this situation can be changed in
    the future. Qualitative analysis can and should
    be used at all stages of the project cycle, and
    should be used alongside quantitative and
    qualitative indicators. (CIDA)
  • Gender ME should use qualitative analysis to
    measure the quality of a change and to
    understand barriers not revealed by quantitative
    analysis

22
Measuring changes in gender roles
  • Productive
  • Reproductive
  • Community
  • How have these three spheres been influenced by
    the project?
  • Are gender roles changing towards more gender
    equity
  • Can positive process indicators (no. of women
    participating) lead to change in gender roles
    outcome (distribution of reproductive work)
  • Qualitative indicators and analysis may explain
    obstacles towards more equitable gender roles
    (stereotypes, perceptions, etc)

22
23
Gender disaggregated data, especially collected
through qualitative methods, require gender aware
data collection tool designer and data collector
23
24
Which method to choose?
  • Is the method appropriate to the evaluation
    exercise (what kind of data needed, are we
    looking at numbers or processes, etc)
  • Can the method best measure what one wants to
    measure (assets vs perceptions)
  • Does the data generated need to be comparable?
  • Or are we looking for visual representation of
    the evidence?
  • Is it feasible, within cost, scope and limitations

25
Focus-group discussion
  • Good technique to understand attitudes and
    behavior of a target group
  • Questions are usually open-ended
  • Answers can add details to motives, why no or
    yes, can be useful to understand data collected
    in a survey
  • One can judge if a certain behavior or attitude
    is shared by the group
  • However, one cannot extrapolate data to a general
    or other population (may not be representative)
  • Risk of having the group interviewer provide
    personal opinion that may affect results

26
In-depth Interviews
  • In-depth and semi-structure interviews are a less
    rigid method to acquire data than than structured
    interviews
  • Respondents are allowed to answer at length,
    sometimes bringing in related information that
    was not asked by the interviewer
  • Mostly open-ended questions though close-ended
    ones can also be added
  • Can use random sampling (probability sampling) if
    large sample to be generalizable, unless the
    research is focused on a specific and small
    target-group, or that respondents are hard to
    find. In this case purposive (only disabled
    people for instance) or convenience sampling,
    such as snow-ball techniques, both
    non-probability sampling, can be used. However
    you have to mention how bias can be introduce
    (such as too many old people, or rich, etc) or
    whether the sample acquired is representative of
    a cross-section of the population

27
In-depth Interviews
  • In-depth and semi-structure interviews are a less
    rigid method to acquire data than than structured
    interviews
  • Respondents are allowed to answer at length,
    sometimes bringing in related information that
    was not asked by the interviewer
  • Mostly open-ended questions though close-ended
    ones can also be added
  • Can use random sampling (probability sampling) if
    large sample to be generalizable, unless the
    research is focused on a specific and small
    target-group, or that respondents are hard to
    find. In this case purposive (only disabled
    people for instance) or convenience sampling,
    such as snow-ball techniques, both
    non-probability sampling, can be used. However
    you have to mention how bias can be introduce
    (such as too many old people, or rich, etc) or
    whether the sample acquired is representative of
    a cross-section of the population

28
Narratives, case-studies, life stories
  • Underutilized in ME
  • Provide a broader view of ones experience,
    including changes over time
  • Allow us to understand better social costs and
    benefits from a personal standpoint
  • Allow closeness with subject of research which
    may help the interviewer gather information that
    she or he wouldnt find otherwise
  • However, may not be representative as every life
    is different. Can be cross-checked with other
    stories or triangulated with other forms of data
    collection

29
Collecting Sensitive information
  • Gender related information can be about
    difference and similarities, inequalities,
    control and in more extreme case about abuse and
    violence
  • They tend to require a level of trust that is
    hard to build from survey questions
  • Women may be dependent of their partners,
    influencing responses
  • In some cases, similarities with the data
    collector may help (the peer approach)
  • On the other hand, one may not want to divulge
    some information with a local
  • So there is a need to assess the potential
    benefits (trust, relations) with shortcomings
    (fear of being ostracized)
  • Hence GDD require an ethical data collection
    process

30
Gender-sensitive location
  • Should conduct the interview/survey where
    respondents feel safe, comfortable and open-
    Should consider
  • Location
  • Timing
  • Distance

31
Conclusion
  • GDD requires both quantitative and qualitative
    methods, it is collected on the project (input
    and process) as well as on the community (output
    and outcome)
  • Quantitative measurements are often limited to
    capture the quality of change in gender outcomes,
    hence the need in gender ME to use qualitative
    methods of assessment
  • GDD requires gender-sensitive survey design as
    well as trained data collectors

32
Group Work
  • How would you generate gender differentiated
    resource use pattern?
  • Community in which you are working has
    implemented a project on access to energy by
    providing solar lamps and bio-digesters to
    households How would you collect data on women
    and men are affected by implementing the project.
  • In the community you are working you have
    established an eco-tourism project which brings
    about xxx number of visitors to the community
    every week. How would you collect gender
    sensitive indicators?.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com