Title: Gender-disaggregated data
1Gender-disaggregated data
- Karabi Baruah Ph.D
- Gender, HIV Development Specialist
- For Training Course on Gender Equitable
development Projects - APMASS WAP, AIT
- 27th June 2012 Danang, Vietnam
2Session Outline
- Basic concepts and issues related to the
collection, analysis and use of
gender-disaggregated data - Common understanding of terms useful in gender
disaggregated data - Approaches to collecting and analysing gender
disaggregated data
3GDD and Analysis
- Gender-disaggregated data the collection of
information, from a sample group that includes
both male and female participants, on the
different experiences, needs, interests, and
access to opportunities and resources of men and
women so as to establish an accurate picture of
the local context. - Gender analysis the examination of relationships
between men and women and the factors that create
and influence differential opportunities and
constraints for men and women at the local,
regional and global level.
Source Hovorka, IDRC, 1998.
4Gender-disaggregated data (GDD)
- Collection of data disaggregated by sex
(strictly, this is sex-disaggregated data) - However GDD is more than simply collecting data
FROM women and men - GDD requires a gender-sensitive data collection
process to reveal hidden or untold information
4
5Why the Need for Gender Disaggregated Data?
- Capture real need, contribution, benefits
- GDD needs to be accompanied by disaggregated data
on other variables (age, race, etc) to reflect
gender dynamics - To improve project effectiveness and
sustainability (project is then more responsive). - Better information lead to better performance
(fish harvest, income, etc) - The benefits are to both women and men
6Gender disaggregated data
- Not only about what men and women do, or their
characteristics - Need data to understand differentiated impacts,
vulnerabilities, opportunities - Especially important for monitoring and evaluation
7GDD at different phases
- GDD in baseline (so we can measure changes from a
gender perspective) - Difference in labor, income, control and access
to resource, perceptions - GDD in process (both within project and on target
population) - Difference in participation
- GDD on outcome and impact
- Focus on long-term effects of the project,
measuring against baseline data
8Common understanding of terms useful in gender
disaggregated data
9- ? Data
- Sex disaggregated data, and
- Gender disaggregated data
- Statistics
- ? Indicator Gender sensitive Indicators
- Qualitative quantitative
10Sex Gender-disaggregated data (GDD)
- Data Unprocessed information that can be
quantified - Sex-disaggregated data Collection of data
disaggregated by sex (strictly by physical
attributes ) - Gender Disaggregated Data are Analytical
indicators derived from sex-disaggregated data on
socioeconomic attributes
10
11STATISTICS
- Processed data from a sample
- Numerical information answering the question,
how much, how many that are usually presented
in aggregate form as numbers or proportions in
tables and graphs (Hedman, Perucci and Sundstrom
1996 - Quantitative descriptions of some aspect(s) of
the study population (Fowler 1992) - Characteristics of the study sample (Blalock
1979) )
12Gender- sensitive indicators
- An indicator is a pointer. It can be a
measurement, a number, a fact, an opinion or a
perception that points at a specific condition or
situation, and measures changes in that condition
or situation over time. (CIDA) - Gender-sensitive indicators have the special
function of pointing out gender-related changes
in society over time. (ibid) - Gender-sensitive indicators should be developed
alongside other indicators measuring progress or
achievements - Who develops indicators? Need for a participatory
approach
12
13Examples of indicators
- Level of income generated from agricultural
activities for both male- and female-controlled
crops. - Levels of womens and mens inputs, by
socio-economic grouping, in terms of labor,
tools, etc. - Number (or ) of women and men in key
decision-making positions, by socio-economic
grouping. - Average household expenditure of female/male
headed households on education/health.
- Respondent attitude towards new project
component, disaggregated by sex. - Level of satisfaction by women and men with
degree of participation in project
implementation. - Perception of change in gender equality within
the community since the project started. - Feedback in relation to the usefulness of
training sessions and gender training material.
14Approaches to collecting and analysing gender
disaggregated data
15Qualitative Quantitative Methods of GDD
- Structural questionnaire surveys for quantitative
GDD - Qualitative data collection in-depth
interviews, Survey structured interviews,
Focus group discussion Narratives, case-studies,
life stories etc
16Examples of format for quantitative questions
- Question 1 (yes/no, several options, multiple
choice) - Option a
- Option b
- Option c
- Question 2 (no specific number how many
things/years/children/etc? income? - _________
- Question 3 (Rating questions)
- Do you agree?
- Strongly disagree Strongly agree
- ? ? ? ? ?
17Quantitative indicators may fail to capture gender
- Examples
- an increased income may hide an increase in
dependence towards a spouse an equal sex-ratio
may hide that an activity is not tailored to
womens needs
18Qualitative indicators
- Qualitative indicators can be defined as
people's judgments and perceptions about a
subject, such as the confidence those people have
in sewing machines as instruments of financial
independence. (CIDA) - Hence qualitative indicators are crucial to
participatory methods, since they dont measures
things or numbers but peoples views.
19How gender-sensitive are the survey questions?
- Question that dont generate gender-disaggregated
data (household income, or respondent income) - Questions that only cover waged labor or
cash-crop (since these will be male dominated) to
measure livelihoods. - Assume the respondent knows better than other
family members (access to training, resources,
decision-making). A husband and a wife may give a
different view on their level of decision-making,
or on domestic violence)
- Questions designed to cover differentiated task
- Who collects water (or fuelwood, fodder,
foodstuff) in your household? How far do you
respondent or this person have to travel to
collect water? - Or different crop cycles
- Plowing, planting/transplanting, weeding,
picking, grinding, etc., which may better
represent both men and womens economic activity - Questions that ask about intra-household dynamics
- Question on time-use (to pick up what specific
questions dont) - Informal work when asking about labor activity
20Examples of bad and good data collection methods
in term of gender
- In a household survey, use HH as respondents
(most HH are men, responses will reflect their
views) - In-depth interviews with women are conducted by
men interviewers (contextual possible in some,
not in others) - Selection of respondents based on village
leaders, or available list (leaders tend to be
men, so are their networks list often use
designated HH) - Depending on context, mixed Focus-group
discussion where men talk and women remain silent
(or men sit in the middle, women on the outside)
- Respondents are alternated between W and M, or
both W and M (father/mother), (husband/wife) are
chosen - In-depth interviews with women are conducted by
women interviewers (opposite may also be true in
some context, men should interview men) - Random selection with equal number of women and
men, or separate selection methods in some
contexts (may take into account division of
labor where are M and W) - Male and female only FGD. However, whenever
possible mixed FGD can be very useful to show
contrasting or common views
21Qualitative analysis
- Qualitative analysis is used to understand
social processes, why and how a particular
situation that indicators measure came into
being, and how this situation can be changed in
the future. Qualitative analysis can and should
be used at all stages of the project cycle, and
should be used alongside quantitative and
qualitative indicators. (CIDA) - Gender ME should use qualitative analysis to
measure the quality of a change and to
understand barriers not revealed by quantitative
analysis
22Measuring changes in gender roles
- Productive
- Reproductive
- Community
- How have these three spheres been influenced by
the project? - Are gender roles changing towards more gender
equity - Can positive process indicators (no. of women
participating) lead to change in gender roles
outcome (distribution of reproductive work) - Qualitative indicators and analysis may explain
obstacles towards more equitable gender roles
(stereotypes, perceptions, etc)
22
23Gender disaggregated data, especially collected
through qualitative methods, require gender aware
data collection tool designer and data collector
23
24Which method to choose?
- Is the method appropriate to the evaluation
exercise (what kind of data needed, are we
looking at numbers or processes, etc) - Can the method best measure what one wants to
measure (assets vs perceptions) - Does the data generated need to be comparable?
- Or are we looking for visual representation of
the evidence? - Is it feasible, within cost, scope and limitations
25Focus-group discussion
- Good technique to understand attitudes and
behavior of a target group - Questions are usually open-ended
- Answers can add details to motives, why no or
yes, can be useful to understand data collected
in a survey - One can judge if a certain behavior or attitude
is shared by the group - However, one cannot extrapolate data to a general
or other population (may not be representative) - Risk of having the group interviewer provide
personal opinion that may affect results
26In-depth Interviews
- In-depth and semi-structure interviews are a less
rigid method to acquire data than than structured
interviews - Respondents are allowed to answer at length,
sometimes bringing in related information that
was not asked by the interviewer - Mostly open-ended questions though close-ended
ones can also be added - Can use random sampling (probability sampling) if
large sample to be generalizable, unless the
research is focused on a specific and small
target-group, or that respondents are hard to
find. In this case purposive (only disabled
people for instance) or convenience sampling,
such as snow-ball techniques, both
non-probability sampling, can be used. However
you have to mention how bias can be introduce
(such as too many old people, or rich, etc) or
whether the sample acquired is representative of
a cross-section of the population
27In-depth Interviews
- In-depth and semi-structure interviews are a less
rigid method to acquire data than than structured
interviews - Respondents are allowed to answer at length,
sometimes bringing in related information that
was not asked by the interviewer - Mostly open-ended questions though close-ended
ones can also be added - Can use random sampling (probability sampling) if
large sample to be generalizable, unless the
research is focused on a specific and small
target-group, or that respondents are hard to
find. In this case purposive (only disabled
people for instance) or convenience sampling,
such as snow-ball techniques, both
non-probability sampling, can be used. However
you have to mention how bias can be introduce
(such as too many old people, or rich, etc) or
whether the sample acquired is representative of
a cross-section of the population
28Narratives, case-studies, life stories
- Underutilized in ME
- Provide a broader view of ones experience,
including changes over time - Allow us to understand better social costs and
benefits from a personal standpoint - Allow closeness with subject of research which
may help the interviewer gather information that
she or he wouldnt find otherwise - However, may not be representative as every life
is different. Can be cross-checked with other
stories or triangulated with other forms of data
collection
29Collecting Sensitive information
- Gender related information can be about
difference and similarities, inequalities,
control and in more extreme case about abuse and
violence - They tend to require a level of trust that is
hard to build from survey questions - Women may be dependent of their partners,
influencing responses - In some cases, similarities with the data
collector may help (the peer approach) - On the other hand, one may not want to divulge
some information with a local - So there is a need to assess the potential
benefits (trust, relations) with shortcomings
(fear of being ostracized) - Hence GDD require an ethical data collection
process
30Gender-sensitive location
- Should conduct the interview/survey where
respondents feel safe, comfortable and open-
Should consider - Location
- Timing
- Distance
31Conclusion
- GDD requires both quantitative and qualitative
methods, it is collected on the project (input
and process) as well as on the community (output
and outcome) - Quantitative measurements are often limited to
capture the quality of change in gender outcomes,
hence the need in gender ME to use qualitative
methods of assessment - GDD requires gender-sensitive survey design as
well as trained data collectors
32Group Work
- How would you generate gender differentiated
resource use pattern? - Community in which you are working has
implemented a project on access to energy by
providing solar lamps and bio-digesters to
households How would you collect data on women
and men are affected by implementing the project. - In the community you are working you have
established an eco-tourism project which brings
about xxx number of visitors to the community
every week. How would you collect gender
sensitive indicators?.