Quality Indicator Review for Literacy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Quality Indicator Review for Literacy

Description:

Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy Determining priority need areas Prescribing and planning activities to ... (Content Areas) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:152
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: S979
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quality Indicator Review for Literacy


1
Quality Indicator Review for Literacy
  • SETRC network guide for assessment of programs

2
Intended Uses
  • Assessing quality of district program and
    practice in areas of literacy
  • Determining priority need areas
  • Prescribing and planning activities to change
    practices and improve student outcomes

3
NYSED Literacy Work Group
  • SETRC representatives from across state
  • NYSED VESID representatives
  • Faculty Consultant College of St. Rose

4
NYSED Literacy Study Group
  • Representatives of the Task Force for Quality
    Inclusive Schooling
  • Sarah McPherson - NYIT, Facilitator
  • Lynne Burke Intl Dyslexia Assoc.
  • Roberta Schnorr SUNY Oswego
  • Rene Wroblewski St. Bonaventure

5
Levels of Quality Indicators for Literacy
  • Early Literacy Instructional Practice
  • Adolescent Literacy (Middle Level)
  • Adolescent Literacy (High School)
  • Specially Designed and Intensive Reading for
    Students with Disabilities
  • Systemic Support

6
Structure of Quality Indicator Assessment and
Resource Guide
  • Key Questions
  • Indicator Level
  • Component
  • Quality Indicators in terms of there is evidence
    that
  • Look For suggestions of evidence
  • Comments/Evidence
  • Annotations of definitions and hotlinks

7
Early Literacy Instructional Practice
  • Component Phonemic Awareness
  • Key Questions
  • Is there an awareness of the progression and
    development of phonemic awareness skills
    students?
  • How does staff consistently provide explicit
    systematic instruction using research-based
    materials?

8
Early Literacy Instructional Practice
  • Component Phonics, decoding
  • Key Questions
  • What research-based strategies for word
    identification are consistently used?
  • Are students given instruction in phonics at
    their level of instruction?

9
Early Literacy Instructional Practice
  • Component Fluency, automatic reading of text
  • Key Questions
  • Is the student fluency assessed, recorded, and
    monitored systematically to guide instruction at
    least three times per year?
  • Are there instructional strategies, (ex timed
    reading, repeated reading, whisper reading)
    utilized to improve fluency skills?

10
Early Literacy Instructional Practice
  • Component Vocabulary
  • Component Reading and Listening Comprehension
  • Component Written Expression
  • Component Spelling and Handwriting
  • Component Progress Monitoring
  • Research Links attached

11
Adolescent Literacy (Middle Level)
  • Component Direct, Explicit Comprehension
    Instruction
  • Key Questions
  • How does our literacy program support student as
    they move from learning to read to reading to
    learn?
  • What are the ways that teachers demonstrate and
    scaffold students application of comprehension
    strategies to meet the demands of challenging
    text?
  • How do we determine which vocabulary will be
    taught and what instructional strategies are used
    to facilitate vocabulary development?

12
Adolescent Literacy (Middle Level)
  • Component Literacy Instruction Across the
    Curriculum
  • Key Questions
  • What types of teaching aids (visual prompts,
    graphic organizers, reference charts) are used to
    promote understanding, mastery of content, and
    generalizations?
  • What strategies are used to promote content area
    vocabulary understanding?
  • How do we provide instruction that ensures
    students are able to identify various structures
    (text structures) of expository text?

13
Adolescent Literacy (Middle Level)
  • Component Motivation and Self-directed Learning
  • Component Support for Struggling Readers
  • Component Intensive Writing
  • Component Ongoing Formative Assessment of
    Students

14
Adolescent Literacy (High School)
  • Component Direct Literacy Instruction Across
    Disciplines (Content Areas)
  • Component Reading to Learn
  • Component Motivation and Self-Directed Learning
  • Component Writing Embedded in Content Areas
  • Component Extended Learning Opportunities

15
Specially Designed Intensive Reading
  • Component Explicit and Comprehensive Instruction
  • Component Assessment and Benchmarking
  • Component Intensive Programming
  • Component School-wide Supports
  • Component Motivation and Engagement

16
Systemic Support
  • Component Leadership
  • Component Professional Development
  • Component Summative Assessment of Student
    Programs
  • Component Communication
  • Component Universal Design for Learning

17
Charge to Study Group
  • Review these guidelines
  • Analyze their content
  • Evaluate their relevance to teacher preparation
  • Prepare final report with recommendations for the
    use of these guidelines in teacher preparation
    programs

18
Next Steps
  • Input from Inclusion Task Force
  • Critical Friends from Higher Ed Community
  • Statewide Survey
  • Data Analysis
  • Report of Findings and Recommendations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com