Title: Diapositiva 1
1HISTOLOGICAL QUALITY CONTROL OF FROZEN SAMPLES
USING MATCHING FFPE TISSUE PRELIMINARY
RESULTS OF OUR INSTITUTIONAL BIOBANK E.
Mattioli, E. Foglia Manzillo, V. Rubini, F.
Palma, A. Paradiso, G. Simone
2QUALITY CONTROL IN BIOBANKING
- Definition Quality Control (QC) is a complex of
procedures aimed at verifying the suitability of
the collected samples for research - International publications provide guidelines
and technical details - ISBER, 2012 Best Practices for Repositories,
www.isber.org - IARC, Technical Standards and Protocols for
Biological Resource Centres, 2009 - Mager SR et al, Standard operating procedure for
the collection of fresh frozen tissue samples,
Eur J Cancer 2007 - Morente MM et al, TuBaFrost 2 Standardising
tissue collection and quality control procedures
for a European virtual frozen tissue bank
network, Eur J Cancer 2006
3TYPES OF QUALITY CONTROL
2 levels of QC
4HISTOLOGICAL QC
- AIMS
- verification that the Biobank sample is
representative of the whole lesion - verification that the Biobank sample possesses
adequate morphological and immunohistochemical
features
MEANS observation of frozen sections of the
banked sample and/or sections from matching
paraffin blocks
5MOLECULAR QC
- AIM
- verification that the banked samples are
suitable for research use (preservation of
relevant molecules)
MEANS assay of the degree of fragmentation of
nucleic acids (DNA/RNA) via extraction,
amplification (PCR) and gel electrophoresis
6DESIGN OF THE STUDY
- QC PROCEDURE evaluation of critical
immuno-morphological features on frozen biobank
aliquots and on matching FFPE material
representative of the whole lesion - tumor cellularity
- MIB-1 staining
- AIM testing the concordance (i.e.
reproducibility) of these features on sections
from frozen tissue and from the corresponding
paraffin tissue blocks.
71/2
MATERIALS METHODS
60 cases from our Institutional Biobank were
enrolled, including both primary and metastatic
tumors.
Site/type n.
Primary tumors breast 29
Primary tumors colorectal 9
Primary tumors gastric 5
Primary tumors endometrial 5
Metastatic tumors nodal metastases from breast 6
Metastatic tumors liver metastases from colorectal 6
Total 60
82/2
MATERIALS METHODS
- At our Pathology Department, as a routine
procedure, each biobank-dedicated tissue sample
is cut in two mirror-matching halves - one half is reduced into aliquots, which are
weighed and frozen ? _at_Institutional Biobank - the other half is sent to routine histological
processing ? specular paraffin block
(_at_Pathology Unit)
91/5
RESULTS
The comparison of frozen aliquots with specular
FFPE tissue showed a variable degree of
discrepancy, due to the intrinsic heterogeneity
of tumor tissue.
102/5
RESULTS
The fraction of concordant cases significantly
varied according to the amount of deviation
tolerated in the definition of concordance.
Tolerated deviation Tumor cellularity MIB-1 staining
Low 10 5
Intermediate 15 10
High 20 15
Tumor cellularity MIB-1 staining
Low tolerance 55 (33/60) 52.1 (25/48)
Intermediate tolerance 63.3 (38/60) 68.7 (33/48)
High tolerance 71.7 (43/60) 81.2 (39/48)
113/5
RESULTS TUMOR CELLULARITY
Concordance appeared to be influenced by anatomic
site, histotype and cytoarchitectural features
Tumor cellularity - concordance
Tumor group Low tolerance Intermediate tolerance High tolerance Discordant
Endometrial cr 80 100 100 0
Breast cr 51.7 58.6 65.5 34.5
Colorectal cr 44.4 55.5 77.7 22.3
Gastric cr 60 60 80 20
Node metastases (breast) 50 66.7 66.7 33.3
Liver metastases (colon) 66.6 66.6 66.6 33.4
- Endometrial carcinomas and liver metastases
showed the highest concordance fractions in tumor
cellularity.
124/5
RESULTS MIB-1 STAINING
- Metastatic tumors showed the highest concordance
fractions in MIB-1 staining
MIB-1 staining - concordance
Tumor group Low tolerance Intermediate tolerance High tolerance Discordant
Endometrial cr 20 40 60 40
Breast cr 55.2 75.9 86.2 13.8
Colorectal cr 40 60 80 20
Gastric cr 50 50 50 50
Node metastases (breast) 66.6 66.6 100 0
Liver metastases (colon) 100 100 100 0
- gastric carcinomas were discordant in 50 of
cases.
135/5
RESULTS
MIB-1 was non-assessable in 20 of cases (12/60)
because of technical artefacts on the sections
from frozen aliquots.
- this finding may indicate a higher lability of
the molecular components compared to
morphological attributes.
14CONCLUSIONS
- immunomorphological features were not as
reproducible between matching frozen and FFPE
tissue as expected, because of the inherent
heterogeneity of tumor tissue. - mirror-matching FFPE blocks can still play a
role in biobanking QC procedures - however, sample collection and storage
procedures need to be optimized with the intent
to minimize the effects of tumor heterogeneity
and to improve the preservation of molecular
attributes.
15THANKS!
16(No Transcript)
17WAIT!
WHY MATCHING PARAFFIN SECTIONS???
- easier to cut
- better morphological detail/image quality
- no need to thaw samples!
18(No Transcript)