Large amplitude transverse oscillations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Large amplitude transverse oscillations

Description:

... held in place by the magnetic field They are cooler and denser than the coronal plasma, ... Two successive trains of transverse oscillations, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: TheV152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Large amplitude transverse oscillations


1
Large amplitude transverse oscillations in a
multi-stranded EUV prominence
J. M. Harris C. Foullon, V. M. Nakariakov, E.
Verwichte
2
Prominence Oscillations
  • Solar prominences float in the corona, held in
    place by the magnetic field
  • They are cooler and denser than the coronal
    plasma, therefore appearing
  • bright against a dark background in 304 Å
    (70,000 K),
  • but dark against the bright corona in 195 Å
    (1.5 million K).
  • Oscillations traditionally observed in Ha lines
    as winking filaments
  • e.g. Dyson et al (1930), Brusek (1951), Ramsey
    Smith (1966).
  • The line of sight velocity can be measured using
    the Doppler shift.

EUV images of a prominence on the NE limb
(SOHO/EIT)?
3
Prominence Oscillations
  • Now also observed by EUV imagers
  • e.g. Foullon et al (2004, 2010), Isobe
    Tripathi (2006), Pinter et al (2008).
  • This enables long periods and the field of view
    velocity to be measured.
  • Small amplitude oscillations velocity 2-3
    km/s.
  • Large amplitude oscillations velocity gt 20km/s.
  • can be triggered by nearby flares or EIT waves,
  • observational analyses are scarce, see Tripathi
    et al (2009) for a review.
  • Analysis of these oscillations enables us to
  • measure plasma parameters (e.g. magnetic field)
    via coronal seismology,
  • understand more about solar prominences (e.g.
    link to prominence eruptions),
  • verify oscillation and damping theories.

4
Prominence Oscillation on 30th July 2005
  • Observed using SOHO/EIT
  • 195 Å, 12 min cadence,
  • 304 Å, 6 hour cadence.
  • Two successive trains of transverse oscillations,
  • triggered by EIT waves from two flares in the
    same remote active region
  • X1.3 class flare at 0617
  • C8.9 class flare at 1639

5
EIT Waves
  • 1st EIT wave seen over only 1 frame using running
    difference images (Type II radio burst, 1801
    km/s)
  • 2nd EIT wave seen over 4 fast frames (no Type
    II reported)
  • Intensity depletion is larger following the 1st
    EIT wave

1635 - 1635
EIT Wave 2
EIT Wave 1
6
Evolution of the Apparent Height
position over the limb when
rotation
Image using ratio of 304/195 Å with region of
interest indicated
Foullon Verwichte (2006)?
7
Evolution of Apparent Height
Region of interest moves with the rotation of the
prominence
8
Time - Distance Plots slit 1
9
Time - Distance Plots slit 4
10
Analysis of Time Series slit 1
P 122 23 min ? 131 94 min v 12 5 km/s
P 101 1 min ? 218 47 min v 32 10 km/s
11
Analysis of Time Series slit 4
P 97 21 min ? 274 497 min v 5 4
km/s
P 94 2 min ? 119 19 min v 30 4
km/s
P 108 2 min ? 277 80 min v 17 3
km/s
P 111 4 min ? 362 212 min v 11
3 km/s
12
Results Amplitude Period
13
Results Damping Times
Coronal loop oscillation data Nakariakov et al
(1999)? Aschwanden et al (2002)? Wang Solanki
(2004)? Verwichte et al. (2004)? Van
Doorsselaere et al. (2007)? Hori et al.
(2007)? Van Doorsselaere et al (2009)? Verwichte
et al. (2009)? Verwichte et al.
(2010)? Prominence oscillation data Harris et
al (2010)?
consistent with damping via resonant absorption
14
Conclusions
  • Large amplitude transverse (horizontal)
    prominence oscillation.
  • Velocity amplitudes
  • Generally increasing with height, up to 32km/s
    following the X1.3 class flare and up to 12km/s
    after the C8.9 class flare, as expected due to
    the difference in flare energy.
  • Periods of around 100 minutes (10 minutes)
  • Generally increasing with height and varying for
    different strands, indicating that the prominence
    doesnt oscillate as a solid body but according
    to its filamentary structure.
  • Around 10 shorter during the 1st oscillatory
    train than the 2nd (c.f. 15x flare energy, 5x
    amplitude), suggesting the period is largely
    dependent on the properties of the prominence
    rather than the triggering mechanism, as expected
    for an MHD mode.
  • Damping times
  • 2 to 3 periods for most strands.
    when combined with data from loop
    oscillations, this is consistent with damping via
    resonant absorption.
  • Other strands exhibit much longer decay times,
    but the errors in these cases are very large.

Harris et al. 2010, in preparation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com