Title: Sub-National%20Financial%20Management%20and%20Accountability%20Reforms
1Sub-National Financial Management and
Accountability Reforms
- Experience from Indonesia
- Asmeen Khan Rajiv Sondhi
2Presentation Roadmap
- Key features of decentralization in Indonesia
- Regulatory Developments and Framework
- Country Profile
- Defining the Countrys FM Reform Agenda
- Moving from National to Sub-national levels
- Some Outstanding Issues at Sub National level
- The Challenges of Transition
- The Banks approach and response
3Key Features of Decentralization
- Fundamental and simultaneous transitions
political, economic, fiscal, administrative. Far
reaching impact. - Big Bang Fiscal Decentralization 2001 Laws 22
and 25 in 1999 on Decentralization and Fiscal
relations and Law 34 on Regional Taxes in 2000 - Expenditure responsibilities for public service
delivery decentralized to localities - Laws revised 2004 Some political claw-back. E.g.
Ministry of Home Affairs must approve provincial
budgets (ex-ante) - Raises some very fundamental issues on
administrative capacity, fiduciary management and
accountability.
4Country ProfileThe Story so far.
- 32 of overall countrys total budget is SN
expenditures. - There has been a substantial decline in overall
development spending, despite fiscal
consolidation at the centre. - Development budgets remain scattered between the
Centre (about half), provinces (14) and Local
Govts. 440 local governments , average budget of
32.8 million each, population of 470,000, on
average spend 34 of budget on development
expenditures. - Local Govts. remain highly dependent on fiscal
transfers from centre. IG system of fiscal
transfers is based on equalizing grant (DAU),
shared revenues and taxes and capital grant. - Degree of inequality between regions and
provinces is staggering. - Domestic borrowing limited, foreign borrowing
needs approval by Ministry of Finance (borrowing
less than one half of one percent of GDP) - Own source revenues limited but have doubled in
past 4 years ! - Data show trend of budget surplus in local
governments. - Kabupaten, Kota
5 Structure of Local Govt. Revenues
1999-2002
High Dependency on IG transfers
6Large increase in level of expenditure
Majority of spending goes to staff
7Poor budget forecasting
Significant increase in surplus and reserves as
percentage of total expenditure16 percent for
all sub-national governments (1.2 percent of GDP)
8The Countrys PFM Reform Journey
- Bank diagnostic work ( PER 2000, CFAA CPAR
2001-SN FM assessment 2003) on-going policy
dialogue. - The National Reform Agenda gets set
- White Paper issued by Govt. 2002
- New Laws on State Finance, Treasury and Audit
(2003, 2004). Implementing regulations being
issued in stages. - Budgeting reforms performance budgeting, GFS,
Accounting Standards. - Modernization of Ministry of Finance
- GFMRAP Project to lock in reforms, treasury
automation - Audit sector reform recently commenced.
- Changing practices may be a bigger challenge, as
law enforcement is endemically weak.
9Moving Reforms to the DistrictsThe challenge is
local, as districts move centre-stage
- Administrative Issues
- Inconsistent legal framework
- Proliferation of regional governments
- Limited authority over local civil service
- PFM systems improving, gradually.
- Weak local capacity
- Fiscal Transfers
- Formula-based DAU,
- though limited equalization
- Shared taxes fluctuate
- and create inequality
- Political Issues
- Evidence of elite capture
- Limited local information
- Some participation
- in local decision making
Development Impact
- Institutional Issues
- Pressing need for institutional reforms
- to support increased responsibilities
- To improve investment climate
- To strengthen governance
- To improve service delivery
- Huge variation in regional needs,
- capacity and performance
10The Financial Management and Accountability
BeehiveSome Outstanding Issues at Local Level
Public Debt and Asset Management
Planning Budgeting
Oversight
Regulatory Framework
Budget Execution
External Audit
Accounting Reporting
11Some Outstanding Issues - Regulatory Framework
- Key National Laws on PFM passed - but many
implementing regulations are yet to come out.
Implementation handicapped. - Central Regulations are PFM Regulations links
between sectors and between plans and fiscal
budgets not well laid out. - Regulatory authorities unclear between MOF and
Home Affairs Conflicts in some regulations. - Regions not always clear on what their
legislative authority is. Few districts have
appropriate and comprehensive local legislation
or institutional arrangements in place for FM - Although modernized Procurement decree issued
(2003), there is no procurement law. - Law enforcement continues to be a major concern.
- Limited public consultation on draft local laws
or budget process-though required by law
Public Debt and Asset Management
Planning Budgeting
Oversight Regulatory Framework
Regulatory Framework Legal architecture - Inter
Government fiscal relations
Budget Execution
External Audit
Accounting Reporting
12Some Outstanding Issues Planning and Budgeting
Public Debt and Asset Management
- Five year plan lacks targets, priorities or hard
budget constraint - Many bank accounts for technical departments, not
all revenue reported - Though communities participate in planning
activitiesdisconnect between plans and budgets - Budget realization varies from 80-95, budgets
amended at least once a year, Regions own
revenues exceed targets - Some districts use different expenditure
classifications not consistent with GFS
classification - difficult to account for costs. - Districts starting to use performance based
budgeting cant distinguish salaries versus
goods and services
Planning Budgeting Comprehensiveness Classifica
tion Projection
Oversight
Regulatory Framework Legal architecture - Inter
Government fiscal relations
Budget Execution
External Audit
Accounting Reporting
13Some Outstanding Issues Budget Execution
Public Debt and Asset Management
- Weak cash management inefficiency from idle
funds and pilferage risksno cash forecasting - Local revenues collection arbitrary basis for
setting levies, fees, resulting in random and
nuisance taxes no analysis of revenue
potentialpoor revenue forecasting. - Procurement weak capacitycollusive practices
endemic.No transparency. - Outdated administrative procedures weaken
internal controls. - Internal audit agencies at regional and
provincial levels cover about 5 of budget, not
professionally staffed, seen as punishment
posting. - Weaknesses in internal controls over local cash
collections - Multiple bank accounts, frequently not reconciled
to accounting records.
Planning Budgeting Comprehensiveness Classifica
tion Projection
Oversight
Regulatory Framework Legal architecture - Inter
Government fiscal relations
Budget Execution Procurement Treasury
Mgmt Internal Controls
External Audit
Accounting Reporting
14Some Outstanding Issues Accounting, Reporting
Public Debt and Asset Management
- Cash basis and single entry accounting.
- Confusion over accounting standards due to
inconsistency between MOF and Home Affairs
guidelines - Very weak capacity that do not allow move to
improved accounting practices and accrual
accounting - Reporting restricted to Budget realization
reports. - Timeliness of reporting improving, now legally
required within 4 months of year end. But
reliability?
Planning Budgeting Comprehensiveness Classificat
ion Projection
Oversight
Regulatory Framework - Legal architecture -
Inter Government fiscal relations
Budget Execution Procurement Treasury
Mgmt Internal Controls
External Audit
Accounting Reporting Standards Timeliness Reliabi
lity
15Some Outstanding Issues External Audit
Public Debt and Asset Management
- Supreme Audit Institution (BPK) is able to cover
only 50 of sub-national governments. - Audit Reports not yet publicly disclosed.
- Audit mandate primarily to certify Budget
Realization Reports of governments. Performance
audits not yet developed.
Planning Budgeting Comprehensiveness Classificat
ion Projection
Oversight
Regulatory Framework - Legal architecture -
Inter Government fiscal relations
Budget Execution Procurement Treasury
Mgmt Internal Controls
External Audit
Accounting Reporting Standards Timeliness Reliabi
lity
16Some Outstanding Issues Oversight
Public Debt and Asset Management
- Limited capacity of Local Legislatures to review
budgets or review performance - Public disclosure of financial and procurement
virtually non-existent. Budget documents
difficult to read and accessible. - Civil Society and slow slowly flexing their power
Planning Budgeting Comprehensiveness Classificat
ion Projection
Oversight
Regulatory Framework - Legal architecture -
Inter Government fiscal relations
Budget Execution Procurement Treasury
Mgmt Internal Controls
External Audit
Accounting Reporting Standards Timeliness Reliabi
lity
17Some Outstanding Issues Public Debt and Asset
Management
Public Debt and Asset Management
- No consolidated information on regional public
assets - Local Public debt requires central (MOF)
approval. - Municipal debt market very nascent
- Few formal records on local public debt
-
Planning Budgeting Comprehensiveness Classificat
ion Projection
Oversight
Regulatory Framework - Legal architecture -
Inter Government fiscal relations
Budget Execution Procurement Treasury
Mgmt Internal Controls
External Audit
Accounting Reporting Standards Timeliness Reliabi
lity
18PFM Reforms Critical Success Factors
- (i) Commitment to reform Supply side vs Demand
side - Stimulating the demand for reforms. Role
of civil society, media and donors. Change
champions. - (ii) Identification of functional reform
priorities thinking small. Which end of cycle to
start? Synchronizing with central reforms. - (iii) Adequacy of the roll-out plan and the
sequencing of reforms clearly defining
benchmarks and milestonesmodular approach.
Should reform of budget preparation precede or
follow budget execution reforms? - (iv) Adequacy of technical solution use of
technology, aligned with institutional reforms.
But change in business processes bigger
challenge. - (v) Adequacy of capacity building activities
capacity to absorb and then sustain reforms. - (vi) Realism of short, medium, and long-term cost
estimates.
19How the Bank has responded in Indonesia
challenges and opportunities
- Challenge How to reorganize and work with 400
plus SNGs with weak capacity, and unfamiliar with
the Bank, poor fiduciary environment and
incomplete decentralization policy framework - Strategic organization
- Indonesia CAS FY2004-2007, cross-cutting focus on
SNGs through multi-sector local government
platform group-estimated lending 400-600 million
over current CAS - Coordinated policy advice dialogue and analysis
through dedicated decentralization team - Capacity Building
- Coordinated capacity building program through WBI
and partnership with other donors (DFID, Dutch)
20Approach and Response
- Continue to consolidate National reform.
- GFMRAP APL to lock in reforms at National Level
- Sub-national Lens on Country Diagnostic Work
- Regional PER to provide sub-national component
- Cross-sectoral Reform Loans
- Series of sub-national local governance reform
projects with reform minded districts and
cities targeting capacity building, TA in
procurement, FM, budget transparency and
accountability, and improving local investment
climate - Sectoral projects which build in governance
reform at local institutions (e.g. Water
Utilities, Higher Education Institutes) - PFM Measurement Toolkit under development
21Sub National Measurement Framework for Good
Financial Governance
- Measurement framework and toolkit under
development - Toolkit measure integrity of processes at each
stage of PFM spectrum - Design will provide Snapshot and Trajectory
Scorecard - PFM Toolkit will embed PFM outcomes in a wider
sectoral context
Key Outcomes Public Service Delivery Reduced
Corruption Effective Governance Structures and
Processes
Good Financial Governance
Budget Formulation
External Audit
Oversight
Budget Execution
Accounting Reporting
22Thank you!