option

1
(No Transcript)
2
The characteristic of GVOP

• 4.3.1 targets the local governments modernisation
• To achieve client centered and service based
  operation
• reach the CLBPS level 3. relevant to the EU
  recommendations at L.G.

• 4.3.2. the support for profit us of local
  muncipalities data assets

Priority in amount of funding
80 vs 20
3
Some historical facts

• in the first round, 3 big cities/regions has won
• In the beginning of planning it has said, that
  4-5 pilot cities,
• small regions will have the chance to develop a
  system
• Others would adapt from these systems
• The first planned amount of money was 7.6 million
  E

4

• Source after re-planning the project

5

• Amount of support in 4.3.2

6
Some criteria
Some criteria

• Local governments and their groups were elegible,
  if they represent more than 10,000 as inhabitants
• Related to public services, they will achieve the
  EU recommendations CLBPS level 2 for SMEs
• Those, who has targeted the CLBPS level 4 in any
  levels could have an advanced position

7
The results of 4.3.1

• By the result of the call, various muncipalities,
  districts and newly formed plannig areas (Small
  regions) has enterd to the call with a diverse IT
  infrastructure and knowledge background
• From 56 applicants 29 received funding

8
Results on a map
9
Some notes about the enviroment

• Small regions are quite newly formed (,
  muncipalities-politicians don't have too much of
  working experience with each other
• By the result of area based P.A. Reform, 7
  plannig-statistical region has birth. The aim is
  economical development, coordination and the
  receive of EU funds. The result is
  decentralization, tasks and scope of authority
  reorganization.

10

• Many of them has never managed a complex IT
  development project
• The KET, containing the general rules governing
  the procedures and services of public
  administration authorities has started to put in
  use recently, put online administration affaires
  on an equal footing with traditional
  administration affairs

11
Still enviroment issues

• Only a few applicant has a continous development
  strategy on IT
• The existing systems are heterogenous, sometimes
  binded into one companies development
• There is very low level of integration of the
  systems
• The culture of horizontal cooperation is somehow
  missing in most of the local muncipalities
• Most of L.G. Has a sadly bad decision making
  structure

12

• Challenges for both
• Political factors lack of commitment from the
  leaders, and administration has not put into
  picture
• Conecptual problems - there is no support for the
  workers of the L.G., which means, thay have to
  provide a lot of extra during and after working
  ours from the beginning of the project till the
  end
• Fear of loosing autonomy by the local governments
• Negotiation and management difficulties
• Map chaos for GIS based property applications

13

• Alternative results
• The enviroment has become really unstable for
  having a good deal by the factors mentioned
  before- both for companies and muncipalities
• Some core elements of the call (integration) has
  become endangered by the large number of
  sub-contractors
• The lack of training at the local gov. level has
  produced an intensive setback for the projects

14

• Old HR and IT management truths
• A few projects piloted is better, than financing
  a lot with medium or small amount of money
• Continous IT plan development can help to tackle
  obstacles of later developments
• Strong commitment to standards at the beginning
  could be the bridge for later success on
  interoperability
• Making the staff of the L.G. prepared to work in
  teams, horizontally and geographicall is must (in
  small regional projects).
• The training and education in right time of a
  project manager is essential factor of the
  success of getting what you want

15

• and again
• Politicians also have to learn a bit IT and HR!
• Study visits can help to find what to follow and
  what not to
• Browsing around and testing applications on the
  web (particularly web 2.0) could help to create
  human friendly applications by non-developer
  partners (L.G. Staff)?
• Involving expert outsiders is a good investment
• Cooperation in the marketing of e-services could
  be a cost reducement factor for L.G.'s.

16

• Some extra notes
• ASP (appilcation service providers) services
  could be the best, if the small regional
  differences has been investigated before
• Building cooperation between small regions in IT
  is better soon
• Worth to have a (part-)startegy on
  e-administration introduction
• Leadership information and decision support
  systems, knowledge management

17

• Thank you for you attention!
• I do welcome the questions now
• or later personally or by e-mail at
• madcs_at_option.hu