Title: Lesson Study in Mathematics
1Lesson Study in Mathematics
Camden School Improvement Success for all
- Nigel Bufton
- Anna Middleton
- Rachel Fort
2Context
Camden School Improvement Success for all
- Camden sought to develop Lesson Study approach
across primary schools - Keen to improve progress in mathematics across
Years 2, 3 and 4 - Invited group of 7 schools to participate
- Importance of head teachers involvement
- Schools meet half-termly, self funded
- Develop case studies to share practice
3Progress
Camden School Improvement Success for all
- First meeting with heads and teachers
- Schools identified focus on learning from
- Core Skills of Number
- Language, dialogue
- Problem Solving
- Ongoing input of ideas to explore
- Updates on learning and practices
- Focus on writing case study
- Phase 2 schools about to be invited
4How Lesson Study has helped to improve learning
in mathematics
Camden School Improvement Success for all
5Beckford Primary School
- Inner-city school
- 453 pupils on roll
- 42 eligible for FSM/ Pupil Premium
- 67 of pupils do not have English as a first
language - 19 of pupils are on the SEND register
- Attainment low on entry
- Progress over KS2 is improving
6Focus and Aims for lesson studyTalk in
Mathematics
- Our aims were that our children would be able to
- talk confidently about learning and explain
thinking. - make links across learning and derive new facts
from know secure facts. - We wanted to use the project to
- generate resources and ideas that best supported
children with EAL. - explore the way pupils learn, thorough discussion
and explanation of their mathematical thinking
and reasoning.
7Our lesson study format was flexible to suit our
needs and focus
- Who? Maths Subject Leader/Year 2 class teacher,
parallel class teacher - What? Lessons with different foci but planned for
maximum maths talk and explanations - Where? Year 2, observing children from parallel
class - When? 3 lesson cycle, over a 2 month period
- Why? A need to identify barriers to embedded
learning - How? Class teacher cover made easier with
supportive Leadership team and available GTP
student
8Lesson outlines
- Lesson 1 Mental Maths session Odd and Even
- star words for key vocabulary to include in
explanations - Sentence prompts I know..because I knowso
is not - Conclusion Lack of structure to childrens
explanations prompts needed. Without the frames
find it difficult to structure thinking. With
frames, the thinking is modelled. Was excellent
way to assess true understanding of the concept
e.g. Its a little bit odd! - Lesson 2 Reasoning about number, finding
possibilities - Envelope challenge to find hidden numbers with
differentiated clues, clues given sequentially
and then reasoned as to which numbers can be
eliminated - Sentence prompts I know..because I knowso
is not - Developing resilience in approaching a problem
- Conclusion Children could answer questions like
How do you know that? or Can you explain your
answer? using the frames as starting point.
Developed possibilities. - Lesson 3 Division
- Contextualised examples involving making into
groups and the link main back with earlier x
learning. Use of I know ... so prompts, oral
rehearsal alongside practical solving - Conclusion Using context that children
understand and beginning practically whilst
developing language alongside meant a quicker
move to using abstract symbols than with previous
Year 2 class. Oral rehearsal gives children
confidence very useful AFL.
9What has worked for us?
- Speaking prompts we used
- I knowso ...
- I knowbecause...
- ...is not
- ...is not but...is...because...
- Set high expectations through
- - Framing explanations
- - Full sentence responses
- Accurate vocabulary, explanations
- Star words to be included in explanations
- Allowing sufficient thinking time
10What has worked for us?
- Talk rich activities planned e.g. More opening
ended/using and applying activities/supportive
grouping - Greater ownership of assessing own learning and
next steps - Shared language - Speaking prompts used
throughout school now and in other curriculum
areas e.g. Explanations of character I
knowbecause - Emphasis on inverse relationships and links to
known facts - Maths opportunities beyond the maths lesson
11Impact?
- Greater confidence in approaching and talking
about maths - More accurate assessment of childrens
understanding - More secure with inverse relationships, use of
known facts to derive new facts - Increasingly making links across mathematics
- Talk prompts adopted as whole school focus -
noticeable improvement from Summer group of
children to Autumn term group increasing
confidence and articulation with introduction
into Year 1 - Whole school use of shared language
- Whole school use of tested activities
- What next?
- Lesson study extended to other year groups as a
key to identifying gaps in childrens
understanding and barriers to learning.
12Carlton Primary School
- Inner-city school
- 400 pupils on roll,
- 79 eligible for FSM/ Pupil Premium,
- 75 of pupils do not have English as a first
language - 35 of pupils are on the SEND register
- 79Historically low but rising attainment
- Significant progress KS1 to 2 last year
13Focus and Aims for lesson study
- We wanted to use the project to
- identify barriers in number for those stuck
children - identify why some children were having so much
difficulty in using a number line - Our aims were that our children
- could overcome the barriers that were holding
them back
14How our lesson study operated
- Who? Maths Subject Leader, experienced Year 3
teacher, NQT Year 4 teacher - What? Lessons with a focus on calculation and
place value - Why? Support core group of children struggling
with calculation and not making progress, a dip
in Year 3 that follows some children through to
Year 6 - Where? Year 3 class, taught by class teacher and
subject leader - When? 3 lesson cycle, over 2 terms
15Lesson outlines
- Lesson 1 Calculating with TU numbers
- Offered children a range of models, images to
represent 2-digit numbers and use for
calculations with 2-digit numbers - Wanted to investigate exactly what the
difficulties were - Conclusion our focus group had some shocking
gaps in their understanding and basic skills - we
didnt know what they didnt know! - Lesson 2 Breaking down skills needed for
calculating, splitting class according to need - Two mini lessons first adding multiples of 10,
second adding units to multiples of 10 - Wanted to go back to basics with focus children
where understanding was muddled - Conclusion stuck children need precision
teaching splitting according to their needs
worked well - NB Before Lesson 3, focus children had additional
intervention from subject leader - Lesson 3 Applying skills to data handling
- - Children calculated with 2 digit numbers
through interpreting a bar chart question
language - Wanted to investigate impact of intervention on
focus children - Conclusion improved recall of number facts made
huge difference, more competent calculating
improved understanding of place value?
16What worked?
- Time and space
- Lesson study gave us the time and space to
really observe the children and unpick their
difficulties - Breaking down skills
- Required careful thought about number of
separate skills needed for a simple calculation
each part needs to be mastered - Intervention group
- Children most at risk of not making progress
given opportunity to catch up put them in a
much stronger position - Matching teaching effectively to gaps
- Teaching more needs led different groups can
go off objective if thats what they need to
support learning
17Wider impact
- Key skills
- Identified importance of key skills such as
number facts and place value, to ensure children
make genuine progress throughout school - Progression
- Dialogue with current Year 2 teachers on how to
avoid same difficulties being repeated - Wider professional development
- Lesson Study rolled out across school every
teacher involved in some Lesson Study focus
18Camden School ImprovementSuccess for all
What factors contributed to a successful lesson
study group?
- Supportive Leadership team
- Two-form entry school was useful in having a
partner from the same year group. - Cover to allow observation (e.g. GTP student)
- Time to feedback the same day
- PPA time used to reflect on findings
- Continued focus/theme through lessons, allowing
it to develop - Trying something new that wouldnt be done in
normal practice - After school staff meeting time given to group
meetings for review, sharing and further planning - Working with same class for consistency
- Subject leader able to share findings beyond year
group
19Camden School ImprovementSuccess for all
What to avoid?
- Going alone without the support of senior staff
- Having too many people involved at once
- Not providing participants with sufficient
explanation about or background to the purpose of
Lesson Study - Treating the process as separate learning
sessions needs continuation between lessons to
see development over time - Not sharing the responsibility for planning and
delivering the lesson as the process unfolds - Focusing planning on the teaching rather than
expected learning - Observing teaching and not learning of children
- Delaying post-lesson discussions and review
- Being too cautious