FEEM GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE EUROPEAN CODE STRUCTURE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 78
About This Presentation
Title:

FEEM GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE EUROPEAN CODE STRUCTURE

Description:

feem guidance note on the european code structure upgrade of feem guidance note on the european code structure after several ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:373
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 79
Provided by: Hans2173
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FEEM GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE EUROPEAN CODE STRUCTURE


1
FEEM GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE EUROPEAN CODE
STRUCTURE
2
UPGRADE OF FEEM GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE
EUROPEAN
CODE STRUCTUREAfter several meetings of the
Security Working Group FEEM finally agreed on the
modifications and approved the final version at
our March 2013 meeting in Brussels. In April FEEM
distributed the document to its members
end-user organisations (e.g. UEPG, EASSP,
Euromines, EURACOAL, EFFEE, Eurocement) and to
the EU Commission, Notified Bodies and Competent
Authorities. The text with its appendices was
edited on FEEMs home-page and it was also
officially published on the COMMISSIONS
HOME-PAGE in JUNE 2013. This has got official and
regulatory character now and will enable LAW
ENFORCING BODIES and PUBLIC AUTHORITIES to work
according to FEEM standards.You can down-load
the revised document on FEEMs web-site.
3
EUROPEAN TRACK TRACE CODE
The UN Committee of Experts on the Transport of
Dangerous Goods and on the Globally Harmonized
System of Classification and Labelling of
Chemicals (Sub-Committee of Experts on the
Transport of Dangerous Goods) have met in Geneva
on 23 June 02 July 2013 for their forty-fifth
session. Under Item XX of the agenda they
proposed a HARMONIZED INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR
EXPLOSIVES TRACEABILITY MARKINGS The
sub-committee is requested to add a new paragraph
1.4.4, Provisions for Unique Identification of
Class 1 Explosives (when required by National
Authority), to Chapter 1.4, Security Provisions,
of the Model Regulations. The paragraph 1.4.4
is identical to the European Track Trace
regulations and matches the FEEMs coding
structure.
4
EUROPEAN TRACK TRACE CODE (cont.)
During the latest meeting of the EU Explosives
Working Group on 18 October 2013 the US IME
presented a room document setting out its
preliminary proposals to the forty-fifth session
in mid-2014 of the Sub-Committee of Experts on
the Transport of Dangerous Goods of the UN
Committee of Experts on the Transport of
Dangerous Goods and on the Globally Harmonized
System of Classification and Labelling of
Chemicals, for a harmonised format for
traceability markings based on the EU FORMAT and
the FEEM GUIDANCE.
4
5
EUROPEAN TRACK TRACE CODE (cont.)
FEEM is all in favour towards such a harmonized
marking format which enhances the security of
explosives on a global level and it is of course
of practical and economic value to the European
explosives industry.
6
EUROPEAN TRACK TRACE CODE (cont.)
  • HOWEVER, FEEM PROPOSED SOME CHANGES TO THE IME
    PAPER
  • Unique identification that shall be marked on or
    firmly affixed to each explosive article
    concerned and each smallest packaging unit, in A
    DURABLE WAY AND SO TO ENSURE THAT IT IS CLEARLY
    LEGIBLE.  MARKINGS SHALL NOT BE EASY TO REMOVE
    AND BE AS PERMANENT AS TECHNICALLY AND
    PRACTICALLY FEASIBLE ( IME text)
  • FEEM suggests to delete SMALLEST PACKAGING
    UNIT, because this term is unknown in ADR.
    Within the terminology of ADR a packing unit is
    defined as sales-packaging or
    outer-packaging. The IME proposal could be
    interpreted in such a way, that the unique
    identifications have to be printed or labelled on
    the sales packagings as well. The EU-Directive
    however, is mentioning associated labels for
    each case of detonators, cartridges

7
EUROPEAN TRACK TRACE CODE (cont.)
  • The wording "...SHALL NOT BE EASY TO REMOVE AND
    BE AS PERMANENT AS TECHNICALLY AND PRACTICALLY
    FEASIBLE could be tricky e.g.
  • Does a simple adhesive tag on detonator wires or
    shock-tubes comply with this requirement "shall
    not easy to be remove" if it could easily be
    removed with a knife, a scissors or by other
    means? There are very expensive multi-layer
    plastic labels with cutting protection on the
    market, which also offer only a limited
    protection. However, they are state-of-the-art
    and reflect what is technically and practically
    feasible today.
  • Is a normal inkjet-paint for the printing on
    cartridges sufficient or does only a special ink
    with insoluble ink-particles reflects the todays
    state of technology?
  • Does the industry have to apply
    state-of-technology adhesive labels with a
    special hard-to-remove adhesive? (which are
    extremely expensive but of course such special
    glues are available on the market)?

7
8
EUROPEAN TRACK TRACE CODE (cont.)
  • FEEM SUGGESTED TO DELETE THESES PASSAGES
    COMPLETELY BECAUSE IT MIGHT ONLY PROVOKE USELESS
    DISCUSSIONS AND PROBLEMS.

8
9
A modified paper will be presented at the next UN
meeting in Geneva in June 2014. If it is accepted
by the committee it will most probably enter into
the Orange Book and subsequently into ADR (Accord
Européen relatif au transport international des
marchandises Dangereuses par Route) in 2016.
EUROPEAN TRACK TRACE CODE (cont.)
10
  • SECURITY VETTING OF PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN THE
    WHOLE SUPPLY CHAIN OF EXPLOSIVES AND CBRN
    MATERIALS
  • Within the 48 measures to enhance the security
    of explosives in Europe was the intention to
    consider possible measures at the EU level to
    adopt a harmonized pre-Employment Background
    Check (EBC) to be used in all Member States.

11
SECURITY VETTING OF PERSONNEL
  • The Commission made a study in order to give an
    overview of existing policies and practices in
    the area of personnel vetting and background
    checks in the EU and to explore areas where
    possible policy initiatives at EU level would
    have added value in terms of enhancing security.
    This relates to personnel dealing professionally
    with explosives and high-risk CBRN material,
    including external workers, contractors and
    personnel who may have access to sensitive
    information that could be misused for malicious
    purposes. The study covered 15 Member States and
    approximately 85 of the EU27 population.

12
SECURITY VETTING OF PERSONNEL
  • A specific objective of the study was to analyze
    the EU dimension and cross-border aspects
    connected with security vetting / background
    checking practices. In particular given that the
    FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS is a fundamental
    principle of the EU and a policy chapter of the
    ACQUIS COMMUNAUTAIRE of the European Union, an
    authority in one Member State should be able to
    verify that an individual from another Member
    State holds an appropriate and current clearance/
    certificate. However, although this principle is
    enshrined in Article 45 of the TREATY ON THE
    FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, the study
    established that this is currently not possible
    across all Member States for many employers. As
    an example, the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) in
    different Member States apply differing criteria,
    depth of checks and period of validity and so to
    ensure compliance with the principle, it is
    necessary to calibrate them against each other.

13
SECURITY VETTING OF PERSONNEL
  • The overall key recommendation of the study and
    the first in the group of Best Practice
    Recommendations is
  • To adopt a harmonized pre-Employment Background
    Check (EBC) to be used in all EU- Member States.

14
SECURITY VETTING OF PERSONNEL
  • The Study identified that a harmonized best
    practice EBC standard is already used widely in
    both the private sector and the public sector in
    a majority of Member States. Research has also
    shown that regulated industries in the UK, USA,
    Canada, Australia and the EU e.g. Nuclear,
    EXPLOSIVE and Global Telecommunication industries
    use their own harmonized robust EBC standards.

15
SECURITY VETTING OF PERSONNEL
  • The overarching principle of the EBC is
    confirmation of the following elements
  • Identity and address
  • Nationality and immigration status (including
    entitlement to undertake the work in question)
  • Employment history (minimum past 3 years) and
    details of education
  • Financial check through a recognized credit
    reference bureau
  • Unspent criminal convictions or other police
    checks
  • Checking of at least 2 character referees
  • Additionally, prospective employees should be
    required to give a reasonable account of any
    significant periods (six months or more in the
    past 3 years) of time spent abroad.

16
SECURITY VETTING OF PERSONNEL
  • Concerning the EXPLOSIVES INDUSTRY the Experts
    stated
  • European legislation regulates the physical and
    personnel security of virtually all aspects of
    the EXPLOSIVES INDUSTRY. There is recognition
    that diversion of raw materials and finished
    product for terrorist activity is a real threat.
    Consequently, personnel screening, regulation and
    audit are routine in some Member States and there
    is a ready acceptance of the need for these
    measures. Where fully adopted, the EXPLOSIVES
    INDUSTRY in some Member States demonstrates BEST
    PRACTICE which could be adopted across the CBR
    industries.

17
SECURITY VETTING OF PERSONNEL
  • In this context CEFIC has developed and
    published a Security Vulnerability Assessment
    Tool
  • The Security Vulnerability Assessment Toolkit
    (SVA) of Industrial Sites seeks to identify those
    risks which may result in catastrophic effects,
    it offers a methodology to both modify the risk
    and suggestions for controls which may mitigate
    or reduce the risks. The SVA TOOLKIT develops a
    risk log which will record information on which
    risks the company chooses to mitigate and which
    to accept. Ultimately the only mitigation of the
    risk available may be through financial means by
    accessing enhanced specialist insurance premiums
    and even these may still leave some residual risk
    with the company, however the SVA Toolkit will
    ensure that the full extent of these residual
    risks will have been identified.
  • You find more information about this tool on
    FEEMs web-site.

18
UPDATE ON SCEPYLT (paperless European transfer
process), THE PAN-EUROPEAN INFORMATION SYSTEM ON
EXPLOSIVES CONTROL TO PREVENT AND FIGHT AGAINST
TERRORISM, AND ITS FUTURE

The Spanish SCEPYLT coordinator recalled some of
the obstacles to implementation of the system in
the period up to the end of 2013, when the DG
Home grant expired. Only eight Member States had
made financial contributions to the project
(13,847 EUR each), which had a final budget of
around 980,000 in 2013 (80 funded by DG Home).
Since then the system continued to be used 12
Member States were connected, with just 5 using
it (Spain, France, Portugal, Belgium and the
Netherlands), 3 others (Germany, Poland and UK)
using it on a test basis and Italy to start
testing soon. In 2013 about 75 approvals had
been granted for transports with about 50 pending.
18
19
UPDATE ON SCEPYLT (cont.)
  • Italy explained that further training of
    prefecture staff would be necessary before Italy
    could start the operational phase. National
    funding for this would be facilitated if the
    system was linked to TRACEABILITY, which Italy
    saw as an important objective of the system, with
    access provided to operators to input the
    necessary data.
  • Portugal confirmed that it was using the system,
    which was working well. It no longer used a
    paper-based system for approvals involving other
    SCEPYLT users. Extending the system to cover
    TRACEABILITY would however require careful
    reflection.

20
UPDATE ON SCEPYLT (cont.)
  • Germany also had concerns about extending the
    system to TRACEABILITY. Internal transfers would
    not be covered by the system and it would be
    difficult to manage, given the large volume of
    data that would be involved (e.g. as regards
    shipments of fuses and detonators). Germany also
    pointed out that the vast majority of transfer
    approvals continued to be paper-based and
    wondered whether fees may be a barrier to greater
    use of the system. The chairman noted, that it
    would be useful if Member States could provide
    updated information about their fee structures
    for transfer approvals so that there was an
    overview on this.

21
UPDATE ON SCEPYLT (cont.)
  • The UK said that it hoped to resolve connectivity
    issues and be able to use the system shortly. It
    echoed the concerns about using SCEPYLT as an
    instrument for traceability at this time.
  • The representatives from FEEM, Switzerland and
    EFEE reiterated the doubts expressed about
    including traceability and questioned what useful
    purpose would be served linking such information
    to the transfer approval system.

22
IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMISSION DIRECTIVE
2008/43/EC SETTING UP A SYSTEM FOR THE
IDENTIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY OF EXPLOSIVES FOR
CIVIL USES
STATUS OF PREPARATIONS BY INDUSTRY, INCLUDING
GUIDANCE FEEM reported to the Commission, that
from 5 April 2013 all explosives manufactured by
FEEM member companies are being marked in
accordance with the Directive. FEEM is assisting
end-user organisations like UEPG in their efforts
to ensure that customers are aware of the system
and its requirements. All member companies are
using FEEM's European Code Structure, the
guidance on which was updated in April 2013 (EU
Doc 5.a.1) to cover not only the mandatory
information requirements, but also
recommendations to distributors and re-packagers
to voluntarily use THREE LETTER CODES to identify
them. FEEM also offered to develop a
password-protected software application (APP)
that would enable competent national authorities
to identify the manufacturing site for each
explosive, providing information about the EU
manufacturer or importer, their address and
contact details, etc.
22
23
ITEM 8IME Letter by Debra Satkowiak
24
Our old friend Chris Ronay has retired from IME.
Chris became the president of the IME on October
1, 1994. He came to the Institute following a
career of 23 years as a Special Agent of the FBI.
Chris sent these words to FEEM In many ways
this will be a melancholy affair.  IME has been
such a great part of my life for nearly 20 years
that Im not sure how to deal with leaving it all
behind.  It seems like a replay of my first
retirement from the FBI, leaving friends and
colleagues from many sectors.
Chris Ronay
25
During my time with IME, no other organization
has held the influence and importance for me as
FEEM.  Most remarkably you Hans, John Dolan and
Frank Murray have embodied the Federation and
become so close to IME.  For this and your
friendship I am most grateful and thank you.  May
we always stay in touch!
26
HIS SUCCESSOR AS PRESIDENT IS DEBRA SATKOWIAK.
27
Press Release by the IME
The Institute of Makers of Explosives, the safety
and security organization of the commercial
explosives industry, is very pleased to announce
the hiring of Debra Satkowiak as IMEs new
President.  Until recently, Debra had been the
Chief  of the Firearms and Explosives Industry
Division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF).  Deb has had
an outstanding career with the ATF.  No one knows
more about explosives regulation or better
understands the need for industry and government
to work together to achieve mutually shared
explosives safety and security objectives than
Deb Satkowiak, stated Tim OBrien, President of
Detotec North America, Inc. and Chairman of the
IME.  He added, As the new President of IME,
Debs ability to encourage and foster cooperation
between the industry and government agencies will
be a key strength moving forward.
28
Press Release by the IME
Ms. Satkowiak served for 23 years in a variety of
positions at ATF, culminating in her appointment
to the Firearms and Explosives Industry Division
in 2010.   Over those 23 years, Debs experience
encompassed field inspections, advanced training,
development of explosives policy and regulations,
media and legislative affairs, and executive
leadership.  Her background, which includes
extensive interaction with blasters and other
direct users of commercial explosives,
distributors, manufacturers, consultants, and
company executives, has provided her with a sound
background in the technical aspects of the
products IMEs member companies handle every day.
29
Unfortunately Debra will not be able to attend
this FEEM AGM in Warsaw.  She writes, that she is
disappointed, but a combination of her new
arrival to the job and preparing for IMEs Spring
Meeting beginning of June is preventing her from
traveling to Europe. However, she sends this
message to FEEM 
30
  • FEEM WORKING GROUPS
  • Item 9
  • THE FEEM WORKING GROUPS

31
  • FEEM WORKING GROUPS
  • 4 FEEM Working Groups have
  • been active in 2013 and 2014
  • HEALTH AND SAFETY
  • TRANSPORT
  • BLASTING PRACTICES
  • TRACK TRACE AD-HOC WORKING PARTY (2013)

32
HEALTH AND SAFETY WORKING GROUP
  • Members
  • Severine Gautrau, Davey Bickford, France
  • Jean-Paul Reynaud, Titanobel, France
  • Maurice Delaloye, SSE, Switzerland
  • Martin Klein, DynaEnergetics, Germany
  • Jaroslav Konarik, Austin Detonators, Czech
    Republic
  • Hans Karlström, Kimit, Sweden
  • Jose Castresana, Maxam, Spain
  • Xavier Lopez Amigo, Maxam, Spain
  • Walter Panchyrz, Orica, Germany
  • Thierry Rousse, EPC, France
  • Janusz Drzyzga, Nitroerg, Poland
  • David White, EPC, U.K.
  • Matti Vähäpassi, Forcit, Finland
  • Marin Dorobantu, Weatherford Atlas, Romania


33
HEALTH AND SAFETY WORKING GROUP
  • The Group has met two times since the 2013 AGM
  • on 16 September 2013 in Budapest
  • on 25 March 2014 in Prague

34
HEALTH AND SAFETY WORKING GROUP
  • The main subjects which were discussed are
  • Trace Track Directive
  • Practical experience in production application
  • The IPPC process the impact on explosives sites
  • Elaborating the Best Available Techniques
    Reference (BREF) documents concerning HS
  • New environmental requirements for IPPC
    production sites
  • Precursors Guidance
  • Preparation of a new FEEM guidance note on
    categorisation classification of incidents (CGP
    32)
  • Near misses unusual occurrences
  • Exchange of experiences learnings

35
HEALTH AND SAFETY WORKING GROUP
  • HS Group Chairmanship
  • Since 2011 the chairmanship of this group has
    been vacant.
  • The last chairman was Pat Cosgove from Irish
    Industrial
  • Explosives, who left the European explosives
    business in 2011.
  • Since then the SG has taken over the duties of
    this job.
  • However it is of importance for the
    sustainability of this group
  • to select a member of this group to this
    position.

36
HEALTH AND SAFETY WORKING GROUP
  • HS Group Chairmanship
  • The group suggested Jean-Paul Reynaud from
    Titanobel as
  • their new Chairman.
  • Jean-Paul was elected unanimously by all the
    delegates. He
  • accepted the vote and the group and the SG
    congratulated
  • Jean-Paul to this important and responsible
    position.

37
  • BLASTING PRACTISE WORKING GROUP
  • MEMBERSHIP
  • Mark Pegden EPC UK
  • Frank Hammelmann Orica, Germany
  • Marcos Perena Maxam, Spain
  • Knut Tanbergmoen Forcit, Norway

38
BLASTING WORKING GROUP
  • The Blasting Practice Working Group has met
    twice since the last AGM 2013
  • On 17 September 2013 in Prague, Czech Rep.
  • On 27 March 2014 in Brussels, Belgium


39
BLASTING PRACTISE WORKING GROUP
  • The main working subjects were
  • Finalization of a new Technical Bulletin Safe
    Operation on the Bench
  • New TG 12 "Loading of bulk explosives
  • Learnings from blasting related near misses
    unusual occurrences.

40
TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP
  • Membership
  • Bengt Folkesson (Chairman), EPC Group, Sweden
    (until Sept. 2013)
  • Marlies Becker, Orica Europe, Germany
  • Francois-Xavier Dugres, Davey Bickford, France
  • Marcin Slimak, Nitroerg, Poland
  • Jon Jones, Austin International, UK
  • Ivana Jakubkova, Austin Detonators, CZ
  • Martin Klein, DynaEnergetics, Germany
  • Jean-Paul Reynaud, Titanobel, France
  • Janusz Drzyzga, Nitroerg, Poland
  • Maurice Delaloye, SSE, Switzerland
  • Rafael Lopez-Loriente, Maxam, Spain
  • Marin Dorobantu, Weatherford Atlas, Romania
  • Joanna Flak, Nitroerg, Poland

41
TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP
  • The FEEM Transport and Storage Working Group has
    met
  • two times since the last AGM in 2013.
  • on 16 September 2013 in Budapest
  • on 25 March 2014 in Prague

42
TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP
  • The main working subjects were
  • Directives 93/15 2008/43 and its impact on the
    Supply Chain Processes
  • FEEM Guidance Note XML fields ISO Code
  • Requirement for Transporters to Maintain Records
  • CLP Process related Directives and Regulations
  • Learnings from transport related incidents and
    accidents
  • Intra-EU transfer of explosives procedure for
    returned consignments
  • Status Of Preparations By Industry, Including
    Guidance
  • Trace Track Directive after implementation of
    1st step UEPGs (European Federations of
    Aggregate, Cement Mining Ind.) Action Plan
    regarding European process of cascading down to
    national end-user organisations.


43
TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP
  • The Transport Working Group is also dealing with
    a proposal by the European truck manufacturers to
    modify the existing ADR requirements concerning
    the construction of Type III vehicles and MEMUs
    (chapt. 9.2) regarding
  • Do away with the Battery Master Switch
    (9.2.2.3)!
  • Do away with the 24 Volts regulation (9.3.7.2)!
  • To 1) The intention to remove the Master Switch
    is not quite clear to us!
  • To 2) Here the background is the use of Xenon
    lights, which need much higher voltages!


44
TRANSPORT WORKING GROUP
  • ELECTION OF A NEW CHAIRLADY FOR THE TRANSPORT
    WORKING GROUP
  • Since Bengt Folkesson from EPC Nordic has
    retired from this Group it was necessary to elect
    a new chair.
  • Marlies Becker from Orica offered herself for
    election and she was voted unanimously by the
    delegates. The group and the SG congratulated
    Marlies and wished her lots of success in this
    important position.

45
Statistics 2013
ITEM 12 OF THE AGENDA
46
Explosives Detonator Statistic 2013
For several years FEEM has managed a confidential
statistics service for its members. It acts as a
trustee company in compliance with competition
laws. In order to estimate accurate annual sales
per product in Europe we need from you all your
best sales estimates from all the countries your
are represented in. We will consolidate your data
and give global figures of the European sales
estimate per product only to those companies
which provided figures. The numbers are based on
FEEM members input and represent the arithmetic
average of the reported country numbers.
47
Explosives 2013
48
Explosives Statistic 2013
  • The volume of explosives consumed (not
    manufactured!) in Europe (EU27 Norway
    Switzerland) in 2013 amounted to
  • 580.000 tons
  • This is 9 higher compared to 2012.

49
9,1
50
EXPLOSIVES DEVELOPMENT 1995 2013 (1.000 tons)
51
EXPLOSIVES MARKET BY SHARES (2013 ./. 2012)
52
(No Transcript)
53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
Detonators 2013
61
Detonator Statistic 2013
  • The amount of detonators consumed (not
    manufactured!) in Europe (EU27 Norway
    Switzerland) in 2013 amounted to
  • 61,870 mio. units
  • This is more or less the same than in 2012
    (61,132)

62
(No Transcript)
63
DETONATORS MARKET SHARES (mio. units)
64
(No Transcript)
65
(No Transcript)
66
(No Transcript)
67
Detonating Cords 2013
68
Explosive Production Sites Staff 2013
69

Item 12 of the Agenda (RE)ELECTION TO THE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
70
  • 1.) Re-election to the Executive Committee 2014
  • According to the 2 year rule and according to
    Article 7.2 of FEEMs Constitution the following
    Executives Committee Members have to step down at
    this meeting and stand for re-election
  • Gianni Facchinetti
  • Ulf Sjöblom
  • Vicente Huelamo

71
  • 1.) Re-election to the Executive Committee 2014
  • Gianni Facchinetti
  • Vicente Huelamo
  • Ulf Sjöblom
  • I would like to ask the Delegates for their
    votes
  • Votes Against
  • Votes For
  • Abstentions

72
2.) Election to the Executive Committee
  • The Executive Committee Member Stephen Connolly
    from Orica has stepped down from the Committee as
    of 4 October 2013 and has suggested co-opting
    Jeff Court, Vice-President Orica Europe to the
    Executive Committee according to Article 7.2 of
    FEEMs Constitution (CO-OPTION TO THE EXECUTIVE
    COMMITTEE). The Executive Committee has agreed
    unanimously to this process at their meeting on 4
    October 2013.
  • According to the Constitution Jeff has to step
    down at this meeting and has to offer himself for
    election.

73
2.) Election to the Executive Committee
  • Jeff Court
  • I would like to ask the Delegates for their
    votes
  • Votes Against
  • Votes For
  • Abstentions

74
Item 13CHANGE IN FEEMS PRESIDENCY
According to Articles 7.6 (ELECTION OF OFFICERS)
and 9.2 (TERM OF OFFICE) of the Constitution the
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE has elected a new President
and a new Vice-President from the members of the
Committee.
75
Item 13CHANGE IN FEEMS PRESIDENCY
After two years of excellent service Mr. Daniel
Antille from SSE, Switzerland will step down and
pass the Presidency on to Mr. Bertrand Pougny
from EPC, France.
76
Item 13CHANGE IN FEEMS PRESIDENCY
The Assembly welcomes the new officers and thanks
Daniel Antille for his endeavoring service with a
big applause.
77
ITEM 14Any other business ?
78
DATE AND PLACE OF THE NEXT ANNUAL GENERAL
MEETINGinRome, ItalyonWednesday, 03 June
2015a Gala Dinner on Tuesday, 02 June 2014
ITEM 15
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com