In the name of GOD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

In the name of GOD

Description:

Kneeling ability after total knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. ... Exclusion criteria: simultaneous OA of the hip and/or lumbar. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: acir150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: In the name of GOD


1
In the name of GOD
2
Kneeling ability after total knee replacement in
patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
  • M. Mardani Kivi
  • Guilan University of Medical Sciences

3
Osteoarthritis
  • 40 of the population over 70 years of age
    suffers from osteoarthritis of the knee and by
    the year 2020 this figure is expected to rise by
    66-100.

4
Treatment
5
Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • over 500,000 TKA being performed, on average, in
    the United States annually.

6
Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • In 2001, 171,335 primary TKA were performed.
  • By 2015, medical expenses for this procedure in
    the United States are calculated to increase to a
    staggering 40.8 billion.
  • Demand for primary TKA is projected to grow in
    the USA by 673 to 3.48 million procedures by
    2030.

7
Kneeling
8
Kneeling
  • Most of the functional scoring systems quoted in
    literature use pain, the ability to walk or to
    ascend and descend stairs, the use of a walking
    aid, etc as measurements of outcome. The ability
    to kneel is often ignored.

9
Aim of the Study
  • The lack of literature addressing the specific
    concerns of a large percentage of our patients
    with OA undergoing TKA, regarding the capacity to
    which they will be able to function
    post-operatively performing these tasks, has
    motivated us to investigate kneeling ability
    after TKA in patients with OA of the knee.

10
Methods and Materials
11
Methods and Materials
12
(No Transcript)
13
  • Group A and B were analyzed for changes in
    kneeling ability.

14
Results
  • Total patient population144?114 were possible to
    follow-up
  • Mean age 67.96.2 years (range52 to 81)
  • Sex 69 female (60.5), 45 male (39.5)
  • Mean follow-up length 26.72.4 months (Range14
    to 44)

15
Scoring
Score Pre-op 1-year f/up Final f/up P-value
VAS 9.24 0.7 1.82 1.04 2.01 1.19 plt0.0001
KSS 59.79 4.54 89.07 5.63 89.82 5.11 plt0.0001
FKS 59.57 4.48 87.72 5.21 88.23 5.36 plt0.0001
16
Kneeling results
17
Complications
18
Discussion
  • With the help of different measurement scales
    criteria (VAS, KSS, FKS), Our study showed a
    statistically significant improvement in
    functional outcome after TKA.
  • Similar to other studies
  • Ahmad Hafiz et al, 2011
  • Tahmasebi et al, 2009
  • Dierick et al, 2004

19
Factors affecting kneeling after TKA
20
Kneeling and prosthesis
  • A meta-analysis using results from 130 studies
  • Although more recent studies have shown data to
    be more in favor of PCL substituting prostheses.

21
Kneeling and surgical technique
22
Kneeling and cultural differences
  • Shoji et al. The unintentional passive ?exion
    exercise imparted by the Japanese sitting-style
    appears to be important in achieving and
    maintaining full knee ?exion after TKA.
  • In Iran eating traditionally on the ground and
    praying

23
Kneeling and misinformation
  • No study to date has supported that patients will
    do harm to their prostheses by kneeling
    repetitively.
  • Hamai et al. (2008)
  • Palmer et al. (2002)

24
Kneeling and misinformation
  • Radiographic studies have shown that forces
    exerted from the femur to knee joint

25
Kneeling and misinformation
  • The most recent studies showed that kneeling
    ability, when measured objectively, is greater
    than when measured subjectively after TKA.

26
Kneeling and misinformation
  • Jenkins et al. (2008) a single-blind randomized
    controlled trial? The improvement in
    patient-reported kneeling ability was thought to
    be due to the kneeling intervention provided and
    not to any of the previously reported barriers to
    kneeling such as scar position, numbness, range
    of ?exion, involvement of other joints, and pain.

27
With Regards
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com