Acute Appendicitis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

Acute Appendicitis

Description:

Acute Appendicitis – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:790
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: acir150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Acute Appendicitis


1
Acute Appendicitis
2
Epidemiology
  • The incidence of appendectomy appears to be
    declining due to more accurate preoperative
    diagnosis.
  • Despite newer imaging techniques, acute
    appendicitis can be very difficult to diagnose.

3
Appendicitis
  • The most common surgical condition of the abdomen
  • Lifetime occurrence of 7
  • Peak incidence 10-30y
  • The most common nonobstetric surgical
    intervention during pregnancy

4
Pathogenesis
  • Appendiceal lumen obstruction
  • lymphoid hyperplasia
  • fecaliths
  • parasites
  • foreign bodies
  • crohns disease
  • metastatic cancer
  • carcinoid syndrome

5
Pathophysiology
  • Acute appendicitis is thought to begin with
    obstruction of the lumen
  • Obstruction can result from food matter,
    adhesions, or lymphoid hyperplasia
  • Mucosal secretions continue to increase
    intraluminal pressure

6
Pathophysiology
  • Eventually the pressure exceeds capillary
    perfusion pressure and venous and lymphatic
    drainage are obstructed.
  • With vascular compromise, epithelial mucosa
    breaks down and bacterial invasion by bowel flora
    occurs.

7
Pathophysiology
  • Increased pressure also leads to arterial stasis
    and tissue infarction
  • End result is perforation and spillage of
    infected appendiceal contents into the peritoneum

8
Pathophysiology
  • Initial luminal distention triggers visceral
    afferent pain fibers, which enter at the 10th
    thoracic vertebral level.
  • This pain is generally vague and poorly
    localized.
  • Pain is typically felt in the periumbilical or
    epigastric area.

9
Pathophysiology
  • As inflammation continues, the serosa and
    adjacent structures become inflamed
  • This triggers somatic pain fibers, innervating
    the peritoneal structures.
  • Typically causing pain in the RLQ

10
Pathophysiology
  • The change in stimulation form visceral to
    somatic pain fibers explains the classic
    migration of pain in the periumbilical area to
    the RLQ seen with acute appendicitis.

11
Pathophysiology
  • Exceptions exist in the classic presentation due
    to anatomic variability of the appendix
  • Appendix can be retrocecal causing the pain to
    localize to the right flank
  • In pregnancy, the appendix ca be shifted and
    patients can present with RUQ pain

12
Pathophysiology
  • In some males, retroileal appendicitis can
    irritate the ureter and cause testicular pain.
  • Pelvic appendix may irritate the bladder or
    rectum causing suprapubic pain, pain with
    urination, or feeling the need to defecate
  • Multiple anatomic variations explain the
    difficulty in diagnosing appendicitis

13
symptoms
  • Pain RLQ / RUQ / Flank
  • Anorexia
  • Vomiting
  • Nausea
  • Pain migration
  • Fever

14
Physical examination
  • Tenderness RLQ
  • Rebound Guarding (peritoneal signs)
  • Rovsing sign
  • Dunphys sign
  • Psoas sign (retroperitoneal retrocecal appendix)
  • Obturator sign (pelvic appendix)
  • Rectal examination tenderness (cul-de-sac)
  • Low grade fever

15
Psoas sign
Obturator sign
16
History
  • Primary symptom abdominal pain
  • ½ to 2/3 of patients have the classical
    presentation
  • Pain beginning in epigastrium or periumbilical
    area that is vague and hard to localize

17
History
  • Associated symptoms indigestion, discomfort,
    flatus, need to defecate, anorexia, nausea,
    vomiting
  • As the illness progresses RLQ localization
    typically occurs
  • RLQ pain was 81 sensitive and 53 specific for
    diagnosis

18
History
  • Migration of pain from initial periumbilical to
    RLQ was 64 sensitive and 82 specific
  • Anorexia is the most common of associated
    symptoms
  • Vomiting is more variable, occuring in about ½ of
    patients

19
Physical Exam
  • Findings depend on duration of illness prior to
    exam.
  • Early on patients may not have localized
    tenderness
  • With progression there is tenderness to deep
    palpation over McBurneys point

20
Physical Exam
  • McBurneys Point just below the middle of a line
    connecting the umbilicus and the ASIS
  • Rovsings pain in RLQ with palpation to LLQ
  • Rectal exam pain can be most pronounced if the
    patient has pelvic appendix

21
Physical Exam
  • Additional components that may be helpful in
    diagnosis rebound tenderness, voluntary
    guarding, muscular rigidity, tenderness on rectal

22
Physical Exam
  • Psoas sign place patient in L lateral decubitus
    and extend R leg at the hip. If there is pain
    with this movement, then the sign is positive.
  • Obturator sign passively flex the R hip and knee
    and internally rotate the hip. If there is
    increased pain then the sign is positive

23
Physical Exam
  • Fever another late finding.
  • At the onset of pain fever is usually not found.
  • Temperatures gt39 C are uncommon in first 24 h,
    but not uncommon after rupture

24
Lab
  • CBC WBC ( 80 ? 45 )
  • CRP
  • Urinalysis - mild pyuria
  • mild proteinuria
  • mild hematuria

25
D.D.surgical gyneco
  • Renal stone
  • Gastroenteritis
  • Pancreatitis
  • Cholecystitis
  • Mesenteric adenitis
  • Hernia
  • Bowel obstruction
  • Preterm labor
  • Placenta abruptio
  • Chorioamnionitis
  • Adnexal torsion
  • Ectopic pregnancy
  • Pelvic inflammatory
  • Round lig. pain

26
Diagnostic problems
  • Position of appendix
  • normally 70 intraperitoneal
  • 30 pelvic, retroileal,
    retrocolic
  • pregnancy anatomical changes
  • gravid uterus ? displacement upward
  • outward ? flank pain (3rd trimester)
    (Baer,1932)
  • increased separation of peritoneum ? decreased
    perception of somatic pain and localization

27
Diagnostic problems
  • Symptoms complex physical changes
  • anorexia, nausea vomiting in normal
  • pregnancy
  • Lab relative leukocytosis
  • Imaging techniques

28
Diagnosis
  • Acute appendicitis should be suspected in anyone
    with epigastric, periumbilical, right flank, or
    right sided abd pain who has not had an
    appendectomy

29
Diagnosis
  • Women of child bearing age need a pelvic exam and
    a pregnancy test.
  • Additional studies CBC, UA, imaging studies

30
Diagnosis
  • CBC the WBC is of limited value.
  • Sensitivity of an elevated WBC is 70-90, but
    specificity is very low.
  • But, predictive value of high WBC is 92 and
    predictive value is 50
  • CRP and ESR have been studied with mixed results

31
Diagnosis
  • UA abnormal UA results are found in 19-40
  • Abnormalities include pyuria, hematuria,
    bacteruria
  • Presence of gt20 wbc per field should increase
    consideration of Urinary tract pathology

32
Imaging
  • KUB
  • Barium enema
  • Graded compression ultrasonography
  • Helical CT scan

33
Diagnosis
  • Imaging studies include X-rays, US, CT
  • Xrays of abd are abnormal in 24-95
  • Abnormal findings include fecalith, appendiceal
    gas, localized paralytic ileus, blurred right
    psoas, and free air
  • Abdominal xrays have limited use b/c the findings
    are seen in multiple other processes

34
Graded compression ultrasound
  • Normal appendix (lt6mm) rules out appendicitis.
  • Nonpregnant Sensitivity 85
  • specificity 92
  • Pregnant cecal displacement uterine
    imposition makes precise examination difficult
    (Williams,21 edition)

35
Diagnosis
  • Graded Compression US reported sensitivity 94.7
    and specificity 88.9
  • Basis of this technique is that normal bowel and
    appendix can be compressed whereas an inflamed
    appendix can not be compressed
  • DX noncompressible gt6mm appendix, appendicolith,
    periappendiceal abscess

36
Diagnosis
  • Limitations of US retrocecal appendix may not be
    visualized, perforations may be missed due to
    return to normal diameter

37
Diagnosis
  • CT best choice based on availability and
    alternative diagnoses.
  • In one study, CT had greater sensitivity,
    accuracy, -predictive value
  • Even if appendix is not visualized, diagnose can
    be made with localized fat stranding in RLQ.

38
Diagnosis
  • CT appears to change management decisions and
    decreases unnecessary appendectomies in women,
    but it is not as useful for changing management
    in men.

39
Special Populations
  • Very young, very old, pregnant, and HIV patients
    present atypically and often have delayed
    diagnosis
  • High index of suspicion is needed in the these
    groups to get an accurate diagnosis

40
Treatment
  • Appendectomy is the standard of care
  • Patients should be NPO, given IVF, and
    preoperative antibiotics
  • Antibiotics are most effective when given
    preoperatively and they decrease post-op
    infections and abscess formation

41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
Treatment
  • There are multiple acceptable antibiotics to use
    as long there is anaerobic flora, enterococci and
    gram(-) intestinal flora coverage
  • One sample monotherapy regimen is Zosyn 3.375g or
    Unasyn 3g
  • Also, short acting narcotics should be used for
    pain management

47
Disposition
  • Abdominal pain patients can be put in 4 groups
  • Group 1 classic presentation for Acute
    appendicitis- prompt surgical intervention
  • Group 2 suspicious, but not diagnosed
    appendicitis- benefit from imaging and 4-6h
    observation with surgical consult if serial exam
    changes or imaging studies confirm

48
Disposition
  • Group 3 remote possibility of appendicitis-
    observe in ED for serial exams if no change and
    course remains benign patient can D/C with dx of
    nonspecific abd pain
  • Patients are given instructions to return if
    worsening of symptoms, and they should be seen by
    PCP in 12-24 h
  • Also advised to avoid strong analgesia

49
Disposition
  • Group 4 high risk population(including elderly,
    pediatric, pregnant and immunocomprimised)-
    require high index of suspicion and low threshold
    for imaging and surgical consultation

50
Prognosis
  • Generally good
  • Disease found
  • Surgery complications

51
The end
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com