Sociology Department Retreat - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Sociology Department Retreat

Description:

Sociology Department Retreat Friday, ... Is it strictly the technology that distinguishes the two or can either utilize the same ... Plagiarism detection Respondus ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:259
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: sandra331
Learn more at: http://www.csun.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sociology Department Retreat


1
Sociology Department Retreat
  • Friday, January 16, 2009
  • University Club

2
Universities are at a Crossroad
And The Question is
Will Classes Fail Their Students More Than
Students Will Fail Their Classes?
3
(No Transcript)
4
  • Kaplan University has grown from 24 students in
    2001 to 48,000 today, a 2000 increase in just
    eight years.
  • Kaplan is fully accredited and now ranks among
    the countrys top ten single campus university
    enrollments.
  • A full 82 of Kaplans classes are taught
    online.

Why should we care?
Because Kaplan University, and others like it,
illustrate the crossroad decision being made at
the universities throughout the country.
5
Some say these crossroads exist because of
demand, as in the changing student demographic.
To be sure online students, today, are more
likely to be
  • Older more than 80 are over 24 yrs old
  • Working nearly twice as likely to be full-time
  • Women 16 more likely
  • Part Time 60 more likely
  • Commuters 20 more likely to commute 30 miles

6
Others say these crossroads exist as a function
of supply, as in the economic troubles of
todays universities
  • Tuition costs are up (adjusted for inflation, a
    50 increase during the past 10 years).
  • Public Support is down (as a proportion of
    total funding, it is down 40 during the same
    period).
  • Aggregate Faculty Salaries are up Faculty age
    distribution portends a disproportionately high
    aggregate salary (20 real increase in 90-05 vs.
    75 to 90).
  • Capital Outlay is Down (relies on Revenue
    Bonds which are becoming increasingly difficult
    to sell).

7
Yet, as social scientists, our concerns should
focus more on the functions and dysfunctions of
online teaching. At the Micro level, we should
at least be asking these questions
  • Student Learning Style Do students who engage
    in on-line learning have to be more proactive
    then their classroom based counterparts? More
    collaborative? More technologically adept? And
    how do these styles that vary across student
    characteristics?
  • Student Instructor Relationships Do certain
    teacher-student discourse require face-to-face
    interaction (e.g. critical reasoning vs. drill
    and practice)?
  • Student Inclusivity Should online classes have
    to address all students, to the exclusion of the
    classroom counterpart, or can they co-exist? If
    so, how?

8
At the Macro level, we need to understand the
organizational context of online learning and
should be asking at least these questions
  • Structural Differences What makes the
    structured environment of the classroom different
    from an online learning community? Are they
    mutually exclusive or can they be integrated?
    Should they be synchronous or can they be
    asynchronous? Is it strictly the technology
    that distinguishes the two or can either utilize
    the same technology?
  • Organizational Support Structurally, should
    the university support and facilitate increasing
    adaptation of faculty to online teaching . If so,
    how?
  • Unintended Consequences Given the paradigm
    shift that online learning portends, what are the
    prerequisites necessary to make it happen and the
    unintended consequences of fostering online
    learning (e.g. 24-7 email replies)?

9
Dr. Herman Debose
10
Why Online Instruction?
Millenials (Oblinger, 2003)
Generation X
Net Geners (Barnes et al, 2007)
Students have changed
Digital Natives (Prensky, 2001)
11
How Do 21st Century StudentsPrefer to Learn?

Source ECAR Research Study, Students and
Information Technology, 2008
12
So, How Did EED Address Students Learning
Preferences in Teaching?
Reusable Learning Objects
  • available 24/7
  • instant feedback
  • location independent
  • as many times as desired

13
Pre-requisite Knowledgeon Video
14
SLA Theorieson LecShare
15
Synch Lectures Group Discussions on Elluminate
16
Benefits to Teaching Online?Are there any?to
Students? to Faculty?
  • Listen to What Your Own Colleagues Have to Say
    About Their Own Experiences in Teaching Online?
  • Ellis Godard
  • Jerry Schutte

17
Accessibility Online
  • Aspects
  • International students
  • Enabling the disabled
  • Benefits
  • SLOs assessment necessarily explicit
  • Attention (theirs yours) directed to
    interaction critical thinking
  • Higher fees for non-US savings w/o interpreters

18
What Do We Know?
Cons
Online Technology is costly and ever changing.
Online Instruction is time consuming.
Online Instruction is not well defined or
researched.
Pros
Online Instruction induces flexibility.
Online Instruction fosters collaboration.
Online Instruction increases student performance.
19
Faculty Technology Center
  • Training Faculty Support
  • Universal Design and Accessible Technology
  • Instructional Design and Course Redesign
  • Video Production
  • FTC Office Oviatt 5
  • FTC Video Production Studio Oviatt 37
  • FTC Lab Oviatt 30
  • Extension 3443
  • ftc_at_csun.edu
  • www.csun.edu/at

20
Instructional Technologies
  • WebCT Learning management system
  • Elluminate Real time online classroom
  • LecShare Accessible online lectures
  • TurnItIn Plagiarism detection
  • Respondus Online quizzes
  • DocSoft Captioning
  • Softchalk - LessonBuilder

21
Faculty Associates Assisting Faculty
  • RuthAnn Anderson
  • Sandra B. Chong
  • Barry Cleveland
  • Jacek M. Polewczak
  • Michael Schofield
  • Ashley Skylar
  • 2009-2010 Faculty Associate applications
    available Spring 2009

22
Group Activity
  • Group Assignments Table Groups
  • Group Tasks
  • Discuss your experiences in teaching online
    (supplemental, hybrid and/or fully online models)
  • CHART
  • pros cons experienced in teaching online
  • Brainstorm apprehensions in teaching online, if
    any?
  • Brainstorm questions or issues
  • Time allocated 20 minutes Followed by
  • Whole Group Share and Concluding with a
  • Sharing of Charts

23
5 min. Group Report Q A
24
Resources
  • Allen, E. Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the
    course. Online education in the United States,
    2008. Sloan-C.
  • ECAR (2008). The ECAR study of undergraduate
    students and information technology, 2008.
    EDUCAUSE
  • Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers Gen-Xers,
    Millenials. Understanding the new students.
    EDUCAUSE
  • Schutte, J. (2000). Web based education
    Problem or panacea? Paper presented at Pacific
    Sociological Association, San Diego, CA.
    www/csun.edu/vcsoc00i/ITPSA.pdf
  • Schutte, J. (2004). Ten Ways Online Technology
    has Transformed my Teaching. Paper presented at
    American Sociological Association, San Francisco,
    CA. www.csun.edu/vcsoc00i/ITASA.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com