Title: Protecting Yourself From Rogues and Rascals In Your Employ
1Protecting Yourself From Rogues and Rascals
In Your Employ
When Vice-Principals, Employees, Agents and
Supervisors Go Astray
- Kevin Sadler
- kevin.sadler_at_bakerbotts.com512.322.2500
2Employer Liability
- Four Main Areas
- Vicarious Liability
- Vice-Principal Liability
- Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision - Quid Pro Quo -- Strict Liability for Supervisor's
Sexual Harassment Conduct
3Vicarious Liability
- Employer may be held liable for its employee's
tortuous acts if the act is - Within the scope of the employee's actual or
apparent authority - In furtherance of the employer's business, and
- For the accomplishment of the object for which
the employee was employed - In other words, an employer is liable if the act
fell - "Within the course and scope of employment"
4Vicarious Liability
- Course and Scope
- Conduct must be of the same general nature as
that authorized or incidental to the conduct
authorized - Employer need not approve or authorize
- In furtherance of employer's business
- Turns on employer's ability to control employee
- No Liability where employee's act furthers
self-interest - Assault based on personal animosity
- Personal gratification
5Vice-Principal Liability
- What is it?
- The corporation or employer is liable because the
actions taken by a vice-principal of a
corporation are the acts of the corporation
itself - Vice-principal's acts or omissions must
- Bear a relation to,
- or be referable to,
- or further the employer's business
6Vice-Principal Theory
- Who are vice-principals?
- corporate officers
- those who have authority to hire, fire, and
direct employees - those engaged in the performance of non-delegable
or absolute duties - those who manage the whole or a department or
division of business - In other words . . .
- a vice-principal is a person who has the
authority to hire, discharge, and direct
employees of the corporation or who has the
authority to manage the entire corporation or
division of its business.
7Vice-Principal Theory - Punitive Damages
- The potential for punitive damages is what makes
the vice-principal theory attractive to
plaintiffs and their lawyers - the employer authorized the doing and the manner
of the act - the employee was unfit and the employer was
reckless in employing him, - the employee was employed in a managerial
capacity and was acting in the scope of
employment, - the employer ratified or approved the act
8Vice-Principal Liability
- Cases where punitive damages imposed
- Purvis v. Prattco, Inc., 595 S.W.2d 103 (Tex.
1980) Hotel ejection case. employer liable for
the acts of its manager who ejected a family from
a hotel - Wal-Mart v. Itz, 21 S.W.3d 456 (Tex.
App.--Austin, 2000) Wal-Mart liable for its
manager's assault of a sexual nature when he
"ordered the plaintiff to a back room under a
business pretext" - Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Tucker, 806
S.W.2d 914 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1991, writ
dim'd w.o.j) employer liable for slander when
senior vice-president was considered a
vice-principal and authorized to make statements
about a former employee.
9Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision
- What is it?
- Arises directly from the employer's conduct
- Plaintiff must show that
- Employer owed her a duty
- Employer breached that duty
- Breach proximately caused her damages
10Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision
- Duty
- Duty arises because of the special relationship
that exists between the parties. - E.g., between the employer and the employee
- Employer-employee relationship creates a duty to
a third party only if the third party's harm is
the result of the wrongdoer's employment. - No Duty if
- Individual bears no relation to the employer's
business, OR - Injury cannot be traced back to the fact of the
wrongdoer's employment
11Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision
- FORESEEABILITY
- Plaintiff must establish that his injuries were
brought about by the reason of the employment of
the incompetent employee - Without this connection, "an employer would
essentially be an insurer of the safety of every
person who happens to come into contact with his
employee simply because of his status as an
employee."
12Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision
- Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. v. Ianni
- Facts A crew member for Loram Maintenance was
strung out on crystal methamphetamines, left the
job site and shot and injured a police officer
that approached him while he had an argument with
his wife - 800,000 actual damages
- 500,000 punitive damages
13Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision
- El Paso Court of Appeals upheld judgment because
- supervisors knew of rogue employee's pervasive
drug use (and rest of crew's) - prior incident where field clerk had told
employee to go to next job site after he attacked
another crew member's wife was "some asserted
control" over employee
14Supervisors Sexual Harassment
- Strict Liability -- Quid Pro Quo
- Something for something
- Job benefit or detriment is conditioned on
submission to sexual advances - Hostile Work Environment
- Conduct that alters the conditions of employment
and creates an intimidating or offensive
environment
15The Rules
- Supervisors
- supervisor harassment tangible detriment
- AUTOMATIC LIABILITY
supervisor no tangible good victim fails
to harassment detriment policy utilize
policy
NO LIABILITY
16Reasonable Care to Prevent and Correct Harassment
-
- What is reasonable care?
- 1. Effective and effectual anti-harassment
policy - 2. Prompt, thorough investigation
- 3. Specific, tangible action designed to stop
harassment - What is not reasonable care?
- 1. Failing to adopt/enforce anti-harassment
policy - 2. Failing to investigate timely, or at all
- 3. No record of action
17Practical Tips To Avoid/Minimize Liability
- Communication and Training
- Appropriate Complaint and Investigation
Procedures - Open Door Policy with Human resources
- Limit Authority of Vice-Principals, Supervisors,
and Managers
18Communication and Training
- Make sure employees aware of company policies
- Periodic Reminder Training
- Make sure that supervisors and managers are aware
and routinely reminded of their - obligations under the law
- company policies regarding harassment,
discipline, and investigation - Train management about
- their authority
- how to deal appropriately with employees
19Investigation and Corrective Action
- When employee reports misconduct of a fellow
employee or supervisor, employer MUST - Investigate claim
- Take appropriate action such as
- counseling, sensitivity training
- corrective measures, disciplinary action
- punishment
- demotion
- termination
- Not appropriate to
- ignore
- suggest employee's talk it out
- respond that "boys will be boys" or "that's just
Bob"
20Open Door Policy
- Make sure
- Human Resources has open door policy for
employees - Have more than one channel for employee's to
report misconduct or lodge complaints - Treat complaints against vice-principals,
supervisors, managers, and other high-ranking
officials just as seriously as those against
"rank and file" employees
21Limit Authority
- Avoid granting too much authority to supervisors
- Limit supervisor's authority to make ultimate
employment decisions, i.e., hiring, firing,
without - prior approval from higher management
- advice and consent from Human Resources
- Managers and Supervisors should be subject to
same disciplinary procedures as other employees
22Supervisors Should Know
- Held to a higher standard
- Discipline for ignoring harassment
- Possible personal liability for ignoring
harassment - Third party harassment
- Must report all complaints
- Duty to investigate if you have knowledge or
should have knowledge that harassment may be
taking place - No retaliation
- Document everything
- Confidentiality
23www.bakerbotts.com
24Kevin Sadler kevin.sadler_at_bakerbotts.com512.322.2
500
www.bakerbotts.com