Title: Fall Prevention Needs Assessment:
1- Fall Prevention Needs Assessment
- An Update on Orange County
- Presented by
- John Billimek, PhD
- Consultant
- Juliana Fuqua,PhD
2Overall
- 834 older adults completed the survey, which was
administered in Fall 2006 by Down with Falls
Coalition members
84
3SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS
4Age
5Gender
6Living Situations
57 Do not live alone
7Ethnicity and Language of Population
8RESULTSPrevalence of Falls and Risk Factors
9Prevalence of falling
- 28 of respondents have experienced a fall in the
past - 26 of women
- 32 of men
106 Risk factors for falls
- Living alone (40 of respondents)
- Age over 70 (77)
- Exercise 2 or fewer days per week (39)
- Take over 6 medications per day (44)
- Live in a house (not a condo/apartment) (45)
- Use a walking aid (44)
11Risk factors add up!
reporting a fall on survey
12RESULTSSources of Health Information
13Sources of Health Information
14How Sources of Health Information Differ Between
Groups
English Speaking Non-English Speaking
Healthcare Providers Friends Internet Medical Books Senior/Community Centers
- A very high proportion of respondents in all
groups reported doctors as a key source - Reliance on other sources like family, friends
and other health care providers did not differ
widely across groups.
15RESULTSMotivating people to act!Risk
Perceptions and Resource Seeking
16What sorts of resources exist for fall prevention?
- Programs that teach you how to prevent falls
- Balance and mobility classes
- Hospital and medical group education programs
- Educational materials
- Lectures/seminars
- Literature (brochures, flyers, newsletters)
- Medical Intervention
- Regular medication review
- Physical therapy sessions
- Medical assessments by public health nurses
- Home Modifications
17Who sought resources to prevent falls?
18Perceived Risk Self vs. Others
Participants were much more likely to say that
Falling is a problem for people in my age group
(83) than to indicate they think their own risk
is moderate or higher (36).
19Nature of Perceived Risk
- In addition to looking at how high or low people
estimate their fall risk to be, we looked at the
nature of the risk factors they thought to be
more important.
- Internal Risk Factors on Survey
- Problems with balance
- Muscle weakness
- Dizziness
- Vision problems
- Medical conditions
- Arthritis
- External Risk Factors on Survey
- Stairs
- Position changes
- Footwear
- Uneven surfaces
- Poor lighting
- Pets
- Clutter
20Who sought resources?Level of Perceived Risk
No history of falls
Fell in the past
- Among non-fallers with an external risk
orientation, the likelihood of seeking resources
does not increase with a higher level of
perceived risk - With an internal risk orientation, likelihood of
seeking resources increases, especially with a
high level of perceived risk
21Who sought resources?Nature of Perceived Risk
No history of falls
Fell in the past
- Among non-fallers with an external risk
orientation, the likelihood of seeking resources
does not increase with a higher level of
perceived risk - With an internal risk orientation, likelihood of
seeking resources increases, especially with a
high level of perceived risk
22Who sought resources?Level and Nature of Risk
Perception
No history of falls
Fell in the past
- Among non-fallers with an external risk
orientation, the likelihood of seeking resources
does not increase with a higher level of
perceived risk - With an internal risk orientation, likelihood of
seeking resources increases, especially with a
high level of perceived risk
23Main Themes
- Older adults perceive their own risks differently
than they perceive the risks of others - Education is keybut the methods used should
match the target population - Older adults rely on doctors for information
about falls, but doctors often dont provide it. - Internet and printed resources seemed especially
valuable for English speakers - Community and Senior centers seemed most valuable
for non-English speakers - Level vs. Nature education should include types
of risks (internal vs. external), not just the
level of perceived risk (high vs. low).