Title: The expansion of Participatory Budgeting in Brazil
1The expansion of Participatory Budgeting
in Brazil
- an analysis of the sucessful cases based upon
design and socio-economic indicators - Leonardo Avritzer
- Brian Wampler
The World Bank Institute The Municipal
Development Program (MDP), Africa The
Participatory Democracy Project Belo Horizonte,
Brazil December, 2008
2Explaining the Research
- Presentation guidelines
- P.B. cases
- After the collection of data, it was time to
categorize it for the analysis process. P.B.
cases were categorized according to their
existence in administrative mayoral periods in
Brazil since 1997 - 1997-2000 120 cases
- 2001-2004 199 cases
- 2005-2008 201 cases
- Research Methodology data collection and
categorization - P.B. incidence emergence and spreading
- P.B. incidence socio-economic indicators
- P.B. incidence design and patterns for
successful cases
3PBs Operation
- Citys regionalization and constitution of fora
and regional and thematic assemblies
presentation of demands and discussion of
priorities - Adjustment of the discussion to a set of rules
and procedures to be discussed, such as poverty
indices and access to public goods and services
redistributive criteria - Creation of a PB council (delegates and
councilors) that defines the investment plan and
budget proposal - Control, supervision and fiscalization of the
implementation of approved projects.
4P.B. INCIDENCE Emergence and spreading
Diffusion of PBs through municipal
administrations in Brazil
Period 1989-1992 Period 1993-1996
Source Projeto Democracia Participativa, 2004
5P.B. INCIDENCE Emergence and spreading
Diffusion of PBs through municipal
administrations in Brazil
Period 1997-2000 Period 2001-2004
Source Projeto Democracia Participativa, 2004
6P.B. INCIDENCE Emergence and spreading
Diffusion of PBs through municipal
administrations in Brazil
Period 2005-2008
Source data collected from the present research
7P.B. INCIDENCE Emergence and spreading
Percentage of P.B. Experiences through Brazil
Regions of Brazil Years Years Years
Regions of Brazil 1997-2000 2001-2004 2005-2008
North 2,5 5,5 8,5
Northeast 14,2 22,6 22,4
South 39,2 22,6 21,9
Southeast 41,7 45,2 41,3
Center West 2,5 4 6,0
Source data collected from the present research
8P.B. INCIDENCE Design and patterns for
successful cases
P.B. 2008 In which place of the administration
P.B. is located
PB 2008 Continuity 1997-2008 Continuity 2001-2008
Planning Secretary 32,50 38,20 29,20
Works Secretary 1,90 2,90 3,10
Finances / Accounting Secretary 11,90 8,80 9,20
Sector directly subordinated to the Executive 36,30 20,60 46,20
P.B. Secretary 4,40 11,80 3,10
Secretary of administration 8,10 11,80 4,60
Other 5 5,90 4,60
Source data collected from the research
9P.B. INCIDENCE Design and patterns for
successful cases
P.B. 2008 Timing cycle for the cases
Source data collected from the research
10P.B. INCIDENCE Design and patterns for
successful cases
P.B. 2008 Existence of P.B. Municipal Council
Source data collected from the research
11P.B. INCIDENCE Design and patterns for
successful cases
P.B. 2008 Priorities for the distribution of
resources
Source data collected from the present research
12Conclusions
- HDI ranking above the average
- Historically, P.B. cases are present in cities
that rank higher in HDI average. Despite the
de-concentration from the South and Southeast,
which are regions that usually rank higher
anyway, this pattern hasnt changed, as the table
bellow shows - P.B. Cases still rank higher in HDI in comparison
to Brazils average. Regarding the Northeast
region, which has received most of the new cases
found, the pattern remains the same P.B. Cases
rank higher in comparison to the regions average.
13Conclusions
- Central institutions to the existence of P.B.
- The research has shown the existence of some
institutions that have strong presence in the
successful cases of P.B.. They are described in
the table that follows - These institutons are related to design and may
be understood as key elements for the proper
functioning and even existence of P.B.
14Dissemination paper
15Analysis of data collectedBrazil and Mozambique
- Two phenomena are common to both cases
- FIRST
- Rapid increasing in the degree of urbanization in
the last years
16Analysis of data collectedBrazil and Mozambique
- Second
- In spite of the increase in the degree of
urbanization, there havent been adopted any
effective urban planning policies to guide the
process - The result is the lack of basic policies in many
areas of many cities, such as access to electric
energy, access to basic infrastructure, and so on
17Analysis of data collectedBrazil and Mozambique
- One of the most important observed characteristic
of P.B. cases in Brazil nowadays is not only the
wide territorial distribution, but the
non-complete dependency on the type of political
party to exist. Not only leftist parties have
been adopting it, but also centrist ones.
18Analysis of data collectedBrazil and Mozambique
- Successful cases in Brazil have shown that two
variables do have great weight for the existence
of P.B. - First
- The political will of the government. The support
and initiative of the government are paramount - Second
- The existence of a strong participatory
background, or, in other words, the existence of
a strong civil society capable of pressing the
government for the adoption of the program
19Analysis of data collectedBrazil and Mozambique
- In Mozambique, as well as in many other african
countries, some participatory programs have been
implemented by a myriad of organizations - However, the methodology of such programs implied
a top-down implementation, which means that a
whole prescription was previously made and, then,
implemented as a package - Successfull P.B. cases in Brazil have, rather,
been implemented in a bottom-up basis. This
suggest that the role to be played by civil
society actors is crutial for the success of the
program, participating in all steps of the process