Sociological Perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Sociological Perspective

Description:

Sociological Perspective A Breakdown of Functionalism, Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interactionism – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:240
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: Cranf7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sociological Perspective


1
Sociological Perspective
  • A Breakdown of Functionalism, Conflict Theory and
    Symbolic Interactionism

2
Comparing the Theoretical Perspectives
Functionalism Conflict Theory Symbolic Interactionlism
Level of Analysis Macro Macro Micro
Core Questions What keeps society functioning smoothly? What are the parts of society how do they relate? What are the intended and unintended outcomes of an event? How are wealth and power distributed in society? How do people with wealth and power keep them? Are there groups that get ahead and why? How are societys resources and opportunities divided? How do people co-create the society? How does social interaction influence, create, and sustain human relationships? Do people change behavior from on setting to another? If so why?
3
Functionalism
  • Theoretical Paradigm 1
  • Components Theorists

4
Functionalism
  • Functionalism views society as a system of
    interrelated parts
  • It is a macro (large scale) orientation because
    it studies how social structures affect how a
    society works

5
Functionalist Theorists
  • Auguste Comte
  • Herbert Spencer
  • Emile Durkheim

6
Comte Functionalism
  • Although few sociologists use Comtes original
    theories today, his basic ideas are the
    groundwork on which functionalism is based.

7
What is Functionalism?
  • According to functionalists, society is
    relatively stable, which means that things occur
    in society for a specific function and those
    functions help maintain stability.
  • Social institutions such as the family, economy,
    educational system, and political system are
    critical for society to function properly.

8
  • Functionalism suggests that a societys values
    and norms provide the foundation for the rules
    and laws that it creates.
  • These norms regulate the relationships between
    social institutions.

9
  • Functionalists, however, have differing views
    about how these structures cooperate with one
    another.
  • Some compare society to a living, breathing
    organism others analyze the expected and
    unexpected outcomes of a social event while
    still others wonder what exactly it is that holds
    a society together.

10
Solidarity
  • Solidarity integrates, or holds society together
    because people see themselves as unified.
  • He points out that the type of society influences
    the type of solidarity.

11
Mechanical Organic
  • Solidarity divided into two categories
  • Mechanical solidarity refers to the state of
    community bonding in traditional societies in
    which people share beliefs and values and perform
    common activities.
  • Organic solidarity occurs when people live in a
    society with a diverse division of labor, this
    forces people to depend on one another for
    survival.

12
Mertons Functions
  • One of Mertons greatest contributions to
    functionalism was the understanding that social
    realities have both intended and unintended
    functions.
  • Social factors that affect people in society.

13
Manifest Latent
  • Merton identified two types of functions
  • Manifest functions are factors that lead to an
    accepted consequence or outcome.
  • Latent functions are factors that lead to an
    unforeseen or unexpected consequence.

14
  • Merton suggested that when looking at any social
    event, sociologists should ask the question, For
    whom is this functional?
  • By doing this, well do a complete analysis
    because well consider both manifest and latent
    functions

15
Criticisms of Functionalism
  • Critics of functionalism sometimes claim that
    this paradigm does not take into account the
    influence of wealth and power on the formation of
    society.
  • Functionalists are accused of supporting the
    status quo, even when it may be harmful to do so.

16
  • Functionalists may argue that society works for
    the greatest number of people.
  • Change will arise when problems become big
    enough.
  • However, critics would argue that this belief
    results in many minorities being ignored.

17
  • Functionalist perspective often fails to
    recognize how inequalities in social class, race,
    and gender perpetuate imbalance in our society.

18
Conflict Theorists
  • Theoretical Paradigm 2
  • Components Theorists

19
Conflict Theorists
  • Karl Marx
  • Harriet Martineau
  • W.E.B. du Bois

20
Conflict Theorists Worldview
  • Conflict theory is a theoretical framework that
    views society in a struggle for scarce resources.
  • Studies issues such as race, gender, social
    class, criminal justice, and international
    relations.
  • Two main concerns for conflict theorists are
    economic wealth and power.

21
  • In either case, conflict theory suggests that
    were all struggling for more stuff, whether
    that stuff is power in a marriage or wealth in
    the world.

22
  • In general, the essence of conflict theory
    suggests that a pyramid structure of power an
    wealth exists in society.
  • The elite at the top of the pyramid determine the
    rules for those below.

23
  • The study of inequality in sociology always
    involves a consideration of conflict theory.
  • Therefore, the paradigm applies to social class,
    race, gender, marriage, religion, population,
    environment, and a host of other social phenomena.

24
  • If you believe that discrimination, ageism,
    sexism, racism, and classism occur in society
    because some people have the power to promote
    their desires over others then you think like a
    conflict theorist.

25
Criticism of Conflict Theory
  • Critics of conflict theory often accuse it of
    being too radical.
  • This paradigm often becomes synonymous with the
    idea that powerful people oppress the weak.
  • A simple reading of conflict theory can also seem
    to make the notion of conflict seem like a bad
    thing.
  • Doesnt competition breed excellence?

26
Symbolic Interactionism
  • Theoretical Paradigm 3
  • Components Theorists

27
Symbolic Interactionists
  • George Herbert Mead
  • Herbert Blumer
  • Erving Goffman
  • Howard Becker

28
Symbolic Interactionism
  • Symbolic Interactionism focuses on how
    communication influences the way peoples
    interactions with each other create the social
    world in which we live.
  • Symbolic Interactionists believe that the root of
    society comes from its symbols.
  • They suggest that the symbols we use are
    arbitrary, meaning that they vary from culture to
    culture.

29
  • Our definition of what has value depends on our
    understanding of it.
  • Context and setting affects our understanding of
    a social event.
  • Social order results when the members of society
    share common definitions of what is appropriate.

30
  • Disputes arise when we do not share the same
    definitions.
  • Symbolic interactionism is the most micro of
    sociological approaches, as it often studies the
    activities of individuals and then draws
    connections to larger society from these.
  • Studies of relationships, race, deviance, and
    even social movements can all use a symbolic
    interactionist approach.

31
  • Interactionists argue that individuals have the
    power to co-create the world, to make it what
    they want it to be.
  • People develop standards and norms through a
    process of interacting with others.
  • Symbolic Interactionism is a distinctly American
    way of looking at the world.

32
George Herbert Mead
  • Symbolic Interactionism is the brainchild of
    George Herbert Mead.
  • In Mind, Self and Society, Mead suggests that the
    root of society is the symbols that teach us to
    understand the world.
  • We then use these symbols to develop a sense of
    self, or identity.

33
  • It is this identity that we then take into the
    world and interact with other identities to
    create society.
  • Thus, building blocks of society start with our
    minds, where we interpret symbols.

34
  • Mead suggests that we do this through micro
    interactions we have every day.
  • Mead argues that all these various symbols enter
    our minds, where their meaning is interpreted and
    we are told how to react.
  • Mead suggests that this process is never-ending,
    therefore, we have a fluid sense of who we are.

35
  • Our selves can change, and they do change based
    on how we interpret the symbols thrown our way.
  • In this way, your self develops.
  • Self is your identity, its what makes you who
    you are and separates you from others.

36
Self Evaluation
  • According to Mead, you couldnt have a self
    without symbols or without someone to pass those
    symbols to you.
  • In other words, you learn who you are through
    others.

37
Erving Goffman
  • Goffman developed a theory called dramaturgy, a
    theory of interaction in which all life is like
    acting.
  • Goffman uses this theory to compare daily social
    interactions to the gestures of actors on a
    stage.

38
  • People are constantly acting in order to
    convince people of the character they wish to
    portray to the outside world.
  • Not to say that people are faking it, but rather
    that people are concerned about what the rest of
    the world will think of them and they adjust
    their social interactions accordingly.

39
Criticisms of Symbolic Interactionism
  • Critics of symbolic interactionism suggest that
    his perspective ignores the coercive effects of
    social structure, focusing too much on the power
    of the individual to co-create his or her world.

40
How are the three paradigms interrelated?
  • No single paradigm fits every situation.
  • To get a complete picture, many sociologists use
    all three paradigms.
  • In this way, the three paradigms are interrelated
    and work together to help us figure out why
    society is the way it is.

41
(No Transcript)
42
Max Weber- The Conflict Theorist?
  • Max Weber is a special sociologist because he
    cannot be labeled under just one theory.
  • Because he wrote partly as a response to some of
    Karl Marxs ideas, many consider him to be a
    conflict theorist.
  • Weber accepted that social classes influence our
    outcomes, however he felt Marxs social class
    system was too simple.

43
  • Weber proposed that all people have economic,
    political and cultural conflicts that are related
    to their relative social position.

44
Max Weber-The Functionalist?
  • In other ways, Weber appeared to take a more
    functional approach.
  • Weber proposed that rational and ideal
    bureaucracies naturally occur because we need
    them.
  • They provide clear lines of authority, divide
    tasks so workers can specialize, and clearly
    define rules and expectations.

45
Max Weber-The Symbolic Interactionist?
  • Webers ideas seem to lay the foundation for the
    symbolic interactionist school of thought.
  • He pointed out how values influence our goals and
    affect our behavior.
  • In his book, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit
    of Capitalism, Weber clearly linked a persons
    religious value to the societal creation of a
    capitalist economy.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com