Title: A.%20Dean%20Bennett
1Idaho Healthcare Compliance BootcampDiscriminatio
n LawsWhat You Need To Know
- A. Dean Bennett
- Holland Hart LLP
2Todays Agenda
- Recognizing the Issue
- Discrimination overview federal and state laws
- Developing issues - sexual orientation and
pregnancy discrimination - Investigation and Enforcement - EEOC / IHRC
- Responding to EEOC and other agencies
- Best Practices
3Recognizing the Issue
- Employers cannot unlawfully discriminate based
upon protected characteristics - Anti-discrimination laws prohibit
- adverse actions (e.g., firing, failing to hire,
pay differences, etc.) - harassment (quid pro quo and hostile work
environment) - retaliation
-
4Idaho Anti-Discrimination Law
- Idaho Human Rights Act - I.C. 67-5909
- It shall be a prohibited act to discriminate
against a person because of, or on a basis of,
race, color, religion, sex or national origin . .
. and on the basis of age or disability . . . .
5Federal Anti-Discrimination Laws
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
- Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race,
color, religion, sex, and national origin - Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)
- Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA)
- Equal Pay Act (EPA)
6Disparate Treatment
- Treating applicant or employee differently based
on protected characteristics - Examples
- Female secretary paid less than male secretary
- Conducting background checks on African American
applicants but not on white, Hispanic or other
race applicants
7Disparate Impact
- Neutral conduct that has an adverse effect on a
protected group - Examples
- Requiring a college degree screens out more
blacks than whites - Minimum 56 height requirement screens out
more females than males
8Harassment
- Quid Pro Quo benefit in exchange for sexual
favors - Hostile Work Environment
- Unwelcome physical or verbal conduct
- Based on gender (but may be same sex), or another
protected characteristic such as race, religion,
age - Sufficiently severe or pervasive to create an
abusive working environment and alter working
conditions - Employer knew or should have known of the
offensive environment
9Who is Liable for Harassment?
- Supervisors may be individually liable
- If tangible employment action - Strict liability
- If no tangible employment action -Liability where
the employer knew or should have known of the
conduct, and failed to take appropriate
corrective action
10Defense to HWE Harassment
- Only available when no tangible adverse action
- Employer used reasonable care to prevent
correct bad behavior AND - Employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of
corrective opportunities or otherwise avoid harm
11Retaliation
- Opposition to discrimination
- Filing or threatening to file a complaint or
charge - Complaining about discrimination or harassment
- Refusing to obey an order
- Requesting reasonable accommodation
- Oral Complaints
- Participation
- Assisting in an investigation
- Testifying in a case
12Hot Issues In Discrimination
- Sexual Orientation
- Pregnancy
13Sexual Orientation
- Federal enforcement executive order covers
federal contractors and application to public
employees - State enforcement current debate regarding Add
the Words bill failed in early 2015 - Local Enforcement currently ten cities in Idaho
14Boise Anti-Discrimination Ordinance
- Enacted in 2013
- Passed for other cities Coeur dAlene, Ketchum,
Moscow, Pocatello, Sandpoint, Idaho Falls,
Lewiston, Victor, Driggs (2015) and Hailey (2015) - Some prohibit gender identity discrimination too
15What Boises Ordinance Does
- Prohibits discrimination on basis of gender
identity and sexual orientation in matters of
employment, housing, and places of public
accommodation - Violation is a criminal misdemeanor punishable by
a fine of up to 1,000 and/or up to six months in
jail - No private right of action
16Takeaways
- Be aware it exists
- Good business not to discriminate on any basis
- Risk of citation minimal
- Lots of ways to resolve
- Avoid bad publicity and risk of becoming first
business to set precedent - Stay tuned could see state or federal legislation
17Pregnancy Discrimination
18Pregnancy Discrimination Act Of 1978
- Amended Title VII to cover pregnancy
discrimination - Covers hiring, firing, promoting
- Must be treated the same as non-pregnant
employees who are similar in ability or inability
to work
19EEOC Guidance
- July 2014 Enforcement Guidance on Pregnancy
Discrimination - Called into question recently by U.S. Supreme
Court (Young v. UPS) - Reasonable accommodations for pregnant workers
under ADA
20Administrative Enforcement
- State Level
- Idaho Human Rights Commission
- Federal Level
- Equal Opportunity Employment Commission
21Idaho Statistics
22EEOC Statistics for Idaho
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014
TOTAL CHARGES 81 79 97 80 77 67
of US total charges 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
23Internal Response Before Claim
- Take swift action upon receipt of claim or if
aware of issue - Consider insurance coverage and notice
- Conduct internal investigation
- Involve counsel to preserve privilege
- Be aware of retaliation and shunning issues
- Consider preservation obligation and implement
litigation hold
24Agency Investigation
- EEOC or other Responsible Agency will investigate
alleged unlawful discrimination - Generally claims must be filed within 300 days of
alleged discrimination (only 180 days if only
covered by federal law) - Agency will conduct investigation
- Includes interview with charging party
25Responding to Charge/Complaint
- Important to do it right statements made in
early stages will remain relevant later in
litigation - Well crafted response can foreclose litigation
- Be proactive in defense interview witnesses and
relevant parties - Prepare detailed response statement
- Defend and participate in interviews
26Litigation
- Private party can file suit generally 90 days
after receiving disposition or right to sue
from agency - Agency can also file complaint
- Will trigger litigation process
27Best Practices for Avoiding Liability For
Discrimination And Harassment Claims
28How To Prevent Claims
- Policies
- Recordkeeping
- Training
- Fairness and consistency
29Policies On Discrimination/Harassment
- Conduct not tolerated
- Define
- Reporting responsibility
- Applies not just to acts by employees
- Complaint, reporting, and handling
- Will promptly and fully investigate
- No retaliation
30Language In Evaluations And Discipline
- What type of language to include
- Detail specifics
- Facts not opinions
- Do not include language about protected class
31Evaluation Best Practices
- Have supervisor complete evaluation
- Be honest dont sugar-coat
- Evaluation should contain no surprises
- Have process to contest
- Purpose is to ensure fairness of process
- Request employee signature at bottom of review
32Get HR Involved Or Train
33Internal Investigations
- Timely and thorough
- By the right person
- Must demonstrate your business took it seriously
and was fair - Follow your policies
- Limit it to those involved
- Update alleged victim
34Best Practices - Recap
- Be mindful of protected classes when making
decisions - Consider whether employment practice results in
disparate treatment or disparate impact - Implement training to ensure no discrimination
- Recruit, hire, and promote with these principles
in mind do not rely on stereotypes or
assumptions - Ensure effective investigations
- Consider and update policies
35Thank You!
Thank you!
- QUESTIONS?
- Dean Bennett
- Holland Hart LLP
- ADBennett_at_hollandhart.com
- 208-342-5000