Title: Strategy Analysis And Choice
1Strategy Analysis And Choice
2Strategy Analysis Choice
- Whether its broke or not, fix itmake it better.
Not just products, but the whole company if
necessary. - -- Bill Saporito
3Strategy Analysis Choice
- Strategic analysis and choice largely involves
making subjective decisions based on objective
information.
4Strategy Analysis Choice
- The Nature of Strategy Analysis and Choice
- Establishing long-term objectives
- Generating alternative strategies
- Selecting strategies to pursue
- Best alternative to achieve mission and
objectives
5Strategy Analysis Choice
- Alternative strategies derive from
- Vision
- Mission
- Objectives
- External audit
- Internal audit
- Past successful strategies
6Strategy Analysis Choice
- Participation in generating alternative
strategies should be broad
7Strategy-Formulation Analytical Framework
Stage 1 The Input Stage
Stage 2 The Matching Stage
Stage 3 The Decision Stage
8Formulation Framework
Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix (IFE)
Stage 1 The Input Stage
External Factor Evaluation Matrix (EFE)
Competitive Profile Matrix
9Input Stage
- Provides basic input information for the matching
and decision stage matrices - Requires strategists to quantify subjectivity
early in the process - Good intuitive judgment always needed
10Formulation Framework
TOWS Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Stage 2 The Matching Stage
BCG Matrix
IE Matrix
Grand Strategy Matrix
11Matching Stage
- Match between organizations internal resources
and skills and the opportunities and risks
created by its external factors.
12Matching Key Factors to Formulate Alternative
Strategies
Resultant Strategy
Key External Factor
Key Internal Factor
13Formulation Framework
TOWS Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Stage 2 The Matching Stage
BCG Matrix
IE Matrix
Grand Strategy Matrix
14Matching Stage
- TOWS Matrix
- Threats
- Opportunities
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
15TOWS Matrix
- Develop four types of strategies
- Strengths-Opportunities (SO)
- Weaknesses-Opportunities (WO)
- Strengths-Threats (ST)
- Weaknesses-Threats (WT)
16SO Strategies
Threats Opportunities Weaknesses Strengths (TOWS)
17WO Strategies
Threats Opportunities Weaknesses Strengths (TOWS)
18ST Strategies
Threats Opportunities Weaknesses Strengths (TOWS)
19WT Strategies
Threats Opportunities Weaknesses Strengths (TOWS)
20TOWS Matrix
- Steps in developing the TOWS Matrix
- List the firms key external opportunities
- List the firms key external threats
- List the firms key internal strengths
- List the firms key internal weaknesses
21TOWS Matrix
- Developing the TOWS Matrix
- Match internal strengths with external
opportunities and record the resultant SO
Strategies - Match internal weaknesses with external
opportunities and record the resultant WO
Strategies - Match internal strengths with external threats
and record the resultant ST Strategies - Match internal weaknesses with external threats
and record the resultant WT Strategies
22TOWS Matrix
23Formulation Framework
TOWS Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Stage 2 The Matching Stage
BCG Matrix
IE Matrix
Grand Strategy Matrix
24SPACE Matrix
- Strategic Position and Action Evaluation Matrix
- Four quadrant framework
- Determines appropriate strategies
- Aggressive
- Conservative
- Defensive
- Competitive
25SPACE Matrix
- Two Internal Dimensions
- Financial Strength FS
- Competitive Advantage CA
- Two External Dimensions
- Environmental Stability ES
- Industry Strength IS
26SPACE Matrix
- Overall Strategic position determined by
- Financial Strength FS
- Competitive Advantage CA
- Environmental Stability ES
- Industry Strength IS
27SPACE Matrix
- Developing the SPACE Matrix
- EFE Matrix
- IFE Matrix
- Financial Strength
- Competitive Advantage
- Environmental Stability
- Industry Strength
28SPACE Matrix
- Select variables to define FS, CA, ES, IS
- Assign numerical ranking from 1 (worst) to 6
(best) for FS and IS Assign numerical ranking
from 1 (best) to 6 (worst) for ES and CA. - Compute average score for FS, CA, ES, IS
29SPACE Matrix
- Plot the average scores on the Matrix
- Add the two scores on the x-axis and plot point
on X. Add the scores on the y-axis and plot Y.
Plot the intersection of the new xy point. - Draw a directional vector from origin through the
new intersection point.
30SPACE Factors
31SPACE Factors
32SPACE Matrix
FS
Conservative
Aggressive
6
5
4
3
2
1
CA
IS
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
Competitive
Defensive
-6
ES
33Formulation Framework
TOWS Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Stage 2 The Matching Stage
BCG Matrix
IE Matrix
Grand Strategy Matrix
34BCG Matrix
- Boston Consulting Group Matrix
- Enhances multidivisional firms efforts to
formulate strategies - Autonomous divisions (or profit centers)
constitute the business portfolio - Firms divisions may compete in different
industries requiring separate strategy
35BCG Matrix
- Boston Consulting Group Matrix
- Graphically portrays differences among divisions
- Focuses on market share position and industry
growth rate - Manage business portfolio through relative market
share position and industry growth rate
36BCG Matrix
- Relative market share position defined
- Ratio of a divisions own market share in a
particular industry to the market share held by
the largest rival firm in that industry.
37BCG Matrix
Relative Market Share Position
High 1.0
Medium .50
Low 0.0
Industry Sales Growth Rate
High 20
Medium 0
Low -20
38BCG Matrix
- Question Marks
- Stars
- Cash Cows
- Dogs
39BCG Matrix
- Question Marks
- Low relative market share position yet compete in
high-growth industry. - Cash needs are high
- Case generation is low
- Decision to strengthen (intensive strategies) or
divest
40BCG Matrix
- Stars
- High relative market share and high industry
growth rate. - Best long-run opportunities for growth and
profitability - Substantial investment to maintain or strengthen
dominant position - Integration strategies, intensive strategies,
joint ventures
41BCG Matrix
- Cash Cows
- High relative market share position, but compete
in low-growth industry - Generate cash in excess of their needs
- Milked for other purposes
- Maintain strong position as long as possible
- Product development, concentric diversification
- If becomes weakretrenchment or divestiture
42BCG Matrix
- Dogs
- Low relative market share position and compete in
slow or no market growth - Weak internal and external position
- Decision to liquidate, divest, retrenchment
43Formulation Framework
TOWS Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Stage 2 The Matching Stage
BCG Matrix
IE Matrix
Grand Strategy Matrix
44Grand Strategy Matrix
- Popular tool for formulating alternative
strategies - All organizations (or divisions) can be
positioned in one of four quadrants - Based on two evaluative dimensions
- Competitive position
- Market growth
45RAPID MARKET GROWTH
- Quadrant I
- Market development
- Market penetration
- Product development
- Forward integration
- Backward integration
- Horizontal integration
- Concentric diversification
- Quadrant II
- Market development
- Market penetration
- Product development
- Horizontal integration
- Divestiture
- Liquidation
WEAK COMPETITIVE POSITION
STRONG COMPETITIVE POSITION
- Quadrant IV
- Concentric diversification
- Horizontal diversification
- Conglomerate diversification
- Joint ventures
- Quadrant III
- Retrenchment
- Concentric diversification
- Horizontal diversification
- Conglomerate diversification
- Liquidation
SLOW MARKET GROWTH
46Grand Strategy Matrix
- Quadrant I
- Excellent strategic position
- Concentration on current markets and products
- Take risks aggressively when necessary
47Grand Strategy Matrix
- Quadrant II
- Evaluate present approach seriously
- How to change to improve competitiveness
- Rapid market growth requires intensive strategy
48Grand Strategy Matrix
- Quadrant III
- Compete in slow-growth industries
- Weak competitive position
- Drastic changes quickly
- Cost and asset reduction indicated (retrenchment)
49Grand Strategy Matrix
- Quadrant IV
- Strong competitive position
- Slow-growth industry
- Diversification indicated to more promising
growth areas
50Formulation Framework
Stage 3 The Decision Stage
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)
51QSPM
- Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
- Only technique designed to determine the relative
attractiveness of feasible alternative actions
52QSPM
- Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
- Tool for objective evaluation of alternative
strategies - Based on identified external and internal crucial
success factors - Requires good intuitive judgment
53QSPM
- Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
- List the firms key external opportunities
threats list the firms key internal strengths
and weaknesses - Assign weights to each external and internal
critical success factor
54QSPM
- Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
- Examine the Stage 2 (matching) matrices and
identify alternative strategies that the
organization should consider implementing - Determine the Attractiveness Scores (AS)
55QSPM
- Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
- Compute the total Attractiveness Scores
- Compute the Sum Total Attractiveness Score
56QSPM
Strategic Alternatives
57QSPM
- Limitations
- Requires intuitive judgments and educated
assumptions - Only as good as the prerequisite inputs
58QSPM
- Positives
- Sets of strategies examined simultaneously or
sequentially - Requires the integration of pertinent external
and internal factors in the decision-making
process
59Cultural Aspects of Strategy Choice
- Culture
- The set of shared values, beliefs, attitudes,
customs, norms, personalities, heroes, and
heroines that describe a firm
60Cultural Aspects of Strategy Choice
- Culture
- Successful strategies depend on degree of support
from a firms culture
61Politics of Strategy Choice
- Politics in organizations
- Management hierarchy
- Career aspirations
- Allocation of scarce resources
62Politics of Strategy Choice
- Political tactics for strategists
- Equifinality
- Satisfying
- Generalization
- Focus on Higher-Order Issues
- Provide Political Access on Important Issues
63Role of A Board of Directors
- Duties and Responsibilities
- Control and oversight over management
- Adherence to legal prescriptions
- Consideration of stakeholder interests
- Advancement of stockholders rights