SPED 618: Lifelong Integration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

SPED 618: Lifelong Integration

Description:

SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Understanding Roles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: wit112
Learn more at: http://coe.winthrop.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SPED 618: Lifelong Integration


1
SPED 618 Lifelong Integration
  • Understanding Roles

2
React to these statements in Chapter 3
  • These examples are but a few of the many related
    to the scope and magnitude of changes in health
    care systems, which continue to impact methods of
    service delivery for students with special needs
    (p.99). Comment on each of the three listed.
  • Research is clearly supportive of family-school
    collaborations, indicating that they result in
    improved academic performance, reduced
    absenteeism, and improved discipline (p.121). Do
    you have examples?

3
What teams exist?
  • IEP teams
  • Teacher Assistance Teams
  • School Improvement Committees
  • Parent-Teacher Associations

4
Direct v. Indirect Service
  • Teacher support in the mainstream classroom
  • Teacher support in a consultative manner between
    special education and general education
  • Justify the benefits and/or the situations
    surrounding both options

5
Working with High-Incidence Teams (Correa et al,
2005)
  • Primary functions
  • Student assessment
  • Program evaluation
  • Provision of instruction
  • Responsible for explicit instruction in a
    structured program
  • Many professors believe that NCLB is correct in
    not permitting special educators a dominant role
    in content instruction. Thoughts?

6
Low-incidence Teams (Correa et al, 2005)
  • Responsible for teaching students with physical
    and sensory disabilities and cognitive and
    neurological impairments
  • Primary functions (to be critiqued)
  • Positioning, lifting, and transporting students
  • Monitoring use of medications and prosthetics
  • Managing seizures
  • Modifying aberrant behaviors.
  • Major function is to teach students to synthesize
    their special related services.

7
General Educators role (Correa et al, 2005)
  • Brings content knowledge
  • Observe students interactions with peers who show
    appropriate behaviors
  • Most important role is to provide students with
    appropriate learning experiences
  • Set up an effective classroom environment
  • Should focus on the group

8
Related Services role (Correa et al, 2005)
  • The nature of each persons role with the child
    depends on the school and community environment
    but most importantly the student.
  • Principals and administrators oversee
    organization, funding, and legal matters as well
    as program planning and evaluation.
  • Roles of each person may overlap with other
    persons roles.

9
Services(with whom do we collaborate)
  • Audiology
  • Counseling
  • Medical services
  • Occupational therapy
  • Orientation and mobility services
  • Parent counseling and training
  • Physical Therapy
  • Bilingual specialist
  • Vocational educator
  • Psychological services
  • Recreation
  • Rehabilitation counseling
  • School health / Nurse
  • Social Work
  • Speech pathology
  • Transportation
  • ELL or ESOL
  • Vision
  • Assistive tech services
  • from Rowley case (1982)

10
Coteaching options
  • complementary special education teacher rotates
  • parallel divided class for more personal
    interaction
  • station small groups on specific components
  • alternative special education reinstructs whole
    class
  • shared teachers share equally and instruct
    interchangeably
  • One teach, one assist (or one teach and one
    observe)

11
Continuum of Services
  • LD ages
  • Regular class 42.4
  • (outside of general ed. class less than 21 of
    day)
  • Resource Room 39.3
  • (outside of general ed. class between 21 and 60
    of day)
  • Separate Class 17.4
  • (outside of general ed. class more than 60 of
    day)
  • Separate School 0.6
  • (in a private or public separate day school at
    public expense)
  • Residential Facility 0.1
  • (in a public or private residential facility at
    public expense)
  • Homebound / Hospital 0.2

12
Inclusion debatefrom Zigmond Baker (1995)and
McLeskey and Waldron (1995)
  • Instruction is the key issue not the placement
    (Martin)
  • Special education is sacrificing essential
    components so that students can be in the
    company of age peers (Scruggs and Mastropieri)
  • No tailored education plans (Gerber)
  • Serious disabilities still left untouched (Z B)
  • Students deserve full access to mainstream
    curriculum (McLaughlin)
  • 2/3 of students with disabilities succeeded
    across various models
  • Successes cannot be based upon test scores
    especially for secondary students who have
    already peaked.
  • Few successes exist in segregated settings (M W)

13
Questions
  • Why is it imperative to know each team members
    role and to understand their responsibility and
    even their supporting theories?
  • How do the coteaching options reflect the roles
    within the group?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com