PROPERTY%20E%20SLIDES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

PROPERTY%20E%20SLIDES

Description:

property e s 04-11-13 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: Faj90
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PROPERTY%20E%20SLIDES


1
PROPERTY E SLIDES
  • 04-11-13

2
LOGISTICS ON COURSE PAGE
  • Adjustments to Reflect Final Coverage Choices
  • Updated Assignment Sheet
  • Updated Versions of Sample Exam Qs Best Answers
  • Information Memos for Chapters 1 2
  • Exam Version of Syllabus (with other Exam Prep
    Materials)
  • Detailed Instructions for Review Problem 6D for
    Monday (Let Me Know if Qs)

3
LOGISTICS GENERALLY
  • If you need help with course selection, Ill be
    at school much of next several days. On
    weekdays, just drop by E-Mail to set a time on
    the Weekend.
  • Monday will be a long class
  • Lot of Review Problems in final six classes
    Intended to help you with Exam Prep
  • Deadline for Sample Exam Answers is Sat. 4/27 _at_
    9pm instructions on course page

4
CHAPTER 6 PART BHABITABILITY ISSUES
  1. Overview
  2. Quiet Enjoyment/Constructive Eviction
  3. Implied Warranty of Habitability Related
    Doctrines

5
OPERATION OF IWH
  • What Constitutes Breach?
  • Available Remedies?
  • Notice Time to Cure Required?
  • Waivable?
  • Prohibition of Retaliation?

6
OPERATION OF IWH1. What Constitutes Breach?
  • Legal Test Varies by State (see Note 3 P682)
  • Some States Tie to Breaches of Housing Code
  • E.g., Javins
  • Cant be de minimis (see footnote 60 on P680)
  • Some States Adopt More General Legal Test
  • Florida 83.51
  • Housing Codes if Applicable
  • List of Requirements if No Housing Code

7
OPERATION OF IWH2. Available Remedies?
  • Generally Traditional Contract Remedies Available
    in Note 5 P682-83 (unassigned)
  • Rescission
  • Damages
  • Many States Add More Tenant-Friendly Remedies
    (see Note 6 P684-85)
  • Withholding Rent/Rent Abatement
  • T may have to put rent in escrow (see P680 fn67)
  • Repair Deduct

8
OPERATION OF IWH2. Available Remedies?
  • DQ98 Remedies in Florida Statutes
  • 83.56(1) Termination of Lease (with proper
    notice)
  • 83.60 Withholding rent (with proper notice).
    If defending a suit for non-payment of rent,
    tenant must pay amount due into court registry to
    maintain claim.
  • No repair and deduct provision.

9
OPERATION OF IWH3. Notice Time to Cure?
  • Usually to Invoke IWH, T Must (see Note 4 P682)
  • Provide Notice of Problem to L
  • Allow L Reasonable Time to Cure
  • Significance
  • Some States No Breach Until After
  • Some States Breach as Soon as Habitability
    Problem Occurs, but Remedies Limited w/o

10
OPERATION OF IWH4. Waivable?
  • Varies by State Circumstances
  • (see Note 7 P685)
  • Most States IWH Not Waivable
  • Some States Freely Bargained v. Boilerplate
  • FL 83.51 Can waive all requirements for single
    family home duplex some not waivable for apt
    in multi-unit building

11
OPERATION OF IWH4. Waivable Policy Debate
  • Some Relevant Points in Note 10 (P686-88)
  • Arguments for No Waiver Rule Include
  • Otherwise, L Might Force Bad Conditions on Ts w/o
    Bargaining Power
  • Public Policy re Minimum Quality of Housing
  • DQ97 Possible Harms to Ts or Market if
    Non-Waivable?

12
OPERATION OF IWHConsequences if No Waiver
  • Limits T freedom of choice by preventing genuine
    agreements to lease sub-standard housing at
    below-market prices
  • Ls may withdraw units from market b/c of
    increased maintenance costs (condo conversions or
    abandonment).
  • BUT may encourage Ls to do preventative
    maintenance to avoid costly repairs later.

13
OPERATION OF IWH Actual Impact of Non-Waivable
IWH?
  • Probably less low-end rental housing than in
    1970. Empirically very hard to sort out effects
    of IWH on housing market in light of other social
    phenomena such as
  • Gentrification
  • Increased household spending on housing
  • Decreased government housing construction and
    subsidies
  • Increase in wealth gaps

14
OPERATION OF IWH5.Prohibition of Retaliation?
  • Generally L cannot punish T (eviction, rent
    increase) for complaining to L or Govt re
    Habitability Issues
  • Need to protect more vulnerable party in long
    term relationship when you provide certain rights
  • More Common for Residential than Commercial
  • Operation varies depending on state
    cases/statutes
  • See Note 8 P685, Fl Stat 83.64
  • Not responsible for way rules/statutes work this
    year

15
OPERATION OF IWH5.Prohibition of Retaliation?
  • Generally L cannot punish T (eviction, rent
    increase) for complaining to L or Govt re
    Habitability Issues
  • Need to protect more vulnerable party in long
    term relationship when you provide certain rights
  • More Common for Residential than Commercial
  • Operation varies depending on state
    cases/statutes
  • See Note 8 P685, Fl Stat 83.64
  • Not responsible for way rules/statutes work this
    year

16
SCOPE OF IWH Compare to Other Related Doctrines
  • Illegal Lease Theory
  • See Brown (discussed in Javins _at_ P678-79)
  • Housing Code violations severe enough to make
    occupancy of unit illegal
  • Problems must exist at start of lease
  • Remedy Lease is Void

17
SCOPE OF IWH Compare to Other Related Doctrines
  • Constructive Eviction
  • DQ97 asks about advantages of IWH
  • Key points made in Note 2 P681-82
  • Fewer advantages to IWH if state allows Partial
    Constructive Eviction
  • Problem doesnt have to affect whole apartment
  • T doesnt have to move out completely

18
SCOPE OF IWH Possible Extensions of IWH
  • Policy Qs for You to Think About
  • Extension to Small Commercial Tenants?
  • Done in a Few States
  • See DQ99 Note 9 P685-86
  • Extension of IWH Remedies to Problems with
    Amenities that are Not Needed for Minimum
    Habitability Standards (Pool, Dishwasher, etc.)?
    See Rev. Prob. 6B

19
CHAPTER 6 PART BHABITABILITY ISSUES
  1. Overview
  2. Quiet Enjoyment/Constructive Eviction
  3. Implied Warranty of Habitability Related
    Doctrines
  4. Questions?

20
CHAPTER 6 PART CLIMITS ON TENANT SELECTION
  1. Overview
  2. Right to Transfer
  3. Anti-Discrimination Law

21
OVERVIEW OFLIMITS ON TENANT SELECTION
  • L Ability to Select Ts Significant Aspect of
    Property Rights
  • Can See as Part of Right to Exclude
  • Can See as Right to Use Land in Way that L Sees
    as Most Beneficial (Economically Otherwise)

22
OVERVIEW OFLIMITS ON TENANT SELECTION
  • L Ability to Select Ts Significant Aspect of
    Property Rights
  • Today Limits on Right to Select to Further Other
    Important Interests
  • Anti-Discrimination Law Inclusion Access
  • Ts Right to Transfer
  • Alienability
  • Ts Economic Fairness Interests

23
OVERVIEW OFLIMITS ON TENANT SELECTION
  • Two Relevant Time Frames
  • At Start of New Lease
  • Common Law L Had Complete Discretion
  • Today Limited by Anti-Discrimination Statutes
    (Federal State)
  • During Lease If T Wishes to Transfer, L
    Consenting to the Transferee

24
OVERVIEW OFLIMITS ON TENANT SELECTION
  • Two Relevant Time Frames
  • At Start of New Lease
  • During Lease If T Wishes to Transfer, L
    Consenting to the Transferee
  • Common Law Governed by Lease Terms
  • Today Limited by
  • Anti-Discrimination Statutes (Federal State)
  • Qs re Reasonableness of Withholding Consent
    (State Law)

25
CHAPTER 6 PART CLIMITS ON TENANT SELECTION
  1. Overview
  2. Right to Transfer
  3. Anti-Discrimination Law

26
TENANTS RIGHT TO TRANSFER ASSIGNMENT v.
SUBLEASE
  • Two Types of Transfers
  • Assignment
  • T Transfers Entire Lease Term to Assignee
  • T Still Responsible to L, BUT L and Assignee Also
    Generally Directly Responsible to Each Other
    for LeaseTerms
  • Sublease

27
TENANTS RIGHT TO TRANSFER ASSIGNMENT v.
SUBLEASE
  • Two Types of Transfers
  • Assignment
  • Sublease
  • T Transfers Less Than Entire Lease Term to
    Sublessee
  • T Still Responsible to L Sublessee and L
    Generally NOT Directly Responsible to Each Other
    for Lease Terms

28
TENANTS RIGHT TO TRANSFER BACKGROUND RULES
  • T Right to Transfer Unless Lease Says Otherwise
  • Limits in Lease Read Narrowly No Subleases
    Assignments Allowed
  • Part of Pro-Alienation Policy Favoring Easy
    Transfer of Land
  • Like Some Estates Future Interests Rules
  • Like Repose Idea in Adverse Possession

29
Tenants Right to Transfer Reasonableness Issues
  • Common provision No transfer w/o consent of
    landlord
  • Reasonable Withholding of Consent
  • Should Courts Imply Reasonableness?
  • Commercial Tenancies
  • Residential Tenancies
  • Waiver Permissible?

30
Tenants Right to TransferDefinition of of
Reasonable
  • Some leases will say No transfer without consent
    of L, which will not be withheld unreasonably.
  • Some states imply reasonableness into leases
    requiring Ls consent to transfer
  • What is reasonable in these contexts?

31
Tenants Right to TransferDefinition of of
Reasonable
  • What is reasonable in these contexts?
  • Funk look to what a reasonable man in the Ls
    position would do. (Thanks)

32
Tenants Right to TransferDefinition of of
Reasonable
  • LEGITIMATE CONCERNS
  • Assurances re Rent
  • Assurances re Use Care of Premises
  • Proposed Use
  • Need for Alterations
  • Legality
  • Compatible w Other Tenants

33
Tenants Right to TransferDefinition of of
Reasonable
  • NOT LEGITIMATE CONCERNS
  • Personal Taste, Sensibility or Convenience (Funk)
  • Lever to Change Lease Terms (esp. T expectations
    re ) (Funk)
  • Other Cases Collateral Economic Advantage
    (e.g., Filling Other Units)
  • Note In Appropriate Context You Can Argue That
    Cases Weve Read Are Wrong

34
Tenants Right to TransferDefinition of of
Reasonable
  • HYPOS DQ101(b/c) Rev. Prob. 6F(B)
  • Bait Switch (T wants to transfer to previously
    rejected applicant no financial reason to
    reject)
  • Religious or Political Objections
  • Well Do Arguments Next Tuesday w Everglades
    Yosemites should jump in if you have ideas about.

35
Tenants Right to Transfer
  • Lease No Transfer w/o Ls Consent
  • Reasonable Withholding of Consent
  • Should Courts Imply Reasonableness?
  • Commercial Tenancies
  • Residential Tenancies
  • Waiver Permissible?

36
Tenants Right to TransferImply Reasonableness
(Comml)?
  • Arguments FOR Implying Reasonableness
  • Importance of Alienation
  • General Reqmt. of Good Faith Fair Dealing
  • Protects Ls Legitimate Concerns (esp. re )
  • Prevents L Using Transfer to Extort Better Lease
    Terms

37
Tenants Right to TransferImply Reasonableness
(Comml)?
  • Arguments Against Implying Reasonableness
  • Rewriting Contract
  • Interferes w Ls Control of Own Property
  • May Lead to Lot of Litigation

38
Tenants Right to Transfer
  • Lease No Transfer w/o Ls Consent
  • Reasonable Withholding of Consent
  • Should Courts Imply Reasonableness?
  • Commercial Tenancies
  • Residential Tenancies
  • Waiver Permissible?

39
Tenants Right to TransferImply Reasonableness
(Residential)?
  • Why Different if Residential Lease?
  • Maybe L more personally involved ? More L Control
  • If L lives on premises ? More L control
  • T may have less knowledge and/or bargaining power
    ? Less L Control
  • More legit. reasons to reject in comml setting
  • More States Imply in Residential Setting

40
Tenants Right to Transfer
  • Lease No Transfer w/o Ls Consent
  • Reasonable Withholding of Consent
  • Should Courts Imply Reasonableness?
  • Commercial Tenancies
  • Residential Tenancies
  • Waiver Permissible?

41
Tenants Right to TransferWaiver Permissible?
  • Restatement says Waiver OK if freely bargained
    for.
  • Some States say NO.
  • Well Do Arguments w DENALI in Context of Review
    Problem 6F(A) Starting Late on Monday Again
    Yosemites should jump in if you have ideas

42
CHAPTER 6 PART CLIMITS ON TENANT SELECTION
  1. Overview
  2. Right to Transfer
  3. Anti-Discrimination Law

43
LIMITS ON TENANT SELECTIONFROM
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW
  • Always Statutory
  • Relevant Federal Statutes
  • FHA 3604 (S11)
  • Civil Rights Act of 1866 1981-82 (S153)
  • State Statutes Often Have Additional or Different
    Coverage
  • Can Look Up on Lawyering Q if Relevant
  • Otherwise, Not Expected to Address

44
RELEVANT FEDERAL ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW
Protected Characteristics Transactions Covered Exceptions
FHA 3604 Race, Color, National Origin, Religion, Sex, Familial Status, Handicap Residential Property Sales Leases Smallholders, Senior Housing, Religious Organizations
CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1866 Race (Defined Broadly to Include Ethnicity) All (including Commercial Sales and Leases) None
45
ZION Sorenson DQ102-04
TEMPLES TOWERS OF THE VIRGIN
46
ZION DQ102 Evidence in Sorenson
  • What evidence supported the plaintiff in
    Sorenson?
  • What evidence supported the defendant?
  • Whose story do you find more convincing (and
    why)?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com