Michael Moll ( CERN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Michael Moll ( CERN

Description:

Title: Radiation Damage in Silicon Detectors Author: Michael Moll Last modified by: vwedlake Created Date: 2/7/2001 7:03:14 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Michael3664
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Michael Moll ( CERN


1
CERN PH-DT2 Scientific Tea meeting 13.10.2006

Radiation Tolerant Silicon Detectors
  • Michael Moll ( CERN PH-DT2-SD)

Outline
  • What is a silicon detector? How does it work?
  • What is radiation damage? What are the
    problems?
  • Radiation damage in future experiments
    Super-LHC (LHCb Upgrade)
  • The CERN RD50 collaboration
  • Strategies to obtain more radiation tolerant
    detectors
  • Some examples how to obtain radiation tolerant
    detectors
  • Material Engineering
  • Device Engineering
  • Summary

2
Silicon Detector Working principle
  • Take a piece of high resistivity silicon and
    produce two electrodes (not so easy !)
  • Apply a voltage in order to create an internal
    electric field (some hundred volts over
    the 0.3mm thick device)
  • Traversing charged particles will produce
    electron-hole pairs
  • The moving electrons and holes will create a
    signal in the electric cicuit

3
Silicon Strip Detector
  • Segmentation of the p layer into strips (Diode
    Strip Detector) and connection of strips to
    individual read-out channels gives spatial
    information

typical thickness 300mm (150?m - 500?m used)
  • using n-type silicon with a ?resistivity of
    ? 2 KWcm (ND 2.2.1012cm-3) results
    in a depletion voltage 150 V
  • Resolution ? depends on the pitch p (distance
    from strip to strip)
  • - e.g. detection of charge in binary way
    (threshold discrimination) and
    using center of strip as measured coordinate
    results in
  • typical pitch values are 20 mm 150 mm ? 50 mm
    pitch results in 14.4 mm resolution

4
Example The ATLAS module
5
LHCb VELO Silicon sensor details
R-measuring sensor (45 degree circular segments)
  • 300 mm thick sensors
  • n-on-n, DOFZ wafers
  • 42 mm radius
  • AC coupled, double metal
  • 2048 strips / sensor
  • Pitch from 40 to 100 mm
  • Produced by Micron Semiconductor

42 mm
8 mm
F-measuring sensor (radial strips with a stereo
angle)
Martin van Beuzekom, STD6, September 2006
6
LHCb-VELO - Module construction
Beetle
  • 4 layer kapton circuit
  • Heat transport with TPG
  • Readout with 16 Beetle chips
  • 128 channels, 25 ns shaping time,
  • analog pipeline
  • 0.25 mm CMOS
  • no performance loss up to 40 Mrad
  • Yield gt 80

Kapton hybrid
Carbon fibre
Thermal Pyrolytic Graphite (TPG)
Martin van Beuzekom, STD6, September 2006
7
Motivation for RD on Radiation Tolerant
Detectors Super - LHC
  • LHC upgrade ?LHC (2007), L 1034cm-2s-1
    f(r4cm) 31015cm-2
  • ?Super-LHC (2015 ?), L 1035cm-2s-1
    f(r4cm)
    1.61016cm-2
  • LHC (Replacement of components) e.g. - LHCb Velo
    detectors (2010) - ATLAS Pixel B-layer
    (2012)
  • Linear collider experiments (generic RD)Deep
    understanding of radiation damage will be
    fruitful for linear collider experiments where
    high doses of e, g will play a significant role.

? 5
8
Overview Radiation Damage in Silicon Sensors
  • Two general types of radiation damage to the
    detector materials
  • ? Bulk (Crystal) damage due to Non Ionizing
    Energy Loss (NIEL) - displacement
    damage, built up of crystal defects
  • Change of effective doping concentration (higher
    depletion voltage,

    under- depletion)
  • Increase of leakage current (increase of shot
    noise, thermal runaway)
  • Increase of charge carrier trapping (loss of
    charge)
  • ? Surface damage due to Ionizing Energy Loss
    (IEL) - accumulation of positive in the
    oxide (SiO2) and the Si/SiO2 interface
    affects interstrip capacitance (noise
    factor), breakdown behavior,
  • Impact on detector performance and Charge
    Collection Efficiency (depending on detector
    type and geometry and readout electronics!)Signa
    l/noise ratio is the quantity to watch
  • ? Sensors can fail from radiation
    damage !

9
The charge signal
  • Collected Charge for a Minimum Ionizing
    Particle (MIP)
  • Mean energy loss dE/dx (Si) 3.88 MeV/cm ?
    116 keV for 300?m thickness
  • Most probable energy loss 0.7 ?mean
    ? 81 keV
  • 3.6 eV to create an e-h pair ? 72 e-h /
    ?m (mean) ? 108 e-h / ?m (most
    probable)
  • Most probable charge (300 ?m) 22500 e
    3.6 fC

10
Signal to Noise ratio
  • Landau distribution has a low energy tail -
    becomes even lower by noise broadening
  • Noise sources (ENC Equivalent Noise Charge)
    - Capacitance -
    Leakage Current - Thermal
    Noise (bias resistor)
  • Good hits selected by requiring NADC gt noise tail
    If cut too high ? efficiency
    loss If cut too low ? noise
    occupancy
  • Figure of Merit Signal-to-Noise Ratio S/N
  • Typical values gt10-15, people get nervous below
    10. Radiation damage severely degrades
    the S/N.

11
The CERN RD50 Collaboration http//www.cern.ch/rd
50
RD50 Development of Radiation Hard Semiconductor
Devices for High Luminosity Colliders
  • Collaboration formed in November 2001
  • Experiment approved as RD50 by CERN in June 2002
  • Main objective

Development of ultra-radiation hard semiconductor
detectors for the luminosity upgrade of the LHC
to 1035 cm-2s-1 (Super-LHC). Challenges -
Radiation hardness up to 1016 cm-2 required
- Fast signal collection (Going
from 25ns to 10 ns bunch crossing ?) - Low mass
(reducing multiple scattering close to
interaction point) - Cost effectiveness (big
surfaces have to be covered with detectors!)
  • Presently 261 members from 52 institutes

Belarus (Minsk), Belgium (Louvain), Canada
(Montreal), Czech Republic (Prague (3x)),
Finland (Helsinki, Lappeenranta), Germany
(Berlin, Dortmund, Erfurt, Freiburg, Hamburg,
Karlsruhe), Israel (Tel Aviv), Italy (Bari,
Bologna, Florence, Padova, Perugia, Pisa, Trento,
Turin), Lithuania (Vilnius), The Netherlands
(Amsterdam), Norway (Oslo (2x)), Poland (Warsaw
(2x)), Romania (Bucharest (2x)), Russia (Moscow),
St.Petersburg), Slovenia (Ljubljana), Spain
(Barcelona, Valencia), Switzerland (CERN, PSI),
Ukraine (Kiev), United Kingdom (Exeter, Glasgow,
Lancaster, Liverpool, Sheffield, University of
Surrey), USA (Fermilab, Purdue University,
Rochester University, SCIPP Santa Cruz, Syracuse
University, BNL, University of New Mexico)
12
Approaches to develop radiation harder solid
state tracking detectors
  • Defect Engineering of SiliconDeliberate
    incorporation of impurities or defects into the
    silicon bulk to improve radiation tolerance of
    detectors
  • Needs Profound understanding of radiation damage
  • microscopic defects, macroscopic parameters
  • dependence on particle type and energy
  • defect formation kinetics and annealing
  • Examples
  • Oxygen rich Silicon (DOFZ, Cz, MCZ, EPI)
  • Oxygen dimer hydrogen enriched Si
  • Pre-irradiated Si
  • Influence of processing technology
  • New Materials
  • Silicon Carbide (SiC), Gallium Nitride (GaN)
  • Diamond (CERN RD42 Collaboration)
  • Amorphous silicon
  • Device Engineering (New Detector Designs)
  • p-type silicon detectors (n-in-p)
  • thin detectors, epitaxial detectors
  • 3D detectors and Semi 3D detectors, Stripixels
  • Cost effective detectors
  • Scientific strategies
  • Material engineering
  • Device engineering
  • Change of detectoroperational conditions

CERN-RD39Cryogenic Tracking Detectorsoperation
at 100-200K to reduce charge loss
13
Silicon Materials under Investigation by RD50
Material Symbol ? (?cm) Oi (cm-3)
Standard FZ (n- and p-type) FZ 17?10 3 lt 5?1016
Diffusion oxygenated FZ (n- and p-type) DOFZ 17?10 3 12?1017
Magnetic Czochralski Si, Okmetic, Finland (n- and p-type) MCz 1?10 3 5?1017
Czochralski Si, Sumitomo, Japan (n-type) Cz 1?10 3 8-9?1017
Epitaxial layers on Cz-substrates, ITME, Poland (n- and p-type) EPI 50 - 100 lt 1?1017
  • DOFZ silicon
  • Enriched with oxygen on wafer level,
    inhomogeneous distribution of oxygen
  • CZ silicon
  • high Oi (oxygen) and O2i (oxygen dimer)
    concentration (homogeneous)
  • formation of shallow Thermal Donors possible
  • Epi silicon
  • high Oi , O2i content due to out-diffusion from
    the CZ substrate (inhomogeneous)
  • thin layers high doping possible (low starting
    resistivity)

14
Standard FZ, DOFZ, Cz and MCz Silicon
24 GeV/c proton irradiation
  • Standard FZ silicon
  • type inversion at 2?1013 p/cm2
  • strong Neff increase at high fluence
  • Oxygenated FZ (DOFZ)
  • type inversion at 2?1013 p/cm2
  • reduced Neff increase at high fluence
  • CZ silicon and MCZ silicon
  • no type inversion in the overall fluence range
    (verified by TCT measurements) (verified for CZ
    silicon by TCT measurements, preliminary result
    for MCZ silicon) ? donor generation
    overcompensates acceptor generation in high
    fluence range
  • Common to all materials (after hadron
    irradiation)
  • reverse current increase
  • increase of trapping (electrons and holes) within
    20

15
EPI Devices Irradiation experiments
G.Lindström et al.,10th European Symposium on
Semiconductor Detectors, 12-16 June 2005
G.Kramberger et al., Hamburg RD50 Workshop,
August 2006
  • Epitaxial silicon
  • Layer thickness 25, 50, 75 ?m (resistivity 50
    ?cm) 150 ?m (resistivity 400 ?cm)
  • Oxygen O ? 9?1016cm-3 Oxygen dimers
    (detected via IO2-defect formation)

?105V (25mm)
?230V (50mm)
?320V (75mm)
  • Only little change in depletion voltage
  • No type inversion up to 1016 p/cm2 and 1016
    n/cm2?high electric field will stay at front
    electrode!?reverse annealing will decreases
    depletion voltage!
  • Explanation introduction of shallow donors is
    bigger than
    generation of deep acceptors
  • CCE (Sr90 source, 25ns shaping)? 6400 e (150
    mm 2x1015 n/cm-2) ? 3300 e (75mm 8x1015
    n/cm-2) ? 2300 e (50mm 8x1015 n/cm-2)

16
Device engineeringp-in-n versus n-in-p detectors
n-type silicon after high fluences
p-type silicon after high fluences
non-p
pon-n
  • p-on-n silicon, under-depleted
  • Charge spread degraded resolution
  • Charge loss reduced CCE
  • n-on-p silicon, under-depleted
  • Limited loss in CCE
  • Less degradation with under-depletion
  • Collect electrons (fast)

Be careful, this is a very schematic
explanation,reality is more complex !
17
n-in-p microstrip detectors
n-in-p - no type inversion, high electric field
stays on structured side - collection
of electrons
  • n-in-p microstrip detectors (280mm) on p-type FZ
    silicon
  • Detectors read-out with 40MHz

CCE 6500 e (30) after 7.5 1015 p cm-2 at 900V
18
3D detector - concepts
Introduced by S.I. Parker et al., NIMA 395
(1997) 328
  • 3D electrodes - narrow columns along detector
    thickness, - diameter 10mm, distance 50 -
    100mm
  • Lateral depletion - lower depletion voltage
    needed - thicker detectors possible - fast
    signal - radiation hard

19
3D detector - concepts
Introduced by S.I. Parker et al., NIMA 395
(1997) 328
  • 3D electrodes - narrow columns along detector
    thickness, - diameter 10mm, distance 50 -
    100mm
  • Lateral depletion - lower depletion voltage
    needed - thicker detectors possible - fast
    signal - radiation hard

n-columns
p-columns
wafer surface
n-type substrate
  • Simplified 3D architecture
  • n columns in p-type substrate, p backplane
  • operation similar to standard 3D detector
  • Simplified process
  • hole etching and doping only done once
  • no wafer bonding technology needed
  • Simulations performed
  • Fabrication
  • IRST(Italy), CNM Barcelona

metal strip
hole
C. Piemonte et al., NIM A541 (2005) 441
hole
Hole depth 120-150mm Hole diameter 10mm
C.Piemonte et al., STD06, September 2006
  • First CCE tests under way

20
Conclusion
  • New Materials like SiC and GaN have been
    characterized (not shown in this talk) . ?
    ? CCE tests show that these materials are not
    radiation harder than silicon ? Silicon
    (operated at e.g. -30C) seems presently to be
    the best choice
  • At fluences up to 1015cm-2 (Outer layers of SLHC
    detector) the depletion voltage change and the
    large area to be covered is major problem
  • MCZ silicon detectors could be a cost-effective
    radiation hard solution
  • p-type (FZ and MCZ) silicon microstrip detectors
    show good results CCE ? 6500 e Feq
    4?1015 cm-2, 300mm, collection of electrons,
    no reverse annealing observed in CCE
    measurement!
  • At the fluence of 1016cm-2 (Innermost layer of a
    SLHC detector) the active thickness of any
    silicon material is significantly reduced due to
    trapping. New options
  • Thin/EPI detectors drawback radiation hard
    electronics for low signals needed
    e.g. 3300e at Feq
    8x1015cm-2, 75mm EPI,
    . thicker layers (150 mm presently
    under test)
  • 3D detectors drawback very difficult
    technology
    .. steady progress within RD50

Further information http//cern.ch/rd50/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com