Low Rate UWB for TG4a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Low Rate UWB for TG4a

Description:

Title: 05-0021-01 Subject: Low Rate UWB for TG4a Author: Matt Welborn Last modified by: r63015 Created Date: 7/20/2003 2:56:08 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: MattW195
Learn more at: https://www.ieee802.org
Category:
Tags: uwb | amplifier | low | rate | sense | tg4a

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Low Rate UWB for TG4a


1
Project IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless
Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title
TG4a Proposal for Low Rate DS-UWB
(DS-UWB-LR) Date Submitted January
2004 Source Matt Welborn (1), Michael
McLaughlin (2), Shariar Emami (1) Company
(1) Freescale Semiconductor, Inc, (2) decaWave,
Ltd. Address 8133 Leesburg Pike, Vienna VA
22182 Voice703-269-3000, FAX ,
E-Mailmatt.welborn _at_ freescale.com, or
michael_at_decawave.com Re Response to Call for
Proposals Abstract This document describes a
proposal for the TG4a baseline draft
standard. Purpose Proposal Presentation for
the IEEE802.15.4a standard. Notice This
document has been prepared to assist the IEEE
P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion
and is not binding on the contributing
individual(s) or organization(s). The material in
this document is subject to change in form and
content after further study. The contributor(s)
reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw
material contained herein. Release The
contributor acknowledges and accepts that this
contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may
be made publicly available by P802.15.
2
UWB for Low Rate Communications
  • UWB has great potential for low power
    communications
  • Low fading margin can provide same range for
    lower transmit power
  • Large (ultra-wide) bandwidth can provide fine
    time resolution provides potential for accurate
    ranging primary differentiation from existing
    15.4 capabilities
  • Drawbacks due to regulations
  • Limited transmit power how much is enough?
  • Operation at long ranges is highly dependent on
    NLOS path loss characteristics

3
Proposal for TG4a Alternate PHY Layer
4
Overview of DS-UWB-LR TG4a Proposal
  • Based on higher rate DS-UWB proposal under
    consideration in TG3a, but modified for low power
    and lower complexity
  • Variable-length code spreading with BPSK
    modulation of data
  • Chip rates are 1/3 the rates used in DS-UWB (so
    about 450 MHz)
  • Bandwidth is only 500 MHz (instead of 1500 M)
  • Lower complexity FEC convolutional code
    (constraint length k4)
  • Data rates of 30 kbps to 10 Mbps
  • Use spreading codes of length 24 to 6144
  • AWGN range of 15 to 75 meters (assuming n3.5 PL
    at gt 10m)
  • Support for precise ranging
  • Very straight forward solutions using RTT
    measurements with corrections for non-direct-path
    propagation effects
  • Flexible pulse shaping
  • Allows many pulse generation, antenna and
    receiver architectures
  • Supports requirements for coexistence
    regulatory constraints
  • Will enable interoperation between higher rate
    DS-UWB devices and low rate, low complexity TG4a
    devices
  • Support wider range of asymmetric applications
  • Enables active coexistence and coordination

5
Benefits of Low Rate DS-UWB
  • Bandwidth operating frequency
  • Transmit power, ranging, complexity performance
  • Pulse rate
  • Effects on efficiency implementation
  • Data Rate
  • Interoperability Coexistence

6
Operating Frequency
  • If multiple bands used
  • Multiple operating channels with different center
    frequencies to provide FDM operation for
    different networks
  • Three piconet bands at 3536, 4056, and 4576 MHz
  • Different performance due to 20 Log10(Fc) term in
    path loss
  • Also uses CDM for sharing of each band by
    different piconets
  • Could also use pure CDM in a single wider band
  • Could even mix wider band devices (1500 MHz) and
    narrower band devices (500 MHz)
  • Cost of generating the reference frequency
    depends on the specific frequency
  • DS-UWB is based on low cost, high quality 26 MHz
    crystals (widely used in cell phones)
  • Better frequency accuracy can relax other system
    constraints
  • Acquisition at longer range requires longer
    integration and therefore more accurate reference
    frequency
  • High accuracy clock can allow longer sleep time
    better power management
  • Precise ranging using TOA methods requires high
    precision time measurements over relatively long
    intervals (RTT) to determine small differences in
    signal propagation times
  • Simplified and improved with good reference clock

7
Signal Operating Bands for Low Rate UWB
Relative PSD (dB)
Possible Lower Rate Signaling Bands (500 MHz
bandwidth)
High rate DS-UWB Low Band with RRC Pulse Shape
0
-3
FCC Mask
-20
4056
3536
4576
Frequency (MHz)
3100
5100
  • Ultra-wideband 500 MHz bands for each piconet
  • Code-division and Frequency-division multiplexing
  • Multiple piconets in each band using different
    codes
  • Operation in close proximity, interference
    avoidance or coexistence
  • Three piconet bands at 3536, 4056, and 4576 MHz

8
Low Rate DS-UWB Pulse Rate
  • Impulse radio (IR) originally meant low pulse
    rate (10s of M pulse/sec) using time hopping
    for multiple access and pulse position modulation
    (PPM)
  • More generally, IR is just pulse-based spread
    spectrum with data modulation
  • Many choices for modulation (BPSK, PPM, OOK,
    etc.)
  • One or more pulses per data symbol
  • Low rate DS-UWB uses a chip rate that is designed
    to meet minimum 500 MHz bandwidth for simple BSK
    modulation
  • Center frequency is always a multiple of 26 MHz
  • Chip rate is equal to center frequency divided by
    9 (e.g. 4052 / 9 450.66MHz)
  • Spreading codes are based on 24-chip code
  • Longer spreading codes are derived from the basic
    code by further sreading with PN sequence (e.g.
    length 192 code is a length 24 code spread by a
    length 8 PN code)
  • Pulse rate does not fundamentally affect transmit
    power, signal bandwidth or system performance
  • Pulse rate does affect energy per pulse and
    therefore peak power (and voltage)

9
Higher Pulse Rate Lower Peak Power
Higher peak power voltage for same average
power
  • Lower pulse rate requires higher energy per
    pulse and therefore higher peak power (and
    voltage) for same transmit power
  • Process technology can limit available peak
    voltage that can be achieved without an external
    power amplifier ___
  • If pulse rate is 100x slower, then peak voltage
    is ?100 10x higher

10
Something Special about Impulse Radio
  • For impulse radio, basic idea was to send a fixed
    pulse shape at a regular (or controlled) interval
  • For conventional carrier systems, the pulse
    shape at RF is not fixed due to lack of fixed
    relationship between carrier phase and symbol
    clock phase
  • Result if properly designed we can have combine
    the benefits of conventional carrier-based
    systems and impulse systems
  • Fixed phase relationship between carrier symbol
  • DS-UWB is based on integer relationship between
    center frequency (carrier) and chip or symbol
    rate
  • Makes frequency synthesis and implementation
    easier

11
No Advantage to Non-Coherent
Given that synchronization to chipping clock must
be done regardless, and Since RF is easily
synchronized to the chipping clock, There is no
reason not to build coherent systems
Chipping Clock Must Be Synchronized Regardless of
Coherent/Incoherent Approach
-
Ring
-
up a filter to create
an RF UWB pulse

Simple injection lock or PLL
Ring
No jitter issues because of high BW
Oscillator
(only 3X multiply)
A very small ring oscillator at 4.1 GHz

Injection lock or PLL
-
an LC oscillator
12
Data Rate Considerations
  • Lowest PHY data rate does not necessarily mean
    lowest energy consumption
  • In fact, a fast radio can potentially be more
    energy efficient than a slow radio. Example
  • Compare a 1 Mbps radio at 100 mW versus 10 kbps
    radio at 10 mW
  • 32 kB _at_ 10 kbps 0.256 mWseconds
  • 32 kB _at_ 1 Mbps 0.0256 mWseconds 1/10 of the
    energy per bit!
  • Assumptions
  • Both radios achieve minimum range requirement for
    application
  • Minimum acquisition time is a function of SNR
    (range) not data rate
  • Requires fast wake-up and shut down of radio with
    aggressive power management
  • Relative energy usage depends on packet size
  • Fast radio advantage is higher for longer packets
  • Notice transmit power is a small fraction of the
    total power (lt1)
  • The largest power use is turning on the radio and
    processing signal

13
Data Rate Considerations
Lower radio power, but longer transmission time
for data payload
Power
Preamble
Time
Higher peak power but shorter transmission time
for same payload
Power
Preamble
Time
  • Total energy use from battery is the area under
    the power vs. time curves shown above
  • Relative efficiency depends on power duration
    (payload size)

14
Low Rate DS-UWB Data Rates
  • LR-DS-UWB data rates are designed to support
    relatively high rate operation at relatively
    small duty cycle

Spreading code Length Symbol Rate FEC Rate PHY Bit Rate
192 2.35 MHz 0.5 1.17 Mbps
768 587 kHz 0.5 293 kbps
6144 73 kHz 0.5 37 kbps
24 18.778 MHz 0.5 9.4 Mbps
15
Link Budget
16
Link Budget Notes
  • Assumptions
  • Chipping rate 450.66 MHz
  • Includes 1.9 dB Tx power reduction for spectral
    ripple in certification testing
  • Assumes 3.8e-5 BER to achieve 1 PER with 32
    octet data packet

17
Interoperability Coexistence
  • All of the specific co-existing systems in the
    Slection Requirements are out-of-band to
    LR-DS-UWB
  • Robustness against in-band interference is
    provided by the UWB bandwidth of the LR-DS-UWB
    system (large processing gain)
  • Many types of other UWB systems and waveforms
    will share the UWB bands
  • Interoperability between TG4a higher rate
    systems could enable improved coexistence
  • Interoperation with higher rate systems could
    increase the utility of the TG4a standard
  • Interoperability of low cost sensor/RFID devices
    with nearby UWB CE devices
  • Interoperability with DS-UWB could be quite
    simple if correct parameters are chose for TG4a
  • Common reference frequency, codes operating
    bands

18
Dual 15.4 and DS-UWB (15.3a Proposal) is Easy and
Could Provide Interoperability/Co-existence
Receiver
LNA
ò
To ADC
S
/
H
Ternary Code
3
n RF Cycles


1
,
0
,
-
1

Encoded
Ant
per Chip
TxData
Code Gen
Filter
LPF
Code Clock
Chip Clock
d
Sense
r
D
x
3
n
Q
Ck
This is as simple as anything else
Symbol Rate
?L
code
Chip Rate Clock
Idealized
n

1
for
1
.
5
GHz BW
(
15
.
3
a
)
?n
-
-
-
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
n

3
for
500
MHz BW
(
15
.
4
a
)
Filtered (LPF RF)
1
.
352
GHz
(
104
13
MHz
)
Inverted
,
Non
-
Inverted and Zero
-
Amplitude Wavelets
Agile Clock
Locks to Chip Rate
19
Ranging using the DS-UWB Approach
  • TG4a has done an extensive review of potential
    location techniques thank you!
  • Some result in hyperbolic lines of position (LOP)
  • Some result in circular LOPs (since they are
    determined directly from node-to-node ranges)
  • Simple node-to-node ranging can also be useful
    when used without the benefit of fixed reference
    nodes
  • Brief review of node-to-node ranging

20
Basic Approach for Ranging
Packet Exchange Timeline
Delay before data is transmitted
Total elapsed time
Response
Initiating packet
Node A
Node B
Initiating packet
Response
Delay in receiver before ACK is transmitted
?T due to multipath excess delay
?T due to direct path propagation
21
Required Measurements
Node A Computes Range
Node A Initiates Ranging Operation
TX_Initialize (Node A)
Sync_Ref_Point (Node A)
Node A Excess Delay Estimate
Total elapsed time
Node A
Channel Scan
Response packet
Initiating packet
Node B later sends data to A
Sync_Ref_Point (Node B)
TX_Initialize (Node B)
Inter-packet time
Node B
Initiating packet
Response packet
Channel Scan
Node B Excess Delay Estimate
22
Example NLOS Range Calculations
Actual Ranges (ft) Actual Ranges (ft)
1 16.7
2 17.7
3 18.6
4 19.6
5 20.6
6 21.6
7 22.5
8 23.5
9 24.5
Nine Different NLOS Channel Impulse Responses,
Ranges 16-25 Feet
-3
x 10
3
2
Amplitude
1
0
-1
-2
-3
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
-7
x 10
Time (seconds)
Leading Edges of Reponses, Showing Direct Path
Component Detection
-3
x 10
1.5
16.7 ft-1-1
17.9 ft-2-1
24.1 ft-4-1
18.7 ft-3-1
1
Amplitude
0.5
0
-0.5
20.5 ft-5-1
23.5 ft-8-1
22.4 ft-7-1
-1
21.4 ft-6-1
21.2 ft-9-1
-1.5

200
220
240
260
280
300
320
Range (in inches)
23
Measured Multipath Resolution with an Operating
Radio
Optimal lock path for radio
14 dB lower power
Earliest arriving path
Multipath component amplitude (dB)
10 ns earlier
Time in nanoseconds (time reversed)
24
Technical Feasibility
  • The Low rate DS-UWB solution for TG3a has a high
    level of manufacturability
  • Based on existing DS-UWB technology
  • Can be implemented in low-cost CMOS technology
  • Time to Market
  • Time to market should be quite reasonable.
  • Regulatory Impact
  • DS-UWB technology is know to be compliant with
    FCC UWB rules
  • Other regulatory administrations are using FCC
    rules as a basis for initial discussions
  • Many mechanisms exist to ensure compliance for
    other regions that adopt other regulations

25
System Performance
  • System and SOP simulations are underway results
    TBD

26
Collaboration Whats Important
Characteristic Importance (to me)
Radio manufacturability High
Performance-to-emissions ratio High-to-medium
Absolute performance Medium
Precision ranging potential High-to-medium
Coexistence w/other UWB High-to-medium
Regulatory compliance Essential
Scalability (rates, applications, etc) High-to-medium
Ultra-low complexity Medium
Low power consumption support High-to-medium
Signal bandwidth (500 to 1500) Medium-to-low
Other modulation parameters Specific spreading codes, chip rates, data rates, etc Medium
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com