Title: International%20Health%20Care%20Systems
1International Health Care Systems
- Kao-Ping Chua
- Jack Rutledge Fellow, 2005-2006
- American Medical Student Association
2Structure of systems
Insurance Delivery Examples
National health service Mostly public Mostly public U.K.
Entrepre-neurial Mostly private Mostly private U.S.
Mandated insurance Mostly public Public and private Germany
3The influence of values on systems
- European social ethic public good, social
solidarity - American individualistic ethic individual good,
social fragmentation
4Three categories of analysis
- Organization insurance pools, public/private mix
- Quality, choice, and access
- Problems
5Outline
- U.S.
- Japan
- Germany
- France
- U.K.
- Canada
THINK BIG PICTURE!!!
6U.S.
WHO Ranking for Health Attainment 24 WHO
Overall Ranking 37 GDP spent on health care
15 (OECD median 8.6)
7US Organization
This refers to the non-elderly population
8US Quality, choice, access
- Quality depends on plan often gaps for
prescription drugs, dental, vision - Choice Restricted choice of providers
- Access Waiting lines relatively rare, huge
amount of uninsurance
9US Problems
- 45 million uninsured
- Skyrocketing health care costs
- Significant health disparities by race and income
10Japan
WHO Ranking for Health Attainment 1 WHO
Overall Ranking 10 GDP spent on health care
7.9 (OECD median 8.6)
11Japan organization
12Japan organization
- Most providers and hospitals are in the private
sector - Hospitals are the center of care
13Japan quality, choice, access
- Quality huge amount of technology, comprehensive
benefits - Choice free choice of doctors and hospitals
- Access few waiting lists except at the very best
hospitals
14Japan problems/reforms
- Kenpo associations in debt (cross-subsidizations)
rapidly aging population - Over-prescription of drugs
- High cost-sharing
15France
WHO Ranking for Health Attainment 3 WHO
Overall Ranking 1 GDP spent on health care
10.1 (OECD median 8.6)
16France organization
- Multi-payer system
- 3 main payers are the Sickness Insurance Funds
(SIFs) cover most health care costs - Profession determines which SIF a citizen is
automatically enrolled in
17France organization
- Most ambulatory care physicians are in private
practice - Sector I charge at national fee schedule but get
government benefits - Sector II charge above fee schedule but dont
get government benefits - Hospitals both private and public
- Complementary health insurance for cost-sharing
(90 of the population)
18France quality, choice, access
- Quality very comprehensive, good safety net for
the poor - Choice Free choice of doctors
- Access Can usually see GP on same-day
19France problems
- Nursing and physician shortages
- Increasing health expenditures, mainly from drugs
(19 of all expenditures) - 90 of physician visits end up with
prescriptions!
20Germany
WHO Ranking for Health Attainment 22 WHO
Overall Ranking 25 GDP spent on health care
11.1 (OECD median 8.6)
21Germany organization
- Multi-payer system
- Social Health Insurance (SHI) network made up
of 192 private, occupation-based "sickness funds - High-income may opt-out of SHI and purchase
voluntary health insurance - Free government care
22Germany organization
- Ambulatory physicians are mostly private
- Hospitals are both public and private
23Germany quality, choice, access
- Quality Extremely comprehensive benefits
- Generous sick pay policies
- Choice Free choice of GP and specialists, must
use closest hospital - Access Waiting times not usually a problem
24Germany problems/reforms
- Expensive health care system
- High cost-sharing
- Excessive numbers of physicians (60 of areas are
closed off to more doctors)
25The United Kingdom
WHO Ranking for Health Attainment 14 WHO
Overall Ranking 18 GDP spent on health care
7.7 (OECD median 8.6)
26UK organization
- National health service (NHS) publicly financed
and delivered - Supplemental private insurance for dental and eye
care - Growing sector of substitutive private insurance
27UK Quality, choice, access
- Quality Comprehensive except dental and eye
- Choice Free choice of doctor
- Access major problems with waiting lists
- Specialist (2.5 months)
- Elective procedures (3 months)
28UK problems
- Underfunding
- Waiting lists
- Health care delivery capacity is insufficient for
many services - Facilities need updating
29Canada
WHO Ranking for Health Attainment 12 WHO
Overall Ranking 30 GDP spent on health care
9.9 (OECD median 8.6)
30Canada organization
- Single-payer system
- 13 provincial/territorial governments administer
health care plan (Medicare) - Federal government regulates the
provincial/territorial health care plans by
offering transfer payments contingent upon
pre-specified criteria
31(No Transcript)
32Canada organization
- Providers are mostly private hospitals mostly
public - Most Canadians have complementary private health
insurance for non-covered services
33Canada Quality, choice, access
- Quality Coverage for medically necessary
services - Gaps for dental care, long-term care, outpatient
drugs ? complementary private insurance - Choice Free to choose GP and hospital
- Access
- No waiting lists for GP visits or emergencies
- Waiting times can be problematic for certain
ELECTIVE procedures
34Canada Problems/reforms
- Underfunding
- Gaps in coverage
- Tension between provincial and central
governments
35Points to remember, part 1
- Every country is dealing with increasing health
care costs - ANY system can have problems if it is
underfunded, no matter how good it is
theoretically - Privatization exists to various degrees in each
systembut no country allows private elements to
price people out of health care
36Points to remember, part 2
- UHC can be achieved while maintaining
- Comprehensive benefits for everyone (every
country but U.S.) - Free choice of providers (every country but U.S.)
- High levels of technology (Japan, Germany)
- Few waiting lists (France, Germany, Japan)
37Parting thought
- The U.S. is the only industrialized country
- in the world without UHC
- but we can achieve high-quality, affordable
health care for EVERYONE if we used the vast
amounts of money in our system more efficiently