Title: Using design to enrich mental constructs of a mathematical concept
1Using design to enrich mental constructs of a
mathematical concept
- Dr Zingiswa MM Jojo
- Department of Mathematics Education
- University of South Africa
2Introduction
- Instructional design is the process by which
instruction is improved through the analysis of
learning needs and systematic development of
learning material (Carter, 2011) - creation of effective meaningful lessons
- helping students to make sense of information
- cut through extraneous information
- The choice of instruction to be used in a lesson
depends on
3The design of instruction and activities
- the teachers knowledge of the concept,
- preconceptions,
- misconceptions and
- the difficulties that learners could experience
in learning the concept. - To understand a particular mathematics concept or
topic involves knowing the relationship between
various topics and where a particular topic fits
in the bigger picture
4Curriculum Shifts
- Learner centred approaches and arguments have
replaced examination focused, teacher-centred,
and content driven approaches for deep
understanding of mathematical concepts - These bear evidence of teachers struggle in
putting them to practice in their classrooms in
South Africa due to both cultural and resource
contexts.
5Understanding a mathematical concept
Wiggins (1) explanation, (2)
interpretation, (3) contextual applications,
(4) perspective, (5) empathy and (6)
self-knowledge.
6 In order to think about mathematical ideas
there is a need to represent them internally in a
way that allows the mind to operate on them As
relationships are constructed between internal
representations of ideas, they produce networks
which could be structured like vertical
hierarchies or webs.
7- With regard to learning mathematics with
understanding - a mathematical idea or procedure or fact is
understood if it is part of an internal network - the mathematics is understood if its mental
representation is part of a network of
representations. - The degree of understanding is determined by the
number and strength of connections.
8Initial genetic decomposition (IGD)
- IGD refers to the set of mental constructs which
the learners should construct in order to
understand a given mathematics concept. - The genetic decomposition was composed in terms
of mental constructions (actions, processes,
objects, schemas) and mechanisms (contrast,
separation, generalisation and fusion) learners
might employ when learning inequalities.
9APOS and Variation
10Variation Interaction
- Variation interaction is a strategy to interact
with mathematics learning environment in order to
bring about discernment of mathematical
structure. - Variation is about what changes, what stays
constant and the underlying rule that is
discerned by learners in the process. - Instructional design to enrich mental constructs
from the lens of variation and how learners are
brought to the schema level of understanding a
concept.
11Variation
- Based on Leung (2012) the object of learning
i.e. What is to be learnt? discernment of what
is to be learnt in the lesson - Contrast presupposes that for one to know what a
concept is, he/she has to discern and know what
it is not. e.g. examples and non-examples - Separation assumes that all concepts have a
multitude of features, each of which give rise to
different understandings of the concept. - Generalisation refers to the verification and
conjecture making activity that checks out the
validity of a separation.
12Variation continued
- Fusion is the simultaneous discernment of all the
critical features of a concept and a relationship
between them which allows a learner to make
connections gained in past and present
interactions
13Research Question
- What is the nature of instructional support that
can generate in students the kinds of mental
representations that will enable them to think
about these critical differences when engaging in
symbol manipulation activity involving
inequalities?
14Questions to consider for instruction
- What are students conceptions of inequalities?
- What is typical correct and incorrect reasoning?
- What are common errors?
- What are possible sources of students incorrect
solutions? - What are promising ways to teach the topics of
inequalities?
15Challenges for Teaching the topic
- Inequalities are
- taught in secondary school as a subordinate
subject (in relationship with equations), - dealt with in a purely algorithmic manner,
- taught in a manner to avoid the difficulties
inherent in the concept of function. - taught in a sequence of routine procedures, which
are not easy for students to understand,
interpret and control - algebraic transformations are performed without
taking care of the constraints deriving from the
fact that the gt sign does not behave like the
sign
16Separation-discernment of the critical
characteristics of a concept to differentiate it
from others
Processes- Action interiorisation-transformations
in the mind
Objects-process encapsulated-
Generalisation-verification and conjecture making
activity on the separated pattern
Contrast- to know and discern what a concept is
and what it is not
Fusion-Totality of actions
Actions- Physical manipulations external to the
mind
Schema- reflection on process as a totality of
knowledge
17HOW and WHERE do I start with the teaching of
inequalities?
18An inequality is like an equation, but instead of
an equal sign () it has one of these signs lt
less than less than or equal to gt
greater than greater than or equal to
19x -2
- means that whatever value x has, it must be
greater than or equal to -2. - Try to name ten numbers that are greater than or
equal to -2!
20Numbers greater than -2 are to the right of -5 on
the number line.
- If you said -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc., you are
right. - There are also numbers in between the integers,
like -1/2, 0.2, 3.1, 5.5, etc. - The number -2 would also be a correct answer,
because of the phrase, or equal to.
21Solve an Inequality
w 5 lt 8
We will use the same steps that we did with
equations, if a number is added to the variable,
we add the opposite sign to both sides
w 5 (-5) lt 8 (-5)
w 0 lt 3
All numbers less than 3 are solutions to this
problem!
w lt 3
22Do we do the same with the next example? When do
we deviate from this routine procedure?
23More Examples
1 -2y 5
1 - 2y (-1) 5 (-1)
-2y 4
All numbers from -2 up (including -2) make this
problem true!
24Example
25Teacher 2 - Concept Map- IGD
26How does this help with the learners learning of
the concept?
27Contexualising the problem
- The doctor instructed my grandfather to take no
more than 3 pills per day - My instructor advised me to run at least 10km per
day to prepare for the marathon - I ate at most two meals today
28Example x lt 6
- Teacher 2What is meant by this?
- Are those the only numbers?
- To the answers given, the teacher probed by
suggesting non-examples - How can we represent this on the number line?
- Opened up the scope of knowledge- encouraging
critical thinking - The learner has to convince himself- Internalize
the knowledge
29Discussion- Teacher 1
30Teacher 2
- Contextualised the problem- using an authentic
task as an instructional strategy - make sense of some of the exceptional
transformation rules used in solving inequalities - properties underlying valid equation-solving
transformations are not the same as those
underlying valid inequality-solving
transformations - multiplying both sides by the same number, which
produces equivalent equations, can lead to
pitfalls for inequalities
31Conclusions and recommendations
- Discernment of the concept - the learner to be
aware of certain features which are critical to
the intended way of seeing this concept - Highlight the essential features of the concepts
through varying the non-essential features - Give the learners a chance to demonstrate argue
and explain their solutions to others
32- See learners as constructors of meaning
- help learners to actively try things out,
- Experience the construction of multiple
perspectives of mathematical concepts, - Find components of the concept that are
interconnected with each other
33- extend the original problem by varying the
conditions, changing the results and generalize - (2) multiple methods of solving a problem by
varying the different processes of solving a
problem and associating different methods of
solving a problem - (3) multiple applications of a method by
applying the same method to a group of similar
problems.
34Thank you Ndiyabulela