S519: Evaluation of Information Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

S519: Evaluation of Information Systems

Description:

S519: Evaluation of Information Systems Social Statistics Inferential Statistics Chapter 10: t test T test for dependent A repeated-measures study (a.k.a dependent ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: nori74
Learn more at: https://ils.indiana.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: S519: Evaluation of Information Systems


1
S519 Evaluation of Information Systems
  • Social Statistics
  • Inferential Statistics
  • Chapter 10 t test

2
T test for dependent
  • A repeated-measures study (a.k.a dependent study)
    is one in which a single sample of individuals is
    measured more than once on the same dependent
    variable.
  • Main benefit two sets of data are from the same
    subjects.

3
Example
  • Three professors at University of Alabama studied
    the effects of resource and regular classrooms on
    the reading achievement of learning-disabled
    children. A group of children was test before
    they take the 1-year daily instruction and after
    they took the 1-year daily instruction.
  • Which statistical test we should use?

4
T test for dependent
the sum of all the difference between
groups the sum of the differences squared
between groups n the number of pairs of
observations
5
T test for dependent
Pre-test Post-test D D2
3 7 4 16
5 8 3 9
4 6 2 4
6 7 1 1
5 8 3 9
5 9 4 16
4 6 2 4
5 6 1 1
3 7 4 16
6 8 2 4
7 8 1 1
8 7 -1 1
7 9 2 4
6 10 4 16
7 9 2 4
8 9 1 1
8 8 0 0
9 8 -1 1
9 4 -5 25
8 4 -4 16
7 5 -2 4
7 6 -1 1
6 9 3 9
7 8 1 1
8 12 4 16
6
T test for dependent
  • Step1 A statement of the null and research
    hypotheses

7
T test for dependent
  • Step2 setting the level of risk (or the level of
    significance or Type I error) associated with
    null hypothesis
  • 0.05

8
T test for dependent
  • Step3 selection of the appropriate test
    statistics
  • Following Figure 10.1
  • T test for dependent t test for paired samples
    t test for correlated samples

9
T test for dependent
  • Step4 computation of the test statistic value
  • t2.45

10
T test for dependent
  • Step5 determination of the value needed for
    rejection of the null hypothesis
  • Table B2
  • dfn-125-124
  • One tailed because research hypothesis is
    directed

11
T test for dependent
  • Step6 a comparison of the t value and the
    critical value
  • 2.45gt1.711
  • Reject the null hypothesis

12
T test for dependent
  • Step7 and 8 time for a decision
  • There is the difference between pre-test and
    post-test the post-test scores are higher than
    the pre-test scores.

13
Excel TTEST function
  • TTEST (array1, array2, tails, type)
  • array1 the cell address for the first set of
    data
  • array2 the cell address for the second set of
    data
  • tails 1 one-tailed, 2 two-tailed
  • type 1 a paired t test 2 a two-sample test
    (independent with equal variances) 3 a
    two-sample test with unequal variances

14
Excel TTEST()
  • It does not computer the t value
  • It returns the likelihood that the resulting t
    value is due to chance
  • Less than 1 of the possibility that two tests
    are different due to chance ? the two tests are
    difference due to other reasons than chance.

15
Excel ToolPak
  • T test paired two sample for means option

t-Test Paired Two Sample for Means t-Test Paired Two Sample for Means

  pretest posttest
Mean 6.32 7.52
Variance 2.976666667 3.343333333
Observations 25 25
Pearson Correlation 0.050718341
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 24
t Stat -2.449489743
P(Tltt) one-tail 0.010991498
t Critical one-tail 1.710882067
P(Tltt) two-tail 0.021982997
t Critical two-tail 2.063898547  

16
Advantages of theRepeated-Samples Design
  • Repeated-measures design reduces or limits the
    variance, by eliminating the individual
    differences between samples.

17
Problems With theRepeated-Samples Design
  • Carryover effect (specifically associated with
    repeated-measures design) subjects score in
    second measurement is altered by a lingering
    aftereffect from the first measurement.

18
Types of t test
19
Example I
  • A researcher is interested in a new technique to
    improve SAT verbal scores. It is known that SAT
    verbal scores have µ500 s100.
  • She randomly selects n30 students from this
    population, and has them undergo her training
    technique. Students are given analogy questions,
    and are shocked each time they get an answer
    wrong.
  • The sample then writes the SAT, and gets M 560.

20
Example II
  • A social psychologist is interested in whether
    people feel more or less hopeful following a
    devastating flood in a small rural community. He
    randomly selects n10 people and asks them to
    report how hopeful the feel using a 7-point scale
    from extremely hopeful (1) to neutral (4) to
    extremely unhopeful (7)
  • The researcher is interested in whether the
    responses are consistently above or below the
    midpoint (4) on the scale, but has no hypothesis
    about what direction they are likely to go.
  • His sample reports M4.7, s 1.89.

21
Example III
  • To test the hypothesis that people give out more
    candy to kids in cute costumes than scary ones, I
    hire 20 kids to work for me. Ten are randomly
    assigned to wear cute bunny costumes, and the
    other ten wear Darth Vader costumes.
  • I drop the kids off in random parts of the city,
    and count the total pieces of candy each has
    after 1 hour of trick-or-treat.
  • Cute bunnies M 120, s 10
  • Darth Vaders M 112, s 12

22
Example IV
  • We are testing the effects of moderate amounts of
    alcohol on driving performance. We make the
    hypothesis that even a small amount of beer will
    degrade driving performance (an increase in
    obstacles hit).
  • To test our hypothesis, we have n5 subjects
    drive around a course on Big Wheels covered with
    cardboard cutouts of children and furry animals,
    and we record the number of cutouts they hit.
    Then, they drink one beer, and do the course
    again again we record the number of cutouts hit.
  • What is a potential confound with this experiment?

23
Example V
  • We want to determine if IU SLIS faculty publish
    more than the national average of 4 papers per
    year (per person). We take a random sample of
    n12 IU SLIS profs and survey the number of
    papers each has published, obtaining M6.3,
    s1.13.

24
Example VI
  • I want to know which dog is responsible for the
    holes in my yard. I buy 10 German Shepherds, 10
    Beagles, and randomly assign each dog to its own
    yard. At the end of the day, the Beagles have dug
    M11.3 holes, s2.1, and the Shepherds have dug
    M5.4 holes, s1.9. Test my hypothesis that
    Beagles dig more holes than German Shepherds.

25
Example VII
  • We want to know if noise affects surgery
    performance. We randomly select a sample of 9
    surgeons, and have them perform a hand-eye
    coordination task (not while performing surgery,
    of course). The surgeons first perform the task
    in a quiet condition, and then we have them
    perform the same task under a noisy condition.
    Test the hypothesis that noise will cause poorer
    performance on the task.

26
Example VIII
  • ETS reports that GRE quantitative scores for
    people who have not taken a training course are
    µ555, s139. We take a sample of 10 people from
    this population and give them a new preparation
    course. Test the hypothesis that their test
    scores differ from the population.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com