Split-TCP:%20State%20of%20the%20Union%20Address - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Split-TCP:%20State%20of%20the%20Union%20Address

Description:

Split-TCP: State of the Union Address Dan Berger 03/03/03 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: DanB122
Learn more at: http://alumni.cs.ucr.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Split-TCP:%20State%20of%20the%20Union%20Address


1
Split-TCP State of the Union Address
  • Dan Berger
  • 03/03/03

2
Adgenda
  • Proxied or Split TCP Conceptual Overview
  • Previous Investigation
  • Current Work
  • Results and Analysis
  • Conclusion

3
Conceptual Overview
  • The Problem(s)
  • TCP cant distinguish link failure from
    congestion.
  • Results in lowered throughput
  • Effect is magnified on longer (hop-count)
    connections

4
Concepts (Cont.)
  • The Proposal
  • Designate nodes along the path to be packet-level
    proxies.
  • These proxies buffer segments until theyve been
    received (and acknowledged) by the next proxy (or
    destination)
  • If the packet isnt ackd in reasonable time
    they resend.

5
Details, Details
  • Proxy selection must be distributed and dynamic,
    to accommodate mobility in the network.
  • The proxies should be as stateless as possible
    specifically, keeping per-flow state is bad.

6
Previous Investigation
  • In a simple string topology Split-TCP is able to
    provide a better overall throughput than TCP, up
    to about 15
  • In a complex topology with mobility, the total
    throughput improves with the use of proxies by
    about 5 to about 30

7
Current Work
  • The initial goal was to implement a linux kernel
    implementation.
  • This work was stymied by a lack of detailed
    understanding of the desired behavior of the
    protocol.
  • Work done last quarter found issues with the
    current simulation model which suggested it
    needed to be revisited.

8
Forward, march!
  • We decided to turn our attention to building a
    more accurate and usable simulation model in ns.
  • The specific issues in the existing model we
    wanted to address were
  • Lack of end-to-end window management
  • Lack of dynamic proxy selection

9
Proxy-To-Proxy Window Mgmt.
  • The initial simulation model literally decomposed
    a long TCP connection into multiple shorter
    connections.
  • This had undesired (and unforeseen) consequences.

10
Static Proxy Selection
  • Additionally, this decomposition was done using
    global routing knowledge.
  • To accommodate mobility, the proxy selection code
    was re-run periodically.
  • This meant that new TCP connections were
    established, and the old ones allowed to drain.

11
The New Model
  • The new simulation model consists of three
    components
  • SplitTCPSource
  • SplitTCPWedge
  • SplitTCPSink
  • The Source and Sink are simply specializations of
    TCPSource and TCPSink, respectively.

12
SplitTCPWedge
  • In order to perform dynamic proxy selection, one
    needed to be able to inspect each packet received
    by a node.
  • Then the decision to proxy can be based on
    whatever criteria seem appropriate.
  • All Split-TCP enabled nodes run the wedge code.

13
An Anonymous NS Node
14
Better, Stronger, Faster
SplitTCPWedge
15
Model Summary
  • This new simulation model uses a TCP session
    established between the source and target, and
    dynamic proxy selection is performed along the
    path.

s
t
16
End-To-End Window Mgmt.
  • The TCP session performs window management as
    usual but control can be tweaked both manually
    as well as by the Wedge.
  • For instance, end-to-end ACKs can be skipped, the
    congestion window can be managed based on
    inter-proxy ACKs, etc.

17
Proxy Selection
  • Each node decides, independently, (currently
    based on hops since last proxy and their current
    backlog) if they should proxy a packet.
  • Proxying does not keep per-flow state.
  • Retransmissions are scheduled based on the
    current inter-proxy round trip time estimate.

18
Results
  • Current simulations show a ? 10 degradation in
    throughput vs. Standard TCP.
  • With parameter tweaking, this degradation varies,
    but Split TCP never equals standard TCP.

19
Analysis
  • One identified cause of the dramatically
    different behavior of the old and new simulation
    models relates to out-of-order packet delivery.
  • In the old model, the packet stream was
    reassembled at each proxy and bytes were only
    forwarded once they arrived in order.
  • Per-flow state at each proxy.
  • In the new model, this is not the case.

20
Parameterization
  • By tuning various parameters including initial
    congestion window, window growth factors, etc
    the throughput of Split TCP can be improved.
  • There are over 150 tuning parameters in the
    stock NS TCP code. If they were all just
    binary parameters thats still 2150 possible
    configurations!

21
Conclusion
  • Were trying to determine rational next steps
  • Do we continue the search for the magic set of
    parameters?
  • Do we examine the behavior of the new model in
    scenarios with mobility?
  • Few answers, many more questions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com