The Application of Petri Nets to Workflow Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

The Application of Petri Nets to Workflow Management

Description:

Paper Summary (1) Task Hierarchy but also time (anomalies) Case Someone has to carry out the activity Resources Work Item Activity = transition firing – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:161
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: Alessa83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Application of Petri Nets to Workflow Management


1
Paper Summary (1)
/153
2
Paper Summary (2)
3
Paper Summary (3)
I forgot fairness in the previous slide. Very
important because Soundness and Fairness
Guarantee that each case will end in place o
eventually
A WF PN is sound if and only if is Live and
Bounded
PN
o
i
We know how to handle it
4
Paper Summary (4)
Sound Safe
S-Coverable PN
Sound WS FC
(iff starting from each place it is possible to
identify a subnet that is strongly connected, is
a state machine and for each place in the subnet,
each transition connected to that place belong to
the subnet)
Sound FC WS
S-C
  • Always safe
  • S-cov. Cheched in pol. time
  • Soundess is NP-complete

WS
FC
Well-Structured PN
  • A FC PN can be checked for soundness in
    polynomial time
  • NFC PNs may have anomalous behaviors difficult to
    trace

Free-choice PN
(Balanced AND/OR-splits and AND/OR-joins)
  • Confusion
  • There are NFC PN that correspond to WF
  • There are FCPN that make no sense

A WS PN can be checked for soundness in
polynomial time
5
Discussion (1)
  • Why PN?
  • What about FSMs?
  • D. Wodtke, G. Weikum, A Formal Foundation For
    Distributed Workflow Execution Based on State
    Charts,Proc. International Conference on
    Database Theory, 1997
  • Muth, P., Wodtke, D., Weissenfels, J., Weikum,
    G., Kotz Dittrich, A., Enterprise-wide Workflow
    Management based on State and Activity Charts, 
    in A. Dogac, L. Kalinichenko, T. Ozsu, A. Sheth
    (Eds.) Workflow Management Systems and
    Interoperability, Springer Verlag, 1998  

6
Discussion (1.1)
  • In fact only 4 tools that constitute 1 complete
    toolset are presented that are based on PN
  • Not enough to have a clear idea of whats going
    on in the real world
  • The Author says that many tools are not based on
    PN. Which are the other model? Are they formal?
    Is it possible to verify the property?

7
Discussion (2)
  • Othogonalization of concerns
  • Computation vs. Communication
  • Task vs. Resource
  • What about interoperability?
  • Communication between different WFP engine

8
Little demo and links
  • (I had to many things to do, its all I could do)
  • ExSpect (Performance Analysis) exspect.com
  • Protos (Design) pallas.nl
  • Woflan (verification) http//tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/res
    earch/workflow/woflan/
  • http//www6.software.ibm.com/FlowMark/demo1.htm
  • http//www.daimi.au.dk/PetriNets/
  • http//wwwis.win.tue.nl/wsinwa/tools.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com