Solar%20Orbiter%20EUV%20Spectrometer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Solar%20Orbiter%20EUV%20Spectrometer

Description:

Solar Orbiter EUV Spectrometer Thermal Design Progress Bryan Shaughnessy – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: TomD95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Solar%20Orbiter%20EUV%20Spectrometer


1
Solar Orbiter EUV Spectrometer
  • Thermal Design Progress
  • Bryan Shaughnessy

2
Summary
  • Progress and current status
  • Developing thermal design concepts for trade-off
  • Thermal Background
  • Thermal Concepts
  • Conclusions

3
Basic Configuration
4
Initial Thermal Requirements
  • Detector temperature lt -60 deg C (target -80 deg
    C)
  • Structure and optics
  • Multilayer coatings (if used) are assumed to be a
    limiting factor. lt 100 deg C assumed at present.
  • Thermal Control System Mass lt 3.5 kg
  • Thermal Control System Power TBD (minimise)

5
Thermal Environment
(Excludes solar input from outside of the
observed region)
Distance From Sun AU Heat Flux W/m2 Through Aperture, W
1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 951 1370 1691 2140 3805 8562 34250 9.51 13.7 16.9 21.4 38.0 85.6 342.5
Cold case non operational
Hot case non operational
Start Up
Cold Case Operational
Hot Case operational
6
The Thermal Challenges
  • Reject heat input to system of 340W at 0.2AU
  • Maintaining sensible temperatures within
    instrument
  • Getting heat to radiators
  • Spreading the heat across the radiators
  • Prevent heat loss when instrument is further from
    the Sun
  • Maintaining sensible temperatures within
    instrument
  • Minimising heat transfer to radiators
  • Minimising power required for survival heaters
  • Overall challenge achieving the above with
    sensible mass/power budgets.

7
Radiator Surface Area
  • Heat output via radiator(s) mounted on the Z
    surface
  • Radiator heat rejection capability a function of
  • Emissivity 0.95 for z306 black paint
  • Efficiency 0.96
  • View-factor to space 0.95

Radiator (1.4 m x 0.31 m) Radiator (1.4 m x 0.31 m) Radiator (1.4 m x 0.31 m) Radiator (1.4 m x 0.31 m)
Temperature Temperature Heat Rejection Heat Rejection
K C W/m2 Watts
233 253 273 293 313 333 343 353 373 -40 -20 0.0 20 40 60 70 80 100 144 200 270 357 461 587 654 734 907 62 87 117 154 200 254 284 318 393
8
Basic Thermal Concept
  • Solar absorptivity of the optics
  • High (i.e., SiC) remove more heat from primary
    mirror
  • Low (e.g., gold coated) remove more heat from
    structure but likely restriction on coating
    temperature
  • Coupling to the main radiator
  • Various options being considered in the thermal
    trade-off
  • Fitted with heat pipes or loop heat pipes to
    distribute heat
  • Primary mirror and structure connected to
    radiator via thermal straps and/or heat pipe
    evaporator. Development programme needed to
    attached heat pipe evaporators to SiC structure
    or optics.
  • Heat loss minimised during cold phases by
  • Louvers
  • Temperature dependent coatings (major development
    programme required)
  • Use of loop heat pipes
  • Use of variable conductance heat pipes

9
Loop Heat Pipe / Absorbing Optics Concept
  • Technical Challenges
  • Selection of working fluid compatible with hot
    and cold environments (ammonia -40C ?80C
    methanol 55C ? 140C)
  • Thermally coupling the primary mirror to the
    evaporator

10
Basic Thermal Concept (cont)
  • Detectors
  • Dedicated radiator attached to detectors via a
    cold finger
  • Detector fitted in an enclosure to thermally
    isolate it from the warm structure

11
Detector Thermal Control
Internal VDA
12
Conclusions
  • The EUS instrument presents an extremely
    challenging thermal design problem
  • Work is ongoing to investigate a number of
    thermal design options
  • Initial indications are that the mass of the
    thermal control system will exceed 3.5 kg (e.g.,
    radiators, heat pipes, heaters, redundancy, etc)

13
Future Work
  • Consider options for reducing heat load into the
    instrument, e.g.
  • Shutter
  • Instrument rastering
  • Filters
  • Complete trade-offs and identify potential
    thermal designs (together with mass budgets,
    margins, hardware/suppliers, development
    programmes, etc)
  • Identify if a spacecraft level thermal control
    system should be considered
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com