Calder v. Jones Are Intentional Torts Different? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Calder v. Jones Are Intentional Torts Different?

Description:

Calder v. Jones Are Intentional Torts Different? Who was being sued? National Enquirer Calder (Editor) South (Reporter w/ Byline) Who challenged P J? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: AchtenbergD
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Calder v. Jones Are Intentional Torts Different?


1
Calder v. JonesAre Intentional Torts Different?
2
  • Who was being sued?
  • National Enquirer
  • Calder (Editor)
  • South (Reporter w/ Byline)
  • Who challenged P J?
  • Calder
  • South
  • Why not National Enquirer?

3
  • What contacts did Editor have with CA?
  • What contacts did Writer have with CA?
  • What contacts did Court care about?

4
Is Calder an Application of Burger King
  • No PA if contacts are
  • Random,
  • Fortuitous,
  • Attenuated.

5
Is Calder an Application of Burger King
No PA if contacts are the result of unilateral
activity of someone other than the D.
6
Is Calder an Application of Burger King
PA where contact proximately results from Ds
own actions that create substantial connection
with forum state.
7
Is Calder an Application of Burger King
  • PA exists where D deliberately
  • Engaged in activities within state
  • Created continuing obligations with forum
    residents

8
Is Calder an Application of Burger King
For specific jurisdiction, cause of action must
arise out of or relate to the Ds contacts with
the forum.
9
  • What does Calder tell us about
  • The importance of Ps contacts with the forum?
  • The importance of the degree of wrongfulness?

10
  • What about the boiler-welder hypothetical?
  • What sort of argument is it?
  • Why doesnt it work?
  • Modify the boiler-welder
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com