Title: Calder v. Jones Are Intentional Torts Different?
1Calder v. JonesAre Intentional Torts Different?
2- Who was being sued?
- National Enquirer
- Calder (Editor)
- South (Reporter w/ Byline)
- Who challenged P J?
- Calder
- South
- Why not National Enquirer?
3- What contacts did Editor have with CA?
- What contacts did Writer have with CA?
- What contacts did Court care about?
4Is Calder an Application of Burger King
- No PA if contacts are
- Random,
- Fortuitous,
- Attenuated.
5Is Calder an Application of Burger King
No PA if contacts are the result of unilateral
activity of someone other than the D.
6Is Calder an Application of Burger King
PA where contact proximately results from Ds
own actions that create substantial connection
with forum state.
7Is Calder an Application of Burger King
- PA exists where D deliberately
- Engaged in activities within state
- Created continuing obligations with forum
residents
8Is Calder an Application of Burger King
For specific jurisdiction, cause of action must
arise out of or relate to the Ds contacts with
the forum.
9- What does Calder tell us about
- The importance of Ps contacts with the forum?
- The importance of the degree of wrongfulness?
10- What about the boiler-welder hypothetical?
- What sort of argument is it?
- Why doesnt it work?
- Modify the boiler-welder