Title: Introduction%20of%20new%20electronic%20systems%20for%20aviation
1Introduction of new electronic systems for
aviation
- Thor Breien, Dr. Ing
- Park Air Systems AS
- Presented by
- Linda Lavik
2Subjects to be discussed
- Navigation Systems in use for air traffic
- Why need for new systems
- Factors against transition from ground based to
satellite based systems - The Authorities, ATC / airport operators, system
suppliers, and airlines roles in the
implementation process - Experiences from SCAT-I
3E-navigation in aviation
- All professional air navigation is based on
electronic systems due to the visibility
limitations - IFR corresponds to E-navigation for maritime
- IFR Instrument Flight Rules
- VFR Visual Flight Rules
4Navigation Systems in useHistory of air
navigation
- Aviation started in 1903
- From 1919 bonfires and artificial lights, in
addition to landmarks and maps, were used to help
pilots find their way
5Navigation Systems in use Early Landing Aid and
Landing field light
6Navigation Systems in use History of air radio
navigation
- 1920s Started use of radio navigation aids
(NAVAIDS) - In 1947 ICAO was founded as a specialized
aviation UN agency and NAVAIDS international
standardized. Several systems were then taken in
use - CONSOL -DME (distance)
- LORAN -ILS (landing)
- VOR (bearing) -NDB (bearing/position)
7Navigation Systems in use Typical today's
Navigation and Landing aids
8Why need for new NAVAIDS?
- Technology evolution
- The availability of GPS and extended use of
computers in flight management systems - Congestions in airspace
- Need to increase capacity by moving from today's
route network to Free Flight navigation (Single
European Sky) - Cost reductions
- Need for more cost-effective use of aircraft by
shorter stopovers and less fuel consumption - Lower Navigation fees reduction of redundant
NAVAIDS - Increased safety
- Introduction of NAVAIDS for more areas and
airports will increase safety and potential for
fewer accidents
9Factors against transition from ground based to
satellite based systems
- For most of the users, no operational need for
transition to a new system - Large cost for re-certification
- Transition period with costly overlapping systems
- No incentives from ANSP / authorities
10Why new NAVAIDS? Potential cost savings and
environmental benefits with GPS-based systems
11Why not just use satellite systems...
- ..and switch off the expensive ground
infrastructure?? - There are several obstacles
- All aircraft must have installed new avionics
- International consensus on the transition
required - Political and legal aspects to be clarified
- Satellite systems must have proved their
performance
12Political and legal aspects to be clarified
- Who is responsible for any accidents?
- Who controls the signal availability?
- Need for more systems than GPS
- Reduced accessibility, who takes the delay /
cancellation bill?
13International coordination for introduction of
new systems
- National and international Radio Navigation Plans
are policy documents for the future use of
existing and new navigation aids - All plans agree on the main items
- Navigation and landing will be based on a mixture
of ground and satellite systems - Evolutionary introduction of satellite systems
- Some ground based systems will be gradually
withdrawn - Maintain complementary ground systems until
satellite systems have received full acceptance
14Who participate in the the NAVAIDS transition
process?
- Authorities
- ATC / airport operators (Air Navigation Service
Providers) - System suppliers
- Airlines
15The Authorities role
- ICAO (parallel to IMO)
- establish the international agreed standards and
set the protection dates - EUROCONTROL
- develops, coordinates and plans for
implementation of pan-European air traffic
management strategies - Civil Aviation Authority
- Establish national regulations
- Issue certificates to put new systems into
operations - Inspections of service providers, industry and
airlines according to JAA/EU regulations
16The Air Navigation Service Providers role
- Clarify service needs based on input from
airlines - Define system requirements
- Collect/produce documentation for approval
- Acquire and put into operations
- Maintain the systems
17The Airlines role
- Identify the needs for more cost-effective /
safer navigation - Define the avionics concept
- Collect/Produce documentation for certification
- Install the avionics in new aircraft, retrofit
for existing aircraft
18The system suppliers role
- Specify the design methodology, the system
equipment functionality and performance - Produce product documentation and safety
assessments according to the CAA regulations - Design and manufacture the system equipment
19Certification of a first generation
satellite-based landing system
- SCAT-I developed in accordance with USA
specifications due to no international standard - Certification process included approval of
safety-critical software with very stringent
QA-requirements - Certification completed
20SCAT-I Concept
21Challenges for a system frontier
- System Requirements changing during the project
due to better knowledge of GPS-weaknesses - First time an approach is based on flying on
information from a datalink and not a radiation
beam
22Challenges
- Approval authorities not used to software-based
NAVAIDS - Very much focus on integrity aspects
- No other companies in Norway to consult in such
stringent SW-process - Depending on avionics suppliers equipment
completion of the common certification got to a
halt due to partners financial problems
23Status and outcome of the Park Air Systems
development
- SCAT-I ground station certification completed in
2004, avionics in 2007 - Established and successfully implemented a
development process for safety-critical software
and products - Foundation for further development within
satellite navigation systems and other
safety-critical products
24The future for air navigation systems
- Based on more than one satellite system (e.g. GPS
and Galileo) - Some ground based NAVAIDS will remain for backup
/ supplement - Ground systems will still handle the most
safety-critical landings