Laboratory: Experiment 2: lyse cells

1
Laboratory Experiment 2 lyse cells bind
His-tagged protein to nickel resin Lecture
guidelines for proposal reviews In-Class
Writing discuss questions from class 4 (page 26)
Read Unit 2 (29-34) JBC 266 3811-14
(1991) Hand In report 1 flow chart 2 Due
Next Class proposal (3 copies)
2
Each panel will review six proposals. Each
panelist will read three. 1o reviewer for one
proposal 2o reviewer for another 3o reviewer for
a third
3
Panel Discussion Duties Panel Director assign
proposals guide discussion. 1o reviewer
summarize proposal. 2o reviewer discuss opinion
of 1o reviewer. 3o reviewer write summary of
panel discussion. Panel edit approve panel
summary. Give priority rating (high, medium,
low). Rank proposals in order of priority.
Do not indicate rank on reviews. Communicate
rank order to instructor only.
4
Reviews by 1o 2o Panelists Synopsis 1) What
does the author propose to do? 2) What question
will the research address? 3) How will the study
answer the question? Comments 4) Is the
project feasible? 5) Is the topic important or
interesting? 6) Is the proposal clear
carefully prepared? 7) List strengths
weaknesses. Priority high, medium, low.
5
Primary Review Principal Investigator Title Synp
osis Comments Priority high medium
low
6
Secondary Review Principal Investigator Title Sy
nposis Comments Priority high medium
low
7
Panel Summary (by 3o Reviewer) Principal
Investigator Title Synposis Comments Pr
iority high medium low
8
Panel Summary (by Panel Director) Priority Inves
tigator Title 1 2 3 4
5 6
9
Each panel will receive six proposals. Each
panelist will read three proposals, serving as 1o
reviewer for one proposal, 2o reviewer for
another, and 3o reviewer for a third
proposal. Written Reviews Write a brief review
of each proposal address the following
points. 1) What does the author propose to
do? 2) What question will the research
address? 3) How will the study answer the
question? 4) Is the proposed research
feasible? 5) Is the topic important or
interesting? 6) Is the proposal clear and
carefully prepared? Panel Discussion I will
appoint a Director for each panel. The Panel
Director will assign proposals to panelists,
guide the panel discussion, keep the discussion
at an appropriate pace, and present the results
of the panel discussion to the Program Director
(me). The primary (1o) reviewer will present a
summary of the proposal to the panel. The
secondary (2o) reviewer will support or dispute
the opinion of the 1o reviewer. The tertiary (3o)
reviewer will write a summary of the panel
discussion. The panel will edit and approve the
panel summary, which will include a priority
rating (high, medium, low, or not competitive).
The panel will rank all six proposals in order
of priority. The Panel Director will provide
this list to the Program Director.