Title: Omejitve proste trgovine
1Omejitve proste trgovine
- Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
2Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Premik trgovinske politike v smeri odpravljanja
omejitev znotraj meja - t.i. barriers within the border
- Logicna smer razvoja zaradi primarnega uspeha
GATT/WTO sporazumov - Zmanjševanje carinskih stopenj in kolicinskih
omejitev
3Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Reakcije držav podpisnic
- Novi nacini omejevanja trgovine
- Skupni imenovalec novih ukrepov je visoka
stopnja subtilnosti in zakrivanja - Gre za ukrepe, ki omejujejo prosto trgovino s
sklicevanjem na klasicne standarde, ki naj bi
bili povsem v domeni nacionalnih držav kot
suverenih subjektov mednarodnega javnega prava
4Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Standardi
- Zdravje državljanov
- Varnost državljanov
- Varstvo okolja
- Razlikovanje v ureditvah od države do države
- Razlika med standardi predstavlja možnost za
protekcionisticno politiko
5Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Tudi ce ni namena protekcionizma
- Težave pri nacrtovanju koherentne trgovinske
politike - Klasicno vprašanje
- Razmejitev med pravico države do suverenega
urejanja podrocij,ki se dotikajo varnosti in
zdravja državljanov in dolžnostjo neomejevanja
(razen utemeljenega) trgovine do mednarodne
skupnosti
6Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- The decades long process of lowering trade
barriers resembles the draining of a lake that
reveals mountain peaks formerly concealed or
(more pessimistically) the peeling of an onion
that reveals innumerable layers of barriers.
Miles Kahler, Trade and Domestic Differences, 1996
7Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- 70, 80, 90-a leta 20. stoletja
- Rast kolicine in dvig intenzivnosti standardov,
ki naj šcitijo clovekovo okolje, varnost in
zdravje - Odsev moderne socialne države
- Zdravje, varnost, cisto okolje postajajo
ekonomske dobrine - Višji standard drugacne dobrine prevladujejo
8Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Povpraševanje po novih ekonomskih dobrinah
pripelje do novih regulatornih ukrepov (politike
na podrocjih varnosti, okolja) - Ti ukrepi lahko predstavljajo ovire za mednarodno
trgovino - Gre za podrocja, ki naj bi klasicno ne sodili v
domeno mednarodnih trgovinskih sporazumov
9Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Gre za podrocja pod suvereno oblastjo držav
popolnoma notranja razmerja!! - Tipicen primer
- eko-protekcionizem vs. Liberalizacija
- Kje so temeljne težave?
- Države izvoznice
- Države uvoznice
10Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Domaci izdelovalci
- Težave z uvoženimi izdelki, ki so bili izdelani
na podlagi zelo nizkih standardov v državi izvora
- Takšni izdelki imajo doloceno vrsto subvencije
(nižji stroški zaradi nižjih standardov) - Zahtevajo t.i. level playing field
- Kaj pa komparativne prednosti?
11Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Težave predvsem v odnosu
- Države v razvoju
- Želijo uporabljati svoje (ponavadi) nižje
okoljske in zdravstvene standarde kot
komparativno prednost - Razvite države
- Zaradi višjih domacih standardov so domaci
izdelki dražji ? zato naj bi bile komparativne
prednosti DVR v bistvu protekcionisticni ali
diskriminatorni ukrepi
12Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Tipicna primera
- Delaney Clause v ZDA
- zero-tolerance klavzula, kar zadeva karcinogene
elemente - Prepoved tudi, kar zadeva DDT
- Pesticid, ki je dovoljen v skladu s Codex
Alimentarius - CA ? ustvarjen 1963 (WHO, FAO) ? z namenom
zagotoviti varovanje pravic potrošnikov na
podrocju prehrane in zagotoviti spoštovanje
poštenih poslovnih obicajev pri trgovini s hrano. - Preseganje standardov iz CA pomeni prima facie
presumpcijo ukrepov, ki predstavljajo OMEJITEV
proste trgovine - ZDA bo prisiljena dovoliti prihod izdelkov, ki so
kontaminirani.
13Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Britanske klobase (oznacevanje)
- Britanski izvoznik prodaja klobase v Nemciji
- Predpis od njega zahteva, da svoje izdelke
oznacuje in trži pod terminom - pork-filled offal tubes in ne
- sausages
- Zahteva nedvomno izraža sestavo prehrambenega
artikla, ima pa lahko tudi negativne ucinke kar
zadeva marketing
14Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Regulatorni okvir
- OECD
- GATT/WTO
- NAFTA
- EU
15Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- OECD (GUIDING PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICIES 1972) - Where valid reasons for differences do not exist,
governments should seek harmonization of
environmental policies, for instance, with
respect to timing and the general scope of
regulation for particular industries to avoid the
unjustified disruption of international trade
patterns and of the international allocation of
resources that may arise from diversity of
national environmental standards. - Measures taken to protect the environment should
be framed as far as possible in such a manner as
to avoid the creation of non-tariff barriers to
trade. - Where products are traded internationally and
where there could be significant obstacles to
trade, governments should seek common standards
for polluting products and agree on the timing
and general scope of regulations for particular
products. - It is highly desirable to define in common, as
rapidly as possible, procedures for checking
conformity to product standards established for
the purpose of environmental control. Procedures
for checking conformity to standards, to be
applied by an exporting country to the
satisfaction of the importing country, should be
mutually agreed.
16Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- GATT/WTO
- Art III/4
- The products of the territory of any contracting
party imported into the territory of any other
contracting party shall be accorded treatment no
less favourable than that accorded to like
products of national origin in respect of all
laws, regulations and requirements affecting
their internal sale, offering for sale, purchase,
transportation, distribution or use. The
provisions of this paragraph shall not prevent
the application of differential internal
transportation charges which are based
exclusively on the economic operation of the
means of transport and not on the nationality of
the product.
17Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- GATT/WTO (Note to III/4)
- Any internal tax or other internal charge, or any
law, regulation or requirement of the kind
referred to in paragraph 1 which applies to an
imported product and to the like domestic product
and is collected or enforced in the case of the
imported product at the time or point of
importation, is nevertheless to be regarded as an
internal tax or other internal charge, or a law,
regulation or requirement of the kind referred to
in paragraph 1, and is accordingly subject to the
provisions of Article III.
18Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Omogoceni so torej ukrepi, ki ne predstavljajo
diskriminatornih ukrepov. - Kaj pa je z nediskriminatornimi ukrepi?
19Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- GATT III/1
- internal taxes and other internal charges, and
laws, regulations and requirements affecting the
internal sale, offering for sale, purchase,
transportation, distribution or use of products,
and internal quantitative regulations requiring
the mixture, processing or use of products in
specified amounts or proportions, should not be
applied to imported or domestic products so as to
afford protection to domestic production
20Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- GATT III/1 predvideva dokazno breme tožece
stranke protekcionizem zaradi
nediskriminatornih ukrepov bo težko dokazati!
21Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- GATT XX
- Subject to the requirement that such measures are
not applied in a manner which would constitute a
means of arbitrary or unjustifiable
discrimination between countries where the same
conditions prevail, or a disguised restriction on
international trade, nothing in this Agreement
shall be construed to prevent the adoption or
enforcement by any contracting party of measures
22Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- (b) necessary to protect human, animal or plant
life or health - (g) relating to the conservation of exhaustible
natural resources if such measures are made
effective in conjunction with restrictions on
domestic production or consumption
23Zdravstveni in varnostni standardi
- Restriktivna razlaga izjem
- Dokazno breme na stranki, ki uporabi izjemo
24GATT - primeri
- Thai Cigarettes
- http//www.worldtradelaw.net/reports/gattpanels/th
aicigarettes.pdf - Tuna/Dolphin
- Herring and Salmon
- http//www.worldtradelaw.net/reports/gattpanels/ca
nadaherring.pdf - Beef Hormones
25Sklepi iz odlocb panelov
- Kaj paneli upoštevajo pri presoji ukrepov, ki jih
države uvajajo z opravicilom varstva zdravja? - 1. ali je ukrep razumen in namenjen promociji
legitimnih ciljev ali gre za prikrito
diskriminacijo? - 2. ali je ukrep utemeljen z znanstvenimi
argumenti (scientific risk assessment)? - 3. ali je ukrep sorazmeren z zasledovanim ciljem?
26Sklepi iz odlocb panelov
- 1. ali je ukrep razumen in namenjen promociji
legitimnih ciljev ali gre za prikrito
diskriminacijo? - Ustrezen test?
- T.i. sham test
- Panel mora dejanje države (suverena!!!)
okarakterizirati kot slaboverno politiko - Gre za precejšen poseg v suverenost, predvsem pa
za povsem subjektivno presojo - Panel mora odlociti, kakšen je bil resnicni
namen države
27Sklepi iz odlocb panelov
- 2. ali je ukrep utemeljen z znanstvenimi
argumenti (scientific risk assessment)? - Kljub prima facie objektivnosti tega testa gre
pogosto za vrednostno odlocanje - Rezultati povsem odvisni od uporabljene
metodologije - Odlocanje o nasprotujocih si znanstvenih
argumentacijah - Imajo clani panelov (pravniki, diplomati) znanja,
ki jim omogocajo takšno neodvisno odlocanje?
28Sklepi iz odlocb panelov
- 3. ali je ukrep sorazmeren z zasledovanim ciljem?
- Proporcionalnost, Least Drastic Means test
- Težave zaradi potrebe po karakterizaciji in
vrednostni oceni morebitnih alternativnih
ukrepov, ki bi bili sorazmerni - Lahko pride do aksiomaticnega, silogisticnega
odlocanja - Pogosto paneli ne upoštevajo omejitev, ki
enostavno ne omogocajo uporabe alternativnih,
manj restriktivnih ukrepov!
29Vprašanja glede znanstvene narave ocenjevanja
tveganj
- Del tega tudi ? Sporazum WTO o sanitarnih in
fitosanitarnih standardih - (Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures 1995) - Namen ? vzpostaviti
- ?enoten?
- ?harmoniziran?
- ?ucinkovit?
- Sistem delovanja DC na podrocju ukrepov sanitarne
in fitosanitarne narave
30SPS sporazum
- Kaj so sanitarni in fitosanitarni ukrepi?
- 1. Sanitary or phytosanitary measure Any
measure applied - (a) to protect animal or plant life or health
within the territory of the Member from risks
arising from the entry, establishment or spread
of pests, diseases, disease-carrying organisms or
disease-causing organisms - (b) to protect human or animal life or health
within the territory of the Member from risks
arising from additives, contaminants, toxins or
disease-causing organisms in foods, beverages or
feedstuffs - (c) to protect human life or health within the
territory of the Member from risks arising from
diseases carried by animals, plants or products
thereof, or from the entry, establishment or
spread of pests or - (d) to prevent or limit other damage within the
territory of the Member from the entry,
establishment or spread of pests. - Sanitary or phytosanitary measures include all
relevant laws, decrees, regulations, requirements
and procedures including, inter alia, end product
criteria processes and production methods
testing, inspection, certification and approval
procedures quarantine treatments including
relevant requirements associated with the
transport of animals or plants, or with the
materials necessary for their survival during
transport provisions on relevant statistical
methods, sampling procedures and methods of risk
assessment and packaging and labelling
requirements directly related to food safety.
31SPS sporazum
- Podrocje ocenjevanja/omejevanja tveganj (risk
assessment) - DC samostojno odlocajo o tveganjih in ukrepih za
njihovo preprecevanje - Razlika v percepcijah tveganj (politicni,
ekonomski, družbeni vplivi) ? - Potencialna omejevanja mednarodne trgovine
- Razlicni sistemi, metode ocenjevanja, omejevanja
tveganj - Risk assessment / Precautionary principle
- Zato ? SPS Agreement
- Nacelo nediskriminatornosti
- Dvotirni sistem standardov za ukrepe
32SPS sporazum
- Nacelo nediskriminatornosti / sorazmernosti (2.
clen SPS) - Members have the right to take sanitary and
phytosanitary measures necessary for the
protection of human, animal or plant life or
health, provided that such measures are not
inconsistent with the provisions of this
Agreement. - 2. Members shall ensure that any sanitary or
phytosanitary measure is applied only to the
extent necessary to protect human, animal or
plant life or health, is based on scientific
principles and is not maintained without
sufficient scientific evidence, except as
provided for in paragraph 7 of Article 5. - 3. Members shall ensure that their sanitary and
phytosanitary measures do not arbitrarily or
unjustifiably discriminate between Members where
identical or similar conditions prevail,
including between their own territory and that of
other Members. Sanitary and phytosanitary
measures shall not be applied in a manner which
would constitute a disguised restriction on
international trade.
33SPS sporazum
- SPS sporazum uvaja dvotirni sistem dovoljenih
ukrepov - Harmonizacijski standard /Avtonomni standard
- 3. clen SPS (Harmonizacijski standard)
- (1) to harmonize sanitary and phytosanitary
measures Members shall base their sanitary or
phytosanitary measures on international
standards, guidelines or recommendations, where
they exist - (2) Sanitary or phytosanitary measures which
conform to international standards, guidelines or
recommendations shall be deemed to be necessary
to protect human, animal or plant life or health,
and presumed to be consistent with the relevant
provisions of this Agreement and of GATT 1994.
34SPS sporazum
- SPS sporazum uvaja dvotirni sistem dovoljenih
ukrepov - Harmonizacijski standard /Avtonomni standard
- 3. clen SPS (Avtonomni standard)
- 3. Members may introduce or maintain sanitary or
phytosanitary measures which result in a higher
level of sanitary or phytosanitary protection
than would be achieved by measures based on the
relevant international standards, guidelines or
recommendations, if there is a scientific
justification, or as a consequence of the level
of sanitary or phytosanitary protection a Member
determines to be appropriate in accordance with
the relevant provisions of paragraphs 1 through 8
of Article 5.
35SPS sporazum
- Temeljna težava (kot ste lahko ugotovili)
- Avtonomni standard
- SPS forsira harmonizacijo
- Možnost DC, da intenzivno odstopajo od mednarodno
dogovorjenih standardov, je omejena. - Beef Hormones
- Article 3.1 imposes an obligation on all Members
to base their sanitary measures on international
standards except as otherwise provided for in the
SPS Agreement, and in particular in Article 3.3
thereof. In this sense, Article 3.3 provides an
exception to the general obligation contained in
Article 3.1. - Izrazito napeta intepretacija! -? sledi tudi -
sicer nepravilna odlocitev panela, da je
dokazno breme zato na toženi stranki
36SPS sporazum
- Dodatna težava ? kdaj so standardi, ki odstopajo
od mednarodnih, dovoljeni (poleg
nediskriminacije) - if there is a scientific justification
- Ni sporazuma o metodi znanstvene utemeljenosti
- 2 temeljni metodi ?
- Risk assessment
- Precautionary principle
37SPS sporazum
- Risk assessment
- Klasicna, znanstvena metoda
- Znanost kot nevtralni arbiter
- Ni vrednot pri odlocanju
- Širši družbeni konsenz ni pomemben/potreben
- Širok manevrski prostor za potencialne kršitelje
(multinacionalke) - Temeljni kriteriji
- Hazard identification
- Dose-response evaluation
- Human exposure evaluation
- Risk characterization
38SPS sporazum
- Precautionary principle
- RISK ASSESSMENT
- Upoštevanje družbenega konsenza
- Upoštevanje preferenc potencialno ogroženih
- Upoštevanje zgodovinskih, socialnih, politicnih
parametrov - Ketelson
- Those of us who support the Precautionary
Principle do so in part because we perceive our
democratic rights to a clean environment and
health have been violatedThis technocratic
process (risk assessment) purports to put the
decisions into an objective framework but the
process gives greater power to corporate
interests and tends to violate individual and
collective rights to health
39SPS sporazum
- Pomanjkljivost ? odprta vrata za protekcionizem
- Ameriški pogled
- The Precautionary Principle is a nebulous
doctrine developed by Europeans as a means to
erect a trade barrier against any item that can
be produced more efficiently in the United
States. - Evropski odgovor
- We do not spend our days in Brussels as some
might think in Machiavellian plotting to apply
precaution to the detriment of US businesses
(Margot Wallstrom Head of European Union
Environmental Commission)