Monitoring of Groundwater and Surfacewater Interactions on the Walla Walla River - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Monitoring of Groundwater and Surfacewater Interactions on the Walla Walla River

Description:

Monitoring of Groundwater and Surfacewater Interactions on the Walla Walla River Graduate Student: Starr Silvis Major Professor: John Selker Field Coordinator: Bob Bower – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:192
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: metc156
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Monitoring of Groundwater and Surfacewater Interactions on the Walla Walla River


1
Monitoring of Groundwater and Surfacewater
Interactions on the Walla Walla River
  • Graduate Student Starr Silvis
  • Major Professor John Selker
  • Field Coordinator Bob Bower

2
Presentation Outline
  • Location and features of the basin
  • Background
  • Goals
  • Methods
  • Chemical Signature
  • Mini-piezometers
  • Temperature Profiling
  • Results
  • Discussion

3
Location of the Walla Walla River Basin
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Water Resources for the Basin
  • Surface water
  • North Fork and South Fork
  • Groundwater
  • Alluvial aquifer
  • Basalt aquifers

16
Monthly Mean Flows
22 years of data 1969 - 1991
17
Walla Walla River Returns!
  • All river water above levied section (100
    c.f.s.) diverted for irrigation since turn of the
    century from June September
  • 1998 American Rivers lists Walla Walla River as
    one of the top 20 most endangered rivers in the
    U.S.
  • Bull trout and Steelhead E.S.A. listed in 1998
    and 1999
  • Irrigation districts pledge to leave flow in the
    mainstem of the Walla Walla River sign agreement
    with U.S.F.W.
  • 2000 13 c.f.s
  • 2001 18 c.f.s.
  • 2002 25 c.f.s
  • 2003 - ?

18
Summer 1999
Summer 2002
19
Low Flow Limitations
  • 2000 - all 13 c.f.s. percolated from the surface
  • Possible causes
  • In-stream gravel mining
  • Naturally high hydraulic conductivity (Schälchli,
    1995,1992)
  • Large hydraulic gradients due to low aquifer
    levels

20
Aquifer Recharge
  • Irrigation ditch losses
  • Primarily unlined ditches
  • Stream losses
  • Winter recharge
  • Now summer recharge too

21
Study Goals
  • Provide quantitative framework for the surface
    and groundwater exchanges
  • Determine influent / effluent nature of levied
    section
  • Quantify river losses
  • Identify seasonal patterns
  • Estimate alluvial aquifer recharge

22
SW/GW Overview
Water flows from the stream into the subsurface
Water flows from the subsurface into the stream
23
Methods
  • Chemical Signature
  • Mini-piezometers
  • Temperature profiling
  • Ditch loss

24
Chemical Signature Requirements
  • Conservative and naturally occurring
  • Chloride and Sulphate
  • GW/SW must have distinctly different
    concentrations
  • Ease of analysis
  • Ion chromatography

25
Chemical Signature
  • Grab Sampling
  • Mainstem Walla Walla River
  • Shallow aquifer wells
  • 10 duplicate sampling
  • Data Analysis
  • Mixing space diagrams
  • Linear Regressions
  • Mass Balance

26
Chemical Signature Mass Balance
27
Groundwater Sampling Sites
Red dots are wells
Hwy 11
Tumalum Bridge
Walla Walla River
Nursery Bridge
Milton-Freewater
28
In-Stream Sampling Sites
Tumalum Bridge
Nursery Bridge
Milton-Freewater
29
Mini-Piezometers
Vertical Hydraulic Gradient dh/dl
Stream surface
dh

Streambed surface
dl
Mid-point of perforations
30
Temperature profiling device
Mini-piezometer
31
Temperature Profiling
32
Temperature Profiling
  • ?Analytical Methods
  • HYDRUS-2D (Šimunek et al., 1999)
  • Computer model using inverse processes to solve
    for vertical flux
  • Sine Wave Fitting
  • Stallmans (1965) equation for a sine wave fit to
    the data

33
Temperature Profiling
  • HYDRUS-2D
  • Sophocleus (1979)

Conduction
Convection
34
Temperature Profiling
  • Sine Wave Fitting
  • Stallman (1965)
  • Solution for diurnally heated and cooled boundary
    condition


Tz (t) ?T e-az sin (2pt/t bz) Taz
35
Temperature Profiling No Flux
HYDRUS-2D no flux simulation R2 0.95
36
Ditch Loss Study
Installed dam Covered with plastic
Allowed to fill to capacity Shut off water
supply Measured time and depth of draining for 6
hours
37
Chemical Signature GW
R2 0.89
38
Chemical Signature SW
R2 0.96
39
Chemical Signature Mass Balance
Filled symbols correspond to left axis, open
symbols correspond to the right axis
GW dominates
Tumalum Bridge
SW dominates
Qgw
Qsin
40
Mini-piezometers
Nursery Bridge
Tumalum Bridge
duplicates
duplicates
41
Temperature Profile
42
Temperature Profiling Sine Wave
M 5.5 August 14
43
Temperature Profiling HYDRUS-2D
44
Temperature Profiling Sine Wave vs. HYDRUS-2D
Pink are results using loggers 3 to 2 (15
cm) Blue are results using loggers 3 to 1 (30 cm)
45
Mini-piezometers
46
Seasonal Patterns Mini-Piezometers
K -Q / (A dh/dl)
47
Seasonal Patterns Temperature
48
Ditch Loss
  • Infiltration estimate 204 cm/d

49
Conclusions
  • Effluent river on section studied
  • Estimated flow loss
  • 0.3-0.76 m3/s using temperature estimates
  • 0.43-0.63 m3/s using in-stream flow measurements
  • Seasonally hydraulic conductivity decreased
  • factor of 2-4 using temperature profiling
    estimates
  • factor of 2-100 using mini-piezometer estimates

50
Implications for GW recharge of the shallow
aquifer
  • Assuming only 50 km of ditches with an average
    infiltration rate of 204 cm/d
  • 2 107 m3 / yr
  • On an area of 538 km2 and a porosity of 0.27
    equivalent to 23 cm of water
  • Assuming 5 months at max infiltration rate of
    310 cm/day using temperature profiling estimates
  • 1.8 108 m3 / yr
  • On an area of 538 km2 equivalent to 1.2 meters of
    water

51
Future Work
  • Determine seasonal patterns in aquifer levels
  • Continual static level measurements
  • Installed pressure transducers in 12 wells
  • Chemical signature
  • Spatial mapping of anion concentrations
  • Ditch loss studies
  • Inflow out flow measurements
  • Temperature profiling of ditch bed
  • Evapotransporation
  • Area of influence of infiltration from the river
  • Instrument a transect across the entire levy
  • Leave devices in place for the entire season

52
Thanks to
  • WWBWC and OWEB for caring enough about the
    watershed to fund this project
  • Bob Bower for EVERYTHING!
  • Community in the Walla Walla Watershed
  • John Selker for tireless enthusiasm and myriad of
    good ideas
  • Emilie Baer for her hard work in the field and in
    data analysis
  • My committee Julia Jones, Jeff McDonnell, Roy
    Haggerty, and Mike Gamroth
  • OSU Bioengineering Department
  • June Rice, Elena Maus, David Rupp, Kristy
    Warren, Ruth Boitz, Linda Hoyser
  • Friends and Family for continual support
  • Especially thanks to Jeff Silvis for still
    becoming my husband even after the trials and
    tribulations of moving across the country and
    graduate school.

53
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com