Controversies in Abdominal Trauma - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Controversies in Abdominal Trauma

Description:

Controversies in Abdominal Trauma Controversies in Emergency Ultrasound Should EM physicians perform ultrasound? How should this work be funded? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:293
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: emco3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Controversies in Abdominal Trauma


1
Controversies in Abdominal Trauma
2
Controversies in Emergency Ultrasound
  • Should EM physicians perform ultrasound?
  • How should this work be funded?
  • What new areas of use should be explored?

3
FAST
4
It isnt rocket science ...
5
Rationale
  • 24x7 access
  • Shorten the time to intervention in life threats
  • Decrease the length of stay in the ED
  • Decrease the cost of care and improve resource
    utilization
  • Improve diagnostic accuracy

6
Abdominal Trauma UltrasoundAccuracy
  • Sensitivity 80 - 100
  • Specificity 85 - 98
  • Intraperitoneal fluid
  • 82-98 sensitivity
  • 88-100 specificity
  • Prospective trials sensitivity 87-98,
    specificity 99-100 (Pearl, 1996)
  • Intraperitoneal injury
  • 69-96 sensitivity
  • 95-100 specificity

7
Sensitivity/Volume of FluidBranney, 1995
8
Abdominal Trauma UltrasoundLearning Curves
  • 12 non-radiologist scanners
  • 8 hours of didactics, 10 supervised exams
  • 50 practice exams on patients
  • Free Fluid Sensitivity 68 Specificity 98
  • Error rate from 17 to 5 after only 10 exams
  • 9.8 indeterminate scan rate
  • (Shackford, et al)

9
Abdominal Trauma UltrasoundTraining Required
  • No definite standard
  • Didactic 4-8 hours of training
  • Supervised exams 15
  • Experiential 20-50 exams

10
Is there still a place for DPL?
11
Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage
  • Component 1 Aspiration of 10cc of blood
  • Indication for emergent laparotomy IF
    hemodynamically unstable
  • Component 2 Lavage
  • gt100,000 RBCs
  • gt20 IU Amylase (Alk Phos)
  • gt500 WBC
  • Bile, Gram Stain

12
Diagnostic Peritoneal LavageProblems
  • Non invasive management of abdominal trauma
  • Complications 0.3
  • More time consuming than ultrasound
  • Less information than CT scan

13
Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage
  • Sharp decrease in use
  • Increased availability of ultrasound
  • Helical CT scans faster and better
  • Non invasive always wins

14
Diagnostic Peritoneal LavageIndications
  • Hypotensive patient with a negative FAST exam
  • Stab wound to the abdomen
  • Gunshot wound to the abdomen
  • DPL vs. Laparotomy

15
Prioritization in trauma
  • Head Injury
  • Hypovolemia
  • Chest trauma
  • Intraperitoneal (Spleen, liver)
  • Retroperitoneal (Pelvis, renal)
  • Occult lethal injuries
  • Traumatic aortic injury
  • Head CT
  • Chest x-ray
  • Ultrasound/DPL
  • Abd CT
  • Chest CT
  • Transesophageal echo
  • Arteriography

16
Prioritization in traumaTwo Contenders
  • Head Injury
  • Most CNS deaths from head injury are due to a
    delay in decompression
  • Intraperitoneal Injury
  • Injuries are amenable to therapy
  • Preventing prolonged hypovolemic shock is
    critical to outcome

17
Prioritization in trauma
  • Unstable with positive ultrasound ? Emergent
    Laparotmy ICP bolt
  • Unstable with negative ultrasound ? DPL ?
    if DPL ?Laparotomy
  • Stable with positive ultrasound or DPL? Head CT
    Abdominal CT
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com