Soviet Union - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Soviet Union

Description:

Title: Soviet Union Author: Stephen Luscombe Last modified by: Stephen Luscombe Created Date: 3/14/2005 3:34:44 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:327
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: Stephe815
Category:
Tags: disaster | india | soviet | union

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Soviet Union


1
Soviet Union
  • Foreign Affairs
  • 1929 - 1941

2
Foreign Policy in the 1920s
  • Memories of Civil War
  • Foreign Intervention
  • British, French, US, Japanese
  • Capitalists fundamentally opposed to Communist
    system
  • Lenin and Trotskys World View
  • Marxism was a global phenomenon
  • The Revolution had to be exported ASAP
  • Russo-Polish War of 1920
  • See-Saw War
  • Both sides Overextended themselves
  • Narrowly averted a disaster allowed Whites to
    Resurrect Civil War in South of Russia

3
  • Comrade Lenin cleans the world of filth.
  • The Promise of exporting Revolution
  • COMINTERN set up in 1919 to achieve World
    Revolution

4
The Bolshevik Dilemma
  • How to deal with the nations of the world
  • Work to undermine them
  • Or
  • Develop Diplomatic relations with them
  • Consider advantages/disadvantages for both of the
    them!

5
Sources Author Date Desire to Spread World Revolution Socialism in One Coutnry










6
Source 1
  • Comrade Lenin cleans the world of filth.
  • 1920

7
Source 2
  • We have always and repeatedly pointed out to the
    workers that the underlying chief task and basic
    condition of our victory is the propagation of
    revolution at least to several of the more
    advanced countries
  • Lenin, Feb 1921

8
Source 3
  • We go to it because trade with Capitalist
    countries (so long as they have not altogether
    collapsed) is unconditionally necessary for us
  • Lenin explaining why he was attending the
    International Conference at Genoa in 1922

9
Source 4
  • The way out lies only in the victory of the
    Proletariat of the advanced countries. Viewed
    from this standpoint, a national revolution is
    not a self-contained whole it is only a link in
    the internal chain. The international revolution
    constitutes a permanent process, despite declines
    and ebbs.
  • Trotsky, 1930

10
Source 5
  • The ensuring of peace cannot depend on our
    efforts alone, it requires the collaboration and
    co-operation of other states. While therefore
    trying to establish and maintain relations with
    all states, we are giving special attention to
    strengthening and making close our relations with
    those which, like us, give proof of their sincere
    desire to maintain peace and are ready to resist
    those who break the peace.
  • Litvinov, 1933

11
Source 6
  • The USSR would never be swayed by alliances with
    this or that foreign power, be it France, Poland
    or Germany, but would always base her policy on
    self-interest
  • Stalin, 1934

12
Source 7
  • We toilers of the Soviet Union must count on our
    own efforts in defending our affairs and, above
    all, on our Red Army in the defence of our
    Country
  • Molotov, 1936

13
Source 8
  • This time we shall observe the contest between
    Germany and the Western powers and shall not
    intervene in the conflict until we ourselves feel
    it fit to do so in order to bring about the
    decision
  • Litvinov to Czech FO, 1938

14
Source 9
  • England and France have rejected the policy of
    collective securityand taken a position of
    non-interventionthe policy of non-intervention
    reveals an eagerness not to hinder Germany from
    embroiling herself in a war with the Soviet
    Union be cautious and do not allow Soviet Russia
    to be drawn into the conflicts by wargmongers who
    are accustomed to have others pull their
    chestnuts out of the fire.
  • Stalin, 1939

15
Source 10
16
Development of Soviet Foreign Policy
  • Phase 1 (1917 8)
  • Revolutionary Period
  • Phase 2 (1918 1920)
  • Civil War Period
  • Phase 3 (1921 1927)
  • Recovery and Peace
  • Phase 4 (1928 1933)
  • The Left Turn
  • Phase 5 (1933 1938)
  • Collective Security
  • Phase 6 (1938 1941)
  • Self-Preservation

17
Development of Soviet Foreign Policy - Phase One
  • The Revolutionary Period
  • October 1917
  • Bolshevik Revolution
  • February 1918
  • Cancellation of all Foreign debts
  • March 1918
  • Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
  • Humiliating but a price worth paying according to
    Lenin
  • Allows Bolsheviks to consolidate power

18
Phase Two
  • The Civil War
  • 1918 - 1919
  • Foreign Intervention in Civil War
  • March 1919
  • COMINTERN established
  • Apr-Oct 1920
  • Russo-Polish War
  • Nov 1920
  • Evacuation of Crimea

19
G. V. ChicherinForeign Commissioner 1918 - 1930
  • Ex-Menshevik and Ex-Aristocrat
  • Worked for Tsarist Foreign Ministry
  • Educated but emotional
  • Converted to Bolshevism whilst forcibly sent on
    holiday to Cure his Homosexuality Chance
    meeting with Lenin
  • Pro-German
  • Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
  • Treaty of Rapallo
  • Anti-British
  • Had been imprisoned by British 1917 1918 for
    anti-war
  • Disliked Curzon
  • Advocated policy of engagement
  • Engage Capitalists in order to stop them uniting
    against Communist Russia
  • Not a member of the Politburo

20
Phase Three
  • Recovery and Peace 1921 1927
  • 1921
  • Anglo-Soviet Trade Agreement
  • 1922
  • Treaty of Rapallo
  • 1923
  • Curzon Ultimatum over Central Asian communist
    adventures
  • Threatened suspension of trade agreement
  • 1924
  • USSR officially recognised by GB, France Italy
  • Forged Zinoviev Letter
  • COMINTERN urging propaganda in British Armed
    Forces
  • Victorious Conservatives cold shouldered USSR for
    a year
  • 1926
  • Treaty of Berlin extended Treaty of Rapallo
  • General Strike in Britain Comintern involvement
  • Socialism in One Country idea proposed by Stalin
  • 1927
  • Chinese communists massacred by Chiang Kai Shek

21
Why did Soviet Foreign Policy become more
Conservative in the 1920s?
  • Russian Polish War disaster
  • Bolshevik Consolidation
  • Internal positioning within Politburo
  • Conservatives backed safe Stalin
  • Leftists backed the more aggressive Trotsky
  • Economic Disaster in Post World War One and Post
    Civil War Russia
  • Economically backward when Tsarist
  • Myriad National Identities within USSR
  • Plenty to keep Red Army busy regaining the old
    borders of Tsarist Russia
  • Fear of Capitalists
  • Had to prepare for a re-invasion of Foreigners
  • Fear of Proxy wars
  • Capitalists might use Turks, Poles or Persians to
    reignite RCW
  • Avoid War on Two Fronts Japan and Germany
  • Unstable Borders
  • Germany, China, Japan in Korea, British in India

22
Relations with Britain
  • 1921 Anglo-Soviet Trade Agreement
  • Positive on both sides
  • Pragmatic
  • Conservatives suspicious of Communists
  • Seizure of private property
  • Curzon ultimatum 1923
  • Zinoviev letter
  • Arcos Raid 1927
  • Soviet Trade delegation accused of spying
  • Diplomatic relations suspended
  • Labour shifts from positive to suspicious
  • Recognises USSR 1924
  • 1926 General Strike
  • TUC returns 26,000 cheque
  • Labelled Social Fascists by Stalin in 1930
  • 1918 1922
  • Lloyd George Liberal Coalition
  • 1922 23
  • Conservative
  • 1924
  • First ever Labour minority government
  • 1924 1929
  • Conservative
  • 1929 1931
  • Labour minority
  • 1931 1940
  • National governments

23
Relations with Germany
  • Rapallo Treaty 1922
  • Stresemann stabilises Eastern borders
  • Helps get around T of V
  • Active Comintern activity in uprisings
  • 1919, 1921, 1923
  • Locarno Treaties
  • Worried Soviets that Germans were being
    reintegrated into Europe
  • Treaty of Berlin 1926
  • Included pledge of Neutrality if either were
    attacked by a Third nation
  • Weak Weimar Governments
  • Conservative Stresemann most positive towards
    USSR
  • Germany has enough problems!
  • SPD hostile to USSR due to uncompromising
    attitude of KPD
  • Rising spectre of Nazis
  • 1933 electoral success
  • Hitler represented the final stage of monopoly
    capitalism he would inflame social tensions
    making revolution more likely in Germany - Stalin

24
Phase 4 The Left Turn
  • Follows Stalins Domestic U-Turn
  • Ditched Bukharins Right Wing Policies
  • Stalin able to dominate Politburo and Comintern
  • Bukharin replaced by compliant Molotov
  • Foreign Communist Party leaders replaced
  • Intellectuals replaced by pliant working class
  • German Communist Party Scandal Corrupt
    Thaelmann reinstated by Stalin
  • Back to basics (and Anti-Trotskyite)
  • Socialists labelled as Social Fascists and
    Counter-Revolutionaries
  • KPD fails to help SPD as a result
  • Nach Hitler Uns After Hitler Us

25
M. M. LitvinovForeign Commissar 1930 - 1939
  • Chicherins deputy in 1920s
  • Ex-Menshevik, Jewish
  • Married to a British woman
  • Talented negotiator
  • Proposed Disarmament first
  • Helps to defend USSR
  • Helps Communist Revolutions
  • Kellogg-Briand Pact
  • Pro-British
  • Anti-German
  • Proposed Collective Security otherwise
  • In favour of League of Nations
  • Joins in 1934
  • Not a member of the Politburo

26
Phase 5 Collective Security
  • March 1934
  • Trade agreement with Germany
  • Sept 1934
  • League of Nations - Litvinovs Collective
    Security Policy
  • May 1935
  • Pacts with France and Czechoslovakia
  • August 1935
  • COMINTERN supports Popular Fronts
  • 1936 1939
  • Spanish Civil War
  • Nov 1936
  • Anti-COMINTERN pact of Germany Japan (Italy
    1937)
  • Sep 1938
  • Munich agreement (USSR excluded)
  • 1938/9
  • Japanese military attacks in Far East (Manchukuo)
  • April 1939
  • Litvinov proposes triple Military alliance
    Britain, France and USSR
  • May 1939

27
Spanish Civil War
  • Intervention or Non-Intervention?
  • Second Republic established 1931
  • Republicans, Socialists, Communists, Anarchists,
    Separatists
  • Traditional Nationalist Hostile
  • Army, Catholic Church, Landowners, Centralists
  • Nazi Germany and Italy supported Nationalists
  • Britain and France wanted to let Spain sort
    itself out.
  • Stalins dilemma?
  • What should he do?

28
Reasons to intervene
  • Ideological battle
  • Communism versus Fascism
  • Soviet Security
  • Keep Germany and Italy busy
  • Help Natural anti-German ally France from being
    surrounded by Fascists
  • Fight Trotskyites
  • Trotskyite Communists were flocking to Spain to
    show a viable alternative form of Communism from
    Stalinism
  • Military practice
  • Allow hardware and tactics to be tried out on the
    battlefield
  • Prestige
  • Be seen as standing up to the forces of Fascism

29
Reasons not to intervene
  • Strategic Concerns
  • Spain is far from Soviet borders
  • Reaction of Italy and Germany
  • Force the two countries closer together in an
    Anti-Communist crusade
  • Reaction of Britain and France
  • A successful communist intervention might scare
    Britain and France closer to Germans
  • Show disregard for League of Nations and of
    collective security
  • Domestic Concerns
  • Busy with anti-Trotskyite Purges
  • Military in particular
  • Five year plans less successful than hoped for
  • USSR not prepared for sustained war of any kind

30
Stalins Decision
  • Limited Secret Intervention
  • Can help fight Fascists but avoid any blame if
    intervention fails (or succeeds)
  • Particularly worried about the position of France
  • Helping to keep France Democratic and not fall
    into hands of Fascists.
  • NKVD directed to control Comintern activities
  • Channel funds
  • Ship goods secretly
  • Via neutral countries
  • Kindly volunteer to look after Spanish Gold
    Reserves
  • Caballero Letter, 1936
  • Calm down Communist demands
  • No social or economic radicalism
  • Foreign property to be respected
  • Attract non-communist sympathisers

31
(No Transcript)
32
Civil War within a Civil War
  • Barcelona, 1937
  • Safe in Republican hands but Anarchists and POUM
    (Trotskyite Communists) think that Republican
    (and Soviet) Communists are being too pragmatic
  • Uprising Fighting in the Streets
  • Stalin asks NKVD to crush POUM
  • Feeds into Purges in USSR
  • People being denounced left, right and centre
  • NKVD executing anyone accused of being
    Trotskyite
  • Infighting fatally weakened Republicans and
    allowed united Nationalists to ultimately triumph
    by 1939

33
Was it worth it?
  • Positives
  • 4th largest Gold Reserves in the world
  • Seen Fascist Equipment and Tactics in Operation
  • Limited Trotskyism as an international
    alternative to Stalinism
  • Negatives
  • Failed to save Republican Spain
  • Seen Fascist Equipment and Tactics in Operation
  • Ruthless Communist tactics revealed to the world
  • Infighting and purges discredited Communism
  • Serving Officers and Diplomats were tainted by
    exposure to Trotskyite ideas
  • Most executed or re-educated on return
  • Experiences wasted
  • Britain and France less than impressed by their
    potential ally
  • Nail in coffin of Litvinovs collective security
    philosophy

34
What! No Chair for me?
35
Czechoslovakian Crisis
  • Stalins last attempt at Collective Security
  • Willing to consider aiding Czechs
  • However,
  • No Physical border with Czechs
  • Polish antipathy
  • French and British allied to Poles
  • Allies found it frustrating dealing with one
    dictator let alone a second.
  • Allies suspicious of Communist motives after
    Spanish Civil War debacle
  • Mussolini was supposed to be the neutral Referee
    hostile to USSR
  • Lessons learnt
  • Stalin Trust no-one USSR must look after its
    own security
  • Hitler The Allies are weak and divided
  • Chamberlain and Briand Allies made to look
    ridiculous determination not to be pushed
    around again
  • Reaffirm Polish treaties
  • Further antagonises Stalin

36
MolotovForeign Commissar 1939 - 1949
  • Replaced anti-German Litvinov
  • Litvinov had failed to cement deal with British
    and French
  • Stalin stooge
  • The ultimate Yes Man
  • Leader of Comintern from 1929
  • Member of Politburo
  • Stalins Deputy

37
The Nazi Soviet Pact
  • The most startling diplomatic event of the 1930s
  • One week before Second World War
  • Treaty of Neutrality
  • Secret Additional Protocol
  • Carved up hated Poland and marked out spheres of
    influence in Eastern Europe
  • Why
  • Relative weakness of Russian Armed Services
  • 1938 purge of Red Army
  • Japan border disputes
  • Open warfare in Siberia
  • One enemy at a time
  • Worried at being surrounded
  • Relative ineffectiveness of Five year plans
  • Not delivering fully advertised output
  • Need more time to deal with German army
  • Create a Buffer zone for added defence against
    German Army
  • Not yet fully aware of capabilities of German
    Army
  • Pre-Blitzkrieg
  • Hopes France and Germany will fight long drawn
    out attritional war a la WWI

38
Phase 6 Nazi Soviet Love-in
  • 8 May 1939
  • Britain rejects military alliance with Russia
  • 20th May 1939
  • Germany asks for trade talks
  • 27th May 1939
  • Chamberlain restarts talks with Russia
  • 18th July
  • Soviets offer Trade deal to Germans
  • 23rd July
  • Britain and France ask for military talks
  • Drax arrives 11th August
  • 14th August 1939
  • Ribbentrop asks to see Stalin personally
  • 19th August
  • Anglo-Soviet negotiations break down
  • German Soviet Trade deal announced
  • 20th August
  • Hitler asks Stalin to meet Ribbentrop
  • 21st August

39
  • The Government of the German Reich and The
    Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist
    Republics desirous of strengthening the cause of
    peace between Germany and the U.S.S.R., and
    proceeding from the fundamental provisions of the
    Neutrality Agreement concluded in April, 1926
    between Germany and the U.S.S.R., have reached
    the following Agreement
  • Article I. Both High Contracting Parties obligate
    themselves to desist from any act of violence,
    any aggressive action, and any attack on each
    other, either individually or jointly with other
    Powers.
  • Article II. Should one of the High Contracting
    Parties become the object of belligerent action
    by a third Power, the other High Contracting
    Party shall in no manner lend its support to this
    third Power.
  • Article III. The Governments of the two High
    Contracting Parties shall in the future maintain
    continual contact with one another for the
    purpose of consultation in order to exchange
    information on problems affecting their common
    interests.
  • Article IV. Should disputes or conflicts arise
    between the High Contracting Parties shall
    participate in any grouping of Powers whatsoever
    that is directly or indirectly aimed at the other
    party.
  • Article V. Should disputes or conflicts arise
    between the High Contracting Parties over
    problems of one kind or another, both parties
    shall settle these disputes or conflicts
    exclusively through friendly exchange of opinion
    or, if necessary, through the establishment of
    arbitration commissions.
  • Article VI. The present Treaty is concluded for a
    period of ten years, with the proviso that, in so
    far as one of the High Contracting Parties does
    not advance it one year prior to the expiration
    of this period, the validity of this Treaty shall
    automatically be extended for another five years.
  • Article VII. The present treaty shall be ratified
    within the shortest possible time. The
    ratifications shall be exchanged in Berlin. The
    Agreement shall enter into force as soon as it is
    signed.

40
  • Secret Additional Protocol.
  • Article I. In the event of a territorial and
    political rearrangement in the areas belonging to
    the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia,
    Lithuania), the northern boundary of Lithuania
    shall represent the boundary of the spheres of
    influence of Germany and U.S.S.R. In this
    connection the interest of Lithuania in the Vilna
    area is recognized by each party.
  • Article II. In the event of a territorial and
    political rearrangement of the areas belonging to
    the Polish state, the spheres of influence of
    Germany and the U.S.S.R. shall be bounded
    approximately by the line of the rivers Narev,
    Vistula and San.
  • The question of whether the interests of both
    parties make desirable the maintenance of an
    independent Polish States and how such a state
    should be bounded can only be definitely
    determined in the course of further political
    developments.
  • In any event both Governments will resolve this
    question by means of a friendly agreement.
  • Article III. With regard to Southeastern Europe
    attention is called by the Soviet side to its
    interest in Bessarabia. The German side declares
    its complete political disinteredness in these
    areas.
  • Article IV. This protocol shall be treated by
    both parties as strictly secret.

41
Essay Question
  • Did Stalin make the correct strategic decision by
    signing the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939?
  • Debate
  • The failure of Collective Security in Europe in
    the late 1930s was not the fault of Stalin.
    Discuss
  • Stalins Foreign Policy was an extension of his
    Domestic Politics. Discuss.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com