Title: Robin Hogan, Chris Westbrook
1The importance of ice particle shape and
orientation for spaceborne radar retrievals
- Robin Hogan, Chris Westbrook
- University of Reading
- Lin Tian
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
- Phil Brown
- Met Office
2Introduction and overview
- To interpret 94-GHz radar reflectivity in ice
clouds we need - Particle mass Rayleigh scattering up to 0.5
microns Z?? mass2 - Particle shape non-Rayleigh scattering above
0.5 microns, Z also depends on the dimension of
the particle in the direction of propagation of
the radiation - Traditional approach
- Ice particles scatter as spheres (use Mie theory)
- Diameter equal to the maximum dimension of the
true particle - Refractive index of a homogeneous mixture of ice
and air - New observations to test and improve this
assumption - Dual-wavelength radar and simultaneous in-situ
measurements - Differential reflectivity and simultaneous
in-situ measurements - Consequences
- Up to 5-dB error in interpretted reflectivity
- Up to a factor of 5 overestimate in the IWC of
the thickest clouds
3Dual-wavelength ratio comparison
10 GHz, 3 cm
10 GHz, 3 cm
94 GHz, 3.2 mm
94 GHz, 3.2 mm
Difference
- NASA ER-2 aircraft in tropical cirrus
4Characterizing particle size
- An image measured by aircraft can be approximated
by a... - Sphere (but which diameter do we use?)
Spheroid (oblate or prolate?)
Note Dmax ? Dlong Dmean(DlongDshort)/2
5Error 1 Rayleigh Z overestimate
- Brown and Francis (1995) proposed masskg0.0185
Dmeanm1.9 - Appropriate for aggregates which dominate most
ice clouds - Rayleigh reflectivity Z ? mass2
- Good agreement between simultaneous aircraft
measurements of Z found by Hogan et al (2006) - But most aircraft data world-wide characterized
by maximum particle dimension Dmax - This particle has Dmax 1.24 Dmean
- If Dmax used in Brown and Francis relationship,
mass will be 50 too high - Z will be too high by 126 or 3.6 dB
- Explains large part of ER-2 discrepancy
6Particle shape
Randomly oriented in aircraft probe
- We propose ice is modelled as oblate spheroids
rather than spheres - Korolev and Isaac (2003) found typical aspect
ratio a Dshort/Dlong of 0.6-0.65 - Aggregate modelling by Westbrook et al. (2004)
found a value of 0.65
Horizontally oriented in free fall
7Error 2 Non-Rayleigh overestimate
Spheroid
Sphere
8Independent verification Z dr
- A scanning polarized radar measures differential
reflectivity, defined as Zdr 10log10(Zh/Zv)
Dshort/Dlong
Solid-ice oblate spheroid
Dependent on both aspect ratio and density (or
ice fraction) If ice particles were spherical,
Zdr would be zero!
Solid-ice sphere
Sphere 30 ice, 70 air
9Chilbolton 10-cm radar UK aircraft
- Reflectivity agrees well, provided Brown
Francis mass used with Dmean
- Differential reflectivity agrees reasonably well
for oblate spheroids
10Z dr statistics
- One month of data from a 35-GHz (8-mm wavelength)
radar at 45 elevation - Around 75 of ice clouds sampled have Zdrlt 1 dB,
and even more for clouds colder than -15C - This supports the model of oblate spheroids
- For clouds warmer than -15C, much higher Zdr is
possible - Case studies suggest that this is due to
high-density pristine plates and dendrites in
mixed-phase conditions (Hogan et al. 2002, 2003
Field et al. 2004)
11Consequences for IWC retrievals
- Empirical formulas derived from aircraft will be
affected, as well as any algorithm using radar
Raw aircraft data
Empirical IWC(Z,T) fit
Spheres with D Dmax Hogan et al. (2006) fit New
spheroids
Note the mass of the particles in these three
examples are the same