US and UK anticorruption regime - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

US and UK anticorruption regime

Description:

US and UK anticorruption regime By Dmitry Dementyev * – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: rul48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: US and UK anticorruption regime


1
US and UK anticorruption regime
  • By Dmitry Dementyev

2
  • WHAT IS US / UK ANTI-BRIBERY REGIME?
  • - easy and complex at the same time

3
US FCPA summary
US Code / Title 15. Commerce and Trade / Chapter
2B Securities Exchanges
Bribery of Foreign Officials
78m. Periodical and other reports
  • 78m(?). Reports by issuer of security contents
  • issuers, registered pursuant to 78l
  • keep information and documents reasonably
    current
  • annual and quarterly reports

78dd-1 Section 30A of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 Prohibited foreign trade practices
by issuers
  • 78dd-1(a) general jurisdiction
  • issuers (78l/78j(d))
  • use of the mails or any means or instrumentality
    of interstate commerce
  • 78m(b). Books, records, and internal accounting
  • issuers registered (78l), and filing reports
    (78o(d))
  • in reasonable detail / accurately and fairly
    reflect
  • system of internal accounting controls
  • 78dd-1(g) alternative jurisdiction
  • U.S. domestic issuers
  • use of mails or any means or instrumentalities
    is unnecessary

2
1
78dd-3 Prohibited foreign trade practices by
persons other than issuers
78dd-2 Prohibited foreign trade practices by
domestic concerns
78ff. Penalties
3
4
UK BA summary
U.K. Bribery Act 2010
Section 1 Bribing another person
Section 6 Bribery of foreign public officials
Section 7 Failure of commercial organizations to
prevent bribery
Section 14 Offenses 1, 2 and 6 by bodies
corporate
  • Offering, promising or giving something before /
    after the fact
  • It does not matter if something is not given in
    return
  • what matters is improper performance of a
    relevant function or activity (reasonable
    expectation test)
  • Separate offense for bribery of foreign
    officials (drafted to resemble Anti-bribery
    Convention)
  • Does not require the showing of improper
    performance
  • liability for management if offense has been
    committed with their consent or connivance
  • A relevant commercial entity is guilty of an
    offense in this section if an associated person
    is guilty of an offense under Section 1 or 6 or
    would be guilty had the jurisdiction applied
  • Books and records under UK Companies Act

4
5
  • WHAT EXACTLY ARE THE THINGS THAT I MUST NOT DO?
  • - must not bribe public officials

6
What is a bribe?
  • Anything of value
  • Gifts
  • Entertainment and hospitality
  • Facilitation payments?

7
Who are public officials?
  • Foreign official is any officer or employee of a
    foreign government or any department, agency, or
    instrumentality thereof
  • What is instrumentality?
  • The term is loosely applied by US DoJ
  • Recently considered by federal district courts
  • ownership / financial control
  • actual control
  • privileges and obligations
  • financing
  • perception is reality

8
  • CAN I STRUCTURE MYSELF OUT?
  • - most likely not

9
UK BA Jurisdiction
Section 7 Failure of commercial organizations to
prevent bribery
Section 14 Offenses 1, 2 and 6 by bodies
corporate
Section 6 Bribery of foreign public officials
Section 1 Bribing another person
  • Section 12 territorial application
  • act or omission which form part of the offense
    is committed in the UK
  • if outside the UK there must be close
    connection

Section 7 Carrying business or part of business
in the UK
Non-executive director with knowledge
Executive director acting illegally
10
UK BA Jurisdiction uncertainty
  • Ministry of justice
  • common sense approach on a case-by-case basis
  • having demonstrable business presence
  • listing ?
  • Courts
  • no binding precedent / instructive only
  • part of a business under Financial Services and
    Markets Act 2000
  • SFO
  • likely take an expansive view
  • value competitive disadvantage for UK business

11
US FCPA Jurisdiction
  • Issuers (foreign domestic) / director, employee
    or agent
  • Domestic concerns / director, employee or agent
  • While in the territory of the US
  • - Use of means and instrumentalities of
    interstate commerce
  • - Expansive interpretation of prong 3
  • - Aiding and abetting / conspiracy

12
  • WILL THEY EVER KNOW WHAT I DID IN GEORGIA?
  • - they may

13
How will they know about a violation?
  • Requests for legal assistance
  • Competitors
  • SARs to UK Serious Organized Crime Agency (SOCA)
  • Whistleblowers (US SEC UK SFO)

14
  • CAN I CHOOSE TO STAY QUIET?
  • - choose wisely

15
Disclosure Obligations
  • US
  • FCPA violations are categorized as a type of
    fraud and trigger SOX violations
  • The application of SOX can affect a decision
    regarding disclosure
  • Sec. 302 of SOX (certification of financial
    statements by CEOs and CFOs) mandates auditors
    and the board of directors to disclose any fraud
    (material or immaterial) involving persons with a
    significant role in corporate internal control
  • Sec. 404 of SOX (internal control procedures)
    requires reporting on internal controls with
    respect to all consolidated subsidiaries,
    including minority-owned subsidiaries
  • The UK
  • UK Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA)

16
  • WILL THEY LET BYGONES BE BYGONES?
  • - most likely not

17
Statute of Limitations
  • FCPA
  • Tolling agreements
  • MLATS
  • BA
  • - no Statute of Limitations

Giving of a bribe crime is complete Pendergast
v. United States, 317 U.S. 412, 418 (1943)
No criminal prosecution, UNLESS
5 years
No criminal prosecution
Criminal conspiracy United States v. Milstein,
401 F.3d 53, 71 (2d Cir. 2005)
5 years
18
  • CAN I PLAY IT SAFE?
  • - you should try

19
Compliance Program
  • UK BA
  • Adequate procedures (UK BA, Official Guidance)
  • Full defense under Section 7
  • FCPA
  • Compliance and internal controls (Sentencing
    Guidelines, DPAs, NPAs)
  • Mitigating factor

20
Compliance information flow
  • Are there rules and procedures in place?
  • Have the rules been properly conveyed?
  • Has the target audience had a chance to ask
    questions?
  • What are the consequences for breaking the rules?
  • Have the rules been updated?

21
Compliance liability pitfalls
  • Sec 802 of SOX obstruction of justice
  • Punishable by a fine and imprisonment of up to 20
    years
  • CCI case
  • flushing down stuff
  • during internal investigation
  • US v Ray obstruction before any federal
    investigation
  • Investigating company counsel are deputized

22
  • FINAL THOUGHTS

23
  • The laws are relevant for companies that do NOT
    fall within the jurisdictional reach
  • Transition from compliance-curious to
    compliance-focused
  • Compliance implementation requires effort
  • Compliance implementation must take into account
    local law specifics

24
  • QUESTIONS?

25
Contact information

Dmitry DementyevCorporate GroupTel. 7 495 633
70 17Fax 7 495 644 05 99Email
DDementyev_at_salans.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com