Such Material! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Such Material!

Description:

Question Words on Parade. The Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How are all very important in Statistics. You need the . Who. and the . What. just to have data. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: pbwo941
Category:
Tags: material | point | someone | such

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Such Material!


1
Such Material!
  • So Content!

2
Class Discussion Time
  • Why do we discuss a statistic but we do not
    discuss a mathematic or a physic?
  • A gentle warning if we do not have a productive
    student-lead discussion, I will instead turn this
    into an individual writing prompt. Timed, of
    course.

3
Think, Show, and Tell
  • Think
  • Before we can solve the problem, we will need to
    spend serious time considering it seriously.
  • Show
  • An answer without a method or without evidence is
    at best an opinion, at worst a lie.
  • Tell
  • Even people who have taken Statistics need
    answers to be broken down. (Let alone those who
    have not!)

4
Types of Summaries of Data
  • Visual
  • Commonly used in Think and Show
  • Numerical
  • Commonly used in Show
  • Verbal
  • Commonly used in Think and Tell
  • Any complete analysis of data almost always
    includes all three of these.

5
More About Data
  • Numerical data (quantitative)
  • Usually counts of things
  • Names or labels (categorical/qualitative)
  • The Five Ws
  • Who
  • What
  • When
  • Where
  • Why
  • How

6
Context
  • Without context, data is just stuff.
  • If you cant answer the who and the what you
    dont have data.
  • And you dont have any useful information.

7
Who - Subjects
  • Answers the question, About whom (or what) has
    data been collected?
  • When data is organized into a data table, the
    rows are generally the who.
  • The who can be referred to as
  • Respondents
  • Subjects
  • Participants
  • Experimental units
  • Records
  • Cases

p. 9
8
What - Variables
  • Characteristics about each individual whose value
    varies from case to case.
  • Usually the columns.
  • Categorical (qualitative) the variable names
    categories or answers questions about how cases
    fall into those categories.
  • Quantitative a variable measured in units or
    answers questions about the quantity of what is
    measured, how many or how much.

9
Two Houses, Both Alike In Dignity
  • Categorical Variables are variables which have
    data that are names, labels, or indicators.
  • These can be numbers, such as a social security
    number or zip code, or in some situationsage.
  • Quantitative Variables are variables which have
    data that are counts or measurements within a
    category.
  • These will be numbers, although not all numbers
    are this kind of variable.
  • There will be units of measurement.

10
Categorical vs Quantitative
  • What is the category label.
  • Who is the individuals counted in the category.
  • Quantity for each individual subject.
  • Must include units of measurement.

11
Categorical or Quantitative?
  • Gender
  • Age
  • 17, 21, 44, 76

12
Univariate or Bivariate
  • Univariate data has only one variable.
  • Bivariate data has two variables.
  • Multivariate data has more than one variable.
  • In this class, we do certain specific things with
    bivariate data, and then most of what we do will
    be done with univariate data.

13
Question Words on Parade
  • The Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How are all
    very important in Statistics.
  • You need the Who and the What just to have data.
  • You need the Why or else the data is not
    meaningful.
  • The When and the Where help you to determine if
    the data can be applied another way.
  • The How lets you know if analyzing the data is
    meaningful and worthwhile by determining if the
    method of gathering data was reliable.

14
Who
  • Who is the data being collected about?
  • Sometimes the who is not people, but instead
    something else.
  • So a more universal question is Who/What is the
    data being collected about?
  • While it could be importantthis question is not
    the same as asking who did the collecting.
  • Although if we know who did the collecting, this
    can help us spot bias.

15
What
  • What data was actually collected?
  • More than one variable might have been collected.
  • The collected variables will, in the context of
    the study, be either categorical or quantitative,
    but never both.

16
When/Where
  • While not as necessary as the Who or What, this
    information is still context.
  • How many studies from before there were internet
    or cell phones are still valid today?
  • Is a study done in California valid in Alaska?
  • Would knowing about the job market in Idaho Falls
    tell you about the job market in Pocatello?

17
Why
  • Why was the data collected?
  • Someone took time to get this data.
  • This is the presumable motivation for gathering
    it.
  • Even if it is not stated, it can sometimes be
    very obvious.
  • The Neilson Company estimates ratings for
    television shows. Why?
  • All about the Benjamins!

18
How
  • How was the data collected, and were the methods
    reliable?
  • For now you can only take your best intuitive
    guess at this.
  • There is an entire unit on how to gather data
    reliably.
  • It is Unit 3.
  • We are in Unit 1.
  • So you are not ready to be all fancy about it
    yet, and I get that. Do your best.

19
The Five Ws
  • A Consumer Reports article on energy bars gave
    the brand name, flavor, price, number of
    calories, and grams of protein and fat.

20
Problem 2
  • Who?
  • Who The 30 other companies
  • Not Fortune Magazine and not the company doing
    the study.
  • What?
  • What 401(k) participation rates
  • When?
  • When Not given
  • 1992 is simply when the article was published.

21
Problem 2
  • Where?
  • Where Not given
  • Why?
  • Why To see if the companys participation in
    401(k) was low compared to other companies.
  • How?
  • How The 30 companies were asked what their
    participation rates are.
  • After we do unit 3, you would have a more
    detailed answer, such as commenting on the
    sampling procedure used.

22
Problem 2
  • For each variable (What Answer), we need to
    identify if it is categorical, or quantitative.
  • The variable, 401(k) participation rates, is
    likely being used as a quantitative variable.
  • The participation rate does not have specified
    units, although the units are most likely
    percentage of the total employees.
  • Even though the instructions for doing this occur
    after the instructions to identify the question
    words, you can totally do this while you are
    doing the what.
  • It is more efficient, in fact.

23
Problem 2, Final Output
  • Who The 30 other companies
  • What 401(k) participation rates (Quantitative
    Units of total employees)
  • When Not given
  • Where Not given
  • Why To see if the companys participation in
    401(k) was low compared to other companies.
  • How The 30 companies were asked what their
    participation rates are.

24
Assignments
  • Finish Reading Chapters 1 and 2 if you have not
    already.
  • Chapter 2 exercises 2-7, 25, 26
  • Due Thursday
  • You can turn them in sooner, either physically or
    via e-mail, and that is fine with me.
  • There will be a chapters 1-3 Quiz on Friday
  • We just finished discussing chapter 2, so a good
    student would know what that means in terms of
    the reading.
  • Ill cut you some slackyou only need to read
    chapter 3 thru the top part of page 31 for
    tomorrow. Read the rest for Thursday.

25
More Unsupporting Cast
  • On yesterdays episode we talked about Mr.
    Cheeseburger and then need for ridiculously
    levels of clarity.
  • Today we will focus on the Casual Observer, the
    Hasty Generalizer and the Exemplar, which might
    seem like the same at first, but are actually
    three very differently flawed archetypes.
  • They do, however, have in common that they come
    to their conclusions far too easily.

26
The Casual Observer
  • This phrase normally refers to a person who is
    looking at the situation, but does not have any
    particularly strong background in what is going
    on and who does not look any deeper than what is
    on the surface.
  • We are using it to refer to someone who does
    exactly that with exactly the same restrictions.
  • Casual Observers are easily swayed by misleading
    pictures and misinformation because they are only
    looking at what is immediately available.

27
The Casual Observer
  • The reason it is important to be aware of these
    observers is that the reason we must be concise
    is because if we take yawn-worthy lengths of time
    to get to our true point, some people will have
    totally tapped out by then.
  • We need to get to our points in a timely manner
    so that a casual observer gets the information
    before they would otherwise give up.

28
The Hasty Generalizer
  • A hasty generalization is when a person assumes
    that something which is/seems true in some
    situation is also actually true in many, if not
    all, similar situations.
  • The person I refer to here is a little different
    than that, though.
  • In this context I am referring to a person who
    just wants you to get to the conveniently
    digested point, not really caring how you got
    there, so they can get on with their day.

29
The Hasty Generalizer
  • Such a person will typically latch on the first
    solid point you make and assume that the rest of
    what you said is meaningless, unless a better
    point comes along.
  • At which point they tend to abandon the original
    point in favor of the new one.
  • It is important to be complete while being
    concise in order to get around this. Your entire
    point needs to be visible in a relatively concise
    and clear manner for someone trying to breeze
    through it to get the full effect.

30
The Exemplar
  • Normally an exemplar would be someone who has
    done things in a way that sets a superior example
    for others to follow.
  • In this case, though, I am referring to a person
    who fixates on a specific example of something
    happening, and assumes that it is way more
    important than it is.
  • Interestingly enough, that is actually closer to
    a hasty generalization, most of the time, than it
    is to anything else.

31
The Exemplar
  • For example, this person assumes that 9 out of
    10 dentists approving of a particular dental
    product means that 1 of them did notand that it
    should be closely investigated as to exactly why.
  • This kind of person also assumes that there is
    genuine scientific controversy as to the
    existence of global warming because there are
    scientists which are unconvinced.
  • This kind of person might get pulled over once
    for running a stop sign and then immediately
    decides that cops will always pull you over for
    running stop signs.

32
The Exemplar
  • This sort of person tends to believe that one
    rather unlikely example should hold just as much
    weight as the ongoing, consistent outcomewhich
    is the opposite of that example.
  • It is very important that we address any and all
    unusual results in our efforts to avoid someone
    taking them and running with them,
    metaphorically, which means taking time to
    explore possible reasons that strange results
    occurred.

33
Quiz Bulletpoints
  • Know what T-S-T stands for and what each one
    means.
  • Know how to identify the 5 Ws and How in a
    study.
  • Know the difference between a qualitative and
    quantitative variable.
  • Know how to find percentages from a contingency
    table.
  • Know the area principle.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com