Predicting and Valuing Default - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Predicting and Valuing Default

Description:

Predicting and Valuing Default – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: ChrisL186
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Predicting and Valuing Default


1
Predicting and Valuing Default
2
Approaches
  • Empirical Method.
  • Relies on financial/accounting data.
  • Picks up patterns in history what
    accounting.structures prevail before defaults?
  • Structural Method.
  • Relies on Stock Market data.
  • Variations on the seminal Merton Model.
  • Reduced Form Method.
  • Relies on Bond Market data.
  • Relativistic framework (a la BDT for IR modeling).

3
Empirical Method Failures
  • The Enron and Worldcom bankruptcies in 2001
    highlight a fundamental problem with the
    empirical method. It is backward looking--both
    in terms of patterns relating accounting data to
    default and in terms of the actual data itself.
  • Moodys Case Studies
  • Enron
  • Worldcom
  • Bally's

4
Market-Adjusted Ratings
  • Moodys notes that the standard bond ratings
    process may not be as accurate or timely as
    market-based information.
  • They now market a product called Market Implied
    Ratings (MIR)
  • Moodys MIR

5
Structural Model in Practice
  • Mertons model (also known as the Black-Scholes
    Model) is the benchmark structural model. All of
    the relevant information about the default risk
    of the company, and the price of that risk is
    contained in the stock market.
  • In practice, the Moodys KMV model is probably
    the most widely used variant. While the KMV
    model is proprietary, much has been written about
    it by Moodys economists.

6
KMV Features
  • The benchmark riskfree rate is the swap
    curve--not the Treasury curve.
  • There is time-varying market risk premium.
  • There is a liquidity premium based on the firms
    access to capital markets.
  • Expected Recovery is time-varying.
  • Equity is treated as a perpetual down-and-out
    option on the firms assets.
  • Bankruptcy trigger is a percentage (e.g., 70) of
    total firm liabilities.
  • The translation from the EqRNW default
    probability to the physical probability is made
    by comparing the two historically.

7
Reduced Form Model
  • A popular reduced form model is that of Hull and
    White. The term structure of EqRNW default
    probabilities is obtained from a series of
    Corporate and Treasury bonds.
  • Example
  • 5-Year 0-coupon Treasury yields 5.
  • 5-Year 0-coupon Corporate yields 5.5
  • T 100 exp(-.05 5) 77.8801
  • C 100 exp(-.055 5) 75.9572
  • PV of cost of default 1.9229.
  • If we assume 0 recovery on default, then
  • 100 (p) (exp(-.05 5) 1.9229, where p is the
    EqRNW probability of default.
  • p 2.47.

8
Hull White Model
  • Since there few 0-coupon corporates, the
    implementation of the model entails bootstrapping
    both the Treasury and Corporate yield curves.
    Also, recovery is not 0, so the recovery rate
    would be estimated using relevant historical data.

9
Comparing Models
  • Heres a link to a 2005 study from KMV that
    compares the Merton, Moodys KMV, and Hull-White
    models in terms of their ability to explain
    Credit Default Swap spreads.
  • It is intriguing that the KMV model -- which uses
    stock market information--does a better job than
    the Hull and White model which uses bond market
    information.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com