Title: Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features
1Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In
Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features
N C R S T
INFRASTRUCTURE
2The Problem
- DOT use of spatial inventory data
- Planning
- Infrastructure Management
- Safety
- Traffic engineering
- Meet federal requirements (HPMS)
- Inventory of large systems costly
- e.g., 110,000 miles of road in Iowa
- Current Inventory Collection Methods
- Labor intensive
- Time consuming
- Disruptive to traffic
- Dangerous (workers located on/near roadways)
3Research Objectives
- Investigate use of remotely sensed images for
collection of roadway inventory features - Evaluate level of resolution required for various
inventory features - Identify feasible features for future automation
- Make recommendations
4Research Approach
- Identify common inventory features
- Identify existing data collection methods
- Extract inventory features from aerial photos
- Performance measures
- Feature identification
- Accuracy of linear measurements
- Positional accuracy
- Define resolution requirements
- Recommendations
5Identify Common Inventory Features
- HPMS requirements
- Additional elements (Iowa DOT)
- Number of signals at intersections
- Number of stop signs at intersections
- Type of area road passes through (residential,
commercial, etc)
- Number of business entrances
- Number of private entrances
- Railroad crossings
- Intersection through width
6Required HPMS Physical Inventory Features
- Shoulder Type
- Shoulder Width
- Right and Left
- Number of Right/Left Turn Lanes
- Number of Signalized Intersections
- Number of Stop Intersections
- Number of Other Intersections
- Section Length
- Number of Through Lanes
- Surface/Pavement Type
- Lane Width
- Access Control
- Median Type
- Median Width
- Peak Parking
7Data Collection Methods
- Manual (advantages/disadvantages)
- ? low cost
- ? visual inspection of road
- ? accurate distance measurement
- ? workers may be located on-road
- ? difficult to collect spatial (x,y)
- Video-log/photolog vans (advantages/disadvantages)
- ? rapid data collection
- ? permanent record
- ? difficult to collect spatial (x,y)
- ? may interfere with traffic stream
8Data Collection Methods
- GPS (advantages/disadvantages)
- ? highly accurate (x,y,z)
- ? can record elevation
- ? time consuming
- ? workers may be located
- on-road
- Traditional surveying (advantages/disadvantages)
- ? highly accurate (x, y, z, distance)
- ? time consuming
9Pilot Study
Ames, Iowa
10Remote Sensing Datasets
- 2-inch dataset - Georeferenced
- 6-inch dataset - Orthorectified
- 2-foot dataset Orthorectified
- 1-meter dataset Orthorectified
- Simulated 1-meter Satellite Imagery
- not collected concurrently
11Inventory Features Collected
- Crosswalks
- Left turn lanes
- Presence
- Length
- Width
- Stopbar
- Signal
- Structure
- Width
- On-street parking
- Presence
- Type
- Intersection design
- Through lanes
- Number of lanes
- Width
- Shoulder
- Presence, type
- Width
- Pedestrian islands
- Access
- Private
- Commercial/Industrial
- Adjacent land use
- Median
- Presence, type
- Width
12Extraction
6 resolution image
13Performance Measures
- Feature Identification
- Accuracy of Linear Measurements
- Positional accuracy
14Feature Identification
- Number of features identified in aerial photos
versus ground truth - e.g. only 44 of the time can the number of
through lanes be correctly identified (24-inch
resolution)
15Can the Feature be Identified?
16Feature Identification
Observations is the number of features
tested. Differences by datasets indicate a
smaller available sample size
17Linear Measurement Accuracy
- Linear features
- Measured in the field using handheld DMI
- Measured with 4 datasets
- Use of linear measurements
- Turn lane width -- intersection capacity analysis
- Driveway width access management
- Recommended accuracies from NCHRP Report 430
- Lane lengths within 3.28 feet ( 39.4 inches)
- Lane, median, and shoulder widths within 0.328
feet ( 3.9 inches)
NCHRP Report 430 Improved Safety Information To
Support Highway Design
18Thru Lane Width Error
Left Turn Lane Length Error
19Linear Measurement Accuracy
- Lane width, turn lane length, and driveway width
measurement relied heavily on pavement marking - Expect less error with better identifiers (i.e.
length of raised median) - Accuracy required depends on application
20Positional accuracy
- 50 GPS points were collected for comparison
- kinematic GPS
- 5mm to 10mm horizontal
- 4 cm vertical accuracy
- Compared to the same points located with the 4
datasets - Root mean square (RMS)
21Results of RMSE and NSSDA Test (95th Percentile)
NSSDA Spatial accuracy test suggested by
National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy
22Cost Comparison
- Aerial photos
- Iowa DOT estimates 100/mile for images
in-house costs to orthorectify - 1.5 hours in-house to locate 55 features
- hour to measure turn left turn, 2 approach
lanes, lane and median lengths, lane and median
widths for 1 intersection (see davids) - Field manual data collection
- 1 hour to measure and record turn lane and median
lengths lane and median widths for 1
intersection in field not including (see davids)
23Cost Comparison
- GPS
- Cost 1500 for 55 points w/ kinematic GPS from
consultant - 24 person hours
- 10.5 hours for 1 person
- 3 hours processing
- All sites within 2 miles
- Videolog van
- 35/mile to collect
- How many miles can they collect per hour
realistically, not including travel time to
location - Processing time
- Manual see Davids
- Costs for on-road data collection can increase
significantly when sites are located at distances
from data collectors and equipment - 2 hours for Iowa DOT Mandli van to reach Iowa
City from Ames, Iowa
24Conclusions
- Majority of inventory features studied could be
identified in the 2-inch, 6-inch, and 24-inch
datasets - Ability to identify features in 1-meter dataset
is significantly reduced - If identified, most features could be located
spatially and measured - Positional accuracy and linear measurement
accuracy varied by dataset - Acceptability of positional/linear measurement
accuracies depends on application
25RS for Inventorying of Roadway Features
- Advantages
- Rapid field data collection
- Multiple uses of data
- Data can be shared among state, local, etc.
- Do not need to return to the field for missed
items - Can collect most inventory elements (depending on
resolution) - Easily integrated with GIS
- Rapid in-house data collection
- Disadvantages
- Costly for initial collection of images
- (although multiple uses would decrease costs)
- Difficult to detect features such as signs
26Applications
- Iowa DOTs linear referencing system (LRS)
- Identification of passing zones
27Iowa DOTs LRS
- Iowa DOT is implementing a linear referencing
system (LRS) - Requires method to create accurate spatial
representation of network for creation of datum - Current accuracy requirements
- Anchor points (nodes) 3.28 feet
- Anchor sections (links) 6.89 feet
- Business data located - 32.81 feet
28Data Collection Methods Tested by Consultants for
Iowa DOT
- Anchor points
- Kinematic GPS (reference dataset)
- Heads-up digitizing of 24-inch orthophotos for
coordinates (meets) - Heads-up digitizing of 6-inch orthophotos for
coordinates (meets accuracy) - Project plans (did not meet)
- Existing cartography (did not meet)
29Data Collection Methods Tested by Consultants for
Iowa DOT
- Anchor sections
- Videolog van DMI (reference dataset)
- Videolog van DGPS (did not meet)
- Heads-up digitizing of 24-inch orthophotos for
distances (did not meet) - Heads-up digitizing of 6-inch orthophotos for
distances (meets accuracy) - Project plans (did not meet)
- Existing cartography (did not meet)
30ISU Research Team Results
- All datasets but 1-meter meet anchor point
accuracy requirements - In progress -- distance measurements
- DMI (reference)
- Roadware van
- 2-inch photos
- 6-inch orthophotos
- 24-inch orthophotos
- 1-meter orthophotos
- All datasets meet positional accuracy
requirements for business data
31Creation of Datum Using Aerial Photos
Heads-up digitized centerline for datum
Cartography centerline
6-inch resolution aerial photos
32Passing Zones on Rural 2-lane Roadways
- Provide guidance to drivers as to whether the
geometric layout of the roadway allows sufficient
sight distance for a following vehicle to pass a
slower moving one - Are identified by pavement marking
- Inventory of passing zones useful for
- Safety analysis
- Design
- Evaluation of deficiencies
- Capacity studies
- Roadway maintenance and rehabilitation
33Identification of Passing Zones
Identification of changes in pavement marking for
passing zones
- Begin and end point represented as points
- Attribute tables created
- Point features snapped to street centerline
- Distance from reference location calculated
? Point feature to delineate changes in pavement
marking
Street database centerline
34Using Point Features and Attributes to Linearly
Reference Passing Zones