Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features

Description:

Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features N C R S T INFRASTRUCTURE – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:196
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: CTR75
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features


1
Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In
Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features
N C R S T
INFRASTRUCTURE
2
The Problem
  • DOT use of spatial inventory data
  • Planning
  • Infrastructure Management
  • Safety
  • Traffic engineering
  • Meet federal requirements (HPMS)
  • Inventory of large systems costly
  • e.g., 110,000 miles of road in Iowa
  • Current Inventory Collection Methods
  • Labor intensive
  • Time consuming
  • Disruptive to traffic
  • Dangerous (workers located on/near roadways)

3
Research Objectives
  • Investigate use of remotely sensed images for
    collection of roadway inventory features
  • Evaluate level of resolution required for various
    inventory features
  • Identify feasible features for future automation
  • Make recommendations

4
Research Approach
  • Identify common inventory features
  • Identify existing data collection methods
  • Extract inventory features from aerial photos
  • Performance measures
  • Feature identification
  • Accuracy of linear measurements
  • Positional accuracy
  • Define resolution requirements
  • Recommendations

5
Identify Common Inventory Features
  • HPMS requirements
  • Additional elements (Iowa DOT)
  • Number of signals at intersections
  • Number of stop signs at intersections
  • Type of area road passes through (residential,
    commercial, etc)
  • Number of business entrances
  • Number of private entrances
  • Railroad crossings
  • Intersection through width

6
Required HPMS Physical Inventory Features
  • Shoulder Type
  • Shoulder Width
  • Right and Left
  • Number of Right/Left Turn Lanes
  • Number of Signalized Intersections
  • Number of Stop Intersections
  • Number of Other Intersections
  • Section Length
  • Number of Through Lanes
  • Surface/Pavement Type
  • Lane Width
  • Access Control
  • Median Type
  • Median Width
  • Peak Parking

7
Data Collection Methods
  • Manual (advantages/disadvantages)
  • ? low cost
  • ? visual inspection of road
  • ? accurate distance measurement
  • ? workers may be located on-road
  • ? difficult to collect spatial (x,y)
  • Video-log/photolog vans (advantages/disadvantages)
  • ? rapid data collection
  • ? permanent record
  • ? difficult to collect spatial (x,y)
  • ? may interfere with traffic stream

8
Data Collection Methods
  • GPS (advantages/disadvantages)
  • ? highly accurate (x,y,z)
  • ? can record elevation
  • ? time consuming
  • ? workers may be located
  • on-road
  • Traditional surveying (advantages/disadvantages)
  • ? highly accurate (x, y, z, distance)
  • ? time consuming

9
Pilot Study
Ames, Iowa
10
Remote Sensing Datasets
  • 2-inch dataset - Georeferenced
  • 6-inch dataset - Orthorectified
  • 2-foot dataset Orthorectified
  • 1-meter dataset Orthorectified
  • Simulated 1-meter Satellite Imagery
  • not collected concurrently

11
Inventory Features Collected
  • Crosswalks
  • Left turn lanes
  • Presence
  • Length
  • Width
  • Stopbar
  • Signal
  • Structure
  • Width
  • On-street parking
  • Presence
  • Type
  • Intersection design
  • Through lanes
  • Number of lanes
  • Width
  • Shoulder
  • Presence, type
  • Width
  • Pedestrian islands
  • Access
  • Private
  • Commercial/Industrial
  • Adjacent land use
  • Median
  • Presence, type
  • Width

12
Extraction
6 resolution image
13
Performance Measures
  • Feature Identification
  • Accuracy of Linear Measurements
  • Positional accuracy

14
Feature Identification
  • Number of features identified in aerial photos
    versus ground truth
  • e.g. only 44 of the time can the number of
    through lanes be correctly identified (24-inch
    resolution)

15
Can the Feature be Identified?
16
Feature Identification
Observations is the number of features
tested. Differences by datasets indicate a
smaller available sample size
17
Linear Measurement Accuracy
  • Linear features
  • Measured in the field using handheld DMI
  • Measured with 4 datasets
  • Use of linear measurements
  • Turn lane width -- intersection capacity analysis
  • Driveway width access management
  • Recommended accuracies from NCHRP Report 430
  • Lane lengths within 3.28 feet ( 39.4 inches)
  • Lane, median, and shoulder widths within 0.328
    feet ( 3.9 inches)

NCHRP Report 430 Improved Safety Information To
Support Highway Design
18
Thru Lane Width Error
Left Turn Lane Length Error
19
Linear Measurement Accuracy
  • Lane width, turn lane length, and driveway width
    measurement relied heavily on pavement marking
  • Expect less error with better identifiers (i.e.
    length of raised median)
  • Accuracy required depends on application

20
Positional accuracy
  • 50 GPS points were collected for comparison
  • kinematic GPS
  • 5mm to 10mm horizontal
  • 4 cm vertical accuracy
  • Compared to the same points located with the 4
    datasets
  • Root mean square (RMS)

21
Results of RMSE and NSSDA Test (95th Percentile)
NSSDA Spatial accuracy test suggested by
National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy
22
Cost Comparison
  • Aerial photos
  • Iowa DOT estimates 100/mile for images
    in-house costs to orthorectify
  • 1.5 hours in-house to locate 55 features
  • hour to measure turn left turn, 2 approach
    lanes, lane and median lengths, lane and median
    widths for 1 intersection (see davids)
  • Field manual data collection
  • 1 hour to measure and record turn lane and median
    lengths lane and median widths for 1
    intersection in field not including (see davids)

23
Cost Comparison
  • GPS
  • Cost 1500 for 55 points w/ kinematic GPS from
    consultant
  • 24 person hours
  • 10.5 hours for 1 person
  • 3 hours processing
  • All sites within 2 miles
  • Videolog van
  • 35/mile to collect
  • How many miles can they collect per hour
    realistically, not including travel time to
    location
  • Processing time
  • Manual see Davids
  • Costs for on-road data collection can increase
    significantly when sites are located at distances
    from data collectors and equipment
  • 2 hours for Iowa DOT Mandli van to reach Iowa
    City from Ames, Iowa

24
Conclusions
  • Majority of inventory features studied could be
    identified in the 2-inch, 6-inch, and 24-inch
    datasets
  • Ability to identify features in 1-meter dataset
    is significantly reduced
  • If identified, most features could be located
    spatially and measured
  • Positional accuracy and linear measurement
    accuracy varied by dataset
  • Acceptability of positional/linear measurement
    accuracies depends on application

25
RS for Inventorying of Roadway Features
  • Advantages
  • Rapid field data collection
  • Multiple uses of data
  • Data can be shared among state, local, etc.
  • Do not need to return to the field for missed
    items
  • Can collect most inventory elements (depending on
    resolution)
  • Easily integrated with GIS
  • Rapid in-house data collection
  • Disadvantages
  • Costly for initial collection of images
  • (although multiple uses would decrease costs)
  • Difficult to detect features such as signs

26
Applications
  • Iowa DOTs linear referencing system (LRS)
  • Identification of passing zones

27
Iowa DOTs LRS
  • Iowa DOT is implementing a linear referencing
    system (LRS)
  • Requires method to create accurate spatial
    representation of network for creation of datum
  • Current accuracy requirements
  • Anchor points (nodes) 3.28 feet
  • Anchor sections (links) 6.89 feet
  • Business data located - 32.81 feet

28
Data Collection Methods Tested by Consultants for
Iowa DOT
  • Anchor points
  • Kinematic GPS (reference dataset)
  • Heads-up digitizing of 24-inch orthophotos for
    coordinates (meets)
  • Heads-up digitizing of 6-inch orthophotos for
    coordinates (meets accuracy)
  • Project plans (did not meet)
  • Existing cartography (did not meet)

29
Data Collection Methods Tested by Consultants for
Iowa DOT
  • Anchor sections
  • Videolog van DMI (reference dataset)
  • Videolog van DGPS (did not meet)
  • Heads-up digitizing of 24-inch orthophotos for
    distances (did not meet)
  • Heads-up digitizing of 6-inch orthophotos for
    distances (meets accuracy)
  • Project plans (did not meet)
  • Existing cartography (did not meet)

30
ISU Research Team Results
  • All datasets but 1-meter meet anchor point
    accuracy requirements
  • In progress -- distance measurements
  • DMI (reference)
  • Roadware van
  • 2-inch photos
  • 6-inch orthophotos
  • 24-inch orthophotos
  • 1-meter orthophotos
  • All datasets meet positional accuracy
    requirements for business data

31
Creation of Datum Using Aerial Photos
Heads-up digitized centerline for datum
Cartography centerline
6-inch resolution aerial photos
32
Passing Zones on Rural 2-lane Roadways
  • Provide guidance to drivers as to whether the
    geometric layout of the roadway allows sufficient
    sight distance for a following vehicle to pass a
    slower moving one
  • Are identified by pavement marking
  • Inventory of passing zones useful for
  • Safety analysis
  • Design
  • Evaluation of deficiencies
  • Capacity studies
  • Roadway maintenance and rehabilitation

33
Identification of Passing Zones
Identification of changes in pavement marking for
passing zones
  • Begin and end point represented as points
  • Attribute tables created
  • Point features snapped to street centerline
  • Distance from reference location calculated

? Point feature to delineate changes in pavement
marking
Street database centerline
34
Using Point Features and Attributes to Linearly
Reference Passing Zones
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com