Title: No title provided
1ROAD ACCIDENT FUND COMMISSION
2Significance of Road Accident Benefits
- 900 000 vehicles in road accidents
- 130 000 injuries and 10 000 deaths
- R2.7bn raised by fuel levy
- 80 000 loss occurrence events/150 000 claims
- Transaction costs known R620m unknown costs
- Further costs pain and suffering, lost
productivity, healthcare burden, duplication of
pensions
3Mandate
4Reasonable (p.10)
- A reasonable system of road accident compensation
should acknowledge the symbiotic relationship of
road accident compensation with the broader
system of social security and its objectives.
There should be moderation without extremes of
generosity or meanness. The system should be
sensible in its ambitions and reflective of both
the needs and resources of the South African
society in which it is founded. The system should
be purposive in conception and not a piecemeal
mixture of legislative amendment.
5Equitable (p.11)
- A system of road accident compensation must be
equitable in that there must be proportionality
between the funding of the system and the demands
made thereon. There should be impartial and
unbiased treatment of road accident victims and
their families. The purpose and effect of such a
system should be supportive of justice and
fairness as between road accident victims and
their families. There should be some balance or
congruence between the benefits made available to
road accident victims and the benefits made
available to other South Africans in need.
6Affordable (p.10)
- An affordable system of road accident
compensation should be within the financial means
of road users and South African society as a
whole. The system (in its funding demands,
administration costs and social security
benefits) must provide value to road users in
South African society.
7Sustainable (p.10)
- A sustainable system of road accident
compensation must be efficient in its
accessibility and administration. The system
should be facilitative of health care and
rehabilitation as also the alleviation of
financial hardship and anxiety. There should be
reinforcement of the broader system of social
security which in turn should be supportive of
road accident compensation. Any such system must
be long lasting in its availability to road
accident victims who are reliant thereon.
Accordingly the system must remain financially
and morally viable in the eyes of all South
African society.
8Questions
- Is there any rationale for the intervention of
the State in the fate of the victims of road
accidents in a manner more advantageous to them
than to victims of violent crime, birth defects
or household accidents? p.11 - In the event that rationale is found to justify
legislative intervention and State regulation of
a system of compensation of benefits to the
victims of road accidents then For whose benefit
does the State intervene? Is intervention for the
benefit of negligent vehicle drivers or for the
benefit of victims and survivors of road
accidents? p.12
9Questions
- Should such intervention be viewed as a system of
insurance or part of State administered social
security benefits? - Should State intervention be limited to
facilitation of funding a system of road accident
compensation or should the State be concerned
with the establishment of a structure to
administer provision of compensation or benefits? - p.12
10Questions
- What should be the nature of any compensation or
benefits made available to victims of road
accidents? - What should be the extent of compensation or
benefits? - To what extent should a system of road accident
compensation be integrated within the provision
of other social security benefits? - p.12
11Stakeholders p.99
- Road user
- Taxpayer
- Government
- (other role players agents servants
facilitators)
12Outline of Report Volumes 1 2
- Current situation chapters 3 14
- Policy issues chapters 15 25
- Current compensation proposed benefits
- chapters 26 36
- Delivery chapters 37 42
- Table of Contents
13Research Results Volume 3
- Analysis of claims finalized by the RAF in
1998/1999 Human Sciences Research Council p.21 - Analysis of road accident injuries 1998/1999
Medical Research Council p.217 - Research into lump sum payments of compensation
to road accident victims Strategy Tactics
p.407 - AMA Guides case studies Dr D Fish p.481
14Research Results Volume 3
- ICF case studies World Health Organization
p.497 - Impact of HIV/AIDS on road accident benefits
Centre for Actuarial Research p.531 - The cost of healthcare for road accident victims
at public hospitals Dr J Herbst /MRC
p.547 - Actuarial valuation of recommendations
NMG-Levy Actuaries p.569
15Current Scheme
- Road Use chapters 3 5 pp. XII, 37-101
- Claims and Compensation
- chapters 6 8 pp.XIV, 101-179
- Funding chapters 9 11 pp.XV, 179-277
- Transaction Costs chapter 12 pp.XV, 277-309
- Abuse chapter 13 pp.XVI, 309-349
- Evaluation chapter 14 pp.XVI, 349-373
16Current Scheme of Compensation
- Levy on fuel (18,5c/l) to RAF
- Motorist at fault
- Innocent victim claims compensation
- Compensation medical expenses, funeral
expenses, loss income/support, general damages - Once-and-for-all lump sum compensation
- Compensation unlimited
- Wrongdoing motorist indemnified
17Evaluation p.350
- Failure to claim from the RAF
- Ignorance of the RAF Ability to claim
Exclusion by fault - The claims process
- Delay Transaction costs Inconvenience Prospects
of success - Compensation
- Exclusion Cause above need Unequal
treatment Allocation Nature More to the
wealthy Financing - Delivery
- Consumer experience
18Evaluation p.367
- Exclusion (pp.368, 373 427)
- Fault (pp.369, 513 584)
- Allocation of compensation (pp.369, 160 177)
- Unlimited compensation (pp.370, 160 177, 428
467) - Transaction costs (pp.370, 277 307, 309 348)
- Lump sum payments (pp.371, 585 664)
- Delivery (pp.136-160, 351-357, 360-367, 546-553,
616-637, 1183-1285)
19Policy Issues
- Social Security chapters 15 17 pp.XIX, 373-467
- Common Law Remedies chapter 18 pp.XX, 468 - 503
- Fault vs No-Fault chapters 1920 pp.XXI, 513-584
- Lump Sum Awards vs
- Periodic Payments chapters 2122 pp.XXI, 585-668
- Disability Assessment chapter 23 pp.XXII,
669-703
20Policy Shifts
- Liability Insurance Social Security
- Premium Taxation
- Fault No-Fault
- Compensation Benefits
- Lump Sums Pensions
- Unlimited Defined
21Object of Road Accident Benefits Scheme
The Road Accident Benefits Scheme should provide
timeous, appropriate and effective
healthcare and rehabilitative intervention,
protection against impoverishment,
restoration of a life with dignity and
solace for suffering to road accident victims
who have sustained serious injuries
with life changing consequences
or for the families of deceased road accident
victims
22Benefits
- Healthcare chapters 2630 pp.XXIV, 789-994
- Loss of earning capacity
- chapters 3132 pp.XXV, 995-1058
- Funeral benefits chapter 33 pp.XXVII, 1059-1064
- Family support
- benefits chapters 34 pp.XXVII, 1065-1101
- Non-economic loss
- benefits chapters 3536 pp.XXVIII, 1103-1182
23Recommendations re Benefits
- Road Accident Benefits Scheme pp.LVIII, 1308
1317 - Funded by
- fuel levy
- surcharges on road use fines
- surcharges on registration of certain vehicles.
- Pay-as-you-go scheme pp.XXXVI-XL, 181-276
- Integration within system of comprehensive social
protection pp.XXXVIII-XL,
373-427
24- Safety-net only with limitations on benefits.
- Thresholds waiting periods for income support
benefits, severity assessment of impairment for
life enhancement benefits. - Ceilings caps on income and family support,
maximum on life enhancement benefits. - Prescribed benefits tariffs on healthcare,
schedule for life enhancement benefits, flat rate
funeral benefits.
pp.XL, 428-467 - Victim retains common law right to sue for
damages from wrongdoer if not satisfied with
State provided road accident benefits
pp.XLI, 468-503
25- Fault plays no part benefits available to all
road accident victims
pp.XLII, 514-564 - Lump sum awards reduced.
- Healthcare, rehabilitation and lifecare fees paid
to supplier at time of provision of goods and
services. - Income and family support made by periodic
payment. - Funeral benefits and family adjustment benefits
paid by flat rate lump sum. - Life enhancement benefits paid in lump sum
according to schedule
pp.XLII, 587-664
26- Healthcare hospitals, medical, pharmaceutical,
therapeutic, prosthetic, appliances and lifecare. - To provincial and private suppliers.
- Tariff.
- No waiting period.
- Paid to suppliers
pp.XLV-LI, 789-994
27- Income support
- Paid to earners for temporary and permanent loss
of earning capacity. - Paid to non-earners only for permanent loss of
earning capacity (12/18 months). - International Classification of Functioning (ICF)
-assessment of disablement - Waiting periods - basic conditions of Employment
Act plus 7/20 working days. - Earners benefits 80 of net pre-accident income
to maximum amount (highest marginal tax rate on
R8000). - Non-earners benefits 80 of tax threshold
- pp.LI-LIV, 995-1058
28- Funeral benefits flat rate lump sum (R15 000)
pp.LIV, 1059-1064 - Family adjustment benefits flat rate lump sum
(R10 000/R15 000)
pp.LVI, 1065-1101
29- Family support benefits available to children and
spouses/partners. - Children until eighteen years or twenty-three
years. - Surviving spouses periods from three years to
five years. - Benefits one half for surviving spouses and
children and to share in one half of deceaseds
spouses income support benefits. - Payable as pension. pp.LIV-LVI, 1065-1101
30- Life enhancement benefits
- Calculated according to impairment determined by
AMA Guides. - Eligible if assessed 30 or more Whole Person
Impairment. - Amounts of benefits percentage of maximum
amount payable R500,000. - Paid in lump sum. pp.LVII, 1103-1182
31Cost Drivers pp.1340 - 1362
Reduction in costs
- Reviewable periodic payments
- Abolition of foreign currency payments
- Healthcare tariffs
- Managed healthcare
- Direct payment to suppliers
32Cost Drivers
Reduction in costs
- Waiting periods
- Benefits limited to declared income
- Monetary ceilings
- Limitation on dependants
- Time limit
- Impairment thresholds
pp.LVII LX, XXVI, 1308 - 1319
33Cost Drivers
Increase in costs
- No-fault participation
- Payment to public sector
- Flat rate funeral and family adjustment benefits
- Benefits to non-earners
- Removal of ceilings on passengers
pp.LVII LX, XXVI, 1308 - 1319
34Systemic Approach vs Piecemeal Fiddling
- Context (SA, data research, international)
- Policy and strategy (National planning.
Constitution) - Coordination of policy, benefits and delivery
(Departments of Finance, Minerals Energy,
Transport, Health, Social Development Parliament)
35Ad hoc example (1)
- Object Save money
- Proposal Introduce periodic payments
- Result
- Insurance vs social security?
- Delay healthcare rehabilitation because fault
- Delay pension because fault
- Retain legalistic approach
- Retain transaction costs
- Increase delivery costs incapacity
36Ad hoc example (2)
- Object Save money
- Proposal Remove or limit compensation
- Result
- Insurance or social security?
- Common law right to sue for balance of damages?
- No exchange limit compensation for automatic
entitlement - Retain delays transaction costs
- Retain misallocation of compensation
- Duplication inappropriate personnel
37RAF Amendment Bill p.117
- Compulsory mediation/arbitration (pp.771)
- Reduce compensation by collateral benefits
(pp.463) - Limit compensation for non-residents (pp.424)
- Remove compensation for emotional shock (pp.874)
- Managed healthcare (pp.938)
- No direct payment to healthcare providers
(pp.842) - No payment to lawyers (pp.345)
- Periodic payments (pp.642, 1132)
38Comment on RAF Amendment Bill
- No context, vision or planning
- Neither fish nor fowl
- Purpose to avoid, delay or reduce expenditure
- No data or research
- Unproven capacity
39Delivery
- RAF chapters 37 39 pp.XXIX, 1183-1284
- Implementation chapters 40 42 pp.XXX,
1285-1363
40Current Scheme
- Road Use chapters 3 5 pp. XII, 37-101
- Claims and Compensation
- chapters 6 8 pp.XIV, 101-179
- Funding chapters 9 11 pp.XV, 179-277
- Transaction Costs chapter 12 pp.XV, 277-309
- Abuse chapter 13 pp.XVI, 309-349
- Evaluation chapter 14 pp.XVI, 349-373
41(Figure 10.6 Total petrol and diesel
consumption in South Africa and RAF income from
the fuel levy p.223 Source SAPIA Annual
Report 2001 RAF Annual Reports)
42(Figure 8.9 Distribution of claims paid
according to extent of injury p.171 Source
HSRC Report)
43(Figure 26.3 Injuries with the highest impact on
the compensation system p.802 )
A B C
Most Frequent Injury Greatest Expenditure on Compensation by Injury Category Greatest Compensation Paid to Individual Claimants
Sprain strain of the neck Sprain strain of the neck Injuries to nerves spinal cord
Fracture lower leg Fracture lower leg Fracture vertebral column
Superficial injury to head Fracture of upper leg Amputation of foot
Superficial injury to face Intracranial injury Fracture of upper back
Fracture upper leg Fracture pelvis Dislocation of back
Sprain and strain of back Fracture of ribs Amputation of forearm
44 (Figure 8.7 Distribution of claims paid in 1999
according to claim type p.170 Source HSRC
Report)
45 (Figure 8.8 Distribution of amounts paid in
1999 according to claim type p.171 Source
HSRC Report)
See Volume 3 MRC Report p.383
46Distribution of Claim Size
47Categories of compensation
48 (Figure 8.13 Distribution of compensation paid
per compensation category 1999 p.174 Source
HSRC Report)
49The Claims Process
50Time Period (Figure 17.9 Average years from
accident to settlement, according to seriousness
of injuries Vol.3, p.188)
51 (Figure 12.1 Utilisation of RAF Income 1999)
p.282
1999
RAF Income (Fuel Levy Investment) R (million) Utilisation of RAF Income Rm
Compensation 1,449 64
Transaction Costs 483 21
Other 55 2
Surplus Transferred to Reserve 298 13
2,285 Total 2,285 100
Transaction costs 483 - 21 RAF Admin
expenses 129(6) RAF (Legal Experts) 125(5)
Claimants (Admin, Legal Experts) 227(10)
52 (Figure 12.1 Utilisation of RAF Income 2001)
p.283
2001
RAF Income (Fuel Levy Investment) R (million) 2,388 Utilisation of RAF Income Rm
Utilisation of Reserve 342 Compensation 2,055 75
Transaction Costs 619 23
Other 56 2
2,730 Total 2,730 100
Transaction costs 619 - 23 RAF Admin
expenses 179(7) RAF (Legal Experts) 134(5)
Claimants (Admin, Legal Experts) 306(11)
53Distribution Transaction Costs
p.284
54Abuse
Chapter 13
- False Claims
- Exaggerated Claims
- Opportunistic Claims
- Fraud within the RAF
- Legal Malpractice
55Fault vs No-Fault
Chapter 19
- Vindication and Retribution
- Liability Insurance
- Incentive to Safety
- General Deterrence
- Publicity
- Issues of Proof
- Not Always Human Error
- Standard of Fault
- Contributory Negligence
- Reduction in Compensation
- Exclusion from Compensation
- Complexity and Delay
- Complexity and Cost
56Lump Sum Compensation vs Periodic Payment of
Benefits
Chapter 21
- Promote Finality
- Independence Dignity of Claimant
- Facilitate New Life Style
- Inheritance for Beneficiaries
- Funding Litigation
- Guesswork and False Prophecies
- Under Compensation
- Over Compensation
- Process of Calculation Increases Cost
- Process of Calculation Causes Delay
- HIV/AIDS
- Utilization of Award
57General Damages
Chapter 36
- No Medium of Exchange
- Uncertainty
- Inconsistency
- Unequal Treatment
- Incentives to Maximize Damage
- Lifestyle Changes
- Drain on Resources
- Small Claims
- Transaction Costs
- Common Law Recognition
- Sense of Justice
- A Real Loss
- Reconciliation and Solace
- Financing Lifestyle Changes
- Absence of Other Assistance Support
58Delivery
- RAF chapters 37 39 pp.XXIX, 1183-1284
- Implementation chapters 40 42 pp.XXX,
1285-1363
59Recommendations re Delivery
- Road Accident Benefits Scheme (RABS) to
administer proposed scheme pp.LVIII,
1308-1317 - RAF to wind down with ringfencing of current
obligations pp.LVIII -
LIX, 1317-1318 - RABS
- Subject to oversight of Ministry (Social
Development / Transport) and Board - Executive competency (managerial and financial
experience in private sector) - Administrative competencies (healthcare and
pension administration) pp.LVIII, 1304-1308
60Oversight of the RAF
- Minister
- Financial Services Board
- Auditor-General
- Board
61- Minister (pp.1304 - 1307)
- Change of Ministry?
- Provision of social security benefits
- Core competency
62- Financial Services Board (pp.1195 - 1196)
- Advice and financial supervision of FSB should
not apply
63- Auditor-General (pp.1196-1198)
- Limitation of audit
- 120/50 000 claims files checked
64- Board (pp.1183-1195, 1198-1206,
1206-1209,1209-1215) - Absence of managerial and financial expertise
- Sectional interests and conflicts of interests
- Lack of political independence
- Failure to give proper accounting
65Management of RAF
- Context
- Expertise
- Employment costs
- Capacity
- Consultants
- Severance packages
66- Context (pp.1219-1229)
- Monopoly
- No evaluation of service delivery
- No bottom line
- Organisation in transition
67- Expertise (pp.1229-1239)
- Absence management and financial experience
- Absence healthcare skills
- Absence administrative and clerical competencies
- Oversupply legal qualifications (44 total
employees / 86 claims staff)
68- Employment Costs (pp.1239-1247)
- CEO package R990,000 p.a. / R82,500 p.m.
- Managers R350,000 R544,000 p.a. / R44,672 p.m.
- Tea lady R4,150 p.m.
- Employee in private sector earning R9,000 enters
RAF with R44,000
69- Capacity
- Forensic audit report pp.1228-1229, 1262- 1263
- Consultants pp.1265-1269
- Litigation management pp.144-148, 738-753
- Absence of data pp.16, 23, 175-176, 1198-1206
70- Consultants (pp.1262-1274)
- Circa R20m p.a.
- R218,400 for photocopying and collation of
material - R340,000 including preparation of PowerPoint
templates
71- Severance Packages (pp.1244-1246, 1275-1279,
1283) - 24 months salary across the board
- Van Oudtshoorn package R2.2 million for 5 years
employment (166 years) - Mabunda package R1.2 million for 23 months
employment (118 years)
72Recommendations re Delivery
- Road Accident Benefits Scheme (RABS) to
administer proposed scheme pp.LVIII,
1308-1317 - RAF to wind down with ringfencing of current
obligations pp.LVIII -
LIX, 1317-1318 - RABS subject to oversight of Ministry (social
development / transport) and Board. Executive
competency (managerial and financial experience
in private sector) and administrative
competencies (healthcare and pension
administration)
pp.LVIII, 1304-1308
73(No Transcript)
74Social Security Definition
75The Constitution Social Security
76The Common Law Remedy to Sue
77Fault No-Fault
78Fault No-Fault
79Lump Sum Compensation
80Lump Sum Compensation
81General Damages
- There is no medium of exchange for happiness.
There is no market for expectation of life. The
monetary evaluation of non-pecuniary loss is a
philosophical and policy exercise more than a
legal or logical one. The award must be fair and
reasonable, fairness being gauged by earlier
decision but the award must also of necessity be
arbitrary or conventional. No money can provide
true restitution. Andrews v Grand Toy
Alberta Ltd., (1978) 83 DLR (3D) 452, Dickson J
p.1127
82(No Transcript)