Meso- - Scale and Meso- -Scale Convective Systems

1
Meso- - Scale and Meso- -Scale Convective
Systems
2
Mesoscale Convective System

• Grouping of deep cumulonimbus clouds merged at
  the anvil forming a meso-b-scale or larger
  cluster.
• Defining the term MCS implies that there are
  one or more dynamics mechanisms maintaining and
  growing the system.
• What are some of these mechanisms?

3
Organization Mechanisms

• 1. Independent Mesoscale Circulation
• a) sea breeze circulation
• b) slope flow circulation
• c) land use forced thermal circulation
• 2. Independent Synoptic Circulation
• a) frontal circulation
• b) ageostrophic Jet-Streak circulation

4
Organization Mechanisms

• Mesoscale basis of self-organization
• Conditional Instability of the First Kind (CIFK)
  traditional conditional instability occurring on
  meso-b- and meso-a-scale.
• Conditional Instability of the Second Kind
  (CISK) Growth and maintenance of a meso-b- and
  meso-a-scale disturbance through assumed
  interaction with meso-g-scale convection.
• Conditional symmetric instability (CSI)
  traditional linear conditional instability
  applied to a rotating fluid.
• Convective Inertial Instability (CII) Combined
  CIFK and inertial Instability

5
Organization Mechanisms(continued)

• Mesoscale basis of self-organization (continued)
• Thermodynamic Process (engine) A cyclic
  thermodynamic process used to describe
  organization

6
Original Concept of CISK

• Unstable growth of a wave on the scale of several
  cumulus (meso-b-scale and larger) in response to
  latent heating
• Originally applied to the growth of a hurricane
  depression by Charney and Elliasen
• Later applied to the growth of any wave using
  linear theory (wave-CISK)

7
Real CISK

• Scale-dependent feedback from cumulus to system
  by
• momentum forcing
• thermal forcing
• Response of system to cumulus
• Thermal field (mass) adjusts to momentum forcing
  (LltLR)
• Wind field (momentum) adjusts to thermal (mass)
  forcing (LgtLR)

8
Real CISK(continued)

• Since the heating of cumulus projects on to
  multiple scales on either side of LR, a multiple
  of responses to cumulus occur some gravity and
  some rotational.
• Because the properties of the rotational response
  are so different from the gravity wave response,
  the evolving system can be complex.
• Normally, the system is defined by a slow
  mesoscale response that defines the system
  organization over time.

9
Real CISK(continued)

• There is still a role of the traditional CISK
  concept to understand individual components of a
  much more complex system.

10
Frictional CISK(Charney and Elliasen , 1962)

• Once believed to the basis of organization for a
  tropical cyclone
• An ensemble of cumuli is supported by mesoscale
  ascent driven by Ekman pumping of cyclone vortex.
• cumulus feed back to vortex strength by heating
  on scale of vortex (through a cumulus
  parameterization) In the linear formulation, this
  major assumption is a feedback that makes linear
  instability in the system appear that is used to
  account for the hurricane growth.

11
Frictional CISK(continued)

• Flaw
• the cumulus parameterization assumes the scale
  interaction that it is trying to find.
• Many hurricanes dont have cumulus!
• 20 years later, they realized that explaining the
  growth of a hurricane this way was a circular
  argument.

12
Traditional Wave-CISK

• Upward mesoscale vertical motion driven by the
  propagation of linear wave (gravity wave,
  rotational wave, any wave) drives cumulus heating
  that amplifies the wave.
• Cumulus parameterization used to represent
  cumulus feed back on wave.
• Flaw cumulus parameterization assumes the scale
  interaction it is trying to predict.

13
Density Current Organization

• Mesoscale density current formed by combined
  effect of a group of cumulus over time acts to
  organize lifting along the gust front (density
  current boundary).
• Density current moves relatively slowly and has a
  long lifetime when compared to time scale of
  individual cumulus. Hence the density current
  is the basis of the system organization.
• But
• Density currents are a nonlinear packet of
  shallow trapped internal wavesa solitary wave.
• Not treated by linear theory

14
Slant-Wise Convection

• Two competing stabilities present in the
  atmosphere
• 1. Static Stability (vertical planes)
• 2. Inertial Stability (horizontal planes)
• Stability in one plane limits instability in the
  other
• Both stabilities are represented by gradients of
  a conservative potential

15
Slant-Wise Convection(continued)

• There is free movement relative to a particular
  stability along iso-lines of constant potential.
• There is stability induced oscillation for
  movement perpendicular to iso-lines of constant
  potential.

16
Slant-Wise Convection(continued)

• The potential for dry static stability is
  potential temperature (q)
• The potential for moist static stability
  (saturated air) is equivalent potential
  temperature(qe)
• The potential for inertial stability is angular
  momentum given by where
  y is the radius from the center of rotation.

17
Slant-Wise Convection(continued)

• Lines of constant (q) are usually horizontal but
  dip downward (due to thermal wind balance) into
  the center of a cyclonic vortex whose strength
  decreases with height (warm core) and rise upward
  into the center of vortex whose strength
  increases with height (cold core).
• Lines of constant inertial stability (m) are
  usually vertical, but tilt away from the center
  of a cyclonic warm core vortex because of the
  thermal wind effect and vise versa in a warm core
  vortex.

18
Slant-Wise Convection(continue)

• Hence if we have a saturated warm core vortex,
  neutral inertial upward movement (movement along
  an m surface) experiences less static stability
  than pure vertical upward movement .
• Likewise, neutral horizontal movement along a q
  surface, experiences less inertial stability than
  pure horizontal movement
• If vortex is strong enough momentum lines and q
  lines can cross, creating static instability
  along m surfaces or inertial instability along q
  surfaces (isentropes).

19
Slant-Wise Convection(continued)

• Hence convection erupting up the tilted momentum
  surface is called slant-wise convection
• Slant-wise convection is due to symmetric
  instability or inertial instability relative to
  the symmetric vortex that defines the radius of
  curvature for the momentum lines.

20
Slant-Wise Convection(continued)

• Slantwise moist convection (conditional symmetric
  instability) is very important in the stratiform
  regions of mesoscale convective systems
• Slant wise convection may look in some ways like
  vertical convection, and even be associated with
  lightning, graupel, strong up and downward motion.

21
Conditional Symmetric Instability

• Conditional Instability along a momentum m
  surface, ie condition for slantwise moist
  convection
• Alternative way of looking at the same thing
  Inertial Instability along a theta_e surface

22
Convective - Symmetric Instability(different
from conditional symmetric instability)

• Conditional Instability (vertical) is limited in
  strength by the energy consumed in forcing
  horizontal motion due to symmetric stability.
• Regions of weak horizontal inertial instability
  can enhance vertical conditional instability.

23
lt C - S I
lt C S I
24
Organization of MCSs

• Linear
• Mesoscale forced
• Convergence line
• Sea breeze
• etc
• Middle Latitude Squall lines
• Frontal
• Prefrontal
• Derecho
• Progressive
• Serial (prefrontal)
• Supercell
• Tropical Squall Lines
• Circular
• MCS
• MCC

25
Linear Meso-b-scale MCSs

• Linear organizations can appear for wide range of
  reasons including
• Wave-CISK
• CSI
• C-SI
• Barotropic converging flows
• Baroclinic forcing (density current)

26
Middle Latitude Squall Line
27
Prefrontal Middle Latitude Squall Line

• In its formative stage the line organizes along a
  preexisting convergence line and is
  three-dimensional in character, i.e. it is
  composed of a linear arrangement of individual
  convective cells.
• The mature line becomes essentially
  two-dimensional in construction and follows the
  equilibrium model of sheared convection presented
  earlier.
• It is the mature stage of squall line MCS that
  begins with a line of cumulus initiated along a
  preexisting boundary such as a cold front or
  local thermal circulation

28
Middle Latitude Squall Line(continued)

• After several hours of down shear tilting short
  lived cumulus a deep density current is built
  that becomes the basis of maintenance of the
  steady state quasi-two-dimensional line structure
• Persistence of the quasi-steady structure can
  evolve to build a strong positive vortex sheet
  along a shear line at middle levels. Associated
  mass adjustment to the vorticity results in low
  pressure and mesoscale circulations that support
  the line.

29
Middle Latitude Squall Line(continued)

• Eventual shearing instability can lead to
  balling up of the vortex sheet into a circular
  warm core vortex aloft
• Mid-level vorticity maximum can drive mesoscale
  ascent in support of convection.

30
Middle Latitude Squall Line(continued)

• Role of slantwise convection in trailing
  stratiform anvil.
• Slantwise mesoscale subsidence driven by melting
  and evaporation in anvil.
• Compensating upward slantwise motion are forced
  helped by new condensation and ice growth along
  upward motion.
• Vertical circulation may build jet streak feature
  at upper levels