Title: Lecture 9: Introduction to Genetic Drift
1Lecture 9 Introduction to Genetic Drift
September 25, 2015
2Last Time
- Overdominance and Underdominance
- Overview of advanced topics in selection
- Introduction to Genetic Drift
3Today
- First in-class simulation of population genetics
processes drift - Fisher-Wright model of genetic drift
4What Controls Genetic Diversity Within
Populations?
4 major evolutionary forces
Diversity
5Genetic Drift
- Relaxing another assumption infinite populations
- Genetic drift is a consequence of having small
populations - Definition chance changes in allele frequency
that result from the sampling of gametes from
generation to generation in a finite population - Assume (for now) Hardy-Weinberg conditions
- Random mating
- No selection, mutation, or gene flow
6Drift Simulation
- Pick 1 red and 3 other mms so that all 4 have
different colors - Form two diploid genotypes as you wish
- Flip a coin to make 2 offspring
- Draw allele from Parent 1 if heads get
another mm with the same color as the left
allele, if tails get one with the color of
the right allele - Draw allele from Parent 2 in the same way
- Mate offspring and repeat for 3 more
generations - Report frequency of red allele in last
generation
Parent 1
Parent 2
m
m
m
7Genetic Drift
- A sampling problem some alleles lost by random
chance due to sampling "error" during reproduction
8Simple Model of Genetic Drift
- Many independent subpopulations
- Subpopulations are of constant size
- Random mating within subpopulations
9Key Points about Genetic Drift
- Effects within subpopulations vs effects in
overall population (combining subpopulations) - Average outcome of drift within subpopulations
depends on initial allele frequencies - Drift affects the efficiency of selection
- Drift is one of the primary driving forces in
evolution
10Effects of Drift
- Simulation of 4 subpopulations with 20
individuals, 2 alleles
- Random changes through time
- Fixation or loss of alleles
- Little change in mean frequency
- Increased variance among subpopulations
11How Does Drift Affect the Variance of Allele
Frequencies Within Subpopulations?
12Drift Strongest in Small Populations
13Effects of Drift
http//www.cas.vanderbilt.edu/bsci111b/drosophila/
flies-eyes-phenotypes.jpg
- Buri (1956) followed change in eye color allele
(bw75) - Codominant, neutral
- 107 populations
- 16 flies per subpopulation
- Followed for 19 generations
14Modeling Drift as a Markov Chain
- Like the m m simulation, but analytical rather
than empirical - Simulate large number of populations with two
diploid individuals, p0.5 - Simulate transition to next generation based on
binomial sampling probability (see text and lab
manual)
15Modeled versus Observed Drift in Buris Flies
16Effects of Drift Across Subpopulations
- Frequency of eye color allele did not change much
- Variance among subpopulations increased markedly
17Fixation or Loss of Alleles
- Once an allele is lost or fixed, the population
does not change (what are the assumptions?) - This is called an absorbing state
- Long-term consequences for genetic diversity
44
18Probability of Fixation of an allele within a
subpopulation Depends upon Initial Allele
Frequency
where u(q) is probability of a subpopulation to
be fixed for allele A2
19Effects of Drift on Heterozygosity
- Can think of genetic drift as random selection of
alleles from a group of FINITE populations - Example One locus and two alleles in a forest of
20 trees determines color of fruit - Probability of homozygotes for alleles IBD in
next generation?
20Drift and Heterozygosity
- Expressing previous equation in terms of
heterozygosity -
p and q are stable through time across
subpopulations, so 2pq is the same on both sides
of equation cancels
- Heterozygosity declines over time in
subpopulations - Change is inversely proportional to population
size -
21Diffusion Approximation
- Greatly simplifies the problem of simulating
drift - Readily extended to incorporate other factors
22Time for an Allele to Become Fixed
- Using the Diffusion Approximation to model drift
- Assume random walk of allele frequencies
behaves like directional diffusion heat through
a metal rod - Yields simple and intuitive equation for
predicting time to fixation
- Time to fixation is linear function of population
size and inversely associated with allele
frequency
23Time for a New Mutant to Become Fixed
- Assume new mutant occurs at frequency of 1/2N
- ln(1-p) -p for small p
- 1-p 1 for small p
- Expected time to fixation for a new mutant is 4
times the population size!
24Effects of Drift
- Within subpopulations
- Changes allele frequencies
- Degrades diversity
- Reduces variance of allele frequencies (makes
frequencies more unequal) - Does not cause deviations from HWE
- Among subpopulations (if there are many)
- Does NOT change allele frequencies
- Does NOT degrade diversity
- Increases variance in allele frequencies
- Causes a deficiency of heterozygotes compared to
Hardy-Weinberg expectations (if the existence of
subpopulations is ignored Wahlund Effect)