Energy Transport and Structure of the Solar Convection Zone PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 51
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Energy Transport and Structure of the Solar Convection Zone


1
Energy Transport and Structure of the Solar
Convection Zone
  • James Armstrong
  • University of Hawaii Manoa
  • 5/25/2004
  • Ph.D. Oral Examination

2
Introduction
  • Magnetic Solar Cycle
  • Solar Irradiance Cycle
  • Structural changes
  • Surface features
  • How do proxy models work?

3
Introduction
  • Observations
  • PSPT
  • Red, Blue, and CaIIK
  • MDI
  • Used as a check
  • Faculae
  • Bright wall model
  • Comparison to proxy models

4
Introduction
  • Sunspot bright rings
  • Simple resistor model
  • 2D diffusive model
  • Bright ring observations
  • Temperature Profiles
  • How much energy do they radiate?
  • Facular regions
  • PSF and other corrections
  • Discussion and Conclusions

5
Note For Convenience
  • Ill often refer to pixels or regions as being
    bright. This should be taken to mean
    bolometrically bright.
  • I will often also use µ. µ is the cosine of the
    viewing angle.

6
Magnetic Solar Cycle
  • Roughly periodic with period of 11 years.
  • Sunspots appear at higher latitudes early in the
    cycle and lower in the cycle.
  • Magnetic field flips from one cycle to the next.

7
Magnetic Solar Cycle
  • Solar magnetic field begins with a poloidal field
  • Poloidal field is wound up generating a torroidal
    field
  • Magnetic field rises and recycled

8
Solar Irradiance
  • Solar irradiance changes by 0.1 over the solar
    cycle.
  • This is correlated with the solar magnetic cycle.
  • Short term variability is large.

9
Irradiance vs. Luminosity
  • Irradiance
  • Amount of energy radiated in a particular
    direction e.g. toward earth
  • Luminosity
  • The total energy radiated by the sun
  • They are not the same!
  • Changes in irradiance does not imply changes in
    luminosity.

10
Irradiance vs. Luminosity
Solar irradiance cycle is caused by the time
average of irradiance.
11
Why? Two explanations
  • Solar irradiance cycle is driven by structural
    changes in the solar interior.
  • Solar irradiance cycle is driven by surface
    features.

12
Deeper Structure Changes
  • Magnetic fields generated at or near base of
    convection zone
  • Magnetic fields lead to changes in the solar
    structure
  • This leads to observed solar irradiance changes

13
Surface Features
  • Magnetic fields cause holes.
  • Facular regions appear bright.
  • Due to suppression of convective motion sunspots
    appear dark.
  • Use average area of bright and dark features to
    predict the irradiance.

14
Proxy Models
  • Faculae are bright and increase solar irradiance
  • Sunspots are dark and decrease solar irradiance
  • Assumes that the quiet sun doesnt change

Predict about 95 of irradiance variability
15
End of slide show, click to exit
16
Proxy Models How do they work?
  • Create a proxy model with known properties and
    compare.
  • Include an underlying irradiance cycle.
  • Sunspots and faculae have equal contributions.
  • Linear regression performed without underlying
    irradiance cycle.

17
Comparison
  • Real proxy models have an R of 95
  • Simulated proxy models have an 94
  • Didnt include the underlying solar cycle
  • Only had two independent variables
  • Adding an independent variable which is random
    noise increased R to 95
  • Over estimated contributions from faculae
  • Under estimated contributions for sunspots

18
Observations
  • Precision Solar Photometric Telescope (PSPT)
  • Located on Mauna Loa
  • Seeing Limited Observations
  • Pixels of 1
  • Photometry of 0.1
  • Three bands
  • Red 606.7 607.2 nm
  • Blue 409.3 409.6
  • CaIIK 393.1 393.4 nm

19
Red and Blue ? Temperature
20
CaIIK Traces Magnetic Field
Other Facular studies compute line of sight
magnetic field by dividing by m.
21
Faculae - The Hot Wall Model
  • Magnetic fields provide pressure support.
  • Pressure equilibrium implies lower density.
  • Lower density leads to lower opacity providing an
    energy shunt a preferred route for energy to
    emerge from the solar surface.

22
Properties of Faculae
  • Faculae redistribute the angular surface
    irradiance.
  • Represent a local increase in the radiated
    energy.
  • Stronger faculae appear dark at disk center.

23
Comparison of Faculae to Hot Wall Models
  • We can relate the temperature at the base of the
    flux tube to the surface temperature

Tw/T97
  • Walls are hot, but surrounding down flows are
    cold.

24
Comparison of Observations to Proxy Models
Now we can use conversion factor.
25
Comparison of Observations to Proxy Models
26
Sunspot Bright Rings
  • Sunspots inhibit energy transport in the
    convection zone
  • Heat will build up at the bottom of the sunspot
  • This excess heat flows around the sunspot
    increasing temperature of neighboring solar
    surface

27
Simple Resistor Model
Perturbed temperature solution generated from
effective source at base of sunspot with an
effective luminosity of F
28
Diffusion Model
  • 2D diffusion model of sunspots

29
Diffusion Model
  • 2D diffusion model of sunspots
  • Sunspot blocks all energy transport
  • Conductivity derived from analytic mixing length
    and numerical simulation results
  • Equilibrium conditions computed

30
Conductivity
31
2D Diffusion Model
32
Predicted Temperature Profiles
MLT Conductivities
33
Predicted Temperature Profiles
Numerical Conductivities
34
Observations
35
MDI
  • Michaelson Doppler imager aboard SOHO
  • 2 pixels
  • Lower Photometry
  • Not designed for photometry
  • Used as a check

36
Calculating the Luminosity
Observe sunspot brightness as it crosses the
solar disk to compute 3D irradiance profile.
37
Observational Results
38
Energy Reradiated
Sunspot in 1 in 2 in 3
8263 22 32 34
8640 6 12 21
8525 12 35 65
8706 15 38 69
But Models predict 2 or less!
39
Diffusion Doesnt Work
  • Mixing length or anisotropic diffusion
    conductivities dont explain bright ring data
  • Correlated flows over scales much larger than a
    density scale height seem to be required
  • Faculae or CaIIK bright pixels are puzzling --
    important local perturbations to heat flow?

40
What about Faculae?
  • Faculae redistribute energy
  • May represent increase in energy
  • Are probably in all sunspot rings
  • Should be corrected for?
  • Try excluding them from computation.

41
Bright Rings - Filtered
  • Removing the bright CaIIK regions

Sunspot in 1 in 2 in 3
8263 -5.0 -5.5 -10
8640 -1.3 -3.3 -8
8525 -0.4 -1.2 -6.2
8706 -0.2 -2.0 -5.3
42
What Happened?
Scattered light ?
43
Scattered Light
  • Scattering of light causes a slight dark ring
    around the sunspot.
  • Compute the PSF and correct.
  • Due to remaining defects, compute forward problem
  • Bright are rings missing.

44
Bright Ring Faculae Are Different
  • Faculae in bright rings are fainter than in quiet
    sun.
  • Correction implies a bright ring which
    reradiates 10 of energy blocked.

45
Comparison of Observations to Proxy Models
46
Plausibility Check
  • We see large changes in solar irradiance
    associated with sunspots and faculae.
  • Other evidence indicates that sunspots and
    faculae dont have a large effect on solar
    irradiance
  • Conflict is resolved by considering a complete
    disk crossing.

47
Plausibility Check
  • Most of the energy reradiated by bright rings are
    associated with magnetic fields.
  • (They are facular in nature)
  • Faculae are darker at disk center.
  • Sunspots are darker at disk center.
  • Sunspots bright ring must be darker at disk
    center.

48
Conclusions
  • Facular regions
  • Redistribute radiated energy.
  • Act as a local increase in energy budget.
  • Might not represent an increase in solar
    irradiance.
  • Proxy models overestimate the contributions of
    facular regions.
  • They are hiding something.

49
Conclusions
  • Sunspot bright rings reradiate at least 40 of
    energy blocked by sunspots.
  • The excess energy radiated by bright rings is
    preferentially channeled through CaIIK bright
    regions.
  • After correction for scattered light, no bright
    ring remains, but facular regions imply that 10
    of energy is reradiated

50
Conclusions
  • Energy transport in the solar convection zone is
    not diffusive.
  • Diffusion models predict that less than 1 of the
    energy blocked by a sunspot is reradiated.
  • Faculae must represent an energy increase.
  • Diffusion models predict that they dont.
  • This represents a contradiction.
  • Energy is transported by large scale bulk
    motions.
  • In small features, radiative transfer is
    important.

51
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com