Title: Energy Transport and Structure of the Solar Convection Zone
1Energy Transport and Structure of the Solar
Convection Zone
- James Armstrong
- University of Hawaii Manoa
- 5/25/2004
- Ph.D. Oral Examination
2Introduction
- Magnetic Solar Cycle
- Solar Irradiance Cycle
- Structural changes
- Surface features
- How do proxy models work?
3Introduction
- Observations
- PSPT
- Red, Blue, and CaIIK
- MDI
- Used as a check
- Faculae
- Bright wall model
- Comparison to proxy models
4Introduction
- Sunspot bright rings
- Simple resistor model
- 2D diffusive model
- Bright ring observations
- Temperature Profiles
- How much energy do they radiate?
- Facular regions
- PSF and other corrections
- Discussion and Conclusions
5Note For Convenience
- Ill often refer to pixels or regions as being
bright. This should be taken to mean
bolometrically bright. - I will often also use µ. µ is the cosine of the
viewing angle.
6Magnetic Solar Cycle
- Roughly periodic with period of 11 years.
- Sunspots appear at higher latitudes early in the
cycle and lower in the cycle. - Magnetic field flips from one cycle to the next.
7Magnetic Solar Cycle
- Solar magnetic field begins with a poloidal field
- Poloidal field is wound up generating a torroidal
field - Magnetic field rises and recycled
8Solar Irradiance
- Solar irradiance changes by 0.1 over the solar
cycle. - This is correlated with the solar magnetic cycle.
- Short term variability is large.
9Irradiance vs. Luminosity
- Irradiance
- Amount of energy radiated in a particular
direction e.g. toward earth - Luminosity
- The total energy radiated by the sun
- They are not the same!
- Changes in irradiance does not imply changes in
luminosity.
10Irradiance vs. Luminosity
Solar irradiance cycle is caused by the time
average of irradiance.
11Why? Two explanations
- Solar irradiance cycle is driven by structural
changes in the solar interior. - Solar irradiance cycle is driven by surface
features.
12Deeper Structure Changes
- Magnetic fields generated at or near base of
convection zone - Magnetic fields lead to changes in the solar
structure - This leads to observed solar irradiance changes
13Surface Features
- Magnetic fields cause holes.
- Facular regions appear bright.
- Due to suppression of convective motion sunspots
appear dark. - Use average area of bright and dark features to
predict the irradiance.
14Proxy Models
- Faculae are bright and increase solar irradiance
- Sunspots are dark and decrease solar irradiance
- Assumes that the quiet sun doesnt change
Predict about 95 of irradiance variability
15End of slide show, click to exit
16Proxy Models How do they work?
- Create a proxy model with known properties and
compare. - Include an underlying irradiance cycle.
- Sunspots and faculae have equal contributions.
- Linear regression performed without underlying
irradiance cycle.
17Comparison
- Real proxy models have an R of 95
- Simulated proxy models have an 94
- Didnt include the underlying solar cycle
- Only had two independent variables
- Adding an independent variable which is random
noise increased R to 95 - Over estimated contributions from faculae
- Under estimated contributions for sunspots
18Observations
- Precision Solar Photometric Telescope (PSPT)
- Located on Mauna Loa
- Seeing Limited Observations
- Pixels of 1
- Photometry of 0.1
- Three bands
- Red 606.7 607.2 nm
- Blue 409.3 409.6
- CaIIK 393.1 393.4 nm
19Red and Blue ? Temperature
20CaIIK Traces Magnetic Field
Other Facular studies compute line of sight
magnetic field by dividing by m.
21Faculae - The Hot Wall Model
- Magnetic fields provide pressure support.
- Pressure equilibrium implies lower density.
- Lower density leads to lower opacity providing an
energy shunt a preferred route for energy to
emerge from the solar surface.
22Properties of Faculae
- Faculae redistribute the angular surface
irradiance. - Represent a local increase in the radiated
energy. - Stronger faculae appear dark at disk center.
23Comparison of Faculae to Hot Wall Models
- We can relate the temperature at the base of the
flux tube to the surface temperature
Tw/T97
- Walls are hot, but surrounding down flows are
cold.
24Comparison of Observations to Proxy Models
Now we can use conversion factor.
25Comparison of Observations to Proxy Models
26Sunspot Bright Rings
- Sunspots inhibit energy transport in the
convection zone - Heat will build up at the bottom of the sunspot
- This excess heat flows around the sunspot
increasing temperature of neighboring solar
surface
27Simple Resistor Model
Perturbed temperature solution generated from
effective source at base of sunspot with an
effective luminosity of F
28Diffusion Model
- 2D diffusion model of sunspots
29Diffusion Model
- 2D diffusion model of sunspots
- Sunspot blocks all energy transport
- Conductivity derived from analytic mixing length
and numerical simulation results - Equilibrium conditions computed
30Conductivity
312D Diffusion Model
32Predicted Temperature Profiles
MLT Conductivities
33Predicted Temperature Profiles
Numerical Conductivities
34Observations
35MDI
- Michaelson Doppler imager aboard SOHO
- 2 pixels
- Lower Photometry
- Not designed for photometry
- Used as a check
36Calculating the Luminosity
Observe sunspot brightness as it crosses the
solar disk to compute 3D irradiance profile.
37Observational Results
38Energy Reradiated
Sunspot in 1 in 2 in 3
8263 22 32 34
8640 6 12 21
8525 12 35 65
8706 15 38 69
But Models predict 2 or less!
39Diffusion Doesnt Work
- Mixing length or anisotropic diffusion
conductivities dont explain bright ring data - Correlated flows over scales much larger than a
density scale height seem to be required - Faculae or CaIIK bright pixels are puzzling --
important local perturbations to heat flow?
40What about Faculae?
- Faculae redistribute energy
- May represent increase in energy
- Are probably in all sunspot rings
- Should be corrected for?
- Try excluding them from computation.
41Bright Rings - Filtered
- Removing the bright CaIIK regions
Sunspot in 1 in 2 in 3
8263 -5.0 -5.5 -10
8640 -1.3 -3.3 -8
8525 -0.4 -1.2 -6.2
8706 -0.2 -2.0 -5.3
42What Happened?
Scattered light ?
43Scattered Light
- Scattering of light causes a slight dark ring
around the sunspot. - Compute the PSF and correct.
- Due to remaining defects, compute forward problem
- Bright are rings missing.
44Bright Ring Faculae Are Different
- Faculae in bright rings are fainter than in quiet
sun. - Correction implies a bright ring which
reradiates 10 of energy blocked.
45Comparison of Observations to Proxy Models
46Plausibility Check
- We see large changes in solar irradiance
associated with sunspots and faculae. - Other evidence indicates that sunspots and
faculae dont have a large effect on solar
irradiance - Conflict is resolved by considering a complete
disk crossing.
47Plausibility Check
- Most of the energy reradiated by bright rings are
associated with magnetic fields. - (They are facular in nature)
- Faculae are darker at disk center.
- Sunspots are darker at disk center.
- Sunspots bright ring must be darker at disk
center.
48Conclusions
- Facular regions
- Redistribute radiated energy.
- Act as a local increase in energy budget.
- Might not represent an increase in solar
irradiance. - Proxy models overestimate the contributions of
facular regions. - They are hiding something.
49Conclusions
- Sunspot bright rings reradiate at least 40 of
energy blocked by sunspots. - The excess energy radiated by bright rings is
preferentially channeled through CaIIK bright
regions. - After correction for scattered light, no bright
ring remains, but facular regions imply that 10
of energy is reradiated
50Conclusions
- Energy transport in the solar convection zone is
not diffusive. - Diffusion models predict that less than 1 of the
energy blocked by a sunspot is reradiated. - Faculae must represent an energy increase.
- Diffusion models predict that they dont.
- This represents a contradiction.
- Energy is transported by large scale bulk
motions. - In small features, radiative transfer is
important.
51Questions?