Title: One Center
1Behavioral Health Consultation
- One Centers Journey Into Primary Care Mental
Health - Kirsten Ging, Psy.d
- Jacaranda Palmateer, Psy.D
- Chris Wera, CPA
- SCOTT CYPERS, Ph.D
2Introduction
- DU 11,500 Students (Spring 2011)
- 5,250 Undergraduate
- 4,600 Traditional Graduates
- 1,650 Non-Traditional Students
- 1000 International Students
- Health and Counseling Center (2010-11 Academic)
- 12,659 Primary Care Medical Visits
- 2,800 Nurse Visits
- 6,000 Mental Health Visits
3Organization
4Why
- Suicide Prevention
- In 2007, there were 34,598 documented suicides in
the United States, the 11th highest cause of
death (CDC Annual Report) - Over 4000 in the 15-24 age range die by suicide
each year - Suicide is the second leading cause of death in
college students - Only 20 of suicide victims had contact with a
mental health provider in the month prior to
their suicide compared to 45 had contact with a
medical provider (Luoma et al, 2002) - Only 15 of college aged people have seen a
mental health provider in the last month, and
only 24 in the past year 77 of people who
commit suicide have seen a medical provider in
the last year (Luoma et al, 2002)
5Why
- Access and early intervention issues
- Access issues are said to be the most significant
reason why someone seeks a medical versus mental
health appointment for psychological issues
(Pomerantz, et al, 2004) - The window of opportunity of effective treatment
may be missed if treatment is delayed - Only 1/3 of people with diagnosable mental health
disorders EVER meet with a mental health
professional (Gunn Blount, 2009) - Approximately 32 of undiagnosed adults with
mental health issues report that they would first
seek assistance from a primary care medical
professional only 4 stated that they would seek
treatment with a psychologist (National Mental
Health Association, 2000) - Decreased wait time for specialty care in one VA
study, wait time for a mental health appointment
decreased from 3-6 weeks to 19 minutes
(Pomerantz, et al, 2004)
6Why
- Integration
- The HCC has shared office space for around 8
years and has been functionally integrated for
approximately 6 years - Increased collaboration between mental health and
medical staff - Improved crisis support for medical appointments
- Improved understanding of treatment options and
approaches - Multidisciplinary meetings and increased
collaborative care with complicated cases
7What is a Behavioral Health Consultant
- Mental health provider
- Housed with the PC providers
- Performs short-term, solution-focused
interventions - Current, primary stress and trigger?
- Patients reaction?
- Patients resources (individual, familial,
social)? - Coping strategies ?
- Intervention
- Referral (longer-term counseling or
hospitalization)?
8Implementation
- Brainstorming
- Selection of screening tool(s)
- How do we ____?
- Training
- Roll out
- Graduate Students Trainees
- Re-evaluation of process
- Added substance use/abuse screening
- Trying to make it permanent
- Future areas of development
9First Stage
- Brainstorming
- Identify the vision/goals
- Development
- Roadblocks and hiccups
- Selection of screening tool(s)
- PHQ-9
- Supplemental suicide screen
- How/when would it be administered
- Interrupt patient visit/cumbersome
- Would students be offended/honest
- How do we . . .?
- Administer the screen(s)
- Address self-harm/suicidal ideation
- Offer versus require consultations for high risk
patients - Handle coverage issues
10Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)
- 10-question survey
- Computer administration/scoring
- Scoring guidelines for severity of depression and
functional impairment - Identifies self-harm/suicidal ideation risk
- (Kroenke and Spitzer, 2001)
11sample question
12score report
13Daily score summary
14Second Stage Training
- Met as a full staff (medical, counseling,
administration) - Discussed how to use the PHQ-9 and scoring
- Established cut-off scores (ranges) for
referral - Discussed process for patients with
self-harm/suicidal ideation risk - Suggested ways to refer and the warm handoff
- Walked through the process from beginning to end
A Sample Script For How To Refer I noticed
your answers on the survey, and it seems like you
are having a hard time. I have a colleague that
can come, spend some time with you and help you
figure some things out. Would you be willing to
meet with her right now?
15Second Stage Roll Out
- Started with only two providers
- Trouble-shooting
- What happens if scores get missed
- Moved my notes to mental health in EHR
- Decided not to use supplemental survey for SI
- Random answering
- International students/translation difficulties
- Gradually added in the rest of the providers
- Interviewed and selected two Graduate Student
Trainees (GSTs)
16Third Stage
- Re-evaluation
- Statistical analysis
- Werent seeing the high scores we anticipated
- Use a different screening instrument?
- Added substance use/abuse screening
- Added four questions that were incorporated into
the survey - Problems encountered
- Scoring
- Pushback
17Fourth Stage
- Trying to make it permanent
- Ideas for future development
- How can we make it more robust
- Biofeedback
- Translate into different languages
- Continue screening for substance use/abuse
18Interventions
- Motivational interviewing
- Behavioral activation
- Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
- Third-wave
- How can we suffer better?
- Coping strategies
- Psycho-education
19Cultural Considerations
- International students 1000
- Translation of PHQ-9
- Common for international students to misinterpret
questions - Guess at what the question asked
- High scores
- However, the BHC reached international students
who might not otherwise come in
20Case Presentation
- Jane is a 27-year-old female graduate student
- Presented for a womens annual exam
- PHQ-9 score 13
- More than half the days
- Little interest/pleasure
- Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless
- Having little energy
- Feeling bad about yourself
- Troubles concentrating
- Several days
- Troubles falling asleep
- Poor appetite
- Feeling fidgety and restless
21Case Presentation
- Referral information
- Had been stressed out since beginning graduate
school - Experienced low libido
- Additional information
- Spent almost all of her time focusing on school
- Felt like she was neglecting her relationships
- About to graduate and worried about
post-graduation plans - Described herself as high strung,
perfectionistic, and always anxious
22Case Presentation
- First Meeting
- Collaboratively established what to target
- Self-care and behavioral activation (BA)
- Boyfriend
- talk without distractions
- go for a walk holding hands
- sensate focus
- Rewarding experiences
- Museums
- cooking/baking
- bike riding
- Diet and exercise
- eat healthier
- yoga
- Made specific goals (how often, how long)
23Case Presentation
- Second Meeting
- Reviewed what helped
- Discussed tendency to ruminate
- Cognitive distortions
- Rules vs consequences
- Mindfulness/grounding/breathing
- First Meeting
- Collaboratively established what to target
- BA and self-care
- Boyfriend
- Rewarding experiences
- Diet and exercise
- Made specific goals (how often, how long)
- Third Meeting
- Reviewed what helped
- Discussed new stressors
- Fears of post-graduation plans
- On-going family issues
- Explored benefits of therapy for deeper issues
24- Handouts
- Anxiety
- Panic Attacks
- Depression
- Sleep hygiene
- Nutrition
- Fatigue
- Cognitive distortions
- Counseling FAQs
- Diaphragmatic breathing
- Reduced risk drinking
25Medical Provider Her perspective
- Advantages
- Same day, same time
- Avoids future scheduling issues
- Helps to identify somatizing
- Reduces, Oh, by the way
- Reduces chances of missing mental health issues
- Handles patients in acute crisis
- Drawbacks
- Irritation with repeated surveying
- Scores can be more indicative of medical illness
vs mental health - Difficult for international students which leads
to inaccurate information - Havent used survey as a measure of treatment,
just screening
26Overall Score Analysis
N1752
N1916
Mean SD Normal
1 0.36 0.673 N
2 0.32 0.604 N
3 0.73 0.897 Y
4 0.84 0.851 Y
5 0.43 0.734 M
6 0.23 0.594 N
7 0.35 0.707 N
8 0.12 0.439 N
9 0.03 0.198 N
10 0.39 0.644 N
Total Score 3.79 4.668 N
Mean SD Normal
1 0.33 0.651 N
2 0.28 0.59 N
3 0.69 0.859 Y
4 0.76 0.799 Y
5 0.39 0.668 N
6 0.19 0.518 N
7 0.32 0.672 N
8 0.1 0.367 N
9 0.03 0.214 N
10 0.33 0.564 N
Total Score 3.41 4.273 N
27Overall Score Analysis
N1919
Mean SD Normal
1 0.364 0.67 N
2 0.28 0.66 N
3 0.69 0.86 Y
4 0.76 0.86 Y
5 0.39 0.77 M
6 0.20 0.54 N
7 0.33 0.69 N
8 0.10 0.41 N
9 0.03 0.30 N
10 0.33 0.60 N
Total Score 3.43 4.36 N
28Overall Score Analysis
29Overall Score Analysis
PHQ-9 Score Frequency Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
0 479 27.3 27.3
1 204 11.6 39.0
2 232 13.2 52.2
3 184 10.5 62.7
4 139 7.9 70.7
5 100 5.7 76.4
6 87 5.0 81.3
7 55 3.1 84.5
8 54 3.1 87.6
9 42 2.4 90.0
10 28 1.6 91.6
11 19 1.1 92.6
12 11 .6 93.3
13 23 1.3 94.6
14 10 .6 95.1
15 17 1.0 96.1
16 17 1.0 97.1
17 12 .7 97.8
18 6 .3 98.1
19 7 .4 98.5
20 6 .3 98.9
21 2 .1 99.0
22 3 .2 99.1
23 3 .2 99.3
24 4 .2 99.5
25 2 .1 99.7
26 2 .1 99.8
27 1 .1 99.8
28 2 .1 99.9
30 1 .1 100.0
Total 1752 100.0
PHQ-9 Score Frequency Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
0 594 31.0 31.0
1 242 12.6 43.6
2 232 12.1 55.7
3 181 9.4 65.2
4 133 6.9 72.1
5 108 5.6 77.8
6 78 4.1 81.8
7 74 3.9 85.7
8 68 3.5 89.2
9 48 2.5 91.8
10 24 1.3 93.0
11 30 1.6 94.6
12 17 .9 95.5
13 18 .9 96.4
14 9 .5 96.9
15 10 .5 97.4
16 14 .7 98.1
17 7 .4 98.5
18 5 .3 98.7
19 3 .2 98.9
20 4 .2 99.1
21 7 .4 99.5
22 2 .1 99.6
23 1 .1 99.6
24 2 .1 99.7
25 1 .1 99.8
26 2 .1 99.9
30 2 .1 100.0
Total 1916 100.0
30Score Summary
- Non-Acute
- Fall Quarter 90
- Winter Quarter 91.8
- Spring Quarter 93.1
- Intervention by PHQ-9 Score
- Fall Quarter 10
- Winter Quarter 8.2
- Spring Quarter 6.9
- Acute
- Fall Quarter 1.5
- Winter Quarter 1.1
- Spring Quarter 1.1
31Total Visits to Number of BHC Visits
- Total Visits - Fall Spring Quarter
- N5587
- Actual BHC Visits
- N 216
- 3.87
- Expected as much at 10
- About 6 that decline BHC Consult
- BHC Visit Initiation
- 43 from PHQ-9 Score
- 57 with scores 11 and below
32Conclusions Questions
- Increased medical provider awareness about mental
health issues - Allowed PCPs to briefly address mental health
issues because they had someone who could follow
up immediately - Provided students with instant access to a mental
health provider who could briefly intervene or
facilitate referral - Established a more efficient system for handling
crises on the medical side - Aided in our suicide prevention efforts
- Facilitated collaboration and integration of
medical and mental health issues, especially for
complicated cases - Reached a larger number of international students
- Improved the relationship between the medical
and mental health providers
33References Resources
- Gunn, W. B., Blount, A. (2009). Primary care
mental health A new frontier for psychology.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65 (3), 235-252. - James, L. C., ODonohue, W. T. (2009). The
Primary Care Toolkit Practical Resources for
the Integrated Behavioral Care Provider. New
York Springer. - Hunter, C. L., Goodie, J. L., Ooordt, M. S.,
Dobmeye, A. C. (2009) Integrated Behavioral
Health in Primary Care. Washington, D. C.
American Psychological Association. - Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B.
(2001). Validity of a brief depression severity
measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine,
16 (9), 606-613. - Luoma, J. B., Martin, C. E., Pearson, J. L.
(2002). Contact with mental health and primary
care providers before suicide A review of the
evidence. The American Journal of Psychiatry,
159 (6), 909-916. - Pomerantz, A., Cole, B. H., Watts, B. V.,
Weeks, W. B. (2008). Improving efficiency and
access to mental health care combining
integrated care and advanced access. General
Hospital Psychiatry, 30 (6), 546-551. - Robinson, P. J., Reiter, J. T. (2007).
Behavioral Consultation and Primary Care A
Guide to Integrating Services. New York
Springer.