Public Procurement Review and Remedies in the Member States of the EU PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 12
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Procurement Review and Remedies in the Member States of the EU


1
Public Procurement Review and Remedies in the
Member States of the EU
  • Martin Trybus
  • University of Sheffield
  • (1st June 2007 University of Birmingham)

Conference onPublic Procurement Review
Remedies Systems Dubrovnik 24-25 May 2007
2
What? Why?
  • What Study
  • Review and remedies systems
  • 27 Member States (24 returns)
  • Review bodies, available remedies, review culture
  • Why Better understanding knowledge may help
    inspire Sigma-partner countries in reforming or
    setting up.

3
Review Remedies
How did Member States organise their review and
remedies systems?
4
EC requirements
  • EC Remedies Directives
  • Rapid and effective remedies.
  • Independent review bodies.
  • Judicial review in last instance.
  • Interim relief.
  • European Court of Justice case law.
  • Alcatel
  • Stadt Halle

5
Not in EU law
  • Administrative or civil judicial review?
  • Composition of review bodies?
  • Arbitration?
  • Number and size of review bodies?
  • Calculation of damages?
  • Procedural law?

6
What did we want to know?
  • Institutional framework.
  • Courts and review bodies
  • Legal framework.
  • Procedural law, remedies
  • Review and remedies culture.
  • Legal education, attitudes
  • Operation of the system.
  • Number of cases, time, outcomes

7
Findings?
8
Systems of review
  • Single system of review.
  • 1 type of review body (1-3 instances)
  • Dual system of review.
  • Separated by conclusion of contract.
  • Separated by public private nature of defendant.
  • 1-3 instances each.
  • Specialised/general review bodies.
  • Specialised chambers in ordinary courts.

9
Available remedies
  • Set aside of procurement decisions.
  • Set aside of award decisions. Alcatel!
  • Annulment of concluded contract.
  • Interim measures.
  • Damages.

10
Scope
  • Same system for above and below EC thresholds?
  • Same system for public bodies and utilities?

11
Review culture
  • Legal training.
  • Research.
  • Attitudes.
  • Outcome of proceedings.
  • 1st instance varied in the MS.
  • 2nd instance normally not successful.

12
Thank you!
  • Martin Trybus University
    of Birmingham School of Law
    Edgbaston
    Birmingham B15 2TT United Kingdom
    Tel 44 (0)121 414
    3637Fax 44 (0)121 414 3585 M.Trybus_at_bham.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com